This study explores the intersection of continuous-variable quantum computing (CVQC) and classical machine learning, focusing on CVQC data encoding techniques, including Displacement encoding and squeezing encoding, alongside Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial (IQP) encoding from discrete quantum computing. We perform an extensive empirical analysis to assess the impact of these encoding methods on classical machine learning models, such as Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, K-Nearest Neighbors, and ensemble methods like Random Forest and LightGBM. Our findings indicate that CVQC-based encoding methods significantly enhance feature expressivity, resulting in improved classification accuracy and F1 scores, especially in high-dimensional and complex datasets. However, these improvements come with varying computational costs, which depend on the complexity of the encoding and the architecture of the machine learning models. Additionally, we examine the trade-off between quantum expressibility and classical learnability, offering valuable insights into the practical feasibility of incorporating these quantum encodings into real-world applications. This study contributes to the growing body of research on quantum-classical hybrid learning, emphasizing the role of CVQC in advancing quantum data representation and its integration into classical machine learning workflows.
This study explores the intersection of continuous-variable quantum computing (CVQC) and classical machine learning, focusing on CVQC data encoding techniques, including Displacement encoding and squeezing encoding, alongside Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial (IQP) encoding from discrete quantum computing. We perform an extensive empirical analysis to assess the impact of these encoding methods on classical machine learning models, such as Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, K-Nearest Neighbors, and ensemble methods like Random Forest and LightGBM. Our findings indicate that CVQC-based encoding methods significantly enhance feature expressivity, resulting in improved classification accuracy and F1 scores, especially in high-dimensional and complex datasets. However, these improvements come with varying computational costs, which depend on the complexity of the encoding and the architecture of the machine learning models. Additionally, we examine the trade-off between quantum expressibility and classical learnability, offering valuable insights into the practical feasibility of incorporating these quantum encodings into real-world applications. This study contributes to the growing body of research on quantum-classical hybrid learning, emphasizing the role of CVQC in advancing quantum data representation and its integration into classical machine learning workflows.
This study explores the integration of quantum data embedding techniques into classical machine learning (ML) algorithms; to assess performance enhancements and computational implications across a spectrum of models. We explored various classical-to-quantum mapping methods; ranging from basis encoding and angle encoding to amplitude encoding; for encoding classical data. We conducted an extensive empirical study encompassing popular ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, and ensemble methods like Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, and CatBoost. Our findings reveal that quantum data embedding contributes to improved classification accuracy and F1 scores, particularly notable in models that inherently benefit from enhanced feature representation. We observed nuanced effects on running time, with low-complexity models exhibiting moderate increases and more computationally intensive models experiencing discernible changes. Notably, ensemble methods demonstrated a favorable balance between performance gains and computational overhead. This study underscores the potential of quantum data embedding to enhance classical ML models and emphasizes the importance of weighing performance improvements against computational costs. Future research may involve refining quantum encoding processes to optimize computational efficiency and explore scalability for real-world applications. Our work contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the intersection of quantum computing and classical machine learning, offering insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to harness the advantages of quantum-inspired techniques in practical scenarios.
ABSTRACT Continuous‐variable quantum‐inspired feature encodings have attracted increasing attention as structured transformations for hybrid and classical machine learning. Despite growing interest, their practical behavior within classical learning pipelines, particularly their interaction with different model architectures, remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we analyze three continuous‐variable quantum‐inspired feature encoding mechanisms, namely displacement, squeezing, and Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial style embeddings, when used as feature mappings for classical learning models. Using a real‐world telecommunications customer churn dataset, we examine how these encodings reshape feature geometry and interact with linear, distance‐based, and ensemble classifiers under varying levels of dimensionality reduction. The results indicate that smooth Gaussian encodings, such as displacement and squeezing, exhibit stable interactions with neighborhood‐based and ensemble models, while providing limited benefit for strictly linear classifiers. In contrast, Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial style embeddings show comparatively unstable behavior across several classical learning models, suggesting higher sensitivity to discretization and classifier inductive bias. Classical feature representations remain competitive in absolute predictive performance, indicating that the principal value of continuous‐variable quantum‐inspired encodings lies in their representational and feature transformation capabilities rather than in universal accuracy gains. Overall, the study highlights that encoding effectiveness depends strongly on compatibility between the transformed feature space and the downstream learning architecture, offering useful guidance for simulator‐based and hybrid machine learning settings.
Biomarker classification represents a significant task in biological, medical diagnostics, and bioinformatics, where high-dimensional datasets represent challenges to classical machine learning models. The study presented in this paper focuses on the impact of data encoding and explores quantum machine learning algorithms for biomarker classification. Three quantum embedding methods; Angle Embedding, Amplitude Embedding, and IQP (Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial) Embedding, were combined with Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM) and Quantum k-Nearest Neighbors (QkNN) and compared against classical SVM and KNN baselines. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied as a preprocessing step to reduce dimensionality. Experiments were conducted on the CuMiDa breast cancer dataset using quantum simulators. Results show that IQP embedding and Angle embedding significantly outperform classical models with QSVM, achieving the best performance, where IQP embedding reaching 93.1% accuracy and an F1-score of 0.93 in higher-dimensional settings, outperforming both the other quantum embeddings and the classical SVM. For QkNN, performance depended on dimensionality, with IQP achieving the strongest results in lower dimensions, including a precision of 87.1%, surpassing both the other quantum embeddings and classical KNN. In higher dimensions, Angle embedding yielded the best quantum results, though classical KNN remained superior. Amplitude embedding consistently underperformed in QSVM but was more competitive in QkNN. These findings demonstrate that advanced quantum data encoding, such as IQP and Angle, can enhance biomarker classification performance and highlight the promise of hybrid quantum-classical approaches in biomedical applications.
Quantum computing has inspired new ways to represent and process data, offering perspectives that can also benefit classical machine learning. In this work, we investigate how quantum-inspired data representations can be integrated into classical machine learning classifiers such as Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, and Naive Bayes for binary classification tasks. The proposed approach utilizes a simple amplitude-based encoding that normalizes feature vectors and incorporates phase-like transformations, assisting classical models to capture complex interactions and patterns in the data similar to quantum information processing. We evaluate this approach on both synthetic and three other benchmark datasets, comparing standard and quantum-inspired data representations. The results highlights that the quantum-inspired data encoding often matches or improves classifier performance in terms of accuracy, F1-Score, and precision. Additionally, the normalized encoding provides a more structured representation of the data, which can help with interpretability and visualization. These results highlight the potential of quantum-inspired transformations as a practical and effective tool for improving classical machine learning pipelines without requirement of quantum hardware.
This thesis explores the integration of quantum computing into Machine Learning (ML), aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of quantum-enhanced models compared to classical approaches. As quantum technologies continue to develop, they offer the potential for solving complex computational problems more efficiently, particularly in fields requiring high-dimensional data processing. A literature review is conducted to contextualize current advancements in Quantum Machine Learning, highlighting theoretical benefits and existing practical limitations. This work investigates whether quantum methods, specifically the Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC), can provide measurable improvements over its classical counterpart. The QSVC, implemented using IBM’s Qiskit ML library, replaces traditional kernel functions with quantum kernels computed via quantum circuits and feature maps, embedding classical data into a Hilbert space. The experimental portion of this thesis compares classical and quantum models on two distinct datasets: one from the healthcare domain and another from particle physics. Various parameters are tested in a constrained grid search due to the high computational demands of quantum circuits. Results indicate that while quantum models are significantly more resource-intensive, they can achieve comparable or even improved performance on data that has more complex relations between their variables. However, scalability remains a major challenge. This work concludes that although QSVC does not yet consistently outperform classical models, it offers advantages in specific contexts and lays the groundwork for identifying future use cases where quantum computing may offer a practical advantage in ML.
Quantum machine learning has emerged as a promising paradigm that leverages quantum computational principles to potentially outperform classical approaches on specific learning tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical investigation comparing Quantum Machine Learning (QML), specifically Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM) against Classical Machine Learning (CML) baselines including Logistic Regression, K Nearest Neighbors and classical SVMs. We implement quantum kernel methods using variational quantum circuits with angle embedding, IQP and ZZ feature maps on datasets exhibiting varying structural complexity. Our experiments on synthetic quantum generated datasets (Quantum Parity, Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Interference) demonstrate that QSVM achieves superior classification accuracy with improvements ranging from 2.9 % to 60 % over the best classical baselines achieving a 55.6 % overall win rate. Notably, on the Quantum Parity dataset, QSVM consistently outperformed all classical models across multiple configurations. On real-world benchmark datasets (Breast Cancer, Iris, Wine), QSVM Angle achieved 88% accuracy on Breast Cancer compared to 76% for classical SVM Linear a 15.8 % relative improvement while matching the best classical performance on Iris(100%)and Wine(92%). All experiments were conducted using quantum circuit simulation on classical hardware. These results provide empirical evidence that quantum kernel methods offer meaningful advantages over classical approaches on datasets with complex feature interactions. We discuss the theoretical foundations of these improvements including quantum feature space expressivity and kernel alignment.