In the quest for quantum advantage, a central question is under what conditions can classical algorithms achieve a performance comparable to quantum algorithms--a concept known as dequantization. Random Fourier features (RFFs) have demonstrated potential for dequantizing certain quantum neural networks (QNNs) applied to regression tasks, but their applicability to other learning problems and architectures remained unexplored. In this work, we derive bounds on the true risk gap between classical RFF models and quantum models for regression and classification tasks with both QNN and quantum kernel architectures. Furthermore, we provide sufficient conditions under which this gap is small and thus the quantum system can be dequantized via the RFF method. We support our findings with numerical experiments that illustrate the practical dequantization of existing quantum kernel-based methods. Our findings not only broaden the applicability of RFF-dequantization but also enhance the understanding of potential quantum advantages in practical machine-learning tasks.
In the quest for quantum advantage, a central question is under what conditions can classical algorithms achieve a performance comparable to quantum algorithms--a concept known as dequantization. Random Fourier features (RFFs) have demonstrated potential for dequantizing certain quantum neural networks (QNNs) applied to regression tasks, but their applicability to other learning problems and architectures remained unexplored. In this work, we derive bounds on the true risk gap between classical RFF models and quantum models for regression and classification tasks with both QNN and quantum kernel architectures. Furthermore, we provide sufficient conditions under which this gap is small and thus the quantum system can be dequantized via the RFF method. We support our findings with numerical experiments that illustrate the practical dequantization of existing quantum kernel-based methods. Our findings not only broaden the applicability of RFF-dequantization but also enhance the understanding of potential quantum advantages in practical machine-learning tasks.
There is currently a huge effort to understand the potential and limitations of variational quantum machine learning (QML) based on the optimization of parameterized quantum circuits. Recent proposals toward dequantizing variational QML models for regression problems include approaches based on kernel methods with carefully chosen kernel functions, approximated via Random Fourier Features (RFF). In this short note we show that for a wide range of instances, this approach can be simplified. More specifically, we show that the kernels whose evaluation is approximated by RFF in this dequantization algorithm can in fact often be evaluated exactly and efficiently classically. As such, our results enhance the toolkit for kernel-based dequantization of variational QML.
Quantum-inspired classical algorithms have dequantized several quantum machine learning routines by replacing quantum linear-algebra subroutines with classical counterparts. However, the sampler based on quantum singular value transformation (QSVT) for learning with optimized random features is not covered by existing dequantization frameworks, because the matrix to be inverted is not itself available through sampling access. In this work, we develop a classical algorithm to address this type of quantum-advantage candidate. Our method samples heavy indices, reduces the transformation to a small principal block, and outputs a sparse classical representation with operator-norm guarantees. Applying this method dequantizes the sampler for optimized random features, giving a classical sampler with prescribed accuracy and polynomially related runtime. These results show that the factorization underlying a quantum block encoding can itself provide sufficient classical structure even when sampling-and-query access to the composite matrix is unavailable.
For quantum machine learning, the exact boundary between classical and quantum advantage is still poorly understood. Direct comparison between quantum neural networks (QNNs) and existing classical models, which encompass fundamentally different function classes, often fails to provide broader insight into the difference between the two. Inspired by the techniques of Neural Quantum States and Random Fourier Features, this work introduces Neural Fourier Surrogates (NFS), a stochastic classical neural network architecture for efficiently learning coefficients over the same finite Fourier series support as quantum neural networks. Testing on a selection of tabular benchmark datasets, we find that NFS is an effective classifier architecture broadly competitive with established classical baselines, including a comparable Random Fourier Features model, and possessing comparable performance to data-reuploading QNNs; combined with additional analysis comparing the learned Fourier spectra of QNNs and NFS on synthetic data, these results establish NFS as a natural classical baseline for evaluating QNN performance.
Quantum machine learning is arguably one of the most explored applications of near-term quantum devices. Much focus has been put on notions of variational quantum machine learning where parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) are used as learning models. These PQC models have a rich structure which suggests that they might be amenable to efficient dequantization via random Fourier features (RFF). In this work, we establish necessary and sufficient conditions under which RFF does indeed provide an efficient dequantization of variational quantum machine learning for regression. We build on these insights to make concrete suggestions for PQC architecture design, and to identify structures which are necessary for a regression problem to admit a potential quantum advantage via PQC based optimization.
Quantum kernel methods (QKMs) have emerged as a prominent framework for supervised quantum machine learning. Unlike variational quantum algorithms, which rely on gradient-based optimisation and may suffer from issues such as barren plateaus, non-variational QKMs employ fixed quantum feature maps, with model selection performed classically via convex optimisation and cross-validation. This separation of quantum feature embedding from classical training ensures stable optimisation while leveraging quantum circuits to encode data in high-dimensional Hilbert spaces. In this review, we provide a thorough analysis of non-variational supervised QKMs, covering their foundations in classical kernel theory, constructions of fidelity and projected quantum kernels, and methods for their estimation in practice. We examine frameworks for assessing quantum advantage, including generalisation bounds and necessary conditions for separation from classical models, and analyse key challenges such as exponential concentration, dequantisation via tensor-network methods, and the spectral properties of kernel integral operators. We further discuss structured problem classes that may enable advantage, and synthesise insights from comparative and hardware studies. Overall, this review aims to clarify the regimes in which QKMs may offer genuine advantages, and to delineate the conceptual, methodological, and technical obstacles that must be overcome for practical quantum-enhanced learning.
In recent years, the utility of parameterized quantum circuits as function approximators has been widely studied. In the context of reinforcement learning, this approach has led to variational quantum algorithms such as quantum Q-learning. While these methods show promising empirical results, and can provide provable advantages for artificial problems, it remains unclear whether they can provide a provable quantum advantage over classical approaches for problems of practical relevance. A natural way to investigate this question is through the lens of dequantization: The construction of efficient classical algorithms capable of matching the performance of quantum variational methods. Building on recent kernel-based dequantization results for supervised learning, we take steps towards extending this surrogate-based dequantization program to reinforcement learning. Specifically, we study the simplified setting of reinforcement learning with a uniform generative model in which uniformly random state-action samples are available, which models the regime of sampling from a large experience replay buffer after sufficient exploration. Within this setting, we provide finite sample guarantees for classical kernelized Fitted Q-Iteration, with classical kernels designed to match the inductive bias of particular parameterized quantum circuits. Using these results, we then provide a set of sufficient conditions, on the data-encoding strategy of a parameterized quantum circuit, the corresponding classical kernel, and the problem structure, under which kernelized Fitted Q-Iteration provides a meaningful dequantization of quantum Q-learning, in this simplified setting. Apart from providing rigorous dequantization guarantees when these conditions are met, these results also motivate the use of kernelized fitted Q-iteration as a dequantization heuristic when these sufficient conditions cannot be verified.