Quantum instruments describe both the classical outcome and the updated state associated with a quantum measurement. We ask whether these processes can be simulated using only a natural subset of resources, namely projective measurements on the system and quantum processing of the postmeasurement states. We show that the simulability of instruments can be connected to an entanglement classification problem. This leads to a computationally efficient necessary condition for simulation of generic instruments and to a complete characterisation for qubits. We use this to address relevant quantum information tasks, namely (i) the noise tolerance of standard qubit unsharp measurements, (ii) nonprojective advantages in information-disturbance trade-offs, and (iii) increased sequential Bell inequality violations under projective measurements. Moreover, we consider also d-dimensional Lüders instruments that correspond to weak versions of standard basis measurements and show that for large d these can permit scalable noise advantages over projective implementations.
Quantum instruments describe both the classical outcome and the updated state associated with a quantum measurement. We ask whether these processes can be simulated using only a natural subset of resources, namely projective measurements on the system and quantum processing of the postmeasurement states. We show that the simulability of instruments can be connected to an entanglement classification problem. This leads to a computationally efficient necessary condition for simulation of generic instruments and to a complete characterisation for qubits. We use this to address relevant quantum information tasks, namely (i) the noise tolerance of standard qubit unsharp measurements, (ii) nonprojective advantages in information-disturbance trade-offs, and (iii) increased sequential Bell inequality violations under projective measurements. Moreover, we consider also d-dimensional Lüders instruments that correspond to weak versions of standard basis measurements and show that for large d these can permit scalable noise advantages over projective implementations.
Quantum instruments describe both the classical outcome and the updated quantum state in a measurement process. To do this in a non-trivial way, instruments must have the capability to interact coherently with the state that they measure. Here, we develop a resource theory for instruments. We consider a relevant quantifier of the separation between interactive and non-interactive instruments and show that it admits three distinct operational interpretations in terms of quantum information tasks. These concern (i) the preservation of maximally entangled states after a local measurement, (ii) the average ability to preserve random states after measurement, and (iii) the ability to recover the classical information generated from measuring half of a maximally entangled state. We also introduce a natural set of allowed operations and show that the third task fully characterises the resource content of instruments. Our general framework reproduces as special cases established resource theories for channels and measurements.
In the heart of every physical theory lies measurement theory. While classical measurements are passive probes, QMs can be viewed as active physical processes that shape the available information. Depending on the measurement type, different aspects of the information about a system are retrieved. All possible measurements in quantum physics are described by mathematical objects called Positive Operator-Valued Measures (POVMs). The most familiar standard measurements are called Projective-Valued Measures (PVMs) and make up a subset of POVMs. The complementary subset of POVMs is non-projective. However, some non-projective POVMs can be expressed as a probabilistic mixture of PVMs. Such POVMs are called projectively simulable, while non-simulable POVMs are genuinely non-projective. These can be made projectively simulable by adding noise to the measurements. If a genuinely non-projective POVM requires a large amount of noise before it becomes projectively simulable, it is more non-projective than a POVM that requires less noise. Hence, the degree of non-projectiveness is determined by the required noise strength. The act of measuring a quantum system changes the quantum state. While quantum measurements only take into account the readable classical output value, quantum instruments account for both the classical outcome and the post-measurement state. Hence, instruments are associated with measurements, and in an analogous way, projective and projectively simulable instruments can be defined. For many purposes, non-projective POVMs are more useful than PVMs, and the more non-projective a POVM is, the greater the advantage of using them over PVMs. Therefore, the aim of the thesis is to investigate the genuinely non-projective POVMs. More precisely, the degree of non-projectiveness in qubit POVMs is studied. This is done by convex optimization, specifically by solving semidefinite programs. Furthermore, the thesis addresses the open problem of finding the most non-projective qubit quantum instrument by a witness-based see-saw algorithm.
The standard approach to quantum measurement discrimination is to perform the given unknown measurement on a probe state, possibly entangled with an auxiliary system, and make a decision based on the measurement outcome obtained. In this work, we go beyond the standard aforementioned scenarios by consider not only the classical measurement outcome of a measurement, but also its the post-measurement quantum state. More specifically, instead of considering only the positive-operator valued measure (POVM) operators, we consider their associated Lüders' instrument associated with them. We prove that, when the post-measurement quantum states are available, the task of discriminating two qubit projective measurements is equivalent to discriminating two copies of quantum states associated to each projector pair, extending previous results known for the case where probe states are separable. Then, we proceed by showing that the advantage of considering post-measurement states in measurement discrimination can be large. We formalise this claim by presenting a family of pairs of measurements where the ratio between the discrimination bias of the measurement discrimination task with and without post-measurement states can be arbitrarily large. This shows that, while the post-measurement state was neglected in most of the previous literature, its use can significantly improve the performance of quantum measurement discrimination.
Standard projective measurements (PMs) represent a subset of all possible measurements in quantum physics, defined by positive-operator-valued measures. We study what quantum measurements are projective simulable, that is, can be simulated by using projective measurements and classical randomness. We first prove that every measurement on a given quantum system can be realized by classical randomization of projective measurements on the system plus an ancilla of the same dimension. Then, given a general measurement in dimension two or three, we show that deciding whether it is PM simulable can be solved by means of semidefinite programming. We also establish conditions for the simulation of measurements using projective ones valid for any dimension. As an application of our formalism, we improve the range of visibilities for which two-qubit Werner states do not violate any Bell inequality for all measurements. From an implementation point of view, our work provides bounds on the amount of white noise a measurement tolerates before losing any advantage over projective ones.
Superposition is the core feature that sets quantum theory apart from classical physics. Here, we investigate whether sets of quantum measurements can be modelled by using devices limited to performing jointly diagonalisable measurements. This leads us to introduce classical measurement models, where many such devices are connected together through classical randomness and post-processing. Such classical measurement models are intermediate between the notion of commutative measurements and joint measurability. Towards understanding these models we (i) identify exact noise and loss rates at which all projective measurements admit a classical model, (ii) propose numerical methods to construct classical models for finite sets of measurements, and (iii) show how to construct witnesses for ruling out the existence of classical models. In addition, we show that classical measurement models also have operational implications in non-disturbance tasks where sequential quantum measurements are implemented with classical side-information. Our work provides a new approach to the role of superposition in quantum measurements.
The projection postulate and spectral representation of observables remain central in quantum theory but describe only an idealized measurement limit. Realistic measurements may be inefficient, unsharp, weak, indirect, adaptive, destructive, or informationally incomplete. Positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs) provide the probability rule for processes, whereas quantum instruments specify state transformation. This review traces the hierarchy from von Neumann projective measurement to generalized measurement, emphasizing distinctions among effects, instruments, channels, and implementations. Naimark dilation realizes arbitrary POVMs through unitary coupling to an ancillary meter and projective readout. Stinespring dilation represents completely positive trace-preserving dynamics by unitary evolution on an enlarged system followed by partial trace. A qubit–ancilla interaction yields a partial-measurement instrument, its POVM effects, and its information–disturbance trade-off. It compares projective, generalized, and ancilla-mediated schemes; examines compatibility, instrument incompatibility, and disturbance; and surveys applications to state discrimination, tomography, control, and error correction. Recent developments in dynamic-circuit measurements and noisy-POVM compatibility are integrated with questions concerning measurement back-action and outcome definiteness. The review stresses that a POVM does not uniquely determine state update, dilation theorems establish realizability rather than unique mechanisms, and operational measurement theory does not settle definite outcomes, arguing quantum instruments provide a complete description of measurement.