We consider the problem of Clifford testing, which asks whether a black-box n-qubit unitary is a Clifford unitary or at least ε-far from every Clifford unitary. We give the first 4-query Clifford tester, which decides this problem with probability poly(ε). This contrasts with the minimum of 6 copies required for the closely-related task of stabilizer testing. We show that our tester is tolerant, by adapting techniques from tolerant stabilizer testing to our setting. In doing so, we settle in the positive a conjecture of Bu, Gu and Jaffe, by proving a polynomial inverse theorem for a non-commutative Gowers 3-uniformity norm. We also consider the restricted setting of single-copy access, where we give an O(n)-query Clifford tester that requires no auxiliary memory qubits or adaptivity. We complement this with a lower bound, proving that any such, potentially adaptive, single-copy algorithm needs at least Ω(n1/4) queries. To obtain our results, we leverage the structure of the commutant of the Clifford group, obtaining several technical statements that may be of independent interest.
We consider the problem of Clifford testing, which asks whether a black-box n-qubit unitary is a Clifford unitary or at least ε-far from every Clifford unitary. We give the first 4-query Clifford tester, which decides this problem with probability poly(ε). This contrasts with the minimum of 6 copies required for the closely-related task of stabilizer testing. We show that our tester is tolerant, by adapting techniques from tolerant stabilizer testing to our setting. In doing so, we settle in the positive a conjecture of Bu, Gu and Jaffe, by proving a polynomial inverse theorem for a non-commutative Gowers 3-uniformity norm. We also consider the restricted setting of single-copy access, where we give an O(n)-query Clifford tester that requires no auxiliary memory qubits or adaptivity. We complement this with a lower bound, proving that any such, potentially adaptive, single-copy algorithm needs at least Ω(n1/4) queries. To obtain our results, we leverage the structure of the commutant of the Clifford group, obtaining several technical statements that may be of independent interest.
We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown n-qubit quantum state is a stabilizer state, with only single-copy access. We give an algorithm solving this problem using O(n) copies, and conversely prove that Ω(√n) copies are required for any algorithm. The main observation behind our algorithm is that when repeatedly measuring in a randomly chosen stabilizer basis, stabilizer states are the most likely among the set of all pure states to exhibit linear dependencies in measurement outcomes. Our algorithm is designed to probe deviations from this extremal behavior. For the lower bound, we first reduce stabilizer testing to the task of distinguishing random stabilizer states from the maximally mixed state. We then argue that, without loss of generality, it is sufficient to consider measurement strategies that a) lie in the commutant of the tensor action of the Clifford group and b) satisfy a Positive Partial Transpose (PPT) condition. By leveraging these constraints, together with novel results on the partial transposes of the generators of the Clifford commutant, we derive the lower bound on the sample complexity.
We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown unitary is close to a specified level of the Clifford hierarchy. Bu, Gu, and Jaffe proposed a candidate tester for this task based on a connection with noncommutative analogues of the Gowers uniformity norms. The complexity of this tester -- whose analysis depends on a robust characterization of the near-extremizers of these norms -- was left open. We establish such a characterization for the fourth noncommutative uniformity norm and, as a consequence, obtain an efficient tester for the third level of the Clifford hierarchy. We further discuss possible routes toward resolving the problem of testing for all higher levels, highlighting the main barriers that remain.
We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown n-qubit quantum state ∣ψ⟩ is a stabilizer state, with only single-copy access. We give an algorithm solving this problem using O(n) copies, and conversely prove that Ω(n) copies are required for any algorithm. The main observation behind our algorithm is that when repeatedly measuring in a randomly chosen stabilizer basis, stabilizer states are the most likely among the set of all pure states to exhibit linear dependencies in measurement outcomes. Our algorithm is designed to probe deviations from this extremal behavior. For the lower bound, we first reduce stabilizer testing to the task of distinguishing random stabilizer states from the maximally mixed state. We then argue that, without loss of generality, it is sufficient to consider measurement strategies that a) lie in the commutant of the tensor action of the Clifford group and b) satisfy a Positive Partial Transpose (PPT) condition. By leveraging these constraints, together with novel results on the partial transposes of the generators of the Clifford commutant, we derive the lower bound on the sample complexity.
We establish the first super-polynomial quantum advantage for the tolerant junta testing problem in the adaptive setting. Specifically, we show that within a certain parameter regime, tolerant k-junta testing with high precision can be solved using poly(k) quantum queries, whereas any classical algorithm requires at least kΩ(logk) queries.
The problem of tolerant k-junta testing is as follows: given parameters (k,ε1,ε2), with 0≤ε1<ε2≤1/2, and black-box access to a Boolean function f (defined on n variables), distinguish whether f is ε1-close to some k-junta or ε2-far from every k-junta.
We show the quantum advantage for a range of parameters close to 1/2, for example, ε1=1/2−1/k and ε2=1/2−1/(2k2). The (non-adaptive) quantum tester we use was given by a recent work of Bao, Liu, Yao, Ye, and Zhang (SOSA 2026). We slightly adapt their analysis to show that it holds in the above parameter regime. On the other hand, our classical lower bound requires substantial new ideas. Inspired by the lower bound techniques of Chen and Patel (FOCS 2023), we introduce a new hard distribution of ``yes'' instances (i.e., instances with distance at most ε1 to k-juntas) that is based on planting an ``approximate-junta'' as follows: we randomly pick k out of n coordinates, and for each fixing of the k coordinates, the 2n−k values in the restricted subcube are drawn randomly except for the set of points in an error-correcting code on which we place the same random bit. We show that this distribution is much closer to k-juntas than the uniform distribution, but on the other hand, they are indistinguishable with respect to any classical algorithm making ko(logk) queries.
Stabilizer states are central to quantum computing, underlying quantum error correction, benchmarking, and efficient classical simulation. Yet their learnability exhibits a striking gap: an n-qubit stabilizer state can be learned from Θ(n) copies using two-copy Bell measurements, whereas non-adaptive single-copy measurements require Ω(n2) copies. Here we show that adaptivity completely closes this gap. We give a polynomial-time adaptive algorithm that learns an arbitrary n-qubit stabilizer state from Θ(n) single-copy Clifford measurements, matching the optimal sample complexity of Bell sampling without any multi-copy measurements. The same ideas yield a sample-optimal single-copy tolerant tester and, with k qubits of quantum memory, the optimal testing tradeoff Θ(n−k+1/ε) at infidelity ε. Finally, we show that this adaptive mechanism extends beyond exact stabilizer states: states of stabilizer nullity at most r, including states prepared by Clifford circuits with a bounded number of T gates, can be learned using O(n2r) single-copy measurements.
We study the query complexity of testing quantum juntas. Given an unknown n-qubit unitary or quantum channel, the goal is to decide whether it acts nontrivially on at most k qubits or is ε-far from every such operation. For unitaries, we consider the forward-only model, where the tester has access to U, but not to U† or controlled-U. We give tight bounds for both unitary and channel junta testing. For sufficiently large k, n≥2k, and a broad range of ε, both problems have query complexity Θ(k/(ε2logk)). Our upper bounds are achieved by simple nonadaptive testers using product inputs and single-qubit measurements. For junta channels, this closes the gap by Bao and Yao (COLT 23, TPAMI 2025) between an O(k) upper bound and a Ω(k) lower bound at constant ε, establishing the optimal Θ(k/logk) query complexity. At the heart of both bounds is a strong connection between quantum junta testing and classical support-size testing. For the upper bounds, we reduce quantum junta testing to a generalized support-size problem for distributions over random subsets, and develop a new tester with improved sample complexity. For the lower bounds, we proceed in the reverse direction, reducing classical support-size testing to quantum junta testing through a phase-masked hard ensemble and showing that forward quantum queries can be exactly classicalized on average. Together, these reductions identify support-size testing as the classical core of quantum junta testing and yield matching lower bounds. At constant ε, they also give a separation between Θ(k/logk) forward queries and O(k) queries with inverse access.