Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2503.21296

Specifying the Intrinsic Back-action of a General Measurement

Liang-Liang Sun, Armin Tavakoli, René Schwonnek, Matthias Kleinmann, Zhen‐Peng Xu, Yu, Sixia

Published Mar 27, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Understanding the invasive nature of quantum measurement and its implications in quantum foundations and information science demands a mathematically rigorous and physically well-grounded characterization of intrinsic back-action in general measurement processes. However, such a framework remains elusive, leaving a critical gap in quantum theory. Here, we address this issue by conceptualizing a general quantum measurement as a reduction of extended projection measurements ensured by Naimark's theorem and, derive a state-updating rule for the concerned measurement as a reduction of the projective measurements postulate. Our framework provides a detailed analysis by explicitly decomposing the disturbance effects into two distinct contributions: those arising from the measurement elements themselves and those resulting from the dilation process. Notably, this formulation naturally recovers the projection postulate in the case of projective measurements. Beyond providing insights into joint measurability, non-disturbance, our rule establishes quantitaive connections between intrinsic disturbance and other fundamental quantum features, such as randomness, uncertainty, and information gain.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2503.21296

Related papers

Quantum measurement beyond projection: POVMs, instruments, dilation theorems, ancilla-assisted partial measurement, and operational trade-offs

Sachin .

The projection postulate and spectral representation of observables remain central in quantum theory but describe only an idealized measurement limit. Realistic measurements may be inefficient, unsharp, weak, indirect, adaptive, destructive, or informationally incomplete. Positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs) provide the probability rule for processes, whereas quantum instruments specify state transformation. This review traces the hierarchy from von Neumann projective measurement to generalized measurement, emphasizing distinctions among effects, instruments, channels, and implementations. Naimark dilation realizes arbitrary POVMs through unitary coupling to an ancillary meter and projective readout. Stinespring dilation represents completely positive trace-preserving dynamics by unitary evolution on an enlarged system followed by partial trace. A qubit–ancilla interaction yields a partial-measurement instrument, its POVM effects, and its information–disturbance trade-off. It compares projective, generalized, and ancilla-mediated schemes; examines compatibility, instrument incompatibility, and disturbance; and surveys applications to state discrimination, tomography, control, and error correction. Recent developments in dynamic-circuit measurements and noisy-POVM compatibility are integrated with questions concerning measurement back-action and outcome definiteness. The review stresses that a POVM does not uniquely determine state update, dilation theorems establish realizability rather than unique mechanisms, and operational measurement theory does not settle definite outcomes, arguing quantum instruments provide a complete description of measurement.

International Journal of Physics and Applications•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations

Beyond the projection postulate and back: Quantum theories with generalized state-update rules

Fiorentino, Vincenzo, Weigert, Stefan

Are there consistent and physically reasonable alternatives to the projection postulate? Does it have unique properties compared to acceptable alternatives? We answer these questions by systematically investigating hypothetical state-update rules for quantum systems that Nature could have chosen over the Lüders rule. Among other basic properties, any prospective rule must define unique post-measurement states and not allow for superluminal signalling. Particular attention will be paid to consistently defining post-measurement states when performing local measurements in composite systems. Explicit examples of valid unconventional update rules are presented, each resulting in a distinct, well-defined foil of quantum theory. This framework of state-update rules allows us to identify operational properties that distinguish the projective update rule from all others and to put earlier derivations of the projection postulate into perspective.

•Jan 2, 2026•0 citations

Beyond the projection postulate and back: Quantum theories with generalized state-update rules

Vincenzo Fiorentino, Stefan Weigert

Are there consistent and physically reasonable alternatives to the projection postulate? Does it have unique properties compared with acceptable alternatives? We answer these questions by systematically investigating hypothetical state-update rules for quantum systems that Nature could have chosen over the Lüders rule. Among other basic properties, any prospective rule must define unique post-measurement states and not allow for superluminal signaling. Particular attention will be paid to consistently defining post-measurement states when performing local measurements in composite systems. Explicit examples of valid unconventional update rules are presented, each resulting in a distinct, well-defined foil of quantum theory. This framework of state-update rules allows us to identify operational properties that distinguish the projective update rule from all others and to put earlier derivations of the projection postulate into perspective.

arXiv:2506.06207•Physical Review A•Dec 5, 2025•2 citations

Quantum Measurements

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we first review projective or von Neumann measurements from the point of view of the projection postulate and the Lüders rule, before turning to more general measurements modelled using positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). After examining their mathematical description, we discuss symmetric informationally complete (SIC) POVMs and Zauner’s conjecture, as well as the representation of POVMs as projective measurements on a larger Hilbert space, a result called Naimark dilation. We then a model for non-ideal projective measurements and analyse the properties of such measurements in relation to the properties unbiasedness, faithfulness, and non-invasiveness of ideal projective measurements. Finally, we consider the problem of distinguishing non-orthogonal quantum states and examine how the use of POVMs can be beneficial for this task.

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations

Simulating quantum measurements without superposition devices

Gabriele Cobucci, Alexander Bernal, Roope Uola +1 more

Superposition is the core feature that sets quantum theory apart from classical physics. Here, we investigate whether sets of quantum measurements can be modelled by using devices limited to performing jointly diagonalisable measurements. This leads us to introduce classical measurement models, where many such devices are connected together through classical randomness and post-processing. Such classical measurement models are intermediate between the notion of commutative measurements and joint measurability. Towards understanding these models we (i) identify exact noise and loss rates at which all projective measurements admit a classical model, (ii) propose numerical methods to construct classical models for finite sets of measurements, and (iii) show how to construct witnesses for ruling out the existence of classical models. In addition, we show that classical measurement models also have operational implications in non-disturbance tasks where sequential quantum measurements are implemented with classical side-information. Our work provides a new approach to the role of superposition in quantum measurements.

quant-pharXiv:2602.17462•Reports on Progress in Physics•Feb 20, 2026•0 citations

Uncertainty-disturbance relations and applications

Liang-Liang Sun, Kishor Bharti, Xiang Zhou +3 more

Uncertainty and intrinsic measurement disturbance, two fundamental concepts in quantum measurement, have conventionally been viewed as distinct and studied separately. In this work, we establish a fundamental connection between them, proving that uncertainty not only serves as a prerequisite for intrinsic disturbance but also bounds it from above. We formalize this connection via uncertainty-disturbance relations (UDRs) with direct applications in quantum information science. We show that for rank-one projective measurements, these UDRs effectively function as uncertainty relations by bounding the uncertainties of incompatible measurements. They also enable the experimental estimation of key quantum resources—including von Neumann entropy, purity, coherence, and genuine randomness. Our findings thus unify the understanding of uncertainty and disturbance and provide a versatile framework for quantum resource detection.

arXiv:2202.07251•Physical Review Research•Feb 2, 2026•0 citations
Understanding the invasive nature of quantum measurement and its implications in quantum foundations and information science demands a mathematically rigorous and physically well-grounded characterization of intrinsic back-action in general measurement processes. However, such a framework remains elusive, leaving a critical gap in quantum theory. Here, we address this issue by conceptualizing a general quantum measurement as a reduction of extended projection measurements ensured by Naimark's theorem and, derive a state-updating rule for the concerned measurement as a reduction of the projective measurements postulate. Our framework provides a detailed analysis by explicitly decomposing the disturbance effects into two distinct contributions: those arising from the measurement elements themselves and those resulting from the dilation process. Notably, this formulation naturally recovers the projection postulate in the case of projective measurements. Beyond providing insights into joint measurability, non-disturbance, our rule establishes quantitaive connections between intrinsic disturbance and other fundamental quantum features, such as randomness, uncertainty, and information gain.
The projection postulate and spectral representation of observables remain central in quantum theory but describe only an idealized measurement limit. Realistic measurements may be inefficient, unsharp, weak, indirect, adaptive, destructive, or informationally incomplete. Positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs) provide the probability rule for processes, whereas quantum instruments specify state transformation. This review traces the hierarchy from von Neumann projective measurement to generalized measurement, emphasizing distinctions among effects, instruments, channels, and implementations. Naimark dilation realizes arbitrary POVMs through unitary coupling to an ancillary meter and projective readout. Stinespring dilation represents completely positive trace-preserving dynamics by unitary evolution on an enlarged system followed by partial trace. A qubit–ancilla interaction yields a partial-measurement instrument, its POVM effects, and its information–disturbance trade-off. It compares projective, generalized, and ancilla-mediated schemes; examines compatibility, instrument incompatibility, and disturbance; and surveys applications to state discrimination, tomography, control, and error correction. Recent developments in dynamic-circuit measurements and noisy-POVM compatibility are integrated with questions concerning measurement back-action and outcome definiteness. The review stresses that a POVM does not uniquely determine state update, dilation theorems establish realizability rather than unique mechanisms, and operational measurement theory does not settle definite outcomes, arguing quantum instruments provide a complete description of measurement.
Are there consistent and physically reasonable alternatives to the projection postulate? Does it have unique properties compared to acceptable alternatives? We answer these questions by systematically investigating hypothetical state-update rules for quantum systems that Nature could have chosen over the Lüders rule. Among other basic properties, any prospective rule must define unique post-measurement states and not allow for superluminal signalling. Particular attention will be paid to consistently defining post-measurement states when performing local measurements in composite systems. Explicit examples of valid unconventional update rules are presented, each resulting in a distinct, well-defined foil of quantum theory. This framework of state-update rules allows us to identify operational properties that distinguish the projective update rule from all others and to put earlier derivations of the projection postulate into perspective.
Are there consistent and physically reasonable alternatives to the projection postulate? Does it have unique properties compared with acceptable alternatives? We answer these questions by systematically investigating hypothetical state-update rules for quantum systems that Nature could have chosen over the Lüders rule. Among other basic properties, any prospective rule must define unique post-measurement states and not allow for superluminal signaling. Particular attention will be paid to consistently defining post-measurement states when performing local measurements in composite systems. Explicit examples of valid unconventional update rules are presented, each resulting in a distinct, well-defined foil of quantum theory. This framework of state-update rules allows us to identify operational properties that distinguish the projective update rule from all others and to put earlier derivations of the projection postulate into perspective.
Abstract In this chapter we first review projective or von Neumann measurements from the point of view of the projection postulate and the Lüders rule, before turning to more general measurements modelled using positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). After examining their mathematical description, we discuss symmetric informationally complete (SIC) POVMs and Zauner’s conjecture, as well as the representation of POVMs as projective measurements on a larger Hilbert space, a result called Naimark dilation. We then a model for non-ideal projective measurements and analyse the properties of such measurements in relation to the properties unbiasedness, faithfulness, and non-invasiveness of ideal projective measurements. Finally, we consider the problem of distinguishing non-orthogonal quantum states and examine how the use of POVMs can be beneficial for this task.
Superposition is the core feature that sets quantum theory apart from classical physics. Here, we investigate whether sets of quantum measurements can be modelled by using devices limited to performing jointly diagonalisable measurements. This leads us to introduce classical measurement models, where many such devices are connected together through classical randomness and post-processing. Such classical measurement models are intermediate between the notion of commutative measurements and joint measurability. Towards understanding these models we (i) identify exact noise and loss rates at which all projective measurements admit a classical model, (ii) propose numerical methods to construct classical models for finite sets of measurements, and (iii) show how to construct witnesses for ruling out the existence of classical models. In addition, we show that classical measurement models also have operational implications in non-disturbance tasks where sequential quantum measurements are implemented with classical side-information. Our work provides a new approach to the role of superposition in quantum measurements.
Uncertainty and intrinsic measurement disturbance, two fundamental concepts in quantum measurement, have conventionally been viewed as distinct and studied separately. In this work, we establish a fundamental connection between them, proving that uncertainty not only serves as a prerequisite for intrinsic disturbance but also bounds it from above. We formalize this connection via uncertainty-disturbance relations (UDRs) with direct applications in quantum information science. We show that for rank-one projective measurements, these UDRs effectively function as uncertainty relations by bounding the uncertainties of incompatible measurements. They also enable the experimental estimation of key quantum resources—including von Neumann entropy, purity, coherence, and genuine randomness. Our findings thus unify the understanding of uncertainty and disturbance and provide a versatile framework for quantum resource detection.