Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2509.11066

Quantum State Recovery via Direct Sum Formalism Without Measurement Outcomes

Taiga Suzuki, Masayuki Ohzeki

Published Sep 14, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This study proposes a new approach to quantum state recovery following measurement. Specifically, we introduce a special operation that transfers the probability amplitude of the quantum state into its orthogonal complement. This operation is followed by a measurement performed on this orthogonal subspace, enabling the undisturbed original quantum state to be regained. Remarkably, this recovery is achieved without dependence of the post-measurement operation on the measurement outcome, thus allowing the recovery without historical dependence. This constitutes a highly nontrivial phenomenon. From the operational perspective, as the no-cloning theorem forbids perfect and probabilistic cloning of arbitrary quantum states, and traditional post-measurement reversal methods typically rely on operations contingent on the measurement outcomes, it questions fundamental assumptions regarding the necessity of historic dependence. From an informational perspective, since this recovery method erases the information about the measurement outcome, it's intriguing that the information can be erased without accessing the measurement outcome. These results imply the operational and informational non-triviality formulated in a direct-sum Hilbert space framework.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2509.11066

Related papers

Quantum Subspace Measurements

Neal G. Anderson

Fundamental studies of quantum measurements and their capacity to acquire information are typically based on scenarios in which the full Hilbert space of the measured quantum system is open to measurement interactions. In this work, we consider a class of incomplete quantum measurements — quantum subspace measurements (QSM's) — for which all measurement interactions are restricted to an arbitrary but specified subspace of the measured system Hilbert space. We define QSM's formally through a condition on the measurement Hamiltonian, obtain forms for the post-measurement states and positive operators (POVM elements) associated with QSM's acting in a specified subspace, and upper bound the accessible information for such measurements. Characteristic features of QSM's are identified and discussed.

Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Mar 1, 2007•2 citations

Relating disturbance, information and orthogonality

Yizhou Liu, John B. DeBrota

In the general theory of quantum measurement, one associates a positive semidefinite operator on a $d$-dimensional Hilbert space to each of the $n$ possible outcomes of an arbitrary measurement. In the special case of a projective measurement, these operators are pairwise Hilbert--Schmidt orthogonal, but when $n>d$, orthogonality is restricted by positivity. This restriction has consequences which are not present from a classical perspective; in particular, we find it allows us to more precisely state the old quantum adage that it is impossible to extract information from a system without disturbance. Restricting attention throughout to the Luders state updating rule, we consider three properties of a measurement: its disturbance, a measure of how the expected post-measurement state deviates from the input state, its purity gain, a measure of the expected reduction of uncertainty resulting from measurement, and its orthogonality, a measure of the degree to which the measurement operators differ from an orthonormal set. We show that these quantities satisfy a simple algebraic relation amounting to an expression of an information-disturbance trade-off. Finally, we assess several classes of measurements on these grounds and identify symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements as the unique quantum analogs of a perfectly informative and nondisturbing classical ideal measurement.

•May 5, 2021•0 citations

Relating measurement disturbance, information, and orthogonality

Yizhou Liu, John B. DeBrota

In the general theory of quantum measurement, one associates a positive-semidefinite operator on a $d$-dimensional Hilbert space to each of the $n$ possible outcomes of an arbitrary measurement. In the special case of a projective measurement, these operators are pairwise Hilbert-Schmidt orthogonal, but when $n>d$, orthogonality is restricted by positivity. This restriction allows us to more precisely state the quantum adage: information gain of a system is always accompanied by unavoidable disturbance. Specifically, we investigate three properties of a measurement with L\"uders rule updating: its disturbance, a measure of how the expected postmeasurement state deviates from the input; its measurement strength, a measure of the intrinsic information producing capacity of the measurement; and its orthogonality, a measure of the degree to which the measurement operators differ from an orthonormal set. These quantities satisfy an information-disturbance tradeoff relation that highlights the additional role played by orthogonality. Finally, we assess several classes of measurements on these grounds and identify symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements as the unique quantum analogs of a perfectly informative and nondisturbing classical ideal measurement.

arXiv:2105.02074•Physical Review A•Nov 22, 2021•2 citations

Why Quantum Collapse May Not Be Fundamental

Atsushi Okamoto

Wave function collapse has long been regarded as a fundamental element of the quantum measurement process, providing a mechanism by which a superposed quantum state yields a single observed outcome. Despite its widespread use, the physical meaning of collapse remains conceptually controversial. In particular, it is often assumed that the quantities associated with a quantum state before measurement and the values obtained after measurement belong to the same conceptual category. This assumption leads naturally to the image of a discontinuous transition in which one value is selected from a superposition of possibilities. In the present work, we reexamine the concept of quantum collapse from the perspective of observability. We argue that pre-measurement quantities do not constitute observable values in the ordinary operational sense. Rather, they represent a structure of potential observability associated with possible measurement outcomes. By contrast, post-measurement outcomes correspond to operationally realized observability, in which a specific result becomes accessible through measurement. From this viewpoint, the apparent collapse does not represent a physical jump of an already existing value, but a transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. Based on this distinction, we propose that many conceptual difficulties traditionally associated with wave function collapse arise from treating these two fundamentally different forms of observability as if they were physically equivalent. The apparent discontinuity of collapse may therefore originate not from a discontinuous change in reality itself, but from a conceptual conflation of potential observability and operationally realized observability. Within the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), this interpretation naturally leads to the concept of accessibility transition, in which the emergence of a definite outcome is understood as a change in accessible structure rather than as a fundamental non-unitary state reduction. The present analysis suggests that wave function collapse may not be a fundamental physical phenomenon, but instead a consequence of the transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. This perspective provides a conceptual reorganization of the measurement problem and clarifies the role of observability in the emergence of definite quantum outcomes.

•Jul 11, 2026•0 citations

Quantum state restoration by quantum cloning and measurement

Koji Maruyama, P. L. Knight

Copying information is an elementary operation in classical information processing. However, copying seems rather different in the quantum regime. Since the discovery of the universal quantum cloning machine, much has been found from the fundamental point of view about quantum copying. But a basic question as to the utility of universal quantum cloning remains. We have considered its application in quantum state restoration by using cloning circuit for state estimation. It might be expected that classical information from the state estimation might help restore the quantum state that was disturbed during transmission. We find that the fidelity of the final state is, interestingly, independent of error probabilities inside the channel. However, this also turns out to impose a severe constraint on our original aims.

arXiv:quant-ph/0309167•Sep 23, 2003•0 citations

Quantum Measurement Theory Improves the no-Cloning Theorem

Koji Nagata, Tadao Nakamura

We improve the no-cloning theorem that relies on the property of the quantum theory. Usually, the no-cloning theorem allows for a cloning two orthogonal quantum states, simultaneously. Here we take into account specific quantum measurement theory. We result in the fact that we cannot allow for a cloning two orthogonal quantum states, simultaneously. Especially, we systematically describe our assertion based on more mathematical analysis using raw data.

•Jul 1, 2013•0 citations
This study proposes a new approach to quantum state recovery following measurement. Specifically, we introduce a special operation that transfers the probability amplitude of the quantum state into its orthogonal complement. This operation is followed by a measurement performed on this orthogonal subspace, enabling the undisturbed original quantum state to be regained. Remarkably, this recovery is achieved without dependence of the post-measurement operation on the measurement outcome, thus allowing the recovery without historical dependence. This constitutes a highly nontrivial phenomenon. From the operational perspective, as the no-cloning theorem forbids perfect and probabilistic cloning of arbitrary quantum states, and traditional post-measurement reversal methods typically rely on operations contingent on the measurement outcomes, it questions fundamental assumptions regarding the necessity of historic dependence. From an informational perspective, since this recovery method erases the information about the measurement outcome, it's intriguing that the information can be erased without accessing the measurement outcome. These results imply the operational and informational non-triviality formulated in a direct-sum Hilbert space framework.
Fundamental studies of quantum measurements and their capacity to acquire information are typically based on scenarios in which the full Hilbert space of the measured quantum system is open to measurement interactions. In this work, we consider a class of incomplete quantum measurements — quantum subspace measurements (QSM's) — for which all measurement interactions are restricted to an arbitrary but specified subspace of the measured system Hilbert space. We define QSM's formally through a condition on the measurement Hamiltonian, obtain forms for the post-measurement states and positive operators (POVM elements) associated with QSM's acting in a specified subspace, and upper bound the accessible information for such measurements. Characteristic features of QSM's are identified and discussed.
In the general theory of quantum measurement, one associates a positive semidefinite operator on a ddd-dimensional Hilbert space to each of the nnn possible outcomes of an arbitrary measurement. In the special case of a projective measurement, these operators are pairwise Hilbert--Schmidt orthogonal, but when n>dn>dn>d, orthogonality is restricted by positivity. This restriction has consequences which are not present from a classical perspective; in particular, we find it allows us to more precisely state the old quantum adage that it is impossible to extract information from a system without disturbance. Restricting attention throughout to the Luders state updating rule, we consider three properties of a measurement: its disturbance, a measure of how the expected post-measurement state deviates from the input state, its purity gain, a measure of the expected reduction of uncertainty resulting from measurement, and its orthogonality, a measure of the degree to which the measurement operators differ from an orthonormal set. We show that these quantities satisfy a simple algebraic relation amounting to an expression of an information-disturbance trade-off. Finally, we assess several classes of measurements on these grounds and identify symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements as the unique quantum analogs of a perfectly informative and nondisturbing classical ideal measurement.
In the general theory of quantum measurement, one associates a positive-semidefinite operator on a ddd-dimensional Hilbert space to each of the nnn possible outcomes of an arbitrary measurement. In the special case of a projective measurement, these operators are pairwise Hilbert-Schmidt orthogonal, but when n>dn>dn>d, orthogonality is restricted by positivity. This restriction allows us to more precisely state the quantum adage: information gain of a system is always accompanied by unavoidable disturbance. Specifically, we investigate three properties of a measurement with L\"uders rule updating: its disturbance, a measure of how the expected postmeasurement state deviates from the input; its measurement strength, a measure of the intrinsic information producing capacity of the measurement; and its orthogonality, a measure of the degree to which the measurement operators differ from an orthonormal set. These quantities satisfy an information-disturbance tradeoff relation that highlights the additional role played by orthogonality. Finally, we assess several classes of measurements on these grounds and identify symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements as the unique quantum analogs of a perfectly informative and nondisturbing classical ideal measurement.
Wave function collapse has long been regarded as a fundamental element of the quantum measurement process, providing a mechanism by which a superposed quantum state yields a single observed outcome. Despite its widespread use, the physical meaning of collapse remains conceptually controversial. In particular, it is often assumed that the quantities associated with a quantum state before measurement and the values obtained after measurement belong to the same conceptual category. This assumption leads naturally to the image of a discontinuous transition in which one value is selected from a superposition of possibilities. In the present work, we reexamine the concept of quantum collapse from the perspective of observability. We argue that pre-measurement quantities do not constitute observable values in the ordinary operational sense. Rather, they represent a structure of potential observability associated with possible measurement outcomes. By contrast, post-measurement outcomes correspond to operationally realized observability, in which a specific result becomes accessible through measurement. From this viewpoint, the apparent collapse does not represent a physical jump of an already existing value, but a transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. Based on this distinction, we propose that many conceptual difficulties traditionally associated with wave function collapse arise from treating these two fundamentally different forms of observability as if they were physically equivalent. The apparent discontinuity of collapse may therefore originate not from a discontinuous change in reality itself, but from a conceptual conflation of potential observability and operationally realized observability. Within the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), this interpretation naturally leads to the concept of accessibility transition, in which the emergence of a definite outcome is understood as a change in accessible structure rather than as a fundamental non-unitary state reduction. The present analysis suggests that wave function collapse may not be a fundamental physical phenomenon, but instead a consequence of the transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. This perspective provides a conceptual reorganization of the measurement problem and clarifies the role of observability in the emergence of definite quantum outcomes.
Copying information is an elementary operation in classical information processing. However, copying seems rather different in the quantum regime. Since the discovery of the universal quantum cloning machine, much has been found from the fundamental point of view about quantum copying. But a basic question as to the utility of universal quantum cloning remains. We have considered its application in quantum state restoration by using cloning circuit for state estimation. It might be expected that classical information from the state estimation might help restore the quantum state that was disturbed during transmission. We find that the fidelity of the final state is, interestingly, independent of error probabilities inside the channel. However, this also turns out to impose a severe constraint on our original aims.