Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2506.17089

Quantum Advantage in Learning Quantum Dynamics via Fourier coefficient extraction

Barthe, Alice, Rad, Mahtab Yaghubi, Grossi, Michele, Dunjko, Vedran

Published Jun 20, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

One of the key challenges in quantum machine learning is finding relevant machine learning tasks with a provable quantum advantage. A natural candidate for this is learning unknown Hamiltonian dynamics. Here, we tackle the supervised learning version of this problem, where we are given random examples of the inputs to the dynamics as classical data, paired with the expectation values of some observable after the time evolution, as corresponding output labels. The task is to replicate the corresponding input-output function. We prove that this task can yield provable exponential classical-quantum learning advantages under common complexity assumptions in natural settings. To design our quantum learning algorithms, we introduce a new method, which we term \textit{\subroutine}~algorithm for parametrized circuit functions, and which may be of independent interest. Furthermore, we discuss the limitations of generalizing our method to arbitrary quantum dynamics while maintaining provable guarantees. We explain that significant generalizations are impossible under certain complexity-theoretic assumptions, but nonetheless, we provide a heuristic kernel method, where we trade-off provable correctness for broader applicability.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2506.17089

Related papers

Advantage of quantum machine learning from general computational advantages

Hayata Yamasaki, Natsuto Isogai, Mio Murao

An overarching milestone of quantum machine learning (QML) is to demonstrate the advantage of QML over all possible classical learning methods in accelerating a common type of learning task, as represented by supervised learning from classical data. However, the provable advantages of QML in supervised learning have been known so far only for the learning tasks designed for using the advantage of specific quantum algorithms, i.e., Shor’s algorithms. Here, we explicitly construct an unprecedentedly broader family of supervised learning tasks with classical data to offer the provable advantage of QML based on general quantum computational advantages, progressing beyond Shor’s algorithms. Our learning task is feasibly achievable by executing a general class of functions that can be computed efficiently in polynomial time for a large fraction of inputs by arbitrary quantum algorithms, but not by any classical algorithm. We prove the hardness of achieving this learning task for any possible polynomial-time classical learning method. We also clarify protocols for preparing the classical data to demonstrate this learning task in experiments. These results provide a way to exploit a variety of quantum advantages in computing functions for the realization of provably advantageous QML.

arXiv:2312.03057•npj Quantum Information•Jul 28, 2026•2 citations

Exponential quantum advantages in learning quantum observables from classical data

Riccardo Molteni, Casper Gyurik, Vedran Dunjko

Abstract Quantum computers are believed to bring computational advantages in simulating quantum many-body systems. However, recent works have shown that classical machine learning algorithms are able to predict numerous properties of quantum systems with classical data. Despite examples of learning tasks with provable quantum advantages being proposed, they all involve cryptographic functions and do not represent any physical scenarios encountered in laboratory settings. In this paper, we prove quantum advantages for the physically relevant task of learning quantum observables from classical (measured-out) data. We consider two types of observables: first, we prove a learning advantage for linear combinations of Pauli strings, then we extend our results to a broader case of unitarily parametrized observables. For each case, we delineate sharp boundaries separating physically relevant tasks that admit efficient classical learning from those for which a quantum computer remains necessary for data analysis. Unlike previous works, our classical hardness results rely only on the weaker assumption that $$BQP$$ B Q P hard processes cannot be simulated by polynomial-size classical circuits, and we also provide a nontrivial quantum learning algorithm. Our results clarify when quantum resources are useful for learning problems in quantum many-body physics, and suggest practical directions in which quantum learning improvements may emerge.

arXiv:2405.02027•npj Quantum Information•Jan 10, 2026•6 citations

Supervised Learning with Quantum Hamiltonian Embeddings

Riccardo Molteni, Minjun Jeon, Paolo Braccia +8 more

Machine learning is widely regarded as a promising application in which quantum computing could offer a computational advantage. However, general quantum machine learning models with provable guarantees on performance, trainability, and efficient inference remain limited. In this work, we introduce quantum Hamiltonian embeddings, a supervised learning framework in which a classical training dataset is encoded into a single effective, parameterized Hamiltonian. Training optimizes the parameters of this data-dependent Hamiltonian, whose approximate ground state defines the classification rule. Once the ground state has been approximated using a quantum algorithm, inference can be performed either classically using a classical representation of the learned state, or with a quantum representation of the state. We establish efficient methods for gradient estimation and prove favorable generalization guarantees. Furthermore, under standard cryptographic assumptions, we show that Hamiltonian embeddings can realize hypothesis functions beyond the reach of efficient classical algorithms. We then demonstrate the framework at scale on IBM Heron processors using a standard benchmark dataset. Together, these results establish Hamiltonian embeddings as a new framework for quantum machine learning, combining theoretical guarantees with a path for experimental investigations at scale on quantum hardware.

quant-pharXiv:2610.26833•Oct 20, 2026•0 citations

Exponential separations between classical and quantum learners

Casper Gyurik, Vedran Dunjko

Despite significant effort, the quantum machine learning community has only demonstrated quantum learning advantages for artificial cryptography-inspired datasets when dealing with classical data. In this paper we address the challenge of finding learning problems where quantum learning algorithms can achieve a provable exponential speedup over classical learning algorithms. We reflect on computational learning theory concepts related to this question and discuss how subtle differences in definitions can result in significantly different requirements and tasks for the learner to meet and solve. We examine existing learning problems with provable quantum speedups and find that they largely rely on the classical hardness of evaluating the function that generates the data, rather than identifying it. To address this, we present two new learning separations where the classical difficulty primarily lies in identifying the function generating the data. Furthermore, we explore computational hardness assumptions that can be leveraged to prove quantum speedups in scenarios where data is quantum-generated, which implies likely quantum advantages in a plethora of more natural settings (e.g., in condensed matter and high energy physics). We also discuss the limitations of the classical shadow paradigm in the context of learning separations, and how physically-motivated settings such as characterizing phases of matter and Hamiltonian learning fit in the computational learning framework.

arXiv:2306.16028•Jun 28, 2023•9 citations

Quantum advantage for learning shallow neural networks with natural data distributions

L. Lewis, Dar Gilboa, Jarrod R. McClean

Without large quantum computers to empirically evaluate performance, theoretical frameworks such as the quantum statistical query (QSQ) are a primary tool to study quantum algorithms for learning classical functions and search for quantum advantage in machine learning tasks. However, we only understand quantum advantage in this model at two extremes: either exponential advantages for uniform input distributions or no advantage for arbitrary distributions. Our work helps close the gap between these two regimes by designing an efficient quantum algorithm for learning periodic neurons in the QSQ model over a variety of non-uniform distributions and the first explicit treatment of real-valued functions. We prove that this problem is hard not only for classical gradient-based algorithms, which are the workhorses of machine learning, but also for a more general class of SQ algorithms, establishing an exponential quantum advantage.

arXiv:2503.20879•Nature Communications•Dec 31, 2025•1 citation

Quantum machine learning advantages beyond hardness of evaluation

Riccardo Molteni, Simon C. Marshall, Vedran Dunjko

The most general examples of quantum learning advantages involve data labeled by cryptographic or intrinsically quantum functions, where classical learners are limited by the infeasibility of evaluating the labeling functions using polynomial-sized classical circuits. While broad in scope, such results reveal little about advantages arising from the learning process itself. In cryptographic settings, further insight is possible via random-generatability - the ability to classically generate labeled data - enabling hardness proofs for identification tasks, where the goal is to identify the labeling function from a dataset, even when evaluation is classically intractable. These tasks are particularly relevant in quantum contexts, including Hamiltonian learning and identifying physically meaningful order parameters. However, for quantum functions, random-generatability is conjectured not to hold, leaving no known identification advantages in genuinely quantum regimes. In this work, we give the first proofs of quantum identification learning advantages under standard complexity assumptions. We confirm that quantum-hard functions are not random-generatable unless BQP is contained in the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, ruling out cryptographic-style data generation strategies. We then introduce a new approach: we show that verifiable identification - solving the identification task for valid datasets while rejecting invalid ones - is classically hard for quantum labeling functions unless BQP is in the polynomial hierarchy. Finally, we show that, for a broad class of tasks, solving the identification problem implies verifiable identification in the polynomial hierarchy. This yields our main result: a natural class of quantum identification tasks solvable by quantum learners but hard for classical learners unless BQP is in the polynomial hierarchy.

arXiv:2504.15964•Apr 22, 2025•0 citations
One of the key challenges in quantum machine learning is finding relevant machine learning tasks with a provable quantum advantage. A natural candidate for this is learning unknown Hamiltonian dynamics. Here, we tackle the supervised learning version of this problem, where we are given random examples of the inputs to the dynamics as classical data, paired with the expectation values of some observable after the time evolution, as corresponding output labels. The task is to replicate the corresponding input-output function. We prove that this task can yield provable exponential classical-quantum learning advantages under common complexity assumptions in natural settings. To design our quantum learning algorithms, we introduce a new method, which we term \textit{\subroutine}~algorithm for parametrized circuit functions, and which may be of independent interest. Furthermore, we discuss the limitations of generalizing our method to arbitrary quantum dynamics while maintaining provable guarantees. We explain that significant generalizations are impossible under certain complexity-theoretic assumptions, but nonetheless, we provide a heuristic kernel method, where we trade-off provable correctness for broader applicability.
An overarching milestone of quantum machine learning (QML) is to demonstrate the advantage of QML over all possible classical learning methods in accelerating a common type of learning task, as represented by supervised learning from classical data. However, the provable advantages of QML in supervised learning have been known so far only for the learning tasks designed for using the advantage of specific quantum algorithms, i.e., Shor’s algorithms. Here, we explicitly construct an unprecedentedly broader family of supervised learning tasks with classical data to offer the provable advantage of QML based on general quantum computational advantages, progressing beyond Shor’s algorithms. Our learning task is feasibly achievable by executing a general class of functions that can be computed efficiently in polynomial time for a large fraction of inputs by arbitrary quantum algorithms, but not by any classical algorithm. We prove the hardness of achieving this learning task for any possible polynomial-time classical learning method. We also clarify protocols for preparing the classical data to demonstrate this learning task in experiments. These results provide a way to exploit a variety of quantum advantages in computing functions for the realization of provably advantageous QML.
Abstract Quantum computers are believed to bring computational advantages in simulating quantum many-body systems. However, recent works have shown that classical machine learning algorithms are able to predict numerous properties of quantum systems with classical data. Despite examples of learning tasks with provable quantum advantages being proposed, they all involve cryptographic functions and do not represent any physical scenarios encountered in laboratory settings. In this paper, we prove quantum advantages for the physically relevant task of learning quantum observables from classical (measured-out) data. We consider two types of observables: first, we prove a learning advantage for linear combinations of Pauli strings, then we extend our results to a broader case of unitarily parametrized observables. For each case, we delineate sharp boundaries separating physically relevant tasks that admit efficient classical learning from those for which a quantum computer remains necessary for data analysis. Unlike previous works, our classical hardness results rely only on the weaker assumption that BQPBQPBQP B Q P hard processes cannot be simulated by polynomial-size classical circuits, and we also provide a nontrivial quantum learning algorithm. Our results clarify when quantum resources are useful for learning problems in quantum many-body physics, and suggest practical directions in which quantum learning improvements may emerge.
Machine learning is widely regarded as a promising application in which quantum computing could offer a computational advantage. However, general quantum machine learning models with provable guarantees on performance, trainability, and efficient inference remain limited. In this work, we introduce quantum Hamiltonian embeddings, a supervised learning framework in which a classical training dataset is encoded into a single effective, parameterized Hamiltonian. Training optimizes the parameters of this data-dependent Hamiltonian, whose approximate ground state defines the classification rule. Once the ground state has been approximated using a quantum algorithm, inference can be performed either classically using a classical representation of the learned state, or with a quantum representation of the state. We establish efficient methods for gradient estimation and prove favorable generalization guarantees. Furthermore, under standard cryptographic assumptions, we show that Hamiltonian embeddings can realize hypothesis functions beyond the reach of efficient classical algorithms. We then demonstrate the framework at scale on IBM Heron processors using a standard benchmark dataset. Together, these results establish Hamiltonian embeddings as a new framework for quantum machine learning, combining theoretical guarantees with a path for experimental investigations at scale on quantum hardware.
Despite significant effort, the quantum machine learning community has only demonstrated quantum learning advantages for artificial cryptography-inspired datasets when dealing with classical data. In this paper we address the challenge of finding learning problems where quantum learning algorithms can achieve a provable exponential speedup over classical learning algorithms. We reflect on computational learning theory concepts related to this question and discuss how subtle differences in definitions can result in significantly different requirements and tasks for the learner to meet and solve. We examine existing learning problems with provable quantum speedups and find that they largely rely on the classical hardness of evaluating the function that generates the data, rather than identifying it. To address this, we present two new learning separations where the classical difficulty primarily lies in identifying the function generating the data. Furthermore, we explore computational hardness assumptions that can be leveraged to prove quantum speedups in scenarios where data is quantum-generated, which implies likely quantum advantages in a plethora of more natural settings (e.g., in condensed matter and high energy physics). We also discuss the limitations of the classical shadow paradigm in the context of learning separations, and how physically-motivated settings such as characterizing phases of matter and Hamiltonian learning fit in the computational learning framework.
Without large quantum computers to empirically evaluate performance, theoretical frameworks such as the quantum statistical query (QSQ) are a primary tool to study quantum algorithms for learning classical functions and search for quantum advantage in machine learning tasks. However, we only understand quantum advantage in this model at two extremes: either exponential advantages for uniform input distributions or no advantage for arbitrary distributions. Our work helps close the gap between these two regimes by designing an efficient quantum algorithm for learning periodic neurons in the QSQ model over a variety of non-uniform distributions and the first explicit treatment of real-valued functions. We prove that this problem is hard not only for classical gradient-based algorithms, which are the workhorses of machine learning, but also for a more general class of SQ algorithms, establishing an exponential quantum advantage.
The most general examples of quantum learning advantages involve data labeled by cryptographic or intrinsically quantum functions, where classical learners are limited by the infeasibility of evaluating the labeling functions using polynomial-sized classical circuits. While broad in scope, such results reveal little about advantages arising from the learning process itself. In cryptographic settings, further insight is possible via random-generatability - the ability to classically generate labeled data - enabling hardness proofs for identification tasks, where the goal is to identify the labeling function from a dataset, even when evaluation is classically intractable. These tasks are particularly relevant in quantum contexts, including Hamiltonian learning and identifying physically meaningful order parameters. However, for quantum functions, random-generatability is conjectured not to hold, leaving no known identification advantages in genuinely quantum regimes. In this work, we give the first proofs of quantum identification learning advantages under standard complexity assumptions. We confirm that quantum-hard functions are not random-generatable unless BQP is contained in the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, ruling out cryptographic-style data generation strategies. We then introduce a new approach: we show that verifiable identification - solving the identification task for valid datasets while rejecting invalid ones - is classically hard for quantum labeling functions unless BQP is in the polynomial hierarchy. Finally, we show that, for a broad class of tasks, solving the identification problem implies verifiable identification in the polynomial hierarchy. This yields our main result: a natural class of quantum identification tasks solvable by quantum learners but hard for classical learners unless BQP is in the polynomial hierarchy.