Dear Readers, After a short hiatus, the complexity theory column is back with a double feature! In this issue, we present a column by Mitali Bafna on Size-Efficient PCPs from High-Dimensional Expanders, and a column by Fernando Granha Jeronimo, Itai Leigh and Pei Wu on the landscape of complexity classes surrounding QMA(2). Both columns are excellent, and I am sure you will find them both enjoyable and enlightening. Many thanks to the authors for their hard work! What's coming up next in the pipeline? If all goes according to plan, we will feature guest columns by Geoffroy Couteau; Jesse Goodman (on seedless extractors); Davi Castro-Silva, Arkopal Dutt, and Tom Gur (on connections between additive combinatorics and quantum complexity theory); Debarati Das; and Jeroen Zuiddam (on matrix multiplication, moment polytopes and asymptotic spectra). Stay tuned for upcoming issues of SIGACT News!
The classical PCP theorem is arguably the most important achievement of classical complexity theory in the past quarter century. In recent years, researchers in quantum computational complexity have tried to identify approaches and develop tools that address the question: does a quantum version of the PCP theorem hold? The story of this study starts with classical complexity and takes unexpected turns providing fascinating vistas on the foundations of quantum mechanics and multipartite entanglement, topology and the so-called phenomenon of topological order, quantum error correction, information theory, and much more; it raises questions that touch upon some of the most fundamental issues at the heart of our understanding of quantum mechanics. At this point, the jury is still out as to whether or not such a theorem holds. This survey aims to provide a snapshot of the status in this ongoing story, tailored to a general theory-of-CS audience.
We initiate the study of quantum locally testable codes (
qLTCs). Classical
LTCs are very important in computational complexity. These codes are defined as the linear subspace satisfying a set of local constraints, with the additional requirement that their soundness,
R(δ), which is the probability that a randomly chosen constraint is violated, is proportional to the proximity
δ, where
δn is the distance of a word from the code. Excellent
LTCs exist in the classical world, and they are tightly related to the celebrated
PCP (probabilistically checkable proof) theorem. In quantum complexity, quantum error correcting codes provide central examples in the study of the illusive behavior of multiparticle entanglement, and they have played a crucial role in many computational complexity results. We provide a definition of the quantum analogue of
LTCs and motivate it by connecting its central notions in the study of both entanglement and quantum Hamiltonian complexity. A natural question is whether such codes exist, and how good can their soundness be. To the best of our knowledge all quantum codes known today exhibit poor soundness. Moreover, we show that the soundness of
CSS codes (which are commonly used quantum codes defined by two classical codes) is governed by the minimal soundness of the two classical codes; in the most natural
CSS code we examined as a candidate
qLTC, namely, the Reed--Muller code, there is a tradeoff between the parameters of the two codes, which prevents the resulting quantum code from being
qLTC. These facts seem to suggest a more general phenomenon, by which the soundness of
qLTCs is inherently restricted due to multiparticle entanglement. Our main technical contribution consists of two complementary results regarding
qLTCs which are stabilizer codes (denoted
sLTCs). We first prove a surprising, inherently quantum property of
sLTCs. For small constant values of proximity, the better the local expansion of the interaction graph of the constraints, the less sound the
sLTC becomes. This stands in sharp contrast to the classical setting. The complementary, more intuitive result also holds (and is actually much more involved technically to prove in the quantum case): an upper bound on the soundness when the code is defined on bad local expanders. Together we arrive at a quantum upper bound on the soundness of
sLTCs set on any graph, which does not hold in the classical case. Many open questions are raised regarding what possible parameters are achievable for
qLTCs, and their relation to other objects of interest in quantum information theory. In the appendix we also define a quantum analogue of
PCPs of proximity (
PCPPs) and point out that the result of [E. Ben-Sasson et al., SIAM J. Comput., 36 (2006), pp. 889--974] by which
PCPPs imply
LTCs with related parameters carries over to the
sLTCs. This creates a first link between
qLTCs and quantum
PCPs [D. Aharonov, I. Arad, and T. Vidick, ACM SIGACT News Archive, 44 (2013), pp. 47--79].