Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2509.10657

Boosting Sparsity in Graph Decompositions with QAOA Sampling

George Pennington, Naeimeh Mohseni, Oscar Wallis, Francesca Schiavello, Stefano Mensa, Corey O’Meara, G. Cortiana, Víctor Valls

Published Sep 12, 2025• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the problem of decomposing a graph into a weighted sum of a small number of matchings, a task that arises in network resource allocation problems such as peer-to-peer energy exchange. Computing such decompositions is challenging for classical algorithms, even for small instances. To address this problem, we propose E-FCFW, a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm based on the Fully-Corrective Frank-Wolfe (FCFW) algorithm that incorporates a matching-sampling subroutine. We design a QAOA version of this subroutine and benchmark it against classical approaches (random sampling and simulated annealing) on demand graphs derived from complete, bipartite, and heavy-hex topologies. The quantum subroutine is executed using the Qiskit Aer state-vector and MPS simulators and on IBM Kingston hardware (7-111 qubits). On complete and bipartite graphs with 6-10 nodes, E-FCFW with QAOA yields consistently sparser decompositions than the classical baselines, and even beats the best-known solution for one instance. On heavy-hex graphs with 50, 70 and 100 nodes, E-FCFW with QAOA outperforms the other methods in terms of approximation error, demonstrating performance on utility-scale quantum hardware. For the largest graphs (100 nodes) E-FCFW with QAOA performs much better when using MPS circuit simulation, compared to using quantum hardware. This indicates that at this scale, the performance is severely impacted by hardware noise.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2509.10657

Related papers

Scaling Quantum Optimization to the Thousand-Qubit Scale with Distributed Quantum Sampling

Amana Liaqat, Ahmed Darwish, Stephen DiAdamo +6 more

The Minimum Birkhoff Decomposition (MBD) seeks a sparse weighted sum of matchings and is a challenging optimization problem with applications in network scheduling and energy trading. We scale a quantum-assisted decomposition method by combining single-layer QAOA sampling with Extended Fully-Corrective Frank-Wolfe (E-FCFW) optimization, spectral graph partitioning, and greedy feasibility repair. We demonstrate the pipeline on the 1,354-node PEGASE bus test case (representing a 1,354-bus transmission grid with 1,710 transmission lines), whose 1,710 edges define a native 1,710-variable matching optimization problem requiring 1,710 qubits in the unpartitioned encoding. Partitioning enables distributed execution on IBM superconducting quantum processors. The best reported hardware result uses a 50-qubit partition bound, while reducing partitions to 20 qubits degrades convergence in the partition-size comparison. Larger partitions are more demanding for matrix product state (MPS) simulation, and bond-dimension tests show that truncating quantum correlations reduces candidate quality. The results therefore motivate retaining a substantive quantum sampling task within each partition as the overall problem scales. On the PEGASE-1354 benchmark, repaired QAOA samples achieve lower residual decomposition error than both simulated annealing and uniform random sampling baselines, while spatial circuit packing reduces hardware execution time by approximately a factor of three. These results demonstrate that combining spectral partitioning, spatial circuit packing, and classical feasibility repair provides an executable path for deploying gate-based quantum sampling on thousand-variable constrained optimization problems on current hardware.

quant-pharXiv:2610.10772•Oct 9, 2026•1 citation

Assessing the Efficacy of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing for Combinatorial Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of QAOA and Classical Solvers

Ayan Khan

The transition from theoretical quantum computing to practical real-world applications heavily relies onhybrid quantum-classical architectures designed for NoisyIntermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Among these approaches, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm(QAOA) is a prominent strategy for addressing complex combinatorial optimization challenges, such as the NP-hard MaxCut problem. Instead of performing the entire computationon a quantum processor, QAOA utilizes a quantum circuit toevaluate a parameterized cost function, whereas a classical optimizer refines the parameters iteratively. This study presentsa rigorous empirical evaluation comparing the performanceof QAOA against established classical solvers on small-scaleMax-Cut instances. All experiments were implemented andexecuted using Python (Qiskit Aer) on a state-vector simulator.Using Erdős–Rényi random graphs and regular graphs with4 to 20 nodes, we benchmark QAOA at depths p = 2 andp = 3 against simulated annealing, the Goemans–WilliamsonSDP-based algorithm, and a linear-time greedy heuristic. Ourexperimental results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA implementations exhibit severe performance degradation, prohibitive computational overhead (O(2^n) scaling), and low convergencerates compared to mature classical algorithms. At 20 nodes,QAOA (p = 2) achieves only a 0.467 approximation ratio versus0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, with a 210× runtime slowdownover greedy heuristics

•Jun 3, 2026•0 citations

Evaluation of QAOA based on the approximation ratio of individual samples

Jason M. Larkin, Matías Jonsson, Daniel Justice +1 more

Abstract The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum–classical algorithm to solve binary-variable optimization problems. Due to the short circuit depth and its expected robustness to systematic errors it is a promising candidate likely to run on near-term quantum devices. We simulate the performance of QAOA applied to the Max-Cut problem and compare it with some of the best classical alternatives. When comparing solvers, their performance is characterized by the computational time taken to achieve a given quality of solution. Since QAOA is based on sampling, we utilize performance metrics based on the probability of observing a sample above a certain quality. In addition, we show that the QAOA performance varies significantly with the graph type. In particular for three-regular random graphs, QAOA performance shows improvement by up to two orders of magnitude compared to previous estimates, strongly reducing the performance gap with classical alternatives. This was possible by reducing the number of function evaluations per iteration and optimizing the variational parameters on small graph instances and transferring to large via training. Because QAOA’s performance guarantees are only known for limited applications and contexts, we utilize a framework for the search for quantum advantage which incorporates a large number of problem instances and all three classical solver modalities: exact, approximate, and heuristic.

arXiv:2006.04831•Quantum Science and Technology•Apr 22, 2022•44 citations

Assessing the Efficacy of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing for Combinatorial Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of QAOA and Classical Solver

Ayan Khan

This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.

•May 7, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-Enhanced Network Flow Optimization: A Max-Flow Min-Cut Perspective

Gagan Guruprasad Phadke, Vandana M. Ladwani

This paper is a comparison between classical and quantum inspired methods for solving the max-flow problem, which is commonly a foundational challenge in optimization and graph theory. This study will investigate the feasibility and performance of applying the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and other hybrid quantum-classical approaches to address the max-flow problem. This paper starts with comparing quantum approaches with well-established classical methods such as the Ford-Fulkerson and Edmonds-Karp.The main aim of this work is to asses how close quantum-inspired formulations can get to classical approaches in terms of their flow value as well as their runtime. Implementations are developed using the Qiskit framework on simulated quantum backends and compared against classical baselines across synthetic graph instances of varying sizes and densities. Experimentally, it can be seen that quantum approaches implemented using the QAOA technique managed to attain flow solutions comparable to classical ones, demonstrating similar accuracy, and in certain very dense graph configurations, competitive runtime performance due to parallelization in state-vector computing.These findings suggest that although current quantum-inspired approaches may not yet surpass classical algorithms in efficiency, but they can replicate their outcomes with reasonable fidelity. This provides an important validation of their applicability to combinatorial optimization. This study also lays groundwork for future research to explore hardware-level implementations, scalability enhancements, and also hybrid integration strategies for quantum optimization in network flow problems.

International Conference on Next-Gen Quantum and Advanced Computing: Algorithms, Security, and Beyond (NQComp)•Mar 5, 2026•0 citations

A Variational Qubit-Efficient MaxCut Heuristic Algorithm

Yovav Tene-Cohen, Tomer Kelman, Ohad Lev +1 more

Abstract MaxCut is a key NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. Quantum computing offers methods to solve such problems potentially better than classical counterparts, with the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) being a state-of-the-art example. However, the performance of quantum methods is currently hindered by hardware noise and limited qubit volumes. We present a variational Qubit-Efficient MaxCut (QEMC) algorithm that requires only $$O(\log N)$$ O ( log N ) qubits to tackle graphs of size N , an exponential reduction compared to QAOA. We demonstrate cutting-edge performance for 32-node graph instances (5 qubits) on real superconducting hardware, and for graphs with up to 2048 nodes (11 qubits) via classical simulations. The QEMC algorithm is based on an innovative encoding scheme, with potentially broad applicability, that empowers it with strong noise resilience, but also enables its efficient classical simulation. As such, the QEMC algorithm provides a challenging benchmark for QAOA on noisy devices and offers a novel quantum-inspired approach.

arXiv:2308.10383•npj Quantum Information•Feb 16, 2026•11 citations
We study the problem of decomposing a graph into a weighted sum of a small number of matchings, a task that arises in network resource allocation problems such as peer-to-peer energy exchange. Computing such decompositions is challenging for classical algorithms, even for small instances. To address this problem, we propose E-FCFW, a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm based on the Fully-Corrective Frank-Wolfe (FCFW) algorithm that incorporates a matching-sampling subroutine. We design a QAOA version of this subroutine and benchmark it against classical approaches (random sampling and simulated annealing) on demand graphs derived from complete, bipartite, and heavy-hex topologies. The quantum subroutine is executed using the Qiskit Aer state-vector and MPS simulators and on IBM Kingston hardware (7-111 qubits). On complete and bipartite graphs with 6-10 nodes, E-FCFW with QAOA yields consistently sparser decompositions than the classical baselines, and even beats the best-known solution for one instance. On heavy-hex graphs with 50, 70 and 100 nodes, E-FCFW with QAOA outperforms the other methods in terms of approximation error, demonstrating performance on utility-scale quantum hardware. For the largest graphs (100 nodes) E-FCFW with QAOA performs much better when using MPS circuit simulation, compared to using quantum hardware. This indicates that at this scale, the performance is severely impacted by hardware noise.
The Minimum Birkhoff Decomposition (MBD) seeks a sparse weighted sum of matchings and is a challenging optimization problem with applications in network scheduling and energy trading. We scale a quantum-assisted decomposition method by combining single-layer QAOA sampling with Extended Fully-Corrective Frank-Wolfe (E-FCFW) optimization, spectral graph partitioning, and greedy feasibility repair. We demonstrate the pipeline on the 1,354-node PEGASE bus test case (representing a 1,354-bus transmission grid with 1,710 transmission lines), whose 1,710 edges define a native 1,710-variable matching optimization problem requiring 1,710 qubits in the unpartitioned encoding. Partitioning enables distributed execution on IBM superconducting quantum processors. The best reported hardware result uses a 50-qubit partition bound, while reducing partitions to 20 qubits degrades convergence in the partition-size comparison. Larger partitions are more demanding for matrix product state (MPS) simulation, and bond-dimension tests show that truncating quantum correlations reduces candidate quality. The results therefore motivate retaining a substantive quantum sampling task within each partition as the overall problem scales. On the PEGASE-1354 benchmark, repaired QAOA samples achieve lower residual decomposition error than both simulated annealing and uniform random sampling baselines, while spatial circuit packing reduces hardware execution time by approximately a factor of three. These results demonstrate that combining spectral partitioning, spatial circuit packing, and classical feasibility repair provides an executable path for deploying gate-based quantum sampling on thousand-variable constrained optimization problems on current hardware.
The transition from theoretical quantum computing to practical real-world applications heavily relies onhybrid quantum-classical architectures designed for NoisyIntermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Among these approaches, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm(QAOA) is a prominent strategy for addressing complex combinatorial optimization challenges, such as the NP-hard MaxCut problem. Instead of performing the entire computationon a quantum processor, QAOA utilizes a quantum circuit toevaluate a parameterized cost function, whereas a classical optimizer refines the parameters iteratively. This study presentsa rigorous empirical evaluation comparing the performanceof QAOA against established classical solvers on small-scaleMax-Cut instances. All experiments were implemented andexecuted using Python (Qiskit Aer) on a state-vector simulator.Using Erdős–Rényi random graphs and regular graphs with4 to 20 nodes, we benchmark QAOA at depths p = 2 andp = 3 against simulated annealing, the Goemans–WilliamsonSDP-based algorithm, and a linear-time greedy heuristic. Ourexperimental results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA implementations exhibit severe performance degradation, prohibitive computational overhead (O(2^n) scaling), and low convergencerates compared to mature classical algorithms. At 20 nodes,QAOA (p = 2) achieves only a 0.467 approximation ratio versus0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, with a 210× runtime slowdownover greedy heuristics
Abstract The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum–classical algorithm to solve binary-variable optimization problems. Due to the short circuit depth and its expected robustness to systematic errors it is a promising candidate likely to run on near-term quantum devices. We simulate the performance of QAOA applied to the Max-Cut problem and compare it with some of the best classical alternatives. When comparing solvers, their performance is characterized by the computational time taken to achieve a given quality of solution. Since QAOA is based on sampling, we utilize performance metrics based on the probability of observing a sample above a certain quality. In addition, we show that the QAOA performance varies significantly with the graph type. In particular for three-regular random graphs, QAOA performance shows improvement by up to two orders of magnitude compared to previous estimates, strongly reducing the performance gap with classical alternatives. This was possible by reducing the number of function evaluations per iteration and optimizing the variational parameters on small graph instances and transferring to large via training. Because QAOA’s performance guarantees are only known for limited applications and contexts, we utilize a framework for the search for quantum advantage which incorporates a large number of problem instances and all three classical solver modalities: exact, approximate, and heuristic.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.
This paper is a comparison between classical and quantum inspired methods for solving the max-flow problem, which is commonly a foundational challenge in optimization and graph theory. This study will investigate the feasibility and performance of applying the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and other hybrid quantum-classical approaches to address the max-flow problem. This paper starts with comparing quantum approaches with well-established classical methods such as the Ford-Fulkerson and Edmonds-Karp.The main aim of this work is to asses how close quantum-inspired formulations can get to classical approaches in terms of their flow value as well as their runtime. Implementations are developed using the Qiskit framework on simulated quantum backends and compared against classical baselines across synthetic graph instances of varying sizes and densities. Experimentally, it can be seen that quantum approaches implemented using the QAOA technique managed to attain flow solutions comparable to classical ones, demonstrating similar accuracy, and in certain very dense graph configurations, competitive runtime performance due to parallelization in state-vector computing.These findings suggest that although current quantum-inspired approaches may not yet surpass classical algorithms in efficiency, but they can replicate their outcomes with reasonable fidelity. This provides an important validation of their applicability to combinatorial optimization. This study also lays groundwork for future research to explore hardware-level implementations, scalability enhancements, and also hybrid integration strategies for quantum optimization in network flow problems.
Abstract MaxCut is a key NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. Quantum computing offers methods to solve such problems potentially better than classical counterparts, with the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) being a state-of-the-art example. However, the performance of quantum methods is currently hindered by hardware noise and limited qubit volumes. We present a variational Qubit-Efficient MaxCut (QEMC) algorithm that requires only O(log⁡N)O(\log N)O(logN) O ( log N ) qubits to tackle graphs of size N , an exponential reduction compared to QAOA. We demonstrate cutting-edge performance for 32-node graph instances (5 qubits) on real superconducting hardware, and for graphs with up to 2048 nodes (11 qubits) via classical simulations. The QEMC algorithm is based on an innovative encoding scheme, with potentially broad applicability, that empowers it with strong noise resilience, but also enables its efficient classical simulation. As such, the QEMC algorithm provides a challenging benchmark for QAOA on noisy devices and offers a novel quantum-inspired approach.