The Proto-Quipper family of programming languages aims to provide a formal foundation for the Quipper quantum programming language. Unfortunately, Proto-Quipper languages have complex operational semantics: they are inherently effectful, and they rely on set-theoretic operations and fresh name generation to manipulate quantum circuits. This makes them difficult to reason about using standard programming language techniques and, ultimately, to mechanize. We introduce Proto-Quipper-A, a rational reconstruction of Proto-Quipper languages for static circuit generation. It uses a linear $λ$-calculus to describe quantum circuits with normal forms that closely correspond to box-and-wire circuit diagrams. Adjoint-logical foundations integrate this circuit language with a linear/non-linear functional language and let us reconstruct Proto-Quipper's circuit programming abstractions using more primitive adjoint-logical operations. Proto-Quipper-A enjoys a simple call-by-value reduction semantics, and to illustrate its tractability as a foundation for Proto-Quipper languages, we show that it is normalizing. We show how to use standard logical relations to prove normalization of linear and substructural systems, thereby avoiding the inherent complexity of existing linear logical relations.
The Proto-Quipper family of programming languages aims to provide a formal foundation for the Quipper quantum programming language. Unfortunately, Proto-Quipper languages have complex operational semantics: they are inherently effectful, and they rely on set-theoretic operations and fresh name generation to manipulate quantum circuits. This makes them difficult to reason about using standard programming language techniques and, ultimately, to mechanize. We introduce Proto-Quipper-A, a rational reconstruction of Proto-Quipper languages for static circuit generation. It uses a linear λ-calculus to describe quantum circuits with normal forms that closely correspond to box-and-wire circuit diagrams. Adjoint-logical foundations integrate this circuit language with a linear/non-linear functional language and let us reconstruct Proto-Quipper's circuit programming abstractions using more primitive adjoint-logical operations. Proto-Quipper-A enjoys a simple call-by-value reduction semantics, and to illustrate its tractability as a foundation for Proto-Quipper languages, we show that it is normalizing. We show how to use standard logical relations to prove normalization of linear and substructural systems, thereby avoiding the inherent complexity of existing linear logical relations.
This thesis contains contributions to the mathematical foundations of quantum programming languages. The likely arrival of scalable quantum computers in the not-so-distant future has resulted in a flurry of activity in the development of quantum programming languages. As in classical computing, the transition from a description of a quantum algorithm found in the literature to a hardware-specific set of instructions run on a quantum device is a complex process, prone to errors. This issue is exacerbated in the quantum setting not only by the complexity of quantum algorithms but also by the fragility of quantum information, which renders ineffective some of the classical techniques used to debug programs. In this thesis, we contribute to the solution of some of these issues. We introduce Proto-Quipper-M, a new quantum programming language designed to serve as a testbed for the research and development of sound mathematical semantics and reasoning techniques for quantum programs. We first present Proto-Quipper-M as a formalization of a fragment of Quipper, a high-level functional programming language for describing families of quantum circuits. In particular, we define Proto-Quipper-M as a simply-typed lambda calculus with a special type for quantum circuits and a strong type system designed to enforce linearity on quantum data, and thus prevent violations of the no-cloning property of quantum information. We endow Proto-Quipper-M with computational meaning via a big-step operational semantics and prove that the language is type-safe by showing that it enjoys the type-preservation and error-freeness properties. We also give Proto-Quipper-M a denotational semantics in a suitable class of monoidal categories and show that these categories give rise to linear-non-linear models in the sense of Benton, and thus models of intuitionistic linear logic. Finally, we crystallize the connection between the syntax and the semantics of the language by proving the soundness theorem for Proto-Quipper-M.
Quipper is a functional language for programming quantum circuits. Proto-Quipper is a family of languages aiming to provide a formal foundation for Quipper. In this paper, we extend Proto-Quipper-M with a construct called dynamic lifting, which is present in Quipper. By virtue of being a circuit description language, Proto-Quipper has two separate runtimes: circuit generation time and circuit execution time. Values that are known at circuit generation time are called parameters, and values that are known at circuit execution time are called states. Dynamic lifting is an operation that enables a state, such as the result of a measurement, to be lifted to a parameter, where it can influence the generation of the next portion of the circuit. As a result, dynamic lifting enables Proto-Quipper programs to interleave classical and quantum computation. We describe the syntax of a language we call Proto-Quipper-Dyn. Its type system uses a system of modalities to keep track of the use of dynamic lifting. We then provide an operational semantics, as well as a notion of categorical model for dynamic lifting. We also construct a concrete instance of such a model based on biset-enrichment. We prove that both the type system and the operational semantics are sound with respect to our categorical semantics. Finally, we give some examples of Proto-Quipper-Dyn programs that make essential use of dynamic lifting.
Quipper is a functional programming language for quantum computing. Proto-Quipper is a family of languages aiming to provide a formal foundation for Quipper. In this paper, we extend Proto-Quipper-M with a construct called dynamic lifting, which is present in Quipper. By virtue of being a circuit description language, Proto-Quipper has two separate runtimes: circuit generation time and circuit execution time. Values that are known at circuit generation time are called parameters, and values that are known at circuit execution time are called states. Dynamic lifting is an operation that enables a state, such as the result of a measurement, to be lifted to a parameter, where it can influence the generation of the next portion of the circuit. As a result, dynamic lifting enables Proto-Quipper programs to interleave classical and quantum computation. We describe the syntax of a language we call Proto-Quipper-Dyn. Its type system uses a system of modalities to keep track of the use of dynamic lifting. We also provide an operational semantics, as well as an abstract categorical semantics for dynamic lifting based on enriched category theory. We prove that both the type system and the operational semantics are sound with respect to our categorical semantics. Finally, we give some examples of Proto-Quipper-Dyn programs that make essential use of dynamic lifting.
Quipper is a functional programming language for quantum computing. Proto-Quipper is a family of languages aiming to provide a formal foundation for Quipper. In this paper, we extend Proto-Quipper-M with a construct called dynamic lifting , which is present in Quipper. By virtue of being a circuit description language, Proto-Quipper has two separate runtimes: circuit generation time and circuit execution time. Values that are known at circuit generation time are called parameters , and values that are known at circuit execution time are called states . Dynamic lifting is an operation that enables a state, such as the result of a measurement, to be lifted to a parameter, where it can influence the generation of the next portion of the circuit. As a result, dynamic lifting enables Proto-Quipper programs to interleave classical and quantum computation. We describe the syntax of a language we call Proto-Quipper-Dyn. Its type system uses a system of modalities to keep track of the use of dynamic lifting. We also provide an operational semantics, as well as an abstract categorical semantics for dynamic lifting based on enriched category theory. We prove that both the type system and the operational semantics are sound with respect to our categorical semantics. Finally, we give some examples of Proto-Quipper-Dyn programs that make essential use of dynamic lifting.
Quipper is a domain-specific programming language for the description of quantum circuits. Because it is implemented as an embedded language in Haskell, Quipper is a very practical functional language. However, for the same reason, it lacks a formal semantics and it is limited by Haskell's type system. In particular, because Haskell lacks linear types, it is easy to write Quipper programs that violate the non-cloning property of quantum states. In order to formalize relevant fragments of Quipper in a type-safe way, the Proto-Quipper family of research languages has been introduced over the last years. In this paper we first review Proto-Quipper-M, an instance of the Proto-Quipper family based on a categorical model for quantum circuits, which features a linear type system that guarantees that the non-cloning property holds at compile time. We then derive a tentative small-step operational semantics from the big-step semantics of Proto-Quipper-M and we prove that the two are equivalent. After proving subject reduction and progress results for the tentative semantics, we build upon it to obtain a truly small-step semantics in the style of an abstract machine, which we eventually prove to be equivalent to the original semantics.
Quipper is a practical programming language for describing families of quantum circuits. In this paper, we formalize a small, but useful fragment of Quipper called Proto-Quipper-M. Unlike its parent Quipper, this language is type-safe and has a formal denotational and operational semantics. Proto-Quipper-M is also more general than Quipper, in that it can describe families of morphisms in any symmetric monoidal category, of which quantum circuits are but one example. We design Proto-Quipper-M from the ground up, by first giving a general categorical model of parameters and state. The distinction between parameters and state is also known from hardware description languages. A parameter is a value that is known at circuit generation time, whereas a state is a value that is known at circuit execution time. After finding some interesting categorical structures in the model, we then define the programming language to fit the model. We cement the connection between the language and the model by proving type safety, soundness, and adequacy properties.