Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2503.07859

In Search Of Lost Tunneling Time

Pablo M. Maier, Serguei Patchkovskii, Misha Ivanov, Olga V. Smirnova

Published Mar 10, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The measurement of tunneling times in strong-field ionization has been the topic of much controversy in recent years, with the attoclock and Larmor clock being two of the main contenders for correctly reproducing these times. By expressing the attoclock as the weak value of temporal delay, we extend its meaning beyond the traditional setup. This allows us to calculate the attoclock time for a static one-dimensional tunneling model consisting of a binding delta potential and a constant electric field. We apply the Steinberg weak-value interpretation of the Larmor clock. Using this definition, we obtain the position-resolved time density during tunnel ionization, yielding a non-zero Larmor tunneling time. Our model allows us to derive the analogue of the position-resolved attoclock tunneling time. While non-zero at the tunnel exit, it vanishes at the detector, far away from the atom. Formally, this means that the attoclock does not measure the "local" Larmor time, but instead a "non-local" time closely related to the phase time.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2503.07859

Related papers

Unifying attoclock and Larmor measurements through position-resolved weak values

Pablo M. Maier, Serguei Patchkovskii, Misha Ivanov +1 more

Abstract The measurement of tunneling times in strong-field ionization has been the topic of much controversy in recent years, with the attoclock and Larmor clock being two of the main contenders for correctly reproducing these times. While the non-zero Larmor tunneling time has been unambiguously detected, the tunneling time measured by the attoclock appears to vanish in tunnel ionization of a hydrogen atom. By expressing the attoclock as the weak value of temporal delay, we extend its meaning beyond the traditional setup and connect it to the weak-value interpretation of the Larmor clock. Our approach allows us to derive the position-resolved attoclock tunneling time. We show how this time, while non-zero at the tunnel exit, vanishes at the detector, far away from the atom. Formally, this means that the attoclock does not measure the “local” Larmor time, but instead a “non-local” time closely related to the phase time.

Communications Physics•Apr 17, 2026•1 citation

Tunneling Time and Weak Measurement in Strong Field Ionization

Tomáš Zimmermann, Siddhartha Mishra, Brent Doran +2 more

Tunneling delays represent a hotly debated topic, with many conflicting definitions and little consensus on when and if such definitions accurately describe the physical observables. Here, we relate these different definitions to distinct experimental observables in strong field ionization, finding that two definitions, Larmor time and Bohmian time, are compatible with the attoclock observable and the resonance lifetime of a bound state, respectively. Both of these definitions are closely connected to the theory of weak measurement, with Larmor time being the weak measurement value of tunneling time and Bohmian trajectory corresponding to the average particle trajectory, which has been recently reconstructed using weak measurement in a two-slit experiment [S. Kocsis, B. Braverman, S. Ravets, M. J. Stevens, R. P. Mirin, L. K. Shalm, and A. M. Steinberg, Science 332, 1170 (2011)]. We demonstrate a big discrepancy in strong field ionization between the Bohmian and weak measurement values of tunneling time, and we suggest this arises because the tunneling time is calculated for a small probability postselected ensemble of electrons. Our results have important implications for the interpretation of experiments in attosecond science, suggesting that tunneling is unlikely to be an instantaneous process.

Physical Review Letters•Jun 10, 2016•113 citations

Universal behavior of tunneling time and barrier time-delay decoupling in attoclock measurements

Ossama Kullie

The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.

•Feb 11, 2025•0 citations

Universal Behavior of Tunneling Time and Barrier Time-Delay Decoupling in Attoclock Measurements

Ossama Kullie

The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.

arXiv:2402.14431•Feb 22, 2024•0 citations

Universal behavior of tunneling time and barrier time-delay decoupling in attoclock measurements

Ossama Kullie

Abstract The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.

Journal of Physics Communications•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Distribution of ionization and tunneling times in a model of strong field ionization

Jose Tadeu Lunardi, Luiz A. Manzoni

Abstract We consider a simple model for strong field ionization and use the Salecker-Wigner-Peres clock to obtain a distribution of (real) times associated with this phenomenon. By coupling the Salecker-Wigner-Peres clock to the particle in different regions, we are able to distinguish between the ionization (exit) time, the tunneling time and the time the particle spends in the well before entering the barrier (the well time). We show that the distribution of ionization/exit times, which are the times usually measured in attoclock experiments, may differ significantly from the distribution of tunneling times, suggesting that the ionization times cannot be generally interpreted as tunneling times.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Nov 1, 2019•1 citation
The measurement of tunneling times in strong-field ionization has been the topic of much controversy in recent years, with the attoclock and Larmor clock being two of the main contenders for correctly reproducing these times. By expressing the attoclock as the weak value of temporal delay, we extend its meaning beyond the traditional setup. This allows us to calculate the attoclock time for a static one-dimensional tunneling model consisting of a binding delta potential and a constant electric field. We apply the Steinberg weak-value interpretation of the Larmor clock. Using this definition, we obtain the position-resolved time density during tunnel ionization, yielding a non-zero Larmor tunneling time. Our model allows us to derive the analogue of the position-resolved attoclock tunneling time. While non-zero at the tunnel exit, it vanishes at the detector, far away from the atom. Formally, this means that the attoclock does not measure the "local" Larmor time, but instead a "non-local" time closely related to the phase time.
Abstract The measurement of tunneling times in strong-field ionization has been the topic of much controversy in recent years, with the attoclock and Larmor clock being two of the main contenders for correctly reproducing these times. While the non-zero Larmor tunneling time has been unambiguously detected, the tunneling time measured by the attoclock appears to vanish in tunnel ionization of a hydrogen atom. By expressing the attoclock as the weak value of temporal delay, we extend its meaning beyond the traditional setup and connect it to the weak-value interpretation of the Larmor clock. Our approach allows us to derive the position-resolved attoclock tunneling time. We show how this time, while non-zero at the tunnel exit, vanishes at the detector, far away from the atom. Formally, this means that the attoclock does not measure the “local” Larmor time, but instead a “non-local” time closely related to the phase time.
Tunneling delays represent a hotly debated topic, with many conflicting definitions and little consensus on when and if such definitions accurately describe the physical observables. Here, we relate these different definitions to distinct experimental observables in strong field ionization, finding that two definitions, Larmor time and Bohmian time, are compatible with the attoclock observable and the resonance lifetime of a bound state, respectively. Both of these definitions are closely connected to the theory of weak measurement, with Larmor time being the weak measurement value of tunneling time and Bohmian trajectory corresponding to the average particle trajectory, which has been recently reconstructed using weak measurement in a two-slit experiment [S. Kocsis, B. Braverman, S. Ravets, M. J. Stevens, R. P. Mirin, L. K. Shalm, and A. M. Steinberg, Science 332, 1170 (2011)]. We demonstrate a big discrepancy in strong field ionization between the Bohmian and weak measurement values of tunneling time, and we suggest this arises because the tunneling time is calculated for a small probability postselected ensemble of electrons. Our results have important implications for the interpretation of experiments in attosecond science, suggesting that tunneling is unlikely to be an instantaneous process.
The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.
The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.
Abstract The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.
Abstract We consider a simple model for strong field ionization and use the Salecker-Wigner-Peres clock to obtain a distribution of (real) times associated with this phenomenon. By coupling the Salecker-Wigner-Peres clock to the particle in different regions, we are able to distinguish between the ionization (exit) time, the tunneling time and the time the particle spends in the well before entering the barrier (the well time). We show that the distribution of ionization/exit times, which are the times usually measured in attoclock experiments, may differ significantly from the distribution of tunneling times, suggesting that the ionization times cannot be generally interpreted as tunneling times.