Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2502.14244 · Quantum

The Complexity of Local Stoquastic Hamiltonians on 2D Lattices

Gabriel Waite, Michael J. Bremner

Published May 6, 2026• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We show the 2-Local Stoquastic Hamiltonian problem on a 2D square qubit lattice is StoqMA-complete. We achieve this by extending the spatially sparse circuit construction of Oliveira and Terhal, as well as the perturbative gadgets of Bravyi, DiVincenzo, Oliveira, and Terhal. Our main contributions demonstrate StoqMA circuits can be made spatially sparse and that geometrical, stoquastic-preserving, perturbative gadgets can be constructed, without an increase to particle dimension.

DOI
10.22331/q-2026-05-06-2097

Related papers

Complexity of geometrically local stoquastic Hamiltonians

Asad Raza, Jens Eisert, Alex B. Grilo

The QMA-completeness of the local Hamiltonian problem is a landmark result of the field of Hamiltonian complexity that studies the computational complexity of problems in quantum many-body physics. Since its proposal, substantial effort has been invested in better understanding the problem for physically motivated important families of Hamiltonians. In particular, the QMA-completeness of approximating the ground state energy of local Hamiltonians has been extended to the case where the Hamiltonians are geometrically local in one and two spatial dimensions. Among those physically motivated Hamiltonians, stoquastic Hamiltonians play a particularly crucial role, as they constitute the manifestly sign-free Hamiltonians in Monte Carlo approaches. Interestingly, for such Hamiltonians, the problem at hand becomes more ''classical'', being hard for the class MA (the randomized version of NP) and its complexity has tight connections with derandomization. In this work, we prove that both the two- and one-dimensional geometrically local analogues remain MA-hard with high enough qudit dimension. Moreover, we show that related problems are StoqMA-complete.

arXiv:2407.15499•Quantum•Feb 11, 2026•0 citations

The Complexity of Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians

Alex B. Grilo, Marios Rozos

Despite having an unnatural definition, $\mathsf{StoqMA}$ plays a central role in Hamiltonian complexity, e.g., in the classification theorem of the complexity of Hamiltonians by Cubitt and Montanaro (SICOMP 2016). Moreover, it lies between the two randomized extensions of $\mathsf{NP}$, $\mathsf{MA}$ and $\mathsf{AM}$. Therefore, understanding the exact power of $\mathsf{StoqMA}$ (and hopefully collapsing it with more natural complexity classes) is of great interest for different reasons. In this work, we take a step further in understanding this complexity class by showing that the Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians problem ($\mathsf{StoqSH}$) is in $\mathsf{StoqMA}$. Since Stoquastic Local Hamiltonians are $\mathsf{StoqMA}$-hard, this implies that $\mathsf{StoqSH}$ is $\mathsf{StoqMA}$-complete. We complement this result by showing that the separable version of $\mathsf{StoqSH}$ is $\mathsf{StoqMA}(2)$-complete, where $\mathsf{StoqMA}(2)$ is the version of $\mathsf{StoqMA}$ that receives two unentangled proofs.

cs.CCCross-listedarXiv:2605.02845•May 5, 2026•0 citations

Frustration Free Stoquastic Local Hamiltonian with Sub-Constant Gap is in NP

Eshan Chattopadhyay, Oren Renard, Nicholas Spooner

We continue the study of the Stoquastic Local Hamiltonian problem, a physically motivated restriction of the QMA-complete Local Hamiltonian problem (Kitaev, Shen, and Vyalyi, 2002). For the $β$-gapped, frustration-free case, Bravyi, Bessen, and Terhal (2006) showed that the problem is MA-complete when $β= 1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$. Aharonov and Grilo (2019) derandomized this algorithm and proved membership in NP for constant gap $β= Ω(1)$. We present an improved algorithm and analysis, establishing membership in NP even when $β= Ω(1/(\log\log n))$. We complement our result with an explicit example demonstrating why the analysis does not extend directly to $β= o(1/\log\log n)$.

arXiv:2609.38910•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

On the Computational Complexity of Guided Berry Phase Estimation

Gabriel Waite

We prove that deciding the Berry phase for parameterised 2-local qubit Hamiltonians is BQP-complete when presented with a classical description of a guiding state, promised to overlap with the ground state of the system. Our results extend to systems with weighted Heisenberg interactions and when restricted to a 2D square or triangular lattice geometry. The techniques we develop leverage the Schrieffer--Wolff transformation, typically used in the construction of perturbative gadget reductions for local Hamiltonian problems, extending it to parameterised families of Hamiltonians. We demonstrate that there exists a choice of parameterised simulator Hamiltonians whose Berry phase well-approximates that of a parameterised target family. Using the perturbative gadget reduction framework of Oliveira and Terhal and of Schuch and Verstraete, we adapt the arguments to parameterised interactions and demonstrate the error bounds in the resulting simulation can be controlled. Additionally, we provide an explicit proof that families of 1-local Hamiltonians have a Berry phase that can be efficiently computed to inverse-polynomial precision. This establishes a complexity transition between 1-local and 2-local Hamiltonian families.

quant-pharXiv:2609.25929•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations

Fine-Grained Complexity for Quantum Problems from Size-Preserving Circuit-to-Hamiltonian Constructions

Nai-Hui Chia, Atsuya Hasegawa, François Le Gall +1 more

The local Hamiltonian (LH) problem is the canonical $\mathsf{QMA}$-complete problem introduced by Kitaev. In this paper, we show its hardness in a very strong sense: we show that the 3-local Hamiltonian problem on $n$ qubits cannot be solved classically in time $O(2^{(1-\varepsilon)n})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$ under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), and cannot be solved quantumly in time $O(2^{(1-\varepsilon)n/2})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$ under the Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (QSETH). These lower bounds give evidence that the currently known classical and quantum algorithms for LH cannot be significantly improved. Furthermore, we are able to demonstrate fine-grained complexity lower bounds for approximating the quantum partition function (QPF) with an arbitrary constant relative error. Approximating QPF with relative error is known to be equivalent to approximately counting the dimension of the solution subspace of $\mathsf{QMA}$ problems. We show the SETH and QSETH hardness to estimate QPF with constant relative error. We then provide a quantum algorithm that runs in $O(\sqrt{2^n})$ time for an arbitrary $1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ relative error, matching our lower bounds and improving the state-of-the-art algorithm by Bravyi, Chowdhury, Gosset, and Wocjan (Nature Physics 2022) in the low-temperature regime. To prove our fine-grained lower bounds, we introduce the first size-preserving circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that encodes the computation of a $T$-time quantum circuit acting on $N$ qubits into a $(d+1)$-local Hamiltonian acting on $N+O(T^{1/d})$ qubits. This improves the standard construction based on the unary clock, which uses $N+O(T)$ qubits.

quant-pharXiv:2602.14379•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Feb 17, 2026•0 citations

Termwise versus globally stoquastic local Hamiltonians: questions of complexity and sign-curing

Marios Ioannou, Stephen Piddock, Milad Marvian +2 more

We elucidate the distinction between global and termwise stoquasticity for local Hamiltonians and prove several complexity results. We show that the stoquastic local Hamiltonian problem is $\textbf{StoqMA}$-complete even for globally stoquastic Hamiltonians. We study the complexity of deciding whether a local Hamiltonian is globally stoquastic or not. In particular, we prove $\textbf{coNP}$-hardness of deciding global stoquasticity in a fixed basis and $Σ_2^p$-hardness of deciding global stoquasticity under single-qubit transformations. As a last result, we expand the class of sign-curing transformations by showing how Clifford transformations can sign-cure a class of disordered 1D $XYZ$ Hamiltonians.

arXiv:2007.11964•Jul 23, 2020•0 citations
We show the 2-Local Stoquastic Hamiltonian problem on a 2D square qubit lattice is StoqMA-complete. We achieve this by extending the spatially sparse circuit construction of Oliveira and Terhal, as well as the perturbative gadgets of Bravyi, DiVincenzo, Oliveira, and Terhal. Our main contributions demonstrate StoqMA circuits can be made spatially sparse and that geometrical, stoquastic-preserving, perturbative gadgets can be constructed, without an increase to particle dimension.
The QMA-completeness of the local Hamiltonian problem is a landmark result of the field of Hamiltonian complexity that studies the computational complexity of problems in quantum many-body physics. Since its proposal, substantial effort has been invested in better understanding the problem for physically motivated important families of Hamiltonians. In particular, the QMA-completeness of approximating the ground state energy of local Hamiltonians has been extended to the case where the Hamiltonians are geometrically local in one and two spatial dimensions. Among those physically motivated Hamiltonians, stoquastic Hamiltonians play a particularly crucial role, as they constitute the manifestly sign-free Hamiltonians in Monte Carlo approaches. Interestingly, for such Hamiltonians, the problem at hand becomes more ''classical'', being hard for the class MA (the randomized version of NP) and its complexity has tight connections with derandomization. In this work, we prove that both the two- and one-dimensional geometrically local analogues remain MA-hard with high enough qudit dimension. Moreover, we show that related problems are StoqMA-complete.
Despite having an unnatural definition, StoqMA\mathsf{StoqMA}StoqMA plays a central role in Hamiltonian complexity, e.g., in the classification theorem of the complexity of Hamiltonians by Cubitt and Montanaro (SICOMP 2016). Moreover, it lies between the two randomized extensions of NP\mathsf{NP}NP, MA\mathsf{MA}MA and AM\mathsf{AM}AM. Therefore, understanding the exact power of StoqMA\mathsf{StoqMA}StoqMA (and hopefully collapsing it with more natural complexity classes) is of great interest for different reasons. In this work, we take a step further in understanding this complexity class by showing that the Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians problem (StoqSH\mathsf{StoqSH}StoqSH) is in StoqMA\mathsf{StoqMA}StoqMA. Since Stoquastic Local Hamiltonians are StoqMA\mathsf{StoqMA}StoqMA-hard, this implies that StoqSH\mathsf{StoqSH}StoqSH is StoqMA\mathsf{StoqMA}StoqMA-complete. We complement this result by showing that the separable version of StoqSH\mathsf{StoqSH}StoqSH is StoqMA(2)\mathsf{StoqMA}(2)StoqMA(2)-complete, where StoqMA(2)\mathsf{StoqMA}(2)StoqMA(2) is the version of StoqMA\mathsf{StoqMA}StoqMA that receives two unentangled proofs.
We continue the study of the Stoquastic Local Hamiltonian problem, a physically motivated restriction of the QMA-complete Local Hamiltonian problem (Kitaev, Shen, and Vyalyi, 2002). For the βββ-gapped, frustration-free case, Bravyi, Bessen, and Terhal (2006) showed that the problem is MA-complete when β=1/poly(n)β= 1/\mathrm{poly}(n)β=1/poly(n). Aharonov and Grilo (2019) derandomized this algorithm and proved membership in NP for constant gap β=Ω(1)β= Ω(1)β=Ω(1). We present an improved algorithm and analysis, establishing membership in NP even when β=Ω(1/(log⁡log⁡n))β= Ω(1/(\log\log n))β=Ω(1/(loglogn)). We complement our result with an explicit example demonstrating why the analysis does not extend directly to β=o(1/log⁡log⁡n)β= o(1/\log\log n)β=o(1/loglogn).
We prove that deciding the Berry phase for parameterised 2-local qubit Hamiltonians is BQP-complete when presented with a classical description of a guiding state, promised to overlap with the ground state of the system. Our results extend to systems with weighted Heisenberg interactions and when restricted to a 2D square or triangular lattice geometry. The techniques we develop leverage the Schrieffer--Wolff transformation, typically used in the construction of perturbative gadget reductions for local Hamiltonian problems, extending it to parameterised families of Hamiltonians. We demonstrate that there exists a choice of parameterised simulator Hamiltonians whose Berry phase well-approximates that of a parameterised target family. Using the perturbative gadget reduction framework of Oliveira and Terhal and of Schuch and Verstraete, we adapt the arguments to parameterised interactions and demonstrate the error bounds in the resulting simulation can be controlled. Additionally, we provide an explicit proof that families of 1-local Hamiltonians have a Berry phase that can be efficiently computed to inverse-polynomial precision. This establishes a complexity transition between 1-local and 2-local Hamiltonian families.
The local Hamiltonian (LH) problem is the canonical QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA-complete problem introduced by Kitaev. In this paper, we show its hardness in a very strong sense: we show that the 3-local Hamiltonian problem on nnn qubits cannot be solved classically in time O(2(1−ε)n)O(2^{(1-\varepsilon)n})O(2(1−ε)n) for any ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), and cannot be solved quantumly in time O(2(1−ε)n/2)O(2^{(1-\varepsilon)n/2})O(2(1−ε)n/2) for any ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 under the Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (QSETH). These lower bounds give evidence that the currently known classical and quantum algorithms for LH cannot be significantly improved. Furthermore, we are able to demonstrate fine-grained complexity lower bounds for approximating the quantum partition function (QPF) with an arbitrary constant relative error. Approximating QPF with relative error is known to be equivalent to approximately counting the dimension of the solution subspace of QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA problems. We show the SETH and QSETH hardness to estimate QPF with constant relative error. We then provide a quantum algorithm that runs in O(2n)O(\sqrt{2^n})O(2n​) time for an arbitrary 1/poly(n)1/\mathrm{poly}(n)1/poly(n) relative error, matching our lower bounds and improving the state-of-the-art algorithm by Bravyi, Chowdhury, Gosset, and Wocjan (Nature Physics 2022) in the low-temperature regime. To prove our fine-grained lower bounds, we introduce the first size-preserving circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that encodes the computation of a TTT-time quantum circuit acting on NNN qubits into a (d+1)(d+1)(d+1)-local Hamiltonian acting on N+O(T1/d)N+O(T^{1/d})N+O(T1/d) qubits. This improves the standard construction based on the unary clock, which uses N+O(T)N+O(T)N+O(T) qubits.
We elucidate the distinction between global and termwise stoquasticity for local Hamiltonians and prove several complexity results. We show that the stoquastic local Hamiltonian problem is StoqMA\textbf{StoqMA}StoqMA-complete even for globally stoquastic Hamiltonians. We study the complexity of deciding whether a local Hamiltonian is globally stoquastic or not. In particular, we prove coNP\textbf{coNP}coNP-hardness of deciding global stoquasticity in a fixed basis and Σ2pΣ_2^pΣ2p​-hardness of deciding global stoquasticity under single-qubit transformations. As a last result, we expand the class of sign-curing transformations by showing how Clifford transformations can sign-cure a class of disordered 1D XYZXYZXYZ Hamiltonians.