Since the security of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms is based on the hardness of mathematical problems, while the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on the fundamental principles of quantum physics, each approach possesses distinct advantages and limitations that can complement one another. Consequently, recent studies have proposed hybrid schemes that combine QKD and PQC to establish a dual-layered security model. In response to this trend, this study proposes hybrid schemes that integrate QKD with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standardized PQC algorithms. These hybrid schemes include two core components: a hybrid QKD-PQC key exchange protocol and a hybrid QKD-PQC digital signature scheme. For the hybrid key exchange protocol, this study combines Module-Lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (ML-KEM) with QKD protocols, specifically BB84 and E91, to construct a secure key exchange protocol. In the design of the hybrid digital signature scheme, this study utilizes Module-Lattice-based Digital Signature Algorithms (ML-DSA) and Stateless Hash-based Digital Signature Algorithms (SLH-DSA) to generate signature reconstruction values. These values are verified using confirmation codes transmitted via the BB84 and E91 protocols. The proposed hybrid key exchange protocol is evaluated by examining the shared secret key it produces, particularly with respect to entropy and whether the output is independent and identically distributed (IID). Furthermore, the computation time and message lengths of the proposed hybrid schemes are evaluated.
Since the security of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms is based on the hardness of mathematical problems, while the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on the fundamental principles of quantum physics, each approach possesses distinct advantages and limitations that can complement one another. Consequently, recent studies have proposed hybrid schemes that combine QKD and PQC to establish a dual-layered security model. In response to this trend, this study proposes hybrid schemes that integrate QKD with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standardized PQC algorithms. These hybrid schemes include two core components: a hybrid QKD-PQC key exchange protocol and a hybrid QKD-PQC digital signature scheme. For the hybrid key exchange protocol, this study combines Module-Lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (ML-KEM) with QKD protocols, specifically BB84 and E91, to construct a secure key exchange protocol. In the design of the hybrid digital signature scheme, this study utilizes Module-Lattice-based Digital Signature Algorithms (ML-DSA) and Stateless Hash-based Digital Signature Algorithms (SLH-DSA) to generate signature reconstruction values. These values are verified using confirmation codes transmitted via the BB84 and E91 protocols. The proposed hybrid key exchange protocol is evaluated by examining the shared secret key it produces, particularly with respect to entropy and whether the output is independent and identically distributed (IID). Furthermore, the computation time and message lengths of the proposed hybrid schemes are evaluated.
In recent years, the advancement of quantum computing technology has posed potential security threats to RSA cryptography and elliptic curve cryptography. In response, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published several Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) in August 2024, including the Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism (ML-KEM), Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA), and Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (SLH-DSA). Although these PQC algorithms are designed to resist quantum computing attacks, they may not provide adequate security in certain specialized application scenarios. To address this issue, this study proposes quantum random number generator (QRNG)-based PQC algorithms. These algorithms leverage quantum computing to generate random numbers, which serve as the foundation for key pair generation, key encapsulation, and digital signature generation. A generalized architecture of QRNG is proposed, along with the design of six QRNGs. Each generator is evaluated according to the statistical validation procedures outlined in NIST SP 800-90B, including tests for verification of entropy sources and independent and identically distributed (IID) outputs. Experimental results assess the computation time of the six QRNGs, as well as the performance of QRNG-based ML-KEM, QRNG-based ML-DSA, and QRNG-based SLH-DSA. These findings provide valuable reference data for future deployment of PQC-based Transport Layer Security in web systems.
The emergence of large-scale quantum computers poses a significant threat to current cryptographic protocols, particularly Transport Layer Security (TLS), which relies on RSA and elliptic curve cryptography vulnerable to Shor's algorithm. This paper presents a hybrid framework for quantum-resistant TLS handshakes that integrates post-quantum cryptography (PQC), quantum key distribution (QKD) and classical cryptography to provide comprehensive protection against both classical and quantum attacks. The approach employs three QKD protocols; BB84, E91, and Measurement-Device-Independent QKD (MDI-QKD) alongside NIST-standardized PQC algorithms as well as alternative candidates such as HQC and BIKE. A key innovation is the QKD key management module, which addresses performance bottlenecks through periodic key generation and secure reuse within predefined retention periods, significantly reducing QKD overhead in TLS handshakes. The experimental implementation using the quantum network simulator evaluated 144 distinct cryptographic protocol combinations. Results demonstrate that ML-KEM combined with ML-DSA provides optimal PQC performance, while QKD protocol selection is distance-dependent: BB84 for short-range and MDI-QKD for long-distance communication. The framework includes various attack mitigation mechanisms and ensure security as long as at least one cryptographic method remains uncompromised. Consistent with current global quantum network usage, the proposed TLS approach is designed primarily for MAN and WAN environments rather than the Internet, providing a balanced solution that combines theoretical security guarantees with computational efficiency.
Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and quantum key distribution (QKD) address the quantum threat from opposite directions: PQC replaces vulnerable public-key algorithms with schemes believed to resist quantum cryptanalysis, while QKD derives keys whose secrecy rests on physical assumptions rather than computational ones. Because each approach has a distinct failure mode, a growing body of work combines them so that a session key remains secure if either component holds. We first establish the deployed baseline, hybrid classical-plus-PQC key exchange, against which QKD-augmented designs must be judged. We then propose a taxonomy of hybrid PQC-QKD designs along eight dimensions (integration layer, combiner construction, authentication scope and source, QKD topology, trusted entities, key-delivery interface, classical component, and evidence type), and use it to compare published protocols, including Muckle and its successors, MACsec and TLS integrations, and IKEv2 mechanisms standardised in RFCs 8784, 9370, and 9867. We examine key-combiner constructions in light of the KEM-combiner literature and of NIST, ETSI, and ITU-T guidance, and map the security arguments for hybrid PQC-QKD protocols onto a common grid of security model, assumptions, permitted compromise, established guarantee, and limitations. We synthesise deployment evidence from metropolitan and national QKD networks, distinguishing the few testbeds that have run PQC in the key path from pure-QKD deployments, and summarise the standards and policy landscape, including the positions of national security agencies that recommend against relying on QKD alone. We close with open problems: authentication of the QKD classical channel, shared-infrastructure threat models, device certification versus formal proofs, formal verification of hybrid handshakes, and the lack of peer-reviewed deployment economics.
The transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) marks a pivotal shift in ensuring digital security, prompted by the potential of quantum computers to compromise classical systems such as Rivest-Shamir-Adlema and elliptic-curve cryptography. In response, NIST has standardized three foundational PQC algorithms: Module-lattice-based Key-encapsulation Mechanism for key establishment; Module-lattice-based Digital Signature, and Stateless Hash-based Digital Signature algorithms for digital signatures. Meanwhile, FALCON and Hamming Quasi-cyclic (HQC) schemes, both selected as finalists, are expected to join the standards soon. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of these NIST-selected PQC standards, with a dual focus on software implementations and hardware architecture designs. We analyze their mathematical frameworks, distinctive features, and optimization strategies related to performance, security, and resource efficiency. The software review examines algorithmic complexity, memory usage, and programming considerations, while the hardware review discusses FPGA and ASIC implementations, emphasizing modular arithmetic, polynomial operations, and resource efficiency challenges. A comparative analysis highlights the strengths and trade-offs of each algorithm, offering insights into their applicability across various platforms-from resource-constrained internet of things devices to high-performance computing environments. This study provides a foundational understanding of NIST’s selected PQC standards and their practical deployment in securing the post-quantum era.
The fast development of cyber communications, multimedia distribution, remote working have promoted the demand to transmit sensitive information through secure means in both the public and the private networks. The advent of massive quantum computers is rendering traditional cryptographic algorithms like RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) insecure because they can crack the classical public-key algorithms like the Shor and Grover algorithms. This brings an immediate need of hybrid cryptographic systems, which integrate classical, quantum, and post-quantum algorithms to provide confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and future security beyond the quantum threat horizon.The paper is a proposal of a Hybrid Quantum-Post-Quantum Cryptographic Framework of transmitting files safely. It starts by aggregating files, which is a process to compress several files, images, videos, and multimedia files that users have chosen into one file to minimize redundancy and ease encryption. The AES-256 encrypted file is in GCM mode and provides confidentiality and integrity of the compressed file.The dual-layer mechanism ensures key establishment security. To begin with, Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) based on the protocols of BB84/E91 allows the Sender and the Receiver to generate a Quantum Secret Key (QSK) by exchanging quantum bits in quantum channel. Constant monitoring of the error rate facilitates automatic eavesdropping detection, and guarantees the keys generation is made when the conditions are secure, as well as the safeguarding of interception and man-in-the-middle attacks.A post-quantum layer is provided to ensure long-term security against quantum cryptanalysis, which uses Kyber, a NIST-approved lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM). The Receiver creates a key pair of Kyber and disseminates the public key to the Sender. By using encapsulation, the Sender gets a PQC ciphertext and a Shared Secret (SS), with decapsulation on the Receiver side giving ensure that only participants of good faith get the same secret value.The hybridization phase consists of combining the QSK of QKD and SS of Kyber with the help of HKDF-SHA256 to obtain a Final Wrap Key (FWK). AES-GCM encrypts the key of file encryption by wrapping it with FWK which allows a secure and authenticated transfer of the key. The Sender sends four messages: encrypted file, Kyber ciphertext, wrapped AES key and the initialisation vector. At Receiver end, FWK is calculated once again with the help of QSK and SS so that the original data can be decrypted with the help of AES key.The suggested framework provides a defense-in-depth solution based on the combination of quantum security, post-quantum resilience and authenticated symmetric encryption. It can be analyzed that there is a strong resistance to classical and quantum adversaries, scalability, and compatibility with the existing communication networks. This renders the model to be appropriate to secure government communication, military systems, data exchange in healthcare environments, cloud storage and financial infrastructures. Keywords— Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), Kyber,Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM), HKDF-SHA256, Quantum Secret Key (QSK), GCM Mode.
Many companies are working to build a powerful quantum computer.Once quantum computer with large qubits is reality, asymmetric-key cryptosystem will be vulnerable for Shor's algorithm.The transition from one cryptosystem to another is very slow process and consumes many years.National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is working on standardization of post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) algorithms.Security of current PQC algorithms cannot be fully verified today.So, in coming years we need to rely on both traditional algorithms and PQC algorithms.Hybrid mode consisting of one traditional algorithm and one post quantum algorithm is a best solution for smooth migration to quantum-safe cryptosystem.For key exchange, it means using two or more key exchange encapsulation algorithms for generating session key [Meher and Midhunchakkaravarthy (2019)].For authentication, it means using two or more digital signature algorithms [Meher and Midhunchakkaravarthy (2019)].There are number of approaches to combine secret key from traditional algorithm and PQC algorithm to make key encapsulation mechanism quantum-proof.In the paper we propose a new approach of using secret master key generated from one of the KEM algorithm as a salt for hashbased key derivation function (HKDF) to drive session keys from secret master key generated from another KEM algorithm.