Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2503.00015

The Quantum Ratio

Kenichi Konishi, Hans-Thomas Elze

Published Feb 17, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The concept of the Quantum Ratio was born out of the efforts to find a simple but universal criterion if the center of mass (CM) of an isolated (microscopic or macroscopic) body behaves quantum mechanically or classically, and under which conditions. It is defined as the ratio between the quantum fluctuation range, which is the spatial extension of the pure-state CM wave function, and the linear size of the body (the space support of the internal, bound-state wave function). The two cases where the ratio is smaller than unity or much larger than unity, roughly correspond to the body's CM behaving classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. An important notion following from the introduction of quantum ratio is that the elementary particles (thus the electron and the photon) are quantum mechanical. This is so even when the environment-induced decoherence turns them into a mixed state. Decoherence (mixed state) and classical state should not be identified. This simple observation is further elaborated, by analyzing some atomic or molecular processes. It may have far-reaching implications on the way quantum mechanics works, e.g., in biological systems.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2503.00015

Related papers

The Quantum Ratio 1

Kenichi Konishi, H - T Elze

Abstract The concept of the Quantum Ratio was born out of the efforts to find a simple but universal criterion if the center of mass (CM) of an isolated (microscopic or macroscopic) body behaves quantum mechanically or classically, and under which conditions. It is defined as the ratio between the quantum fluctuation range, which is the spatial extension of the pure-state CM wave function, and the linear size of the body (the space support of the internal, bound-state wave function). The two cases where the ratio is smaller than unity or much larger than unity, roughly correspond to the body’s CM behaving classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. An important notion following from the introduction of quantum ratio is that the elementary particles (thus the electron and the photon) are quantum mechanical. This is so even when the environment-induced decoherence turns them into a mixed state. Decoherence (mixed state) and classical state should not be identified. This simple observation is further elaborated, by analyzing some atomic or molecular processes. It may have far-reaching implications on the way quantum mechanics works, e.g., in biological systems.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2025•0 citations

The Quantum Ratio

Kenichi Konishi, Hans-Thomas Elze

The concept of quantum ratio has emerged from recent efforts to understand how Newton’s equations appear for the center of mass (CM) of an isolated macroscopic body at finite body temperatures as a first approximation of quantum mechanical equations. It is defined as Q≡Rq/L0, where the quantum fluctuation range Rq is the spatial extension of the pure-state CM wave function, whereas L0 stands for the body’s linear size (the space support of the internal bound-state wave function). The two cases Rq/L0≲1 and Rq/L0≫1 roughly correspond to the body’s CM behaving classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. In the present note, we elaborate on this concept and illustrate it through several examples. An important notion following from introduction of the quantum ratio is that the elementary particles (thus, the electron and the photon) are quantum mechanical even when environment-induced decoherence places them into a mixed state. Thus, decoherence and classical state should not be identified. This simple observation, further illustrated by consideration of a few atomic and molecular processes, may have significant implications for the way that quantum mechanics works in biological systems.

arXiv:2402.10702•Symmetry•Apr 4, 2024•3 citations

Newton’s equations from quantum mechanics for a macroscopic body in the vacuum

Kenichi Konishi

Newton’s force law [Formula: see text] is derived from the Schrödinger equation for isolated macroscopic bodies, composite states of e.g. [Formula: see text] atoms and molecules, at finite body temperatures. We first review three aspects of quantum mechanics (QM) in this context: (i) Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations for their center of mass (CM), (ii) the diffusion of the CM wave packet, and (iii) a finite body temperature which implies a metastable (mixed-) state of the body: photon emissions and self-decoherence. They explain the origin of the classical trajectory for a macroscopic body. The ratio between the range [Formula: see text] over which the quantum fluctuations of its CM are effective, and the body’s (linear) size [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text], tells whether the body’s CM behaves classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. In the first case, Newton’s force law for its CM follows from the Ehrenfest theorem. We illustrate this for weak gravitational forces, a harmonic-oscillator potential, and for constant external electromagnetic fields slowly varying in space. The derivation of the canonical Hamilton equations for many-body systems is also discussed. Effects due to the body’s finite size such as the gravitational tidal forces appear in perturbation theory. Our work is consistent with the well-known idea that the emergence of classical physics in QM is due to the environment-induced decoherence, but complements and completes it, by clarifying the conditions under which Newton’s equations follow from QM, and by deriving them explicitly.

arXiv:2209.07318•International Journal of Modern Physics A•May 20, 2023•8 citations

Quantum Universe and its Elusive Classicality

Jahan N. Schad

The article explores challenges presented by revelations in physics and the questions they provoke concerning reality. It sheds light on the disparity between the indefinite nature of quantum reality and our perception of classical reality. The necessity for transition from the quantum to classical reality is underscored, alongside difficulties of observer intervention and the complexities introduced by the objective collapse theory. The work introduces a pioneering approach of decoherence within the framework of universal wave function density matrices. It deploys entanglement among three primary quantum subsystems: mass particles, massless particles, and the human body system. This gives rise to a Von Neumann chain of correlated systems, wherein neglecting one system renders the other two in mixed states. Here the cohered massless system and the animate being constitute subjects of our perceptions. Within the body, the distributions of quantum particle wave packets are highly localized due to entanglement and chemical potential, satisfying the Ehrenfest condition, wherein the thermal deBroglie wavelength scale is considerably smaller than their domain in the body. Thus, each microstate of the body quantum particle ensemble can be analogously represented as a statistical mechanics particle ensemble or likened to microstates in the Debye statistical model. In the statistical mechanics perspective, life represents a macrostate characterized by thermodynamics parameters, and chemical potential. The life macrostate autonomously processes an environment corresponding to a mixed state alternative of its entangled quantum world counterpart, which appears in the stream of consciousness. The quantum universe persists, evolving deterministically, and the classical (macroscopic) universe is its realization statistical by the fundamental predicate of life discerned by the brain; our elusive world.

arXiv:2401.17336•Jan 29, 2024•0 citations

Proof of quantum to classical transition for the center of mass of quantum many body systems

Marco Bilardello

The classical limit of quantum mechanics is investigated, by focusing on the study of the center of mass of a many-body system where each particle is described by quantum mechanics. We study how, in the limit when the number of particles diverges and under quite general assumptions, the center of mass of the system is not anymore described by quantum mechanics but by classical mechanics: the center of mass of the system becomes with a well-defined position and momentum, the state of the center of mass is fully determined by its position and by its momentum, and its dynamics is given by the classical law of dynamics. In order to get this result, three assumptions on the many-body system are necessary: the total mass of the system must be much larger than the mass of each particle composing the system; at most a finite number of particles has non-zero correlation in position with an infinite number of particles; finally, when the number of particles composing the system diverge, the variance in position of each particle converges to a finite value. These assumptions are commonly realized for a macroscopic solid and liquid systems. The results obtained in this paper show how the classical limit of quantum mechanics can be naturally achieved without the need to modify quantum mechanics, without the need to have an external environment and without the need of changing the interpretations of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2508.01362•Aug 2, 2025•0 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICS.

Tursunova Zukhra, Nargiza Sadikova, Sunatova Dilfuza Abatovna +1 more

This article gives a brief information to quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics can be thought of roughly as the study of physics on very small length scales, although there are also certain macroscopic systems it directly applies to. The descriptor “quantum” arises because in contrast with classical mechanics, certain quantities take on only discrete values. However, some quantities still take on continuous values, as we’ll see.

International Bulletin of Applied Sciences and Technology•Oct 14, 2022•0 citations
The concept of the Quantum Ratio was born out of the efforts to find a simple but universal criterion if the center of mass (CM) of an isolated (microscopic or macroscopic) body behaves quantum mechanically or classically, and under which conditions. It is defined as the ratio between the quantum fluctuation range, which is the spatial extension of the pure-state CM wave function, and the linear size of the body (the space support of the internal, bound-state wave function). The two cases where the ratio is smaller than unity or much larger than unity, roughly correspond to the body's CM behaving classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. An important notion following from the introduction of quantum ratio is that the elementary particles (thus the electron and the photon) are quantum mechanical. This is so even when the environment-induced decoherence turns them into a mixed state. Decoherence (mixed state) and classical state should not be identified. This simple observation is further elaborated, by analyzing some atomic or molecular processes. It may have far-reaching implications on the way quantum mechanics works, e.g., in biological systems.
Abstract The concept of the Quantum Ratio was born out of the efforts to find a simple but universal criterion if the center of mass (CM) of an isolated (microscopic or macroscopic) body behaves quantum mechanically or classically, and under which conditions. It is defined as the ratio between the quantum fluctuation range, which is the spatial extension of the pure-state CM wave function, and the linear size of the body (the space support of the internal, bound-state wave function). The two cases where the ratio is smaller than unity or much larger than unity, roughly correspond to the body’s CM behaving classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. An important notion following from the introduction of quantum ratio is that the elementary particles (thus the electron and the photon) are quantum mechanical. This is so even when the environment-induced decoherence turns them into a mixed state. Decoherence (mixed state) and classical state should not be identified. This simple observation is further elaborated, by analyzing some atomic or molecular processes. It may have far-reaching implications on the way quantum mechanics works, e.g., in biological systems.
The concept of quantum ratio has emerged from recent efforts to understand how Newton’s equations appear for the center of mass (CM) of an isolated macroscopic body at finite body temperatures as a first approximation of quantum mechanical equations. It is defined as Q≡Rq/L0, where the quantum fluctuation range Rq is the spatial extension of the pure-state CM wave function, whereas L0 stands for the body’s linear size (the space support of the internal bound-state wave function). The two cases Rq/L0≲1 and Rq/L0≫1 roughly correspond to the body’s CM behaving classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. In the present note, we elaborate on this concept and illustrate it through several examples. An important notion following from introduction of the quantum ratio is that the elementary particles (thus, the electron and the photon) are quantum mechanical even when environment-induced decoherence places them into a mixed state. Thus, decoherence and classical state should not be identified. This simple observation, further illustrated by consideration of a few atomic and molecular processes, may have significant implications for the way that quantum mechanics works in biological systems.
Newton’s force law [Formula: see text] is derived from the Schrödinger equation for isolated macroscopic bodies, composite states of e.g. [Formula: see text] atoms and molecules, at finite body temperatures. We first review three aspects of quantum mechanics (QM) in this context: (i) Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations for their center of mass (CM), (ii) the diffusion of the CM wave packet, and (iii) a finite body temperature which implies a metastable (mixed-) state of the body: photon emissions and self-decoherence. They explain the origin of the classical trajectory for a macroscopic body. The ratio between the range [Formula: see text] over which the quantum fluctuations of its CM are effective, and the body’s (linear) size [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text], tells whether the body’s CM behaves classically or quantum mechanically, respectively. In the first case, Newton’s force law for its CM follows from the Ehrenfest theorem. We illustrate this for weak gravitational forces, a harmonic-oscillator potential, and for constant external electromagnetic fields slowly varying in space. The derivation of the canonical Hamilton equations for many-body systems is also discussed. Effects due to the body’s finite size such as the gravitational tidal forces appear in perturbation theory. Our work is consistent with the well-known idea that the emergence of classical physics in QM is due to the environment-induced decoherence, but complements and completes it, by clarifying the conditions under which Newton’s equations follow from QM, and by deriving them explicitly.
The article explores challenges presented by revelations in physics and the questions they provoke concerning reality. It sheds light on the disparity between the indefinite nature of quantum reality and our perception of classical reality. The necessity for transition from the quantum to classical reality is underscored, alongside difficulties of observer intervention and the complexities introduced by the objective collapse theory. The work introduces a pioneering approach of decoherence within the framework of universal wave function density matrices. It deploys entanglement among three primary quantum subsystems: mass particles, massless particles, and the human body system. This gives rise to a Von Neumann chain of correlated systems, wherein neglecting one system renders the other two in mixed states. Here the cohered massless system and the animate being constitute subjects of our perceptions. Within the body, the distributions of quantum particle wave packets are highly localized due to entanglement and chemical potential, satisfying the Ehrenfest condition, wherein the thermal deBroglie wavelength scale is considerably smaller than their domain in the body. Thus, each microstate of the body quantum particle ensemble can be analogously represented as a statistical mechanics particle ensemble or likened to microstates in the Debye statistical model. In the statistical mechanics perspective, life represents a macrostate characterized by thermodynamics parameters, and chemical potential. The life macrostate autonomously processes an environment corresponding to a mixed state alternative of its entangled quantum world counterpart, which appears in the stream of consciousness. The quantum universe persists, evolving deterministically, and the classical (macroscopic) universe is its realization statistical by the fundamental predicate of life discerned by the brain; our elusive world.
The classical limit of quantum mechanics is investigated, by focusing on the study of the center of mass of a many-body system where each particle is described by quantum mechanics. We study how, in the limit when the number of particles diverges and under quite general assumptions, the center of mass of the system is not anymore described by quantum mechanics but by classical mechanics: the center of mass of the system becomes with a well-defined position and momentum, the state of the center of mass is fully determined by its position and by its momentum, and its dynamics is given by the classical law of dynamics. In order to get this result, three assumptions on the many-body system are necessary: the total mass of the system must be much larger than the mass of each particle composing the system; at most a finite number of particles has non-zero correlation in position with an infinite number of particles; finally, when the number of particles composing the system diverge, the variance in position of each particle converges to a finite value. These assumptions are commonly realized for a macroscopic solid and liquid systems. The results obtained in this paper show how the classical limit of quantum mechanics can be naturally achieved without the need to modify quantum mechanics, without the need to have an external environment and without the need of changing the interpretations of quantum mechanics.