Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2507.23739 · Physical review. D/Physical review. D.

Generalized Krylov complexity

Amin Faraji Astaneh, Niloofar Vardian

Published Dec 22, 2025• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We extend the concept of Krylov complexity to encompass general unitary evolutions involving multiple generators. This generalization enables us to formulate a framework for generalized Krylov complexity, which serves as a measure of the complexity of states associated with continuous symmetries within a model. Furthermore, we investigate scenarios in which different directions of transformation lead to varying degrees of complexity, in close analogy with geometric approaches to complexity, such as Nielsen’s framework. In this context, we introduce a generalized orthogonalization algorithm and delineate its computational structure, which is organized as a network of orthogonal blocks rather than a simple linear chain. Finally, we present explicit evaluations of several illustrative examples to demonstrate the practical application of this framework.

DOI
10.1103/fhb5-t126

Related papers

Geometry of Krylov complexity

Paweł Caputa, Javier M. Magán, Dimitrios Patramanis

We develop a geometric approach to operator growth and Krylov complexity in many-body quantum systems governed by symmetries. We start by showing a direct link between a unitary evolution with the Liouvillian and the displacement operator of appropriate generalized coherent states. This connection maps operator growth to a purely classical motion in phase space. The phase spaces are endowed with a natural information metric. We show that, in this geometry, operator growth is represented by geodesics, and Krylov complexity is proportional to a volume. This geometric perspective also provides two novel avenues toward computation of Lanczos coefficients, and it sheds new light on the origin of their maximal growth. We describe the general idea and analyze it in explicit examples, among which we reproduce known results from the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, derive operator growth based on SU(2) and Heisenberg-Weyl symmetries, and generalize the discussion to conformal field theories. Finally, we use techniques from quantum optics to study operator evolution with quantum information tools such as entanglement and Renyi entropies, negativity, fidelity, relative entropy, and capacity of entanglement.

arXiv:2109.03824•Physical Review Research•Jan 19, 2022•205 citations

Bridging Krylov Complexity and Universal Analog Quantum Simulator

Shuo Zhang, Yuzhi Tong, Pengfei Zhang +1 more

Quantum simulation of complex many-body systems beyond classical computational capabilities provides a promising route toward understanding novel quantum phases and their transitions. In particular, analog quantum simulators with global control fields have attracted considerable attention due to their potential to simulate arbitrary Hamiltonians and perform quantum computing tasks. However, a clear, quantitative measure for the complexity of implementing specific quantum operations in such systems is still lacking. In this Letter, we address this challenge by introducing generalized Krylov complexity, a concept originating from operator growth dynamics, as a direct diagnosis for this synthesis complexity. We construct the block Krylov basis generated by a set of Hamiltonians, which naturally organizes the operator space achievable through the simulator's native interactions and their nested commutators. By analyzing representative systems including Rydberg atom arrays, we demonstrate that the generalized Krylov complexity of a target operation serves as a strong predictor of the minimum time required for its realization. Our results establish Krylov complexity as an intuitive and predictive tool for designing efficient control protocols in analog quantum simulators.

quant-pharXiv:2605.07668•May 11, 2026•0 citations

Explicit Connections Between Krylov and Nielsen Complexity

Ben Craps, Gabriele Pascuzzi, Juan F. Pedraza +2 more

We establish a direct correspondence between Krylov and Nielsen complexity by choosing the Krylov basis to be part of the elementary gate set of Nielsen geometry and selecting a Nielsen complexity metric compatible with the Krylov metric. Up to normalization, the Krylov complexity of a Hermitian operator then equals the length squared of a straight-line trajectory on the manifold of unitaries that connects the identity operator with a precursor operator. The corresponding length provides an upper bound on Nielsen complexity that saturates whenever the straight line is a minimal geodesic. While for general systems we can only establish saturation in the limit of small precursors, we provide evidence that in broad classes of models and for suitable initial operators there is a precise correspondence between Krylov complexity and (the square of) Nielsen complexity for a finite range of precursors.

hep-thCross-listedarXiv:2511.15799•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Nov 21, 2025•1 citation

A universal approach to Krylov state and operator complexities

Mohsen Alishahiha, Souvik Banerjee

We present a general framework in which both Krylov state and operator complexities can be put on the same footing. In our formalism, the Krylov complexity is defined in terms of the density matrix of the associated state which, for the operator complexity, lives on a doubled Hilbert space obtained through the channel-state map. This unified definition of complexity in terms of the density matrices enables us to extend the notion of Krylov complexity, to subregion or mixed state complexities and also naturally to the Krylov mutual complexity. We show that this framework also encompasses nicely the holographic notions of complexity.

arXiv:2212.10583•SciPost Physics•Sep 6, 2023•48 citations

On Minimizing Krylov Complexity Using Higher-Order Generators

Saud Čindrak, Kathy Lüdge

Krylov complexity provides a powerful framework for characterizing the dynamical evolution of quantum systems through the spreading of states in Krylov space. The motivation for this is rooted in the optimality of the Krylov basis for the analyzed cost function. In this work, we reinterpret the motivation for the Krylov basis from a dynamical perspective and show that it corresponds to a first-order approximation of the time-evolution operator. We extend this framework to higher-order generators and analytically disprove the optimality assumption by showing that an infinite-order generator can be constructed to exhibit smaller spread for arbitrary times. We propose a natural time scale for the construction of these higher-order generators and discuss results for matrices sampled from Gaussian Unitary Ensembles, demonstrating smaller Krylov complexity at all higher orders. These results extend the framework of Krylov complexity beyond the conventional Krylov basis by disproving the widely held assumption of optimality, extending the construction to higher-order generators, and introducing a physically motivated method for their construction. Our findings therefore suggest that previous statements and results concerning Krylov complexity may need to be reconsidered.

quant-pharXiv:2603.07183•Mar 10, 2026•0 citations

A Relation between Krylov and Nielsen Complexity

Ben Craps, Oleg Evnin, Gabriele Pascuzzi

Krylov complexity and Nielsen complexity are successful approaches to quantifying quantum evolution complexity that have been actively pursued without much contact between the two lines of research. The two quantities are motivated by quantum chaos and quantum computation, respectively, while the relevant mathematics is as different as matrix diagonalization algorithms and geodesic flows on curved manifolds. We demonstrate that, despite these differences, there is a relation between the two quantities. Namely, the time average of Krylov complexity of state evolution can be expressed as a trace of a certain matrix, which also controls an upper bound on Nielsen complexity with a specific custom-tailored penalty schedule adapted to the Krylov basis.

arXiv:2311.18401•Physical Review Letters•Apr 18, 2024•35 citations
We extend the concept of Krylov complexity to encompass general unitary evolutions involving multiple generators. This generalization enables us to formulate a framework for generalized Krylov complexity, which serves as a measure of the complexity of states associated with continuous symmetries within a model. Furthermore, we investigate scenarios in which different directions of transformation lead to varying degrees of complexity, in close analogy with geometric approaches to complexity, such as Nielsen’s framework. In this context, we introduce a generalized orthogonalization algorithm and delineate its computational structure, which is organized as a network of orthogonal blocks rather than a simple linear chain. Finally, we present explicit evaluations of several illustrative examples to demonstrate the practical application of this framework.
We develop a geometric approach to operator growth and Krylov complexity in many-body quantum systems governed by symmetries. We start by showing a direct link between a unitary evolution with the Liouvillian and the displacement operator of appropriate generalized coherent states. This connection maps operator growth to a purely classical motion in phase space. The phase spaces are endowed with a natural information metric. We show that, in this geometry, operator growth is represented by geodesics, and Krylov complexity is proportional to a volume. This geometric perspective also provides two novel avenues toward computation of Lanczos coefficients, and it sheds new light on the origin of their maximal growth. We describe the general idea and analyze it in explicit examples, among which we reproduce known results from the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, derive operator growth based on SU(2) and Heisenberg-Weyl symmetries, and generalize the discussion to conformal field theories. Finally, we use techniques from quantum optics to study operator evolution with quantum information tools such as entanglement and Renyi entropies, negativity, fidelity, relative entropy, and capacity of entanglement.
Quantum simulation of complex many-body systems beyond classical computational capabilities provides a promising route toward understanding novel quantum phases and their transitions. In particular, analog quantum simulators with global control fields have attracted considerable attention due to their potential to simulate arbitrary Hamiltonians and perform quantum computing tasks. However, a clear, quantitative measure for the complexity of implementing specific quantum operations in such systems is still lacking. In this Letter, we address this challenge by introducing generalized Krylov complexity, a concept originating from operator growth dynamics, as a direct diagnosis for this synthesis complexity. We construct the block Krylov basis generated by a set of Hamiltonians, which naturally organizes the operator space achievable through the simulator's native interactions and their nested commutators. By analyzing representative systems including Rydberg atom arrays, we demonstrate that the generalized Krylov complexity of a target operation serves as a strong predictor of the minimum time required for its realization. Our results establish Krylov complexity as an intuitive and predictive tool for designing efficient control protocols in analog quantum simulators.
We establish a direct correspondence between Krylov and Nielsen complexity by choosing the Krylov basis to be part of the elementary gate set of Nielsen geometry and selecting a Nielsen complexity metric compatible with the Krylov metric. Up to normalization, the Krylov complexity of a Hermitian operator then equals the length squared of a straight-line trajectory on the manifold of unitaries that connects the identity operator with a precursor operator. The corresponding length provides an upper bound on Nielsen complexity that saturates whenever the straight line is a minimal geodesic. While for general systems we can only establish saturation in the limit of small precursors, we provide evidence that in broad classes of models and for suitable initial operators there is a precise correspondence between Krylov complexity and (the square of) Nielsen complexity for a finite range of precursors.
We present a general framework in which both Krylov state and operator complexities can be put on the same footing. In our formalism, the Krylov complexity is defined in terms of the density matrix of the associated state which, for the operator complexity, lives on a doubled Hilbert space obtained through the channel-state map. This unified definition of complexity in terms of the density matrices enables us to extend the notion of Krylov complexity, to subregion or mixed state complexities and also naturally to the Krylov mutual complexity. We show that this framework also encompasses nicely the holographic notions of complexity.
Krylov complexity provides a powerful framework for characterizing the dynamical evolution of quantum systems through the spreading of states in Krylov space. The motivation for this is rooted in the optimality of the Krylov basis for the analyzed cost function. In this work, we reinterpret the motivation for the Krylov basis from a dynamical perspective and show that it corresponds to a first-order approximation of the time-evolution operator. We extend this framework to higher-order generators and analytically disprove the optimality assumption by showing that an infinite-order generator can be constructed to exhibit smaller spread for arbitrary times. We propose a natural time scale for the construction of these higher-order generators and discuss results for matrices sampled from Gaussian Unitary Ensembles, demonstrating smaller Krylov complexity at all higher orders. These results extend the framework of Krylov complexity beyond the conventional Krylov basis by disproving the widely held assumption of optimality, extending the construction to higher-order generators, and introducing a physically motivated method for their construction. Our findings therefore suggest that previous statements and results concerning Krylov complexity may need to be reconsidered.
Krylov complexity and Nielsen complexity are successful approaches to quantifying quantum evolution complexity that have been actively pursued without much contact between the two lines of research. The two quantities are motivated by quantum chaos and quantum computation, respectively, while the relevant mathematics is as different as matrix diagonalization algorithms and geodesic flows on curved manifolds. We demonstrate that, despite these differences, there is a relation between the two quantities. Namely, the time average of Krylov complexity of state evolution can be expressed as a trace of a certain matrix, which also controls an upper bound on Nielsen complexity with a specific custom-tailored penalty schedule adapted to the Krylov basis.