Quantum synchronization has been a subject of intensive research in the last decade. In this Letter, we propose a quantum Liénard system whose classical equivalent features two limit cycles to one of which the system will converge. In the quantum case, both limit cycles coexist in a single steady state. Each of these limit cycles localizes to a distinct phase if coupled to an external drive: one quantum state can thus be assigned two phases. Furthermore, coupling two such oscillators leads to the simultaneous appearance of synchronization and a synchronization blockade. To shed light on this apparent paradoxical result, we introduce finer measures of quantum synchronization.
Quantum synchronization has been a subject of intensive research in the last decade. In this Letter, we propose a quantum Liénard system whose classical equivalent features two limit cycles to one of which the system will converge. In the quantum case, both limit cycles coexist in a single steady state. Each of these limit cycles localizes to a distinct phase if coupled to an external drive: one quantum state can thus be assigned two phases. Furthermore, coupling two such oscillators leads to the simultaneous appearance of synchronization and a synchronization blockade. To shed light on this apparent paradoxical result, we introduce finer measures of quantum synchronization.
Synchronization manifests itself in oscillators adjusting their frequencies and phases with respect to an external signal or another oscillator. In the quantum case, new features appear such as destructive interferences that can result in the suppression of phase locking. A three-level (spin-1) oscillator with equal gain and damping rates and subject to an external drive does not exhibit any 1:1 phase locking but 2:1 phase locking, i.e., its phase distribution features two maxima. This bistable locking at two opposite phases is a signature of the quantum interference synchronization blockade. An analogous behavior was found for two identical coupled spin-1 oscillators. In this work, we consider two coupled spin-1 oscillators and a drive applied to the first spin. This leads to two interference blockades between the drive and the first spin as well as between both spins. Although both interference blockades persist for strong drive and coupling strengths, remarkably, the undriven spin does show a 1:1 phase locking to the external drive. The magnitude of the locking is proportional to the drive strength if the drive strength is small. In other words, the undriven oscillator synchronizes to the external drive through both interference blockades while the blockades persist. For a chain of three coupled spin-1 oscillators, we find synchronization between the first and third spins mediated via the blockaded, second spin.
Limit-cycle oscillators are the basic building blocks for synchronization; yet, the notion of a quantum limit cycle has remained unclear. Here, we study quantum limit cycles and synchronization in the presence of continuous heterodyne measurement. The resulting quantum trajectories, i.e., time evolutions of the quantum state conditioned on the measurement outcome, make the quantum limit cycles apparent. We focus on the paradigmatic model of the quantum van der Pol oscillator and on two-level systems. Our work provides insights into limit cycles in quantum systems, emphasizing their similarity to classical limit cycles subject to noise. Additionally, we connect theoretical measures of quantum synchronization to quantities experimentally accessible via heterodyne detection.
Recently, it was shown that dissipative quantum systems with three or more levels are able to synchronize to an external signal. Some researchers have stated that this is not possible for two-level systems, as those systems lack a stable limit cycle in unperturbed dynamics, but others have demonstrated, under a different definition of synchronization, that it is possible in qubits in models which include other elements. We show how a quantum two-level system can be understood as containing a valid limit cycle as the starting point of synchronization and that it can synchronize its dynamics to an external weak signal. This is demonstrated by analytically solving the Lindblad equation of a two-level system coupled to an environment, determining the steady state. This is a mixed state with contributions from many pure states, each of which provides a valid limit cycle. We show that this is sufficient to phase lock the dynamics to a weak external signal, hence clarifying synchronization in two-level systems. We use the Husimi Q representation to analyze the synchronization region, defining a synchronization measure which characterizes the strength of the phase locking. Also, we study the stability of the limit cycle and its deformation with the strength of the signal in terms of the components of the Bloch vector of the system. Finally, we generalize a model of the three-level system to illustrate how the stationary fixed point of that model can be changed into a limit cycle similar to the one that we describe for the two-level system.
Synchronization, a ubiquitous phenomenon in classical systems, has recently been extended to the quantum domain. Here, we show quantum synchronization of a bosonic mode exhibiting a Fock state-like limit cycle, manifesting as a steady state with a negative Wigner function. We demonstrate that this non-classical state can be phase-locked to an external drive, achieving synchronization within an Arnold tongue regime. We argue that synchronization is a dynamical property and fundamentally tied to the suppression of phase slips, which we show to occur with exponentially decreasing probability. We introduce a novel method to extract the phase slip rate from the Lindblad time evolution of the system. This work opens new avenues for understanding and manipulating non-classical synchronization dynamics.
Synchronization is a collective phenomenon in which interacting nonlinear oscillators develop a persistent relation between their phases and frequencies. In quantum systems, its description requires connecting the classical dynamics of limit-cycle oscillators with quantum fluctuations, dissipation, and the notion of phase. In this tutorial review, we offer a systematic framework for analyzing synchronization in classical and quantum dynamical systems. Starting from amplitude-phase dynamics, we introduce successively topics of relevance, such as phase locking, the Adler equation, Arnold tongues, and the Kuramoto model, and use these concepts to analyze coupled oscillators and their stability. We then formulate the corresponding description for quantum limit-cycle oscillators using Lindblad master equations and phase-space methods, with explicit examples of two and many coupled oscillators. We further discuss noise, synchronization measures, and the extreme quantum regime, including synchronization in spin systems. The emphasis throughout is on analytical derivations and a practical methodology for identifying synchronized states, determining their stability, and characterizing synchronization in quantum systems. The review is designed as a self-contained guide from which we hope that students can learn the essential concepts and techniques, while researchers can readily find the analytical tools and methodological insights needed to approach new synchronization problems.
It is well known that a system with two or more levels exists a limit cycle and can be synchronized with an external drive when the system and the drive are directly coupled. One might wonder if a system can synchronize with the external drive when they are not coupled directly. In this paper, we examine this case by considering a composite system consisting of two coupled two-level quantum systems, one of which is driven by an external field, while another couples to the driven one. Due to the decoherence caused by environments, the composite system would stay in a mixed state, and an effective limit cycle is formed, so phase locking could occur. We find the phase locking phenomenon in the phase diagram characterized by Husimi Q function, and the synchronization can be generated consequently that we will refer to indirect synchronization. The S function defined in the earlier study can also be used to measure the strength of synchronization. We claim that indirect synchronization is possible. This result provides us with a method to synchronize a quantum system that coupled to its neighbour without interacting with external drive directly.