Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2504.12575

Featuremetric benchmarking: Quantum computer benchmarks based on circuit features

Timothy J Proctor, Tran, Anh, Xingxin Liu, Aditya Dhumuntarao, Stefan Seritan, Alaina Green, Norbert M. Linke

Published Apr 17, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Benchmarks that concisely summarize the performance of many-qubit quantum computers are essential for measuring progress towards the goal of useful quantum computation. In this work, we present a benchmarking framework that is based on quantifying how a quantum computer's performance on quantum circuits varies as a function of features of those circuits, such as circuit depth, width, two-qubit gate density, problem input size, or algorithmic depth. Our featuremetric benchmarking framework generalizes volumetric benchmarking -- a widely-used methodology that quantifies performance versus circuit width and depth -- and we show that it enables richer and more faithful models of quantum computer performance. We demonstrate featuremetric benchmarking with example benchmarks run on IBM Q and IonQ systems of up to 27 qubits, and we show how to produce performance summaries from the data using Gaussian process regression. Our data analysis methods are also of interest in the special case of volumetric benchmarking, as they enable the creation of intuitive two-dimensional capability regions using data from few circuits.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2504.12575

Related papers

Benchmarking quantum computers with any quantum algorithm

Stefan Seritan, Aditya Dhumuntarao, Aidan Wilber-Gauthier +5 more

Application-based benchmarks are increasingly used to quantify and compare quantum computers' performance. However, because contemporary quantum computers cannot run utility-scale computations, these benchmarks currently test this hardware's performance on ``small'' problem instances that are not necessarily representative of utility-scale problems. Furthermore, these benchmarks often employ methods that are unscalable, limiting their ability to track progress towards utility-scale applications. In this work, we present a method for creating scalable and efficient benchmarks from any quantum algorithm or application. Our subcircuit volumetric benchmarking (SVB) method runs subcircuits of varied shape that are ``snipped out'' from some target circuit, which could implement a utility-scale algorithm. SVB is scalable and it enables estimating a capability coefficient that concisely summarizes progress towards implementing the target circuit. We demonstrate SVB with experiments on IBM Q systems using a Hamiltonian block-encoding subroutine from quantum chemistry algorithms.

arXiv:2508.05754•Aug 7, 2025•0 citations

A Quantum Computing Benchmark Based on Circuit Features

Xingxin Liu, Timothy J Proctor, Alaina Green +1 more

We propose a quantum computing benchmarking protocol based on multiple circuit features, demonstrated on IBM and IonQ systems, which outperforms traditional volumetric benchmarking by more accurately predicting hardware performance.

Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Software for Creating Scalable Benchmarks from Quantum Algorithms

Noah Siekierski, Stefan Seritan, Neer Patel +3 more

Creating scalable, reliable, and well-motivated benchmarks for quantum computers is challenging: straightforward approaches to benchmarking suffer from exponential scaling, are insensitive to important errors, or use poorly-motivated performance metrics. Furthermore, curated benchmarking suites cannot include every interesting quantum circuit or algorithm, which necessitates a tool that enables the easy creation of new benchmarks. In this work, we introduce a software tool for creating scalable and reliable benchmarks that measure a well-motivated performance metric (process fidelity) from user-chosen quantum circuits and algorithms. Our software, called $\texttt{scarab}$, enables the creation of efficient and robust benchmarks even from circuits containing thousands or millions of qubits, by employing efficient fidelity estimation techniques, including mirror circuit fidelity estimation and subcircuit volumetric benchmarking. $\texttt{scarab}$ provides a simple interface that enables the creation of reliable benchmarks by users who are not experts in the theory of quantum computer benchmarking or noise. We demonstrate the flexibility and power of $\texttt{scarab}$ by using it to turn existing inefficient benchmarks into efficient benchmarks, to create benchmarks that interrogate hardware and algorithmic trade-offs in Hamiltonian simulation, to quantify the in-situ efficacy of approximate circuit compilation, and to create benchmarks that use subcircuits to measure progress towards executing a circuit of interest.

quant-pharXiv:2511.02134•Nov 5, 2025•0 citations

Predictive Models from Quantum Computer Benchmarks

Daniel Hothem, Jordan Hines, Karthik Nataraj +2 more

Holistic benchmarks for quantum computers are essential for testing and summarizing the performance of quantum hardware. However, holistic benchmarks-such as algorithmic or randomized benchmarks-typically do not predict a processor's performance on circuits outside the benchmark's necessarily very limited set of test circuits. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for building predictive models from benchmarking data using capability models. Capability models can be fit to many kinds of benchmarking data and used for a variety of predictive tasks. We demonstrate this flexibility with two case studies. In the first case study, we predict circuit (i) process fidelities and (ii) success probabilities by fitting error rates models to two kinds of volumetric benchmarking data. Error rates models are simple yet versatile capability models which assign effective error rates to individual gates, or more general circuit components. In the second case study, we construct a capability model for predicting circuit success probabilities by applying transfer learning to ResNet50, a neural network trained for image classification. Our case studies use data from cloud-accessible quantum computers and simulations of noisy quantum computers.

arXiv:2305.08796•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 17, 2023•7 citations

Benchmarking the computational power of quantum computers

Timothy Proctor, Oliver Hart, Oliver Widzowski Maupin +27 more

Quantum computing hardware is advancing rapidly toward utility-scale machines that will enable scientific breakthroughs. Many teams are pursuing distinct and difficult-to-compare routes to this goal, using different qubit technologies and logical architectures. Tracking progress toward quantum utility therefore requires rigorous benchmarks that measure computational capability relative to utility-scale challenge problems and enable fair comparison across disparate platforms. Here we demonstrate direct, cross-platform measurement of quantum computational capability using a new benchmark that quantifies the size of the largest computationally relevant quantum circuits that a machine can execute successfully and the speed at which it can execute them. We apply this quantum universal operation performance system (QUOPS) experimentally to leading processors from Quantinuum, Google, and IBM, computing directly on physical qubits. Translating state-of-the-art resource requirements for recognized challenge problems that represent useful quantum computation into effective QUOPS circuit sizes shows that computational capability must grow by 5 orders of magnitude, motivating fault-tolerant approaches. We use the same benchmark to assess the performance of a simple fault-tolerant logical-qubit processor implemented on up to eight [[7,1,3]]-encoded logical qubits using Quantinuum Helios-1, and project the growth of capability across successive generations of fault-tolerant quantum computers to show how QUOPS can track progress toward quantum scientific utility.

quant-pharXiv:2609.12146•Sep 14, 2026•0 citations

Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing

Thomas Lubinski, Sonika Johri, Paul Varosy +6 more

In this work we introduce an open source suite of quantum application-oriented performance benchmarks that is designed to measure the effectiveness of quantum computing hardware at executing quantum applications. These benchmarks probe a quantum computer's performance on various algorithms and small applications as the problem size is varied, by mapping out the fidelity of the results as a function of circuit width and depth using the framework of volumetric benchmarking. In addition to estimating the fidelity of results generated by quantum execution, the suite is designed to benchmark certain aspects of the execution pipeline in order to provide end-users with a practical measure of both the quality of and the time to solution. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years. This benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users and provides benchmarks that correspond to many well-known quantum computing algorithms.

arXiv:2110.03137•IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering•Jan 1, 2023•158 citations
Benchmarks that concisely summarize the performance of many-qubit quantum computers are essential for measuring progress towards the goal of useful quantum computation. In this work, we present a benchmarking framework that is based on quantifying how a quantum computer's performance on quantum circuits varies as a function of features of those circuits, such as circuit depth, width, two-qubit gate density, problem input size, or algorithmic depth. Our featuremetric benchmarking framework generalizes volumetric benchmarking -- a widely-used methodology that quantifies performance versus circuit width and depth -- and we show that it enables richer and more faithful models of quantum computer performance. We demonstrate featuremetric benchmarking with example benchmarks run on IBM Q and IonQ systems of up to 27 qubits, and we show how to produce performance summaries from the data using Gaussian process regression. Our data analysis methods are also of interest in the special case of volumetric benchmarking, as they enable the creation of intuitive two-dimensional capability regions using data from few circuits.
Application-based benchmarks are increasingly used to quantify and compare quantum computers' performance. However, because contemporary quantum computers cannot run utility-scale computations, these benchmarks currently test this hardware's performance on ``small'' problem instances that are not necessarily representative of utility-scale problems. Furthermore, these benchmarks often employ methods that are unscalable, limiting their ability to track progress towards utility-scale applications. In this work, we present a method for creating scalable and efficient benchmarks from any quantum algorithm or application. Our subcircuit volumetric benchmarking (SVB) method runs subcircuits of varied shape that are ``snipped out'' from some target circuit, which could implement a utility-scale algorithm. SVB is scalable and it enables estimating a capability coefficient that concisely summarizes progress towards implementing the target circuit. We demonstrate SVB with experiments on IBM Q systems using a Hamiltonian block-encoding subroutine from quantum chemistry algorithms.
Creating scalable, reliable, and well-motivated benchmarks for quantum computers is challenging: straightforward approaches to benchmarking suffer from exponential scaling, are insensitive to important errors, or use poorly-motivated performance metrics. Furthermore, curated benchmarking suites cannot include every interesting quantum circuit or algorithm, which necessitates a tool that enables the easy creation of new benchmarks. In this work, we introduce a software tool for creating scalable and reliable benchmarks that measure a well-motivated performance metric (process fidelity) from user-chosen quantum circuits and algorithms. Our software, called scarab\texttt{scarab}scarab, enables the creation of efficient and robust benchmarks even from circuits containing thousands or millions of qubits, by employing efficient fidelity estimation techniques, including mirror circuit fidelity estimation and subcircuit volumetric benchmarking. scarab\texttt{scarab}scarab provides a simple interface that enables the creation of reliable benchmarks by users who are not experts in the theory of quantum computer benchmarking or noise. We demonstrate the flexibility and power of scarab\texttt{scarab}scarab by using it to turn existing inefficient benchmarks into efficient benchmarks, to create benchmarks that interrogate hardware and algorithmic trade-offs in Hamiltonian simulation, to quantify the in-situ efficacy of approximate circuit compilation, and to create benchmarks that use subcircuits to measure progress towards executing a circuit of interest.
Holistic benchmarks for quantum computers are essential for testing and summarizing the performance of quantum hardware. However, holistic benchmarks-such as algorithmic or randomized benchmarks-typically do not predict a processor's performance on circuits outside the benchmark's necessarily very limited set of test circuits. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for building predictive models from benchmarking data using capability models. Capability models can be fit to many kinds of benchmarking data and used for a variety of predictive tasks. We demonstrate this flexibility with two case studies. In the first case study, we predict circuit (i) process fidelities and (ii) success probabilities by fitting error rates models to two kinds of volumetric benchmarking data. Error rates models are simple yet versatile capability models which assign effective error rates to individual gates, or more general circuit components. In the second case study, we construct a capability model for predicting circuit success probabilities by applying transfer learning to ResNet50, a neural network trained for image classification. Our case studies use data from cloud-accessible quantum computers and simulations of noisy quantum computers.
Quantum computing hardware is advancing rapidly toward utility-scale machines that will enable scientific breakthroughs. Many teams are pursuing distinct and difficult-to-compare routes to this goal, using different qubit technologies and logical architectures. Tracking progress toward quantum utility therefore requires rigorous benchmarks that measure computational capability relative to utility-scale challenge problems and enable fair comparison across disparate platforms. Here we demonstrate direct, cross-platform measurement of quantum computational capability using a new benchmark that quantifies the size of the largest computationally relevant quantum circuits that a machine can execute successfully and the speed at which it can execute them. We apply this quantum universal operation performance system (QUOPS) experimentally to leading processors from Quantinuum, Google, and IBM, computing directly on physical qubits. Translating state-of-the-art resource requirements for recognized challenge problems that represent useful quantum computation into effective QUOPS circuit sizes shows that computational capability must grow by 5 orders of magnitude, motivating fault-tolerant approaches. We use the same benchmark to assess the performance of a simple fault-tolerant logical-qubit processor implemented on up to eight [[7,1,3]]-encoded logical qubits using Quantinuum Helios-1, and project the growth of capability across successive generations of fault-tolerant quantum computers to show how QUOPS can track progress toward quantum scientific utility.
In this work we introduce an open source suite of quantum application-oriented performance benchmarks that is designed to measure the effectiveness of quantum computing hardware at executing quantum applications. These benchmarks probe a quantum computer's performance on various algorithms and small applications as the problem size is varied, by mapping out the fidelity of the results as a function of circuit width and depth using the framework of volumetric benchmarking. In addition to estimating the fidelity of results generated by quantum execution, the suite is designed to benchmark certain aspects of the execution pipeline in order to provide end-users with a practical measure of both the quality of and the time to solution. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years. This benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users and provides benchmarks that correspond to many well-known quantum computing algorithms.