Abstract Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are promising to demonstrate the advantage of quantum computing over classical computing in practical applications, such as the maximum cut (MaxCut) problem. However, current VQAs such as the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) have lower performance guarantees compared to the best-known classical algorithm, and suffer from hard optimization processes due to the barren plateau (BP) problem. We propose a light-cone VQA by choosing an optimal gate sequence of the standard VQAs, which enables a significant improvement in solution accuracy while avoiding the BP problem. Specifically, we prove that the light-cone VQA with one round achieves an approximation ratio of 0.7926 for the MaxCut problem in the worst case of 3 -regular graphs, which is higher than that of the 3-round QAOA, and can be further improved to 0.8333 by a multi-angle relaxation. We conduct systematic experiments to verify our theory. On the one hand, numerical simulations demonstrate that the light-cone VQA achieves better performance over the classical Goemans–Williamson algorithm and the CPLEX solver. On the other hand, we demonstrate on IBM’s quantum devices that the single-round light-cone VQA exceeds the known classical hardness threshold in both 72- and 148-qubit demonstrations, whereas QAOA fails in the 148-qubit one. This work highlights a promising route towards solving classically hard problems on practical quantum devices.
Abstract Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are promising to demonstrate the advantage of quantum computing over classical computing in practical applications, such as the maximum cut (MaxCut) problem. However, current VQAs such as the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) have lower performance guarantees compared to the best-known classical algorithm, and suffer from hard optimization processes due to the barren plateau (BP) problem. We propose a light-cone VQA by choosing an optimal gate sequence of the standard VQAs, which enables a significant improvement in solution accuracy while avoiding the BP problem. Specifically, we prove that the light-cone VQA with one round achieves an approximation ratio of 0.7926 for the MaxCut problem in the worst case of 3 -regular graphs, which is higher than that of the 3-round QAOA, and can be further improved to 0.8333 by a multi-angle relaxation. We conduct systematic experiments to verify our theory. On the one hand, numerical simulations demonstrate that the light-cone VQA achieves better performance over the classical Goemans–Williamson algorithm and the CPLEX solver. On the other hand, we demonstrate on IBM’s quantum devices that the single-round light-cone VQA exceeds the known classical hardness threshold in both 72- and 148-qubit demonstrations, whereas QAOA fails in the 148-qubit one. This work highlights a promising route towards solving classically hard problems on practical quantum devices.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a near-term combinatorial optimization algorithm suitable for noisy quantum devices. However, little is known about performance guarantees for p>2. A recent work computing MaxCut performance guarantees for 3-regular graphs conjectures that any d-regular graph evaluated at particular fixed angles has an approximation ratio greater than some worst-case guarantee. In this work, we provide numerical evidence for this fixed angle conjecture for p<12. We compute and provide these angles via numerical optimization and tensor networks. These fixed angles serve for an optimization-free version of QAOA and have universally good performance on any 3-regular graph. Heuristic evidence is presented for the fixed angle conjecture on graph ensembles, which suggests that these fixed angles are ``close'' to global optimum. Under the fixed angle conjecture, QAOA has a larger performance guarantee than the Goemans Williamson algorithm on 3-regular graphs for $p\ensuremath{\ge}11$.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.
The max-cut problem (MCP) is a classic problem in the field of combinatorial optimization and has important applications in various fields, including statistical physics and image processing. However, except for some special cases, the MCP still encounters a non-deterministic polynomial complete problem (an NP-complete problem), and there is currently no known efficient classical algorithm that can solve it in polynomial time. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), as a pivotal algorithm in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing era, has shown significant potential for solving the MCP. However, due to the lack of quantum error correction, the reliability of computations in NISQ systems sharply declines as the circuit depth of the algorithm increases. Therefore, designing an efficient, shallow-depth, and low-complexity QAOA for the MCP is a critical challenge in demonstrating the advantages of quantum computing in the NISQ era.In this paper, according to the standard QAOA algorithm, we introduce Pauli Y rotation gates into the target Hamiltonian circuit for the MCP. By enhancing the flexibility of quantum trial functions and improving the efficiency of Hilbert space exploration within a single iteration, we significantly improve the performance of QAOA on the MCP.We conduct extensive numerical simulations using the MindSpore quantum platform, and compare the proposed RY-layer-assisted QAOA with standard QAOA and its existing variants, including MA-QAOA and QAOA+. The experiments are performed on various graph types, including complete graphs, 3-regular graphs, 4-regular graphs, and random graphs with edge probabilities between 0.3 and 0.5. Our results show that the RY-layer-assisted QAOA achieves higher approximation ratios in all graph types, particularly in regular and random graphs, where traditional QAOA variants are difficult to implement. Moreover, the proposed method exhibits strong robustness as the graph size increases, and can maintain high performance even for larger graphs. Importantly, the RY-layer-assisted QAOA requires fewer CNOT gates and has a lower circuit depth than the standard QAOA and its variants, making it more suitable for NISQ devices with limited coherence times and high error rates.In conclusion, the RY-layer-assisted QAOA provides a promising approach for solving MCP in the NISQ era. By improving the approximation ratio while reducing circuit complexity, this method demonstrates significant potential for practical quantum computing applications, thus paving the way for developing more efficient and reliable quantum optimization algorithms.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a near-term combinatorial optimization algorithm suitable for noisy quantum devices. However, little is known about performance guarantees for p>2. A recent work \cite{Wurtz_guarantee} computing MaxCut performance guarantees for 3-regular graphs conjectures that any d-regular graph evaluated at particular fixed angles has an approximation ratio greater than some worst-case guarantee. In this work, we provide numerical evidence for this fixed angle conjecture for p<12. We compute and provide these angles via numerical optimization and tensor networks. These fixed angles serve for an optimization-free version of QAOA, and have universally good performance on any 3 regular graph. Heuristic evidence is presented for the fixed angle conjecture on graph ensembles, which suggests that these fixed angles are ``close" to global optimum. Under the fixed angle conjecture, QAOA has a larger performance guarantee than the Goemans Williamson algorithm on 3-regular graphs for p≥11.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.