Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2503.22797 · Nature Computational Science

Quantum approximate multi-objective optimization

Ayse Kotil, Elijah Pelofske, Stephanie Riedmüller, Daniel J. Egger, Stephan Eidenbenz, Thorsten Koch, Stefan Woerner

Published Oct 24, 2025• 24 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The goal of multi-objective optimization is to understand optimal trade-offs between competing objective functions by finding the Pareto front, that is, the set of all Pareto-optimal solutions, where no objective can be improved without degrading another one. Multi-objective optimization can be challenging classically, even if the corresponding single-objective optimization problems are efficiently solvable. Thus, multi-objective optimization represents a compelling problem class to analyze with quantum computers. Here we use a low-depth quantum approximate optimization algorithm to approximate the optimal Pareto front of certain multi-objective weighted maximum-cut problems. We demonstrate its performance on an IBM Quantum computer, as well as with matrix product state numerical simulation, and show its potential to outperform classical approaches. This study explores the use of quantum computing to address multi-objective optimization challenges. By using a low-depth quantum approximate optimization algorithm to approximate the optimal Pareto front of multi-objective weighted max-cut problems, the authors demonstrate promising results—both in simulation and on IBM Quantum hardware—surpassing classical approaches.

DOI
10.1038/s43588-025-00873-y

Related papers

Multi-objective optimization by quantum annealing

Andrew D. King

An important task in multi-objective optimization is generating the Pareto front -- the set of all Pareto-optimal compromises among multiple objective functions applied to the same set of variables. Since this task can be computationally intensive even for small problems, it is a natural target for quantum optimization. Indeed, this problem was recently approached using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) on an IBM gate-model processor. Here we compare these QAOA results with quantum annealing on the same two input problems, using the same methodology. We find that quantum annealing vastly outperforms not just QAOA run on the IBM processor, but all classical and quantum methods analyzed in the previous study. On the harder problem, quantum annealing improves upon the best known Pareto front. This small study reinforces the promise of quantum annealing in multi-objective optimization.

quant-pharXiv:2511.01762•Nov 4, 2025•0 citations

Binary Optimization with Complex Constraints via Quantum Approximate Multi-Objective Optimization

Andres Ruiz, Soumyadip Ghosh, Stefan Woerner

We show that a class of binary optimization problems with complex non-quadratic objectives or constraints can be reformulated as multi-objective quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. When the objective and constraints depend on a small number of quadratic features and are monotone with respect to their preferred directions, at least one globally optimal solution lies in the Pareto set of the associated MO-QUBO. This enables the constraints to be evaluated classically on Pareto-optimal candidates rather than encoded as penalties. We demonstrate the approach for binary portfolio optimization under a Conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. Using Quantum Approximate Multi-Objective Optimization on an illustrative 100-asset instance, we approximate the mean-variance Pareto front using an IBM Quantum computer and derive mean-CVaR fronts through classical post-processing. The hardware results recover the overall structure of the classical front and yield near-optimal feasible portfolios for different risk bounds.

quant-pharXiv:2609.13790•Sep 15, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-Enhanced Multi-Objective Optimization

Maolin Luo, Jiapei Zhuang, Zuoheng Zou +1 more

Multi-objective combinatorial optimization requires identifying Pareto-optimal trade-off solutions among conflicting objectives, often making it more demanding than its single-objective counterpart. Although quantum multi-objective optimization methods have begun to emerge, most existing quantum optimization workflows are still built around single-objective or fixed-scalarization settings. Building on existing weighted-sum QAOA approaches to quantum multi-objective optimization, we propose QEMOO, a quantum-enhanced multi-objective optimization framework that combines Pareto-based selection and warm-started QAOA sampling in a multi-round protocol under the same total shot budget. We further introduce a PBI-inspired adaptive direction-update scheme to improve coverage in strongly conflicting benchmark regimes. Across three benchmark stages, QEMOO improves Pareto-front hypervolume over the single-pass weighted-sum QAOA baseline under matched shot budgets, suggesting a practical route toward shot-efficient quantum-assisted multi-objective optimization and its future applications.

quant-pharXiv:2607.18848•Jul 22, 2026•0 citations

Variational quantum multiobjective optimization

Linus Ekstrøm, Hao Wang, Sebastian Schmitt

Solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices has gained a lot of attention in recent years. Currently, most studies have focused on single-objective problems, whereas many real-world applications need to consider multiple, mostly conflicting objectives, such as cost and quality. We present a variational quantum optimization algorithm to solve discrete multiobjective optimization problems on quantum computers. The proposed quantum multiobjective optimization (QMOO) algorithm incorporates all cost Hamiltonians representing the classical objective functions in the quantum circuit and produces a quantum state consisting of Pareto-optimal solutions in superposition. From this state, we retrieve a set of solutions and utilize the widely applied hypervolume indicator to determine its quality as an approximation to the Pareto front. The variational parameters of the QMOO circuit are tuned by maximizing the hypervolume indicator in a quantum-classical hybrid fashion. We show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm on several benchmark problems with up to five objectives. We investigate the influence of the classical optimizer and the circuit depth, and compare them to results from classical optimization algorithms. We find that the algorithm is robust to shot noise and produces good results with as few as 128 measurement shots in each iteration. These promising results open the possibility to run the algorithm on near-term quantum hardware.

arXiv:2312.14151•Physical Review Research•May 12, 2025•13 citations

Multiobjective Optimization and Network Routing With Near-Term Quantum Computers

Shao-Hen Chiew, Kilian Poirier, Rajesh Mishra +6 more

Multi-objective optimization is a ubiquitous problem that arises naturally in many scientific and industrial areas. Network routing optimization with multi-objective performance demands falls into this problem class, and finding good quality solutions at large scales is generally challenging. In this work, we develop a scheme with which near-term quantum computers can be applied to solve multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. We study the application of this scheme to the network routing problem in detail, by first mapping it to the multi-objective shortest path problem. Focusing on an implementation based on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) – the go-to approach for tackling optimization problems on near-term quantum computers – we examine the Pareto plot that results from the scheme, and qualitatively analyze its ability to produce Pareto-optimal solutions. We further provide theoretical and numerical scaling analyses of the resource requirements and performance of QAOA, and identify key challenges associated with this approach. Finally, through Amazon Braket we execute small-scale implementations of our scheme on the IonQ Harmony 11-qubit quantum computer.

arXiv:2308.08245•IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering•Jan 1, 2024•12 citations

Quantum Approximate Multi-Objective Optimization in Routing Problems

Eduardo Willwock Lussi, Alisson dos Passos Fumaco, Marcos Vinicius Reballo +3 more

Multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems are common in logistics, where routing decisions must balance conflicting objectives such as travel distance, delivery time, and operational risk. A recently proposed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) parameter-transfer strategy solves multi-objective MAX-CUT problems by reusing parameters trained on smaller instances, avoiding costly reoptimization for each scalarized problem. However, its effectiveness has only been demonstrated on proof-of-concept instances tailored to quantum hardware connectivity. In this work, we evaluate the applicability of this strategy to realistic routing problems. We formulate the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models, reduce them to MAX-CUT, and assess the parameter-transfer framework under conditions matching the original study. Validation is performed through classical simulations and experiments on IBM quantum hardware. The resulting Pareto fronts are compared with those obtained using an adapted classical ε-constraint method, using hypervolume as the primary quality metric. Results indicate that parameter transfer remains effective, frequently achieving higher hypervolume and often finding competitive solutions earlier. However, performance depends on problem structure. The approach is consistently effective for TSP instances but less stable for the more constrained VRP, suggesting that QAOA parameter transferability decreases as the optimization landscape becomes more complex. These results provide the first comprehensive evaluation of QAOA parameter transfer on realistic multi-objective routing problems and demonstrate its potential beyond proof-of-concept MAX-CUT benchmarks.

cs.ETCross-listedarXiv:2610.00168•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations
The goal of multi-objective optimization is to understand optimal trade-offs between competing objective functions by finding the Pareto front, that is, the set of all Pareto-optimal solutions, where no objective can be improved without degrading another one. Multi-objective optimization can be challenging classically, even if the corresponding single-objective optimization problems are efficiently solvable. Thus, multi-objective optimization represents a compelling problem class to analyze with quantum computers. Here we use a low-depth quantum approximate optimization algorithm to approximate the optimal Pareto front of certain multi-objective weighted maximum-cut problems. We demonstrate its performance on an IBM Quantum computer, as well as with matrix product state numerical simulation, and show its potential to outperform classical approaches. This study explores the use of quantum computing to address multi-objective optimization challenges. By using a low-depth quantum approximate optimization algorithm to approximate the optimal Pareto front of multi-objective weighted max-cut problems, the authors demonstrate promising results—both in simulation and on IBM Quantum hardware—surpassing classical approaches.
An important task in multi-objective optimization is generating the Pareto front -- the set of all Pareto-optimal compromises among multiple objective functions applied to the same set of variables. Since this task can be computationally intensive even for small problems, it is a natural target for quantum optimization. Indeed, this problem was recently approached using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) on an IBM gate-model processor. Here we compare these QAOA results with quantum annealing on the same two input problems, using the same methodology. We find that quantum annealing vastly outperforms not just QAOA run on the IBM processor, but all classical and quantum methods analyzed in the previous study. On the harder problem, quantum annealing improves upon the best known Pareto front. This small study reinforces the promise of quantum annealing in multi-objective optimization.
We show that a class of binary optimization problems with complex non-quadratic objectives or constraints can be reformulated as multi-objective quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. When the objective and constraints depend on a small number of quadratic features and are monotone with respect to their preferred directions, at least one globally optimal solution lies in the Pareto set of the associated MO-QUBO. This enables the constraints to be evaluated classically on Pareto-optimal candidates rather than encoded as penalties. We demonstrate the approach for binary portfolio optimization under a Conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. Using Quantum Approximate Multi-Objective Optimization on an illustrative 100-asset instance, we approximate the mean-variance Pareto front using an IBM Quantum computer and derive mean-CVaR fronts through classical post-processing. The hardware results recover the overall structure of the classical front and yield near-optimal feasible portfolios for different risk bounds.
Multi-objective combinatorial optimization requires identifying Pareto-optimal trade-off solutions among conflicting objectives, often making it more demanding than its single-objective counterpart. Although quantum multi-objective optimization methods have begun to emerge, most existing quantum optimization workflows are still built around single-objective or fixed-scalarization settings. Building on existing weighted-sum QAOA approaches to quantum multi-objective optimization, we propose QEMOO, a quantum-enhanced multi-objective optimization framework that combines Pareto-based selection and warm-started QAOA sampling in a multi-round protocol under the same total shot budget. We further introduce a PBI-inspired adaptive direction-update scheme to improve coverage in strongly conflicting benchmark regimes. Across three benchmark stages, QEMOO improves Pareto-front hypervolume over the single-pass weighted-sum QAOA baseline under matched shot budgets, suggesting a practical route toward shot-efficient quantum-assisted multi-objective optimization and its future applications.
Solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices has gained a lot of attention in recent years. Currently, most studies have focused on single-objective problems, whereas many real-world applications need to consider multiple, mostly conflicting objectives, such as cost and quality. We present a variational quantum optimization algorithm to solve discrete multiobjective optimization problems on quantum computers. The proposed quantum multiobjective optimization (QMOO) algorithm incorporates all cost Hamiltonians representing the classical objective functions in the quantum circuit and produces a quantum state consisting of Pareto-optimal solutions in superposition. From this state, we retrieve a set of solutions and utilize the widely applied hypervolume indicator to determine its quality as an approximation to the Pareto front. The variational parameters of the QMOO circuit are tuned by maximizing the hypervolume indicator in a quantum-classical hybrid fashion. We show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm on several benchmark problems with up to five objectives. We investigate the influence of the classical optimizer and the circuit depth, and compare them to results from classical optimization algorithms. We find that the algorithm is robust to shot noise and produces good results with as few as 128 measurement shots in each iteration. These promising results open the possibility to run the algorithm on near-term quantum hardware.
Multi-objective optimization is a ubiquitous problem that arises naturally in many scientific and industrial areas. Network routing optimization with multi-objective performance demands falls into this problem class, and finding good quality solutions at large scales is generally challenging. In this work, we develop a scheme with which near-term quantum computers can be applied to solve multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. We study the application of this scheme to the network routing problem in detail, by first mapping it to the multi-objective shortest path problem. Focusing on an implementation based on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) – the go-to approach for tackling optimization problems on near-term quantum computers – we examine the Pareto plot that results from the scheme, and qualitatively analyze its ability to produce Pareto-optimal solutions. We further provide theoretical and numerical scaling analyses of the resource requirements and performance of QAOA, and identify key challenges associated with this approach. Finally, through Amazon Braket we execute small-scale implementations of our scheme on the IonQ Harmony 11-qubit quantum computer.
Multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems are common in logistics, where routing decisions must balance conflicting objectives such as travel distance, delivery time, and operational risk. A recently proposed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) parameter-transfer strategy solves multi-objective MAX-CUT problems by reusing parameters trained on smaller instances, avoiding costly reoptimization for each scalarized problem. However, its effectiveness has only been demonstrated on proof-of-concept instances tailored to quantum hardware connectivity. In this work, we evaluate the applicability of this strategy to realistic routing problems. We formulate the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models, reduce them to MAX-CUT, and assess the parameter-transfer framework under conditions matching the original study. Validation is performed through classical simulations and experiments on IBM quantum hardware. The resulting Pareto fronts are compared with those obtained using an adapted classical ε-constraint method, using hypervolume as the primary quality metric. Results indicate that parameter transfer remains effective, frequently achieving higher hypervolume and often finding competitive solutions earlier. However, performance depends on problem structure. The approach is consistently effective for TSP instances but less stable for the more constrained VRP, suggesting that QAOA parameter transferability decreases as the optimization landscape becomes more complex. These results provide the first comprehensive evaluation of QAOA parameter transfer on realistic multi-objective routing problems and demonstrate its potential beyond proof-of-concept MAX-CUT benchmarks.