Quantum characterization, verification, and validation (QCVV) is a set of techniques to probe, describe, and assess the behavior of quantum bits (qubits), quantum information-processing registers, and quantum computers. QCVV protocols probe and describe the effects of unwanted decoherence so that it can be eliminated or mitigated. They can be usefully divided into characterization techniques that estimate predictive models for a device's behavior from data, and benchmarking techniques that assess overall performance of a device. In this introductory article, we briefly summarize the history of QCVV, introduce the mathematical models and metrics upon which it relies, and then summarize the foundational fields of tomography, randomized benchmarking, and holistic benchmarks. We conclude with brief descriptions of (and references to) advanced topics including gate set tomography, phase estimation, Pauli noise learning, characterization of mid-circuit measurements and non-Markovianity, classical shadows, verification and certification, and logical qubit assessment.
Quantum characterization, verification, and validation (QCVV) is a set of techniques to probe, describe, and assess the behavior of quantum bits (qubits), quantum information-processing registers, and quantum computers. QCVV protocols probe and describe the effects of unwanted decoherence so that it can be eliminated or mitigated. They can be usefully divided into characterization techniques that estimate predictive models for a device's behavior from data, and benchmarking techniques that assess overall performance of a device. In this introductory article, we briefly summarize the history of QCVV, introduce the mathematical models and metrics upon which it relies, and then summarize the foundational fields of tomography, randomized benchmarking, and holistic benchmarks. We conclude with brief descriptions of (and references to) advanced topics including gate set tomography, phase estimation, Pauli noise learning, characterization of mid-circuit measurements and non-Markovianity, classical shadows, verification and certification, and logical qubit assessment.
Rapid progress in quantum technology has transformed quantum computing and quantum information science from theoretical possibilities into tangible engineering challenges. Breakthroughs in quantum algorithms, quantum simulations, and quantum error correction are bringing useful quantum computation closer to fruition. These remarkable achievements have been facilitated by advances in quantum characterization, verification, and validation (QCVV). QCVV methods and protocols enable scientists and engineers to scrutinize, understand, and enhance the performance of quantum information-processing devices. In this tutorial, we review the fundamental principles underpinning QCVV, and introduce a diverse array of QCVV tools used by quantum researchers. We define and explain QCVV’s core models and concepts—quantum states, measurements, and processes—and illustrate how these building blocks are leveraged to examine a target system or operation. We survey and introduce protocols ranging from simple qubit characterization to advanced benchmarking methods. Along the way, we provide illustrated examples and detailed descriptions of the protocols, highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each, and discuss their potential scalability to future large-scale quantum computers. This tutorial serves as a guidebook for researchers unfamiliar with the benchmarking and characterization of quantum computers, and also as a detailed reference for experienced practitioners.
Highlights• Generalized for many common quantum characterization, verification, and validation models • Identify if a model is consistent with data, and if not, where the inconsistencies are • Explore trends of inconsistencies with various features, such as circuit depth or gate types • Report quantifiable differences among experiment, model, and target SummaryWe are developing methods to determine and report characterization performance on circuit prediction tasks using statistical tests and simulation.We are demonstrating this process in experiment using gate set tomography to evaluate performance on circuit prediction tasks.We aim to create a validation process that is an effective tool in identifying characterization shortcomings and upgrading methodologies to create more accurate characterizations of quantum devices.
Engineering of quantum computers requires reliable characterization of qubits, quantum operations, and even the entire hardware. Quantum tomography is an indispensable framework in quantum characterization, verification, and validation (QCVV), which has been widely accepted by researchers. According to the tomographic target, quantum tomography can be categorized into quantum state tomography (QST), quantum process tomography (QPT), gate set tomography (GST), process tensor tomography (PTT), and instrument set tomography (IST). Standard quantum tomography toolkits generally consist of basic linear inverse methods and statistical maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) based methods. Furthermore, the performance of standard methods, including effectiveness and efficiency, has been further developed by exploiting Bayesian estimation, neural networks, matrix completion techniques, etc. In this review, we introduce the fundamental quantum tomography techniques, including QST, QPT, GST, PTT, and IST. We first introduce the details of basic linear inverse methods. Then, the framework of MLE methods with constraints is summarized. Finally, we briefly introduce recent further research in developing the performance of tomography. This review provides a primary getting-start in developing quantum tomography, which promotes quantum computer development.
Abstract PyGSTi is a Python software package for assessing and characterizing the performance of quantum computing processors. It can be used as a standalone application, or as a library, to perform a wide variety of quantum characterization, verification, and validation (QCVV) protocols on as-built quantum processors. We outline pyGSTi’s structure, and what it can do, using multiple examples. We cover its main characterization protocols with end-to-end implementations. These include gate set tomography, randomized benchmarking on one or many qubits, and several specialized techniques. We also discuss and demonstrate how power users can customize pyGSTi and leverage its components to create specialized QCVV protocols and solve user-specific problems.
This research paper provides an in-depth examination of verification and testing approaches for quantum circuits, focusing on methodologies essential for ensuring the correctness, reliability and operational efficiency of quantum computing systems. Since quantum circuits function on the fundamental principles of superposition and entanglement, they present verification challenges that cannot be effectively addressed using conventional classical testing techniques. As a result, the development of specialized quantum-specific verification strategies has become critically important. The study highlights simulation-based verification as a foundational technique, wherein the outcomes of quantum circuit simulations are systematically compared with results obtained from physical quantum hardware. This process enables the identification of functional inconsistencies and supports iterative refinement of circuit designs. In addition, randomized benchmarking is examined as a key evaluation method for estimating circuit fidelity and quantifying error rates through the application of random gate sequences and performance comparisons against established benchmarks. To further improve system robustness, the research investigates fault-tolerant mechanisms, particularly quantum error correction codes, which play a vital role in minimizing the effects of noise, decoherence and hardware imperfections. The integration of advanced quantum metrology and characterization techniques is also explored, enabling precise measurement and detailed analysis of quantum system behavior. These techniques provide deeper insights into circuit performance and contribute significantly to validation processes. By combining simulation-based verification, randomized benchmarking, fault-tolerant protocols and quantum metrology, this study proposes a comprehensive and reliable framework for quantum circuit verification and testing. The findings contribute to the advancement of dependable quantum technologies and support their growing applications in areas such as cryptography, materials science and other emerging domains.
Noise characterization of multi-qubit entangling Clifford operations is a key practical bottleneck for quantum error mitigation and for the calibration, validation, and optimization of quantum error-correction protocols, especially in the presence of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Although cycle benchmarking can isolate some Pauli error components, it cannot resolve the problem of coupled error parameters, which leads to unlearnable degrees of freedom even in simple noisy gates, not to mention general n-qubit Clifford gates. Here we introduce mid-circuit-measurement-based generalized cycle benchmarking, a framework that makes otherwise unidentifiable Pauli fidelities and non-Markovian noise learnable via repeated measurements and classical post-processing. Applying the deferred feed-forward principle to generalized cycle benchmarking, we show that an insertion of mid-circuit measurements can reverse Pauli cycles induced by a general Clifford gate. This fact enables us to reveal a Pauli-noise learnability condition for Clifford gates. Assuming sufficient state preparation quality, we numerically demonstrate the feasibility of characterizing the previously unlearnable noise components. We implement the protocol on superconducting quantum processing units and validate its effectiveness in disambiguating the coupled noise components, benchmarked against conventional tomography. Finally, we observe consistent measurement-induced bit-flip bias and non-Markovian correlations, which define a range of applicability for the Pauli noise model and the proposed noise-characterization protocol.