Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) leverages the high-dimensional, nonlinear dynamics inherent in quantum many-body systems for extracting spatiotemporal patterns in sequential and time-series data with minimal training overhead. Although QRC inherits the expressive capabilities associated with quantum encodings, recent studies indicate that quantum classifiers based on variational circuits remain susceptible to adversarial perturbations. In this perspective, we investigate the first systematic evaluation of adversarial robustness in a QRC based learning model. Our reservoir comprises an array of strongly interacting Rydberg atoms governed by a fixed Hamiltonian, which naturally evolves under complex quantum dynamics, producing high-dimensional embeddings. A lightweight multilayer perceptron serves as the trainable readout layer. We utilize the balanced datasets, namely MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and Kuzushiji-MNIST, as a benchmark for rigorously evaluating the impact of augmenting the quantum reservoir with a Multilayer perceptron (MLP) in white-box adversarial attacks to assess its robustness. We demonstrate that this approach yields significantly higher accuracy than purely classical models across all perturbation strengths tested. This hybrid approach reveals a new source of quantum advantage and provides practical guidance for the secure deployment of machine learning models on quantum-centric supercomputing with near-term hardware.
Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) leverages the high-dimensional, nonlinear dynamics inherent in quantum many-body systems for extracting spatiotemporal patterns in sequential and time-series data with minimal training overhead. Although QRC inherits the expressive capabilities associated with quantum encodings, recent studies indicate that quantum classifiers based on variational circuits remain susceptible to adversarial perturbations. In this perspective, we investigate the first systematic evaluation of adversarial robustness in a QRC based learning model. Our reservoir comprises an array of strongly interacting Rydberg atoms governed by a fixed Hamiltonian, which naturally evolves under complex quantum dynamics, producing high-dimensional embeddings. A lightweight multilayer perceptron serves as the trainable readout layer. We utilize the balanced datasets, namely MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and Kuzushiji-MNIST, as a benchmark for rigorously evaluating the impact of augmenting the quantum reservoir with a Multilayer perceptron (MLP) in white-box adversarial attacks to assess its robustness. We demonstrate that this approach yields significantly higher accuracy than purely classical models across all perturbation strengths tested. This hybrid approach reveals a new source of quantum advantage and provides practical guidance for the secure deployment of machine learning models on quantum-centric supercomputing with near-term hardware.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) integrates quantum computational principles into learning algorithms, offering improved representational capacity and computational efficiency. However, the security and robustness of QML systems remain underexplored, particularly under adversarial conditions. We present the first comprehensive systematization of adversarial robustness in QML, combining conceptual organization with empirical evaluation across black-box, gray-box, and white-box threat models. We implement five representative attacks: a label-flipping poisoning attack under black-box; an encoder-level indiscriminate poisoning attack and a proxy-model clean-label backdoor attack under gray-box; and a circuit-level backdoor attack (QTrojan) and gradient-based evasion attacks (FGSM and PGD) under white-box. We evaluate these attacks using a Quantum Multilayer Perceptron (QMLP) trained on MNIST and AZ-Class across circuit depths of 2, 5, 10, and 50 layers with angle and amplitude encoding schemes. Our evaluations reveal a fundamental accuracy-robustness trade-off. Amplitude encoding achieves the highest clean accuracy (92.6% on MNIST and 67% on AZ-Class) but collapses under adversarial perturbations and depolarizing noise, whereas shallow angle-encoded models remain more stable. QUID is effective under noiseless conditions but weakened by noise, while the proxy-model backdoor persists unless the circuit itself is overwhelmed. Furthermore, the circuit-level backdoor fails in the multi-class setting, indicating a scalability limitation. Finally, QMLP models are more robust than Classical Multi-Layer Perceptron (CMLP) models under label-flipping attacks but substantially more vulnerable to gradient-based evasion. We conclude by proposing a threat-aware and noise-resilient framework for secure QML deployment.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) fuses quantum computing with machine learning to address complex tasks with potential speedups over classical methods. While QML models such as variational quantum classifiers (QVC), quantum multilayer perceptron(QMLP) models and quantum convolutional neural networks (QCNN) have demonstrated promise in applications like image recognition and malware classification, they remain vulnerable to adversarial threats. Inspired by the vulnerabilities in classical ML, this work systematically investigates how attacks-ranging from training-time poisoning and inferencetime evasion (e.g., quantum versions of FGSM and PGD) to deployment-time trigger attacks-manifest in quantum circuits. We explore how classical adversarial strategies adapt to quantum models through parameterized encodings, hybrid architectures, and probabilistic outputs. The poster evaluates different quantum classifiers under adversarial settings, comparing their robustness, trainability, and resilience to perturbations. Defense mechanisms such as randomized encoding, engineered noise channels, and quantum adversarial training are analyzed in relation to specific threat types. In addition, we assess how quantum models behave differently than classical counterparts under attack, and how quantum-specific design constraints can either exacerbate or mitigate these effects. Our ultimate goal is to define and construct robust QML systems that are both theoretically sound and practically secure. By synthesizing results across multiple QML architectures and threat models, this work provides actionable insight into the development of resilient quantum classifiers, paving the way toward trustworthy and scalable quantum machine learning.
Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) is a promising quantum machine learning framework for near-term quantum platforms, yet the performance of different QRC architectures under realistic constraints remains largely unexplored. Here, we provide a comparative numerical study of single-step-QRC (SS-QRC) and multi-step-QRC (MS-QRC) architectures implemented on a Rydberg atom array. We demonstrate that while MS-QRC performance is highly sensitive to the underlying dynamical phase of matter and decoherence, SS-QRC exhibits greater robustness. Using the randomized measurement toolbox to mitigate measurement overhead, we reveal that sampling noise undermines the convergence property required for MS-QRC. This leads to a significant reduction in the information processing capacity (IPC) of MS-QRC, deteriorating its performance on nonlinear time-series benchmarks. In contrast, SS-QRC maintains high IPC and accuracy across both temporal and non-temporal tasks. Our results suggest SS-QRC as a preferred candidate for near-term practical applications due to its resilience to system configurations and statistical noise.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising paradigm that combines the power of quantum computing with the adaptability of machine learning. QML models have demonstrated potential advantages in solving complex problems across domains such as optimization, pattern recognition, and generative modeling. While much attention has been devoted to exploring their computational benefits and capabilities, the security of QML models and their robustness to adversarial attacks remains an underexplored area in the literature. Understanding adversarial vulnerabilities is critical for assessing the reliability of QML systems, especially as they transition from theoretical constructs to practical applications. In this work, we present an empirical study on the adversarial robustness of QML models. We systematically evaluate the susceptibility of quantum models to adversarial attacks, comparing them with classical counterparts across different settings. Additionally, we examine cross-paradigm attack transferability by testing classical attacks on quantum models and vice versa. Our results indicate that QML models exhibit higher vulnerability in white-box settings and stronger attack transferability than classical ML models. Furthermore, while adversarial training can provide some robustness, its effectiveness remains limited. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of QML security and provide insights into the challenges of building robust QML systems.
Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) leverages the natural dynamics of quantum systems for information processing, without requiring a fault-tolerant quantum computer. In this work, we apply QRC within a hybrid quantum classical framework for image denoising. The quantum reservoir is implemented using a Rydberg atom array, while a classical neural network serves as the readout layer. To prepare the input, images are first compressed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), reducing their dimensionality to match the size of the atom array. Each feature vector is encoded into local detuning parameters of a time-dependent Hamiltonian governing the Rydberg system. As the system evolves, it generates nonlinear embeddings through the measurement of observables across multiple time steps. These temporal embeddings capture complex correlations, which are fed into a classical neural network to reconstruct the denoised images. To evaluate performance, we compare this QRC-assisted model against a baseline architecture consisting of PCA followed by a dense neural network, trained under identical conditions. Our results show that the QRC-based approach achieves improved image sharpness and similar structural recovery compared to the PCA-based model. We demonstrate the practical viability of this framework through experiments on QuEra's Aquila neutral-atom processor, leveraging its programmable atom arrays to physically realize the reservoir dynamics.
Deep neural networks remain highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, limiting their reliability in security- and safety-critical applications. To address this challenge, we introduce QShield, a modular hybrid quantum-classical neural network (HQCNN) architecture designed to enhance the adversarial robustness of classical deep learning models. QShield integrates a conventional convolutional neural network (CNN) backbone for feature extraction with a quantum processing module that encodes the extracted features into quantum states, applies structured entanglement operations under realistic noise models, and outputs a hybrid prediction through a dynamically weighted fusion mechanism implemented via a lightweight multilayer perceptron (MLP). We systematically evaluate both classical and hybrid quantum-classical models on the MNIST, OrganAMNIST, and CIFAR-10 datasets, using a comprehensive set of robustness, efficiency, and computational performance metrics. Our results demonstrate that classical models are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, whereas the proposed hybrid models with entanglement patterns maintain high predictive accuracy while substantially reducing attack success rates across a wide range of adversarial attacks. Furthermore, the proposed hybrid architecture significantly increased the computational cost required to generate adversarial examples, thereby introducing an additional layer of defense. These findings indicate that the proposed modular hybrid architecture achieves a practical balance between predictive accuracy and adversarial robustness, positioning it as a promising approach for secure and reliable machine learning in sensitive and safety-critical applications.