Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2504.15367

Branch-and-bound digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization

Anton Simen, Sebastián V. Romero, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, E. Solano, Narendra N. Hegade

Published Apr 21, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Branch-and-bound algorithms effectively solve combinatorial optimization problems, relying on the relaxation of the objective function to obtain tight lower bounds. While this is straightforward for convex objective functions, higher-order formulations pose challenges due to their inherent non-convexity. In this work, we propose branch-and-bound digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BB-DCQO), a quantum algorithm that addresses the relaxation difficulties in higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) problems. By employing bias fields as approximate solutions to the relaxed problem, we iteratively enhance the quality of the results compared to the bare bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm. We refer to this enhanced method as BBB-DCQO. In order to benchmark it against simulated annealing (SA), we apply it on sparse HUBO instances with up to $156$ qubits using tensor network simulations. To explore regimes that are less tractable for classical simulations, we experimentally apply BBB-DCQO to denser problems using up to 100 qubits on IBM quantum hardware. We compare our results with SA and a greedy-tuned quantum annealing baseline. In both simulations and experiments, BBB-DCQO consistently achieved higher-quality solutions with significantly reduced computational overhead, showcasing the effectiveness of integrating counterdiabatic quantum methods into branch-and-bound to address hard non-convex optimization tasks.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2504.15367

Related papers

Bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum algorithm for higher-order binary optimization

Sebastián V. Romero, Anne-Maria Visuri, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid +3 more

Abstract Combinatorial optimization plays a crucial role in many industrial applications. While classical computing often struggles with complex instances, quantum optimization emerges as a promising alternative. Here, we present an enhanced bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm to address higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO). We apply BF-DCQO to a HUBO problem featuring three-local terms in the Ising spin-glass model, validated experimentally using 156 qubits on an IBM quantum processor. In the studied instances, our results outperform standard methods such as the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, quantum annealing, simulated annealing, and Tabu search. Furthermore, we provide numerical evidence of the feasibility of a similar HUBO problem on a 433-qubit Osprey-like quantum processor. Finally, we solve denser instances of the MAX 3-SAT problem in an IonQ emulator. Our results show that BF-DCQO offers an effective path for solving large-scale HUBO problems on current and near-term quantum processors.

arXiv:2409.04477•Communications Physics•Aug 23, 2025•18 citations

Bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization

Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, Archismita Dalal, Anton Simen +2 more

We introduce a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems on digital quantum computers, where we incorporate auxiliary counterdiabatic (CD) terms into the adiabatic Hamiltonian, while integrating bias terms derived from an iterative digitized counterdiabatic quantum algorithm. We call this protocol bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO). Designed to effectively tackle large-scale combinatorial optimization problems, BF-DCQO demonstrates resilience against the limitations posed by the restricted coherence times of current quantum processors and shows clear enhancement even in the presence of noise. Additionally, our purely quantum approach eliminates the dependency on classical optimization required in hybrid classical-quantum schemes, thereby circumventing the trainability issues often associated with variational quantum algorithms. Through the analysis of an all-to-all connected general Ising spin-glass problem, we exhibit a polynomial scaling enhancement in ground-state success probability compared to traditional DCQO and finite-time adiabatic quantum optimization methods. Furthermore, it achieves scaling improvements in ground-state success probabilities, increasing by up to two orders of magnitude, and offers an average 1.3 × better approximation ratio than the quantum approximate optimization algorithm for the problem sizes studied. We validate these findings through experimental implementations on both trapped-ion quantum computers and superconducting processors, tackling a maximum weighted independent set problem with 36 qubits and a spin glass on a heavy-hexagonal lattice with 100 qubits, respectively. These results mark a significant advancement in gate-based quantum computing, employing a fully quantum algorithmic approach.

arXiv:2405.13898•Physical Review Research•Apr 9, 2025•10 citations

Protein folding with an all-to-all trapped-ion quantum computer

Sebastián V. Romero, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, Pavle Nikačević +8 more

We experimentally demonstrate that the bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm, implemented on IonQ's fully connected trapped-ion quantum processors, offers an efficient approach to solving dense higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) problems. Specifically, we tackle protein folding on a tetrahedral lattice for up to 12 amino acids, representing the largest quantum hardware implementations of protein folding problems reported to date. Additionally, we address MAX 4-SAT instances at the computational phase transition and fully connected spin-glass problems using all 36 available qubits. Across all considered cases, our method consistently achieves optimal solutions, highlighting the powerful synergy between non-variational quantum optimization approaches and the intrinsic all-to-all connectivity of trapped-ion architectures. Given the expected scalability of trapped-ion quantum systems, BF-DCQO represents a promising pathway toward practical quantum advantage for dense HUBO problems with significant industrial and scientific relevance.

arXiv:2506.07866•Jun 9, 2025•1 citation

Comparing Quantum Annealing and BF-DCQO

Pau Farré, Erika Ordog, Kevin T. Chern +1 more

Recent work [1] has claimed that a gate-model quantum-classical hybrid algorithm called bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) [2] outperforms D-Wave's annealing quantum computers in optimization tasks. We find the opposite to be true, and demonstrate that D-Wave's quantum annealers find solutions of far greater quality than claimed in Ref. [1], while using far less computation time. We also present evidence that suggests the quantum component of the hybrid approach makes minimal contributions to solution quality.

arXiv:2509.14358•Sep 17, 2025•0 citations

Quantum optimization beyond QUBO for industrial logistics and scheduling

Juan F. R. Hernandez, Pavle Nikacevic, Enrique Solano +4 more

The increasing complexity of industrial scheduling and transport routing problems motivates the study of alternative optimization formulations and computational paradigms. In this work, we study how higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) formulations of such problems map onto quantum optimization workflows in both noisy and fault-tolerant regimes. We consider three representative logistics and manufacturing use cases and formulate each as a HUBO problem. This captures process intricacies, such as highly correlated assembly-line scheduling rules, which are difficult to express faithfully with the standard quadratic (QUBO) form, while at the same time reducing the number of binary variables required in the quantum mapping, thus lowering qubit demand. We compare the HUBO formulations with corresponding QUBO encodings, highlighting a key trade-off: while HUBO reduces qubit requirements through compact binary encoding, it introduces higher-order interaction terms that increase circuit depth, limiting feasibility on current quantum hardware. The proposed formulations are validated using classical solvers across several problem instances and benchmark small routing problem instances using bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization in classical simulation. We complement these results with a resource and scalability analysis, focusing on the capacitated vehicle routing problem as a representative large-scale industrial use case. Our analysis indicates that while HUBO formulations offer advantages in qubit scaling compared to QUBO encodings, their practical implementation is constrained by gate fidelity, coherence, and circuit depth, making hybrid quantum-classical workflows and early fault-tolerant quantum hardware the most plausible settings for their practical use.

quant-pharXiv:2605.30252•May 29, 2026•0 citations

Digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization for bin packing problem

Ruoqian Xu, Sebastián V. Romero, Jialiang Tang +2 more

Abstract The bin packing problem (BPP), a classical NP-hard combinatorial optimization challenge, has emerged as a promising application for quantum computing. In this work, we tackle the one-dimensional BPP (1dBPP) using a digitized counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DC-QAOA) that incorporates counterdiabatic (CD) driving to achieve a 40% higher feasibility ratio than standard QAOA, while reducing quantum resource requirements. We investigate three ansatz schemes -DC-QAOA, CD-inspired ansatz, and CD-mixer ansatz - each integrating CD terms with distinct combinations of cost and mixer Hamiltonians, resulting in different DC-QAOA variants. Numerical simulations demonstrate that these DC-QAOA variants maintain solution accuracy with less than 5% variance across varying iteration numbers, circuit depths, and Hamiltonian step sizes. Moreover, they require approximately 7 to 8 times fewer measurements to achieve comparable precision under the same parameter variations. Experimental validation on a 10-item 1dBPP instance using IBM quantum computers shows the CD-mixer ansatz achieves five times more feasibility solutions and greater robustness against NISQ noise. Collectively, these results establish DC-QAOA as a resource-efficient framework for combinatorial optimization on near-term quantum devices.

arXiv:2502.15375•EPJ Quantum Technology•Aug 11, 2025•1 citation
Branch-and-bound algorithms effectively solve combinatorial optimization problems, relying on the relaxation of the objective function to obtain tight lower bounds. While this is straightforward for convex objective functions, higher-order formulations pose challenges due to their inherent non-convexity. In this work, we propose branch-and-bound digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BB-DCQO), a quantum algorithm that addresses the relaxation difficulties in higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) problems. By employing bias fields as approximate solutions to the relaxed problem, we iteratively enhance the quality of the results compared to the bare bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm. We refer to this enhanced method as BBB-DCQO. In order to benchmark it against simulated annealing (SA), we apply it on sparse HUBO instances with up to 156156156 qubits using tensor network simulations. To explore regimes that are less tractable for classical simulations, we experimentally apply BBB-DCQO to denser problems using up to 100 qubits on IBM quantum hardware. We compare our results with SA and a greedy-tuned quantum annealing baseline. In both simulations and experiments, BBB-DCQO consistently achieved higher-quality solutions with significantly reduced computational overhead, showcasing the effectiveness of integrating counterdiabatic quantum methods into branch-and-bound to address hard non-convex optimization tasks.
Abstract Combinatorial optimization plays a crucial role in many industrial applications. While classical computing often struggles with complex instances, quantum optimization emerges as a promising alternative. Here, we present an enhanced bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm to address higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO). We apply BF-DCQO to a HUBO problem featuring three-local terms in the Ising spin-glass model, validated experimentally using 156 qubits on an IBM quantum processor. In the studied instances, our results outperform standard methods such as the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, quantum annealing, simulated annealing, and Tabu search. Furthermore, we provide numerical evidence of the feasibility of a similar HUBO problem on a 433-qubit Osprey-like quantum processor. Finally, we solve denser instances of the MAX 3-SAT problem in an IonQ emulator. Our results show that BF-DCQO offers an effective path for solving large-scale HUBO problems on current and near-term quantum processors.
We introduce a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems on digital quantum computers, where we incorporate auxiliary counterdiabatic (CD) terms into the adiabatic Hamiltonian, while integrating bias terms derived from an iterative digitized counterdiabatic quantum algorithm. We call this protocol bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO). Designed to effectively tackle large-scale combinatorial optimization problems, BF-DCQO demonstrates resilience against the limitations posed by the restricted coherence times of current quantum processors and shows clear enhancement even in the presence of noise. Additionally, our purely quantum approach eliminates the dependency on classical optimization required in hybrid classical-quantum schemes, thereby circumventing the trainability issues often associated with variational quantum algorithms. Through the analysis of an all-to-all connected general Ising spin-glass problem, we exhibit a polynomial scaling enhancement in ground-state success probability compared to traditional DCQO and finite-time adiabatic quantum optimization methods. Furthermore, it achieves scaling improvements in ground-state success probabilities, increasing by up to two orders of magnitude, and offers an average 1.3 × better approximation ratio than the quantum approximate optimization algorithm for the problem sizes studied. We validate these findings through experimental implementations on both trapped-ion quantum computers and superconducting processors, tackling a maximum weighted independent set problem with 36 qubits and a spin glass on a heavy-hexagonal lattice with 100 qubits, respectively. These results mark a significant advancement in gate-based quantum computing, employing a fully quantum algorithmic approach.
We experimentally demonstrate that the bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm, implemented on IonQ's fully connected trapped-ion quantum processors, offers an efficient approach to solving dense higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) problems. Specifically, we tackle protein folding on a tetrahedral lattice for up to 12 amino acids, representing the largest quantum hardware implementations of protein folding problems reported to date. Additionally, we address MAX 4-SAT instances at the computational phase transition and fully connected spin-glass problems using all 36 available qubits. Across all considered cases, our method consistently achieves optimal solutions, highlighting the powerful synergy between non-variational quantum optimization approaches and the intrinsic all-to-all connectivity of trapped-ion architectures. Given the expected scalability of trapped-ion quantum systems, BF-DCQO represents a promising pathway toward practical quantum advantage for dense HUBO problems with significant industrial and scientific relevance.
Recent work [1] has claimed that a gate-model quantum-classical hybrid algorithm called bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) [2] outperforms D-Wave's annealing quantum computers in optimization tasks. We find the opposite to be true, and demonstrate that D-Wave's quantum annealers find solutions of far greater quality than claimed in Ref. [1], while using far less computation time. We also present evidence that suggests the quantum component of the hybrid approach makes minimal contributions to solution quality.
The increasing complexity of industrial scheduling and transport routing problems motivates the study of alternative optimization formulations and computational paradigms. In this work, we study how higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) formulations of such problems map onto quantum optimization workflows in both noisy and fault-tolerant regimes. We consider three representative logistics and manufacturing use cases and formulate each as a HUBO problem. This captures process intricacies, such as highly correlated assembly-line scheduling rules, which are difficult to express faithfully with the standard quadratic (QUBO) form, while at the same time reducing the number of binary variables required in the quantum mapping, thus lowering qubit demand. We compare the HUBO formulations with corresponding QUBO encodings, highlighting a key trade-off: while HUBO reduces qubit requirements through compact binary encoding, it introduces higher-order interaction terms that increase circuit depth, limiting feasibility on current quantum hardware. The proposed formulations are validated using classical solvers across several problem instances and benchmark small routing problem instances using bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization in classical simulation. We complement these results with a resource and scalability analysis, focusing on the capacitated vehicle routing problem as a representative large-scale industrial use case. Our analysis indicates that while HUBO formulations offer advantages in qubit scaling compared to QUBO encodings, their practical implementation is constrained by gate fidelity, coherence, and circuit depth, making hybrid quantum-classical workflows and early fault-tolerant quantum hardware the most plausible settings for their practical use.
Abstract The bin packing problem (BPP), a classical NP-hard combinatorial optimization challenge, has emerged as a promising application for quantum computing. In this work, we tackle the one-dimensional BPP (1dBPP) using a digitized counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DC-QAOA) that incorporates counterdiabatic (CD) driving to achieve a 40% higher feasibility ratio than standard QAOA, while reducing quantum resource requirements. We investigate three ansatz schemes -DC-QAOA, CD-inspired ansatz, and CD-mixer ansatz - each integrating CD terms with distinct combinations of cost and mixer Hamiltonians, resulting in different DC-QAOA variants. Numerical simulations demonstrate that these DC-QAOA variants maintain solution accuracy with less than 5% variance across varying iteration numbers, circuit depths, and Hamiltonian step sizes. Moreover, they require approximately 7 to 8 times fewer measurements to achieve comparable precision under the same parameter variations. Experimental validation on a 10-item 1dBPP instance using IBM quantum computers shows the CD-mixer ansatz achieves five times more feasibility solutions and greater robustness against NISQ noise. Collectively, these results establish DC-QAOA as a resource-efficient framework for combinatorial optimization on near-term quantum devices.