Abstract Quantum channel discrimination has been studied from an information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of unknown channel accesses. In this paper, we study the query complexity of quantum channel discrimination, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of channel uses needed to reach a desired error probability. To this end, we show that the query complexity of binary channel discrimination depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Holevo) channel fidelity. As special cases of these findings, we precisely characterize the query complexity of discriminating two classical channels and two classical–quantum channels. Furthermore, by obtaining an optimal characterization of the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing when the error probability does not exceed a fixed threshold, we provide a more precise characterization of query complexity under a similar error probability threshold constraint. We also provide lower and upper bounds on the query complexity of binary asymmetric channel discrimination and multiple quantum channel discrimination. For the former, the query complexity depends on the geometric Rényi and Petz–Rényi channel divergences, while for the latter, it depends on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Uhlmann) channel fidelity. For multiple channel discrimination, the upper bound scales as the logarithm of the number of channels.
Abstract Quantum channel discrimination has been studied from an information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of unknown channel accesses. In this paper, we study the query complexity of quantum channel discrimination, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of channel uses needed to reach a desired error probability. To this end, we show that the query complexity of binary channel discrimination depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Holevo) channel fidelity. As special cases of these findings, we precisely characterize the query complexity of discriminating two classical channels and two classical–quantum channels. Furthermore, by obtaining an optimal characterization of the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing when the error probability does not exceed a fixed threshold, we provide a more precise characterization of query complexity under a similar error probability threshold constraint. We also provide lower and upper bounds on the query complexity of binary asymmetric channel discrimination and multiple quantum channel discrimination. For the former, the query complexity depends on the geometric Rényi and Petz–Rényi channel divergences, while for the latter, it depends on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Uhlmann) channel fidelity. For multiple channel discrimination, the upper bound scales as the logarithm of the number of channels.
The goal of quantum channel discrimination and estimation is to determine the identity of an unknown channel from a discrete or continuous set, respectively. The query complexity of these tasks is equal to the minimum number of times one must call an unknown channel to identify it within a desired threshold on the error probability. In this paper, we establish lower bounds on the query complexities of channel discrimination and estimation, in both the parallel and adaptive access models. We do so by establishing new or applying known upper bounds on the squared Bures distance and symmetric logarithmic derivative Fisher information of channels. Phrasing our statements and proofs in terms of isometric extensions of quantum channels allows us to give conceptually simple proofs for both novel and known bounds. We also provide alternative proofs for several established results in an effort to present a consistent and unified framework for quantum channel discrimination and estimation, which we believe will be helpful in addressing future questions in the field.
Abstract In this paper, we study the problem of sampling complexity for channel discrimination with respect to two different strategies: product strategy and adaptive strategy. We first formally introduce the definitions of the sampling complexity of the channels under the framework of hypothesis testing , wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. We then establish the lower and upper bounds on the sampling complexity of the symmetric, asymmetric, and error exponent hypothesis testing settings. We show that, by imposing product strategy on testing, the bounds are always characterized by the generalized channel divergence, while with adaptive strategy, the bounds are characterized by the amortized channel divergence. Finally, we analyze two concrete examples, and obtain that the adaptive strategy can not lead to an advantage to the problem of determining the sampling complexity for classical-quantum channels, which can bring advantages for generalized amplitude damping channels.
The goal of quantum channel discrimination and estimation is to determine the identity of an unknown channel from a discrete or continuous set, respectively. The query complexity of these tasks is equal to the minimum number of times one must call an unknown channel to identify it within a desired threshold on the error probability. In this paper, we establish lower bounds on the query complexities of channel discrimination and estimation, in both the parallel and adaptive access models. We do so by establishing new or applying known upper bounds on the squared Bures distance and symmetric logarithmic derivative Fisher information of channels. Phrasing our statements and proofs in terms of isometric extensions of quantum channels allows us to give conceptually simple proofs for both novel and known bounds. We also provide alternative proofs for several established results in an effort to present a consistent and unified framework for quantum channel discrimination and estimation, which we believe will be helpful in addressing future questions in the field. Joint work with Zixin Huang, Johannes Jakob Meyer, and Theshani Nuradha.
We study the query complexity of testing quantum juntas. Given an unknown n-qubit unitary or quantum channel, the goal is to decide whether it acts nontrivially on at most k qubits or is ε-far from every such operation. For unitaries, we consider the forward-only model, where the tester has access to U, but not to U† or controlled-U. We give tight bounds for both unitary and channel junta testing. For sufficiently large k, n≥2k, and a broad range of ε, both problems have query complexity Θ(k/(ε2logk)). Our upper bounds are achieved by simple nonadaptive testers using product inputs and single-qubit measurements. For junta channels, this closes the gap by Bao and Yao (COLT 23, TPAMI 2025) between an O(k) upper bound and a Ω(k) lower bound at constant ε, establishing the optimal Θ(k/logk) query complexity. At the heart of both bounds is a strong connection between quantum junta testing and classical support-size testing. For the upper bounds, we reduce quantum junta testing to a generalized support-size problem for distributions over random subsets, and develop a new tester with improved sample complexity. For the lower bounds, we proceed in the reverse direction, reducing classical support-size testing to quantum junta testing through a phase-masked hard ensemble and showing that forward quantum queries can be exactly classicalized on average. Together, these reductions identify support-size testing as the classical core of quantum junta testing and yield matching lower bounds. At constant ε, they also give a separation between Θ(k/logk) forward queries and O(k) queries with inverse access.
We study the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. We characterize the sample complexity of binary quantum hypothesis testing in the symmetric and asymmetric settings, and we provide bounds on the sample complexity of multiple quantum hypothesis testing. The final part of our paper outlines and reviews how sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing is relevant to a broad swathe of research areas and can enhance understanding of many fundamental concepts, including quantum algorithms for simulation and search, quantum learning and classification, and foundations of quantum mechanics. As such, we view our paper as an invitation to researchers coming from different communities to study and contribute to the problem of sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing, and we outline a number of open directions for future research.
This lecture notes gives a basic survey of the theory of hypothesis testing of quantum states in finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. Optimal measurement strategy for testing binary quantum hypotheses, which result in minimum error probability, is discussed. Collective and individual adaptive measurement strategies in testing hypotheses in the multiple copy scenario, with various upper and lower bounds on error probability, are outlined. A brief account on quantum channel discrimination and the role of entangled states in achieving enhanced precision in the task of channel discrimination is given.