Quantum versus classical separation plays a central role in understanding the advantages of quantum computation. In this paper, we present the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized communication complexity in a variant of the Number-on-Forehead (NOF) model. Namely, the three-player Simultaneous Number-on-Forehead model. Specifically, we introduce the Gadgeted Hidden Matching Problem and show that it can be solved using only $O(\log n)$ simultaneous quantum communication. In contrast, any simultaneous randomized protocol requires $Ω(n^{1/16})$ communication. On the technical side, a key obstacle in separating quantum and classical communication in NOF models is that all known randomized NOF lower bound tools, such as the discrepancy method, typically apply to both randomized and quantum protocols. In this regard, our technique provides a new method for proving randomized lower bounds in the NOF setting and may be of independent interest beyond the separation result.
Quantum versus classical separation plays a central role in understanding the advantages of quantum computation. In this paper, we present the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized communication complexity in a variant of the Number-on-Forehead (NOF) model. Namely, the three-player Simultaneous Number-on-Forehead model. Specifically, we introduce the Gadgeted Hidden Matching Problem and show that it can be solved using only O(logn) simultaneous quantum communication. In contrast, any simultaneous randomized protocol requires Ω(n1/16) communication. On the technical side, a key obstacle in separating quantum and classical communication in NOF models is that all known randomized NOF lower bound tools, such as the discrepancy method, typically apply to both randomized and quantum protocols. In this regard, our technique provides a new method for proving randomized lower bounds in the NOF setting and may be of independent interest beyond the separation result.
Numbers-on-Forehead (NOF) communication model is a central model in communication complexity. As a restricted variant, one-way NOF model is of particular interest. Establishing strong one-way NOF lower bounds would imply circuit lower bounds, resolve well-known problems in additive combinatorics, and yield wide-ranging applications in areas such as cryptography and distributed computing. However, proving strong lower bounds in one-way NOF communication remains highly challenging; many fundamental questions in one-way NOF communication remain wide open. One of the fundamental questions, proposed by Gavinsky and Pudlák (CCC 2008), is to establish an explicit exponential separation between quantum and classical one-way NOF communication.
In this paper, we resolve this open problem by establishing the first exponential separation between quantum and randomized communication complexity in one-way NOF model. Specifically, we define a lifted variant of the Hidden Matching problem of Bar-Yossef, Jayram, and Kerenidis (STOC 2004) and show that it admits an (O(logn))-cost quantum protocol in the one-way NOF setting. By contrast, we prove that any k-party one-way randomized protocol for this problem requires communication Ω(2k/3n1/3). Notably, our separation applies even to a generalization of k-player one-way communication, where the first player speaks once, and all other k−1 players can communicate freely.
We give the first exponential quantum advantage in the general interactive three-party Numbers-on-Forehead (NOF) model for a decision problem. Previous separations hold only for restricted protocols like one-way communication for a relation. We construct an explicit partial Boolean function, the Interleaved Unitary Product problem, that requires only O(logn) NOF quantum communication but Ω(n1/32) randomized communication. This function builds on the two-party unitary product problem of Arunachalam, Girish, and Lifshitz (TQC 2024).
The main technical obstacle is that discrepancy, the standard lower-bound method for NOF, also lower-bounds quantum communication. We instead develop a regularity-based argument for randomized NOF lower bounds, building on the approach of Kelley, Lovett, and Meka and adapting the regularity decomposition of Abboud, Fischer, Kelley, Lovett, and Meka (STOC 2024) to cylinder intersections. Combined with matrix-product estimates of Arunachalam, Girish, and Lifshitz, this yields our randomized lower bound.
We study the relative power of public randomness and quantum communication in the multiparty Simultaneous Message Passing (SMP) model. By analyzing a total Boolean function and a relational problem, we establish polynomial and exponential separations between classical public-coin protocols and quantum protocols without shared randomness or prior entanglement.
We first introduce XOR Equality, a total Boolean function in which each of k players receives an unrestricted string xj∈{0,1}n, and the referee must decide whether x1⊕⋯⊕xk=0n. For k≥8 and worst-case error at most 1/3, we prove quantum lower bounds of Ω(min{n,k2}) on total communication and Ω(min{n/k,k}) on maximum message length. A classical public-coin protocol uses two bits per player with error at most 1/4. For n=k2 and worst-case error at most 1/3, we prove that quantum protocols require maximum message length Ω(n) qubits, whereas two public-coin bits per player suffice.
We then turn to relations, for which we obtain exponential separations. Specifically, we study Multiparty Index Coordination, a k-player generalization of the two-player relation studied by Gavinsky, Kempe, Regev, and de Wolf (STOC 2006). We prove an unambiguous quantum lower bound of Ω(n1−1/k) on maximum message length, matched by a classical private-coin protocol. For any fixed error ε∈(0,1/8), we also prove a bounded-error quantum lower bound of Ω(n(k−1)/(k+1)) while we show that public-coin protocols solve the relation unambiguously with maximum message length O(logn), giving exponential separations in both regimes. The implicit constants are independent of k, and both quantum lower bounds become linear when k≥clogn for any fixed c>0.
We consider lifting theorems that transfer lower bounds for two-party communication problems to multiparty communication problems. In particular, following the deterministic Number-on-Forehead (NOF) lifting framework of Yang and Zhang, we study randomized and quantum one-way NOF lifting for composed problems F(z,𝐱) = f(z,G(𝐱)). We work in a one-way NOF model in which only the last player’s view is restricted. The other players have their usual NOF views and communicate as usual, but the last player sees only the gadget output G(𝐱), not the gadget input 𝐱. This kind of restricted-view has appeared in the NOF literature under the name conservative model. Our main contribution is a pair of lifting theorems for this model. In the randomized setting, we show that lifting follows when each preimage G^{-1}(v), the set of gadget inputs with output v, looks pseudorandom to large cylinder intersections. In the quantum setting, we prove an analogous theorem. Equivalently, conservative protocols for F(z,𝐱) = f(z,G(𝐱)) can be converted into two-party one-way protocols for f(z,v) with comparable cost, and the error loss controlled by the corresponding pseudorandomness parameters. Thus, this restriction isolates a setting in which both randomized and quantum one-way NOF lifting can be proved by a direct simulation argument. We prove the required pseudorandomness properties for the generalized inner product gadget over finite fields, using the multiparty character-sum bounds of Yang and Zhang, and for random gadgets, which give non-explicit lifting. As applications, Boolean Hidden Matching yields a randomized-versus-quantum separation in the conservative NOF model, and lifting INDEX gives randomized and quantum conservative NOF lower bounds for O(log n) players.
We study a new type of separations between quantum and classical communication complexity, separations that are obtained using quantum protocols where all parties are efficient , in the sense that they can be implemented by small quantum circuits, with oracle access to their inputs. Our main result qualitatively matches the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity Gavinsky (2016) and is obtained using a quantum protocol where all parties are efficient. More precisely, we give an explicit partial Boolean function f over inputs of length N , such that: f can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog( N ) (where at the beginning of the protocol Alice and Bob also have polylog( N ) entangled EPR pairs). Any classical randomized protocol for f , with any number of rounds, has communication complexity at least Ω~(N1/4) . All parties in the quantum protocol of Item (1) (Alice, Bob and the referee) can be implemented by quantum circuits of size polylog( N ) (where Alice and Bob have oracle access to their inputs). Items (1), (2) qualitatively match the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity, proved by Gavinsky (2016). Item (3) is new. (Our result is incomparable to the one of Gavinsky. While he obtained a quantitatively better lower bound of Ω(N1/2) in the classical case, the referee in his quantum protocol is inefficient). Exponential separations of quantum and classical communication complexity have been studied in numerous previous works, but to the best of our knowledge the efficiency of the parties in the quantum protocol has not been addressed, and in most previous separations the quantum parties seem to be inefficient. The only separations that we know of that have efficient quantum parties are the recent separations that are based on lifting Göös et al. (2017), Chattopadhyay et al. (2019a). However, these separations seem to require quantum protocols with at least two rounds of communication, so they imply a separation of two-way quantum and classical communication complexity, but they do not give the stronger separations of simultaneous-message quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity (or even one-way quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity). Our proof technique is completely new, in the context of communication complexity, and is based on techniques from Raz & Tal (2019). Our function f is based on a lift of the forrelation problem, using xor as a gadget.
We study one-way quantum communication lower bounds for search problems. Unlike decision problems, search problems can have many valid outputs, which pose a fundamental barrier to standard quantum lower-bound techniques. We overcome this by developing a novel method based on matrix discrepancy, which allows us to bound the output measurements of a quantum protocol jointly.
As applications of our method, we establish the first tight quantum lower bounds for two fundamental search problems in some natural parameter regimes: collision finding and triangle finding. For collision finding, we prove a tight Ω(N1/4) one-way quantum communication lower bound. Previously, the best-known quantum communication lower bound for collision finding was Ω(N1/12) due to Göös and Jain (RANDOM 2022), and no stronger bound was known even under the one-way restriction. For triangle finding in graph streams, we prove a one-pass quantum streaming space lower bound of Ω(ΔV) for graphs with m edges, Θ(m) triangles, and constant ΔE, where ΔV and ΔE denote the maximum number of triangles sharing a common vertex and edge, respectively, under the condition that 1≤ΔV≤m2/3. This constitutes the first nontrivial quantum space lower bound in this regime, matching the classical upper bound of Jayaram and Kallaugher (RANDOM 2021) up to logarithmic factors. Notably, our method also recovers the classical lower bound of Kallaugher and Price (SODA 2017) through an entirely different argument, avoiding their Boolean-Hidden-Matching reduction that breaks down for quantum protocols.