Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2509.25790

Testing nonstabilizerness only with stabilizer states

Hyukjoon Kwon

Published Sep 30, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The stabilizer formalism plays a central role in quantum information processing and quantum computing. Since stabilizer states and operations can be efficiently simulated classically and fault-tolerantly implemented in quantum error-correcting codes, quantum states and operations beyond the stabilizer framework, characterized by nonstabilizerness or magic, naturally emerge as resources for quantum computation. Here, we demonstrate that a quantum-information task involving only stabilizer states can reveal a fundamental limitation of stabilizer operations. Specifically, we construct a set of mutually orthogonal stabilizer states that cannot be perfectly distinguished using stabilizer operations and extend this construction to an arbitrary number of qubits. Our results provide an efficient test of nonstabilizerness without requiring the direct use of resourceful states or operations nor relying on computational-hardness assumptions. This nonstabilizerness test could serve as a resource-efficient benchmark for fault-tolerant quantum computers powered by magic-state injection, by providing quantitative bounds on the robustness of magic. More fundamentally, the resulting asymmetry between the preparation and discrimination of free states parallels "nonlocality without entanglement" in entanglement theory, revealing an unexpected connection between these two distinct quantum resource theories.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2509.25790

Related papers

Limitations of Classically Simulable Measurements for Quantum State Discrimination

Chengkai Zhu, Zhiping Liu, Chenghong Zhu +1 more

In the realm of fault-tolerant quantum computing, stabilizer operations play a pivotal role, characterized by their remarkable efficiency in classical simulation. This efficiency sets them apart from nonstabilizer operations within the quantum computational theory. In this Letter, we investigate the limitations of classically simulable measurements in distinguishing quantum states. We demonstrate that any pure magic state and its orthogonal complement of odd prime dimensions cannot be unambiguously distinguished by stabilizer operations, regardless of how many copies of the states are supplied. We also reveal intrinsic similarities and distinctions between the quantum resource theories of magic states and entanglement in quantum state discrimination. The results emphasize the inherent limitations of classically simulable measurements and contribute to a deeper understanding of the quantum-classical boundary.

arXiv:2310.11323•Physical Review Letters•Jul 2, 2024•9 citations

Causal inequalities witness non-stabilizerness

Leonardo Vaglini, Nasra Daher Ahmed, Ravi Kunjwal

Stabilizer operations describe a fragment of quantum theory that is known to be efficiently classically simulable, thanks to the Gottesman-Knill theorem. For this reason, nonstabilizer resources such as magic states are necessary for universal quantum computation. Interestingly, the operational and axiomatic approaches to the resource theory of magic differ: the set of free operations in the former, namely, stabilizer operations (SO), is strictly smaller than that in the latter, namely, completely stabilizer preserving operations (CSPO). A simple example showing the separation is given by a three-qubit stabilizer product basis whose states cannot be perfectly discriminated using SO, but which do admit perfect discrimination using CSPO. Such an ensemble of states is said to exhibit nonstabilizerness without magic (NSWM). Here we obtain a principled understanding of this phenomenon, proving necessary and sufficient conditions for its existence. We first derive a simple criterion to decide whether, given a stabilizer basis, its states can be perfectly discriminated using stabilizer operations alone. We then consider the case where the stabilizer basis contains only product states and use its link with process functions---classical models of paradox-free causal loops---to prove the following: the states in a stabilizer product basis require nonstabilizerness for perfect discrimination if and only if the corresponding process function violates a causal inequality. This provides a new operational meaning to causal inequality violations as witnesses of nonstabilizerness, a form of computational nonclassicality.

quant-pharXiv:2609.40223•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Scalable Measures of Magic Resource for Quantum Computers

Tobias Haug, M. S. Kim

Nonstabilizerness or magic resource characterizes the amount of non-Clifford operations needed to prepare quantum states.It is a crucial resource for quantum computing and a necessary condition for quantum advantage.However, quantifying magic resource beyond a few qubits has been a major challenge.Here, we introduce efficient measures of magic resource for pure quantum states with a sampling cost that is independent of the number of qubits.Our method uses Bell measurements over two copies of a state, which we implement in experiment together with a cost-free error-mitigation scheme.We show the transition of classically simulable stabilizer states into intractable quantum states on the IonQ quantum computer.For applications, we efficiently distinguish stabilizer and nonstabilizer states with low measurement cost even in the presence of experimental noise.Further, we propose a variational quantum algorithm to maximize our measure via the shift rule.Our algorithm can be free of barren plateaus even for highly expressible variational circuits.Finally, we experimentally demonstrate a Bell-measurement protocol for the stabilizer Rényi entropy as well as the Wallach-Meyer entanglement measure.Our results pave the way to understanding the nonclassical power of quantum computers, quantum simulators, and quantum many-body systems.

arXiv:2204.10061•PRX Quantum•Jan 3, 2023•104 citations

A Nonstabilizerness Resource Law for Universal Quantum State Purification

Keming He, Enji Xiong, Xin Wang

Quantum state purification aims to recover higher-fidelity quantum states from multiple noisy copies and is a fundamental primitive for quantum information processing. Magic resources enable operations beyond classically simulable dynamics and are central to universal fault-tolerant quantum computation. Recent no-go results show that classically simulable operations cannot achieve a nontrivial universal fidelity gain. This motivates a quantitative theory of the magic required for purification at prescribed success probability and target fidelity. For universal purification with two input copies, we prove an exact linear mana law in odd dimensions and a two-sided linear robustness law for multi-qubit systems, which becomes exact for a single qubit. We also identify an explicit successful purification map that makes the tradeoff transparent. These results establish universal purification as a task obeying a quantitative magic-fidelity law and link magic resources to error mitigation and fault-tolerant quantum information processing.

quant-pharXiv:2607.08626•Jul 10, 2026•0 citations

No-broadcasting of magic states

Zijian Zhang, Lingxuan Feng, Shunlong Luo

From both intuitive and physical perspectives, it is generally recognized that within a resource theory framework, free operations cannot broadcast a resource state due to their inability to generate resource from free states. In the stabilizer formalism of fault-tolerant quantum computation, the basic ingredients of the corresponding resource theory consist of stabilizer states as free states and stabilizer operations as free operations. The celebrated Gottesman-Knill theorem shows that quantum advantages over classical computation come from the magic (nonstabilizer) resource, such as magic states or non-Clifford gates. In this work, we prove that broadcasting of any magic state via stabilizer operations is impossible, which is reminiscent of the no-broadcasting theorems for noncommuting states or quantum correlations. We further derive a trade-off relation between the magic resource consumed in the initial system and that gained in the target system. These results characterize magic states in the stabilizer formalism from the broadcasting angle, and may have implications for distributed quantum computation and quantum secret sharing.

Physical Review A•Jul 25, 2024•9 citations

Quantum State Discrimination With Stabilizer Circuits

Benjamin Stratton, Santiago Zamora, Rafael Chaves

The task of quantum state discrimination provides an operational characterization of distinguishability and plays a central role in quantum information science. Since the achievable success probability in quantum state discrimination depends both on the states being discriminated and on the allowed measurements, it is natural to study discrimination under physically motivated measurement constraints. Here, we investigate minimum-error quantum state discrimination under measurements implementable by both fixed and adaptive stabilizer circuits. Given arbitrary stabilizer-state ancillas, we show that fixed stabilizer circuits provide no additional discrimination power, whereas adaptive circuits do. Then, focusing on single-qubit systems, we derive analytical expressions for the success probability across both circuit classes when supplied with arbitrary (non-stabilizer) ancillas, showing that the performance gap between fixed and adaptive circuits persists. We further consider discrimination with non-stabilizerness incorporated directly into the measurement operators. Here, the optimization is formulated as a semidefinite program, and analytical bounds interpolating between the stabilizer and Helstrom limits for qubits are derived. Finally, we illustrate applications in quantum random access codes and bounds on unitary synthesis fidelity with a finite number of magic states.

quant-pharXiv:2607.27339•Jul 31, 2026•0 citations
The stabilizer formalism plays a central role in quantum information processing and quantum computing. Since stabilizer states and operations can be efficiently simulated classically and fault-tolerantly implemented in quantum error-correcting codes, quantum states and operations beyond the stabilizer framework, characterized by nonstabilizerness or magic, naturally emerge as resources for quantum computation. Here, we demonstrate that a quantum-information task involving only stabilizer states can reveal a fundamental limitation of stabilizer operations. Specifically, we construct a set of mutually orthogonal stabilizer states that cannot be perfectly distinguished using stabilizer operations and extend this construction to an arbitrary number of qubits. Our results provide an efficient test of nonstabilizerness without requiring the direct use of resourceful states or operations nor relying on computational-hardness assumptions. This nonstabilizerness test could serve as a resource-efficient benchmark for fault-tolerant quantum computers powered by magic-state injection, by providing quantitative bounds on the robustness of magic. More fundamentally, the resulting asymmetry between the preparation and discrimination of free states parallels "nonlocality without entanglement" in entanglement theory, revealing an unexpected connection between these two distinct quantum resource theories.
In the realm of fault-tolerant quantum computing, stabilizer operations play a pivotal role, characterized by their remarkable efficiency in classical simulation. This efficiency sets them apart from nonstabilizer operations within the quantum computational theory. In this Letter, we investigate the limitations of classically simulable measurements in distinguishing quantum states. We demonstrate that any pure magic state and its orthogonal complement of odd prime dimensions cannot be unambiguously distinguished by stabilizer operations, regardless of how many copies of the states are supplied. We also reveal intrinsic similarities and distinctions between the quantum resource theories of magic states and entanglement in quantum state discrimination. The results emphasize the inherent limitations of classically simulable measurements and contribute to a deeper understanding of the quantum-classical boundary.
Stabilizer operations describe a fragment of quantum theory that is known to be efficiently classically simulable, thanks to the Gottesman-Knill theorem. For this reason, nonstabilizer resources such as magic states are necessary for universal quantum computation. Interestingly, the operational and axiomatic approaches to the resource theory of magic differ: the set of free operations in the former, namely, stabilizer operations (SO), is strictly smaller than that in the latter, namely, completely stabilizer preserving operations (CSPO). A simple example showing the separation is given by a three-qubit stabilizer product basis whose states cannot be perfectly discriminated using SO, but which do admit perfect discrimination using CSPO. Such an ensemble of states is said to exhibit nonstabilizerness without magic (NSWM). Here we obtain a principled understanding of this phenomenon, proving necessary and sufficient conditions for its existence. We first derive a simple criterion to decide whether, given a stabilizer basis, its states can be perfectly discriminated using stabilizer operations alone. We then consider the case where the stabilizer basis contains only product states and use its link with process functions---classical models of paradox-free causal loops---to prove the following: the states in a stabilizer product basis require nonstabilizerness for perfect discrimination if and only if the corresponding process function violates a causal inequality. This provides a new operational meaning to causal inequality violations as witnesses of nonstabilizerness, a form of computational nonclassicality.
Nonstabilizerness or magic resource characterizes the amount of non-Clifford operations needed to prepare quantum states.It is a crucial resource for quantum computing and a necessary condition for quantum advantage.However, quantifying magic resource beyond a few qubits has been a major challenge.Here, we introduce efficient measures of magic resource for pure quantum states with a sampling cost that is independent of the number of qubits.Our method uses Bell measurements over two copies of a state, which we implement in experiment together with a cost-free error-mitigation scheme.We show the transition of classically simulable stabilizer states into intractable quantum states on the IonQ quantum computer.For applications, we efficiently distinguish stabilizer and nonstabilizer states with low measurement cost even in the presence of experimental noise.Further, we propose a variational quantum algorithm to maximize our measure via the shift rule.Our algorithm can be free of barren plateaus even for highly expressible variational circuits.Finally, we experimentally demonstrate a Bell-measurement protocol for the stabilizer Rényi entropy as well as the Wallach-Meyer entanglement measure.Our results pave the way to understanding the nonclassical power of quantum computers, quantum simulators, and quantum many-body systems.
Quantum state purification aims to recover higher-fidelity quantum states from multiple noisy copies and is a fundamental primitive for quantum information processing. Magic resources enable operations beyond classically simulable dynamics and are central to universal fault-tolerant quantum computation. Recent no-go results show that classically simulable operations cannot achieve a nontrivial universal fidelity gain. This motivates a quantitative theory of the magic required for purification at prescribed success probability and target fidelity. For universal purification with two input copies, we prove an exact linear mana law in odd dimensions and a two-sided linear robustness law for multi-qubit systems, which becomes exact for a single qubit. We also identify an explicit successful purification map that makes the tradeoff transparent. These results establish universal purification as a task obeying a quantitative magic-fidelity law and link magic resources to error mitigation and fault-tolerant quantum information processing.
From both intuitive and physical perspectives, it is generally recognized that within a resource theory framework, free operations cannot broadcast a resource state due to their inability to generate resource from free states. In the stabilizer formalism of fault-tolerant quantum computation, the basic ingredients of the corresponding resource theory consist of stabilizer states as free states and stabilizer operations as free operations. The celebrated Gottesman-Knill theorem shows that quantum advantages over classical computation come from the magic (nonstabilizer) resource, such as magic states or non-Clifford gates. In this work, we prove that broadcasting of any magic state via stabilizer operations is impossible, which is reminiscent of the no-broadcasting theorems for noncommuting states or quantum correlations. We further derive a trade-off relation between the magic resource consumed in the initial system and that gained in the target system. These results characterize magic states in the stabilizer formalism from the broadcasting angle, and may have implications for distributed quantum computation and quantum secret sharing.
The task of quantum state discrimination provides an operational characterization of distinguishability and plays a central role in quantum information science. Since the achievable success probability in quantum state discrimination depends both on the states being discriminated and on the allowed measurements, it is natural to study discrimination under physically motivated measurement constraints. Here, we investigate minimum-error quantum state discrimination under measurements implementable by both fixed and adaptive stabilizer circuits. Given arbitrary stabilizer-state ancillas, we show that fixed stabilizer circuits provide no additional discrimination power, whereas adaptive circuits do. Then, focusing on single-qubit systems, we derive analytical expressions for the success probability across both circuit classes when supplied with arbitrary (non-stabilizer) ancillas, showing that the performance gap between fixed and adaptive circuits persists. We further consider discrimination with non-stabilizerness incorporated directly into the measurement operators. Here, the optimization is formulated as a semidefinite program, and analytical bounds interpolating between the stabilizer and Helstrom limits for qubits are derived. Finally, we illustrate applications in quantum random access codes and bounds on unitary synthesis fidelity with a finite number of magic states.