Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2501.06338 · Physical Review A

Dynamics of supersolid state: Normal fluid, superfluid, and supersolid velocities

Wayne M. Saslow

Published Aug 12, 2025• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider the dynamics of a supersolid state that is based on Leggett's idea of local phase flow around the atomic sites of the solid. This leads to a local microscopic superfluid velocity that is not Galilean and is defined only relative to the solid and a $T=0$ superfluid fraction ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}/\ensuremath{\rho}<1$ (with $\ensuremath{\rho}$ being the macroscopic mass density). Landau's excitation-based argument for superfluids---that at temperature $T=0$ the normal fluid mass density ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}$ is zero---should apply to supersolids. Together these two arguments imply that at low $T$ there is a missing mass density. We attribute this to a supersolid density ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}$, with ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}$ and a momentum-bearing supersolid velocity ${v}_{Li}$. We derive the macroscopic dynamical equations for this system with three momentum-bearing macroscopic velocities $({v}_{Li},{v}_{Ni},{v}_{Si})$ using Onsager's irreversible thermodynamics. For slow spatial variations, ${v}_{Si}$ accelerates along the negative gradient of the chemical potential or mass, like for an ordinary superfluid, and ${v}_{Ni}$ is subject to drag against ${v}_{Li}$ with a characteristic drag time $\ensuremath{\tau}$. There are three contributions to the acceleration of ${v}_{Li}$: drag against ${v}_{Ni}$, along the negative gradient of the chemical potential or mass, and due to the forces of lattice elasticity. For high-frequency motion relative to the drag time $\ensuremath{\tau}$, ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}$ moves independently of ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}$. The normal modes for such a system have a crossover frequency below which the normal fluid velocity ${v}_{Ni}$ is dragged into motion with ${v}_{Li}$ (so the theory reduces to the ${v}_{Si},{v}_{Ni}$ theory of Andreev and Lifshitz) and above which the normal fluid velocity ${v}_{Ni}$ is an independent variable. For an isotropic lattice we study the transverse and longitudinal responses. A frequency-dependent rotational inertia experiment is predicted to show, at frequencies that are low relative to $\ensuremath{\tau}$, that ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}$ and ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}$ move together but that at high frequencies ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}$ moves much more than ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}$.

DOI
10.1103/yyjt-1tth

Related papers

Models for supercritical motion in a superfluid Fermi liquid

J. A. Kuorelahti, Sami Laine, E. V. Thuneberg

We study the drag force on objects moving in a Fermi superfluid at velocities on the order of the Landau velocity ${v}_{L}$. The expectation has been that ${v}_{L}$ is the critical velocity beyond which the drag force starts to increase toward its normal-state value. This expectation is challenged by a recent experiment measuring the heat generated by a uniformly moving wire immersed in superfluid $^{3}\mathrm{He}$. We introduce the basis for the calculation of the drag force on a macroscopic object using the Fermi-liquid theory of superfluidity. As a technical tool in the calculations, we propose a boundary condition that describes diffuse reflection of quasiparticles from a surface on a scale that is larger than the superfluid coherence length. We calculate the drag force on steadily moving objects of different sizes. For an object that is small compared to the coherence length, we find a drag force that is in accordance with the expectation. For a macroscopic object, we need to take into account the spatially varying flow field around the object. At low velocities, this arises from ideal flow of the superfluid. At higher velocities, the flow field is modified by excitations that are created when the flow velocity locally exceeds ${v}_{L}$. The flow field causes Andreev reflection of quasiparticles and thus leads to change in the drag force. We calculate multiple limiting cases for a cylinder-shaped object. In the absence of quasiparticle-quasiparticle collisions, we find that the critical velocity is larger than ${v}_{L}$ and the drag force (per cross-sectional area) at $2{v}_{L}$ is reduced by an order of magnitude compared to the case of a small object. In a collision-dominated limit, the flow shows signs of instability at a velocity below ${v}_{L}$.

arXiv:1806.02554•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Oct 16, 2018•13 citations

Single-Fluid Model for Rotating Annular Supersolids and Its Experimental Implications

Niccolò Preti, N. Antolini, C. Drevon +6 more

The famous two-fluid model of finite-temperature superfluids has been recently extended to describe the mixed classical-superfluid dynamics of the newly discovered supersolid phase of matter. We show that for rigidly rotating supersolids one can derive a more appropriate single-fluid model, in which the seemingly classical and superfluid contributions to the motion emerge from a spatially varying phase of the global wave function. That allows one to design experimental protocols to excite and detect the peculiar rotation dynamics of annular supersolids, including partially quantized supercurrents, in which each atom brings less than ℏ units of angular momentum. Our results are valid for a more general class of density-modulated superfluids.

arXiv:2510.26753•Physical Review Letters•Dec 19, 2025•3 citations

Superfluidity

C. J. Pethick, H. Smith

The phenomena of superfluidity and superconductivity are intimately connected with the existence of a condensate, a macroscopically occupied quantum state. Such condensates occur in a variety of different physical systems, as described in Chapter 1. The foundation for the description of superfluidity is a picture of the system as being comprised of a condensate and elementary excitations. In Chapter 8 we have seen how physical properties such as the energy and the density of a Bose–Einstein condensed system may be expressed in terms of a contribution from the condensate, plus one from the elementary excitations, and in this chapter we shall consider further developments of this basic idea to other situations. As a first application, we determine the critical velocity for creation of an excitation in a homogeneous system (Sec. 10.1). Following that, we show how to express the momentum density in terms of the velocity of the condensate and the distribution function for excitations. This provides the basis for a two-component description, the two components being the condensate and the thermal excitations (Sec. 10.2). In the past, this framework has proved to be very effective in describing the properties of superfluids and superconductors, and in Sec. 10.3 we apply it to dynamical processes. To describe the state of a superfluid, one must specify the condensate velocity, in addition to the variables needed to characterize the state of an ordinary fluid. As a consequence, the collective behaviour of a superfluid is richer than that of an ordinary one. Collective modes are most simply examined when excitations collide frequently enough that they are in local thermodynamic equilibrium.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 29, 2001•57 citations

Vortex dynamics in two-dimensional supersolids

Chi-Deuk Yoo, Alan T. Dorsey

We investigate the dynamics of quantized vortices in a model two-dimensional supersolid. Starting from an effective action that captures the dynamics of the superfluid condensate and its coupling to the lattice displacements, we integrate out the low-energy Goldstone modes-the phonons of the solid and the superfluid condensate-to arrive at an effective action for the vortices in the condensate. In the low-velocity limit we calculate the effective inertial mass for the vortices, and we find that the mass has a logarithmic frequency dependence, similar to the inertial mass found in superfluid vortices. The vortex dynamics also includes a Magnus force term in the equation of motion that arises from the Berry phase in the effective action.

arXiv:2409.04865•Sep 7, 2024•0 citations

Superfluid speed limits

P. V. E. McClintock

Superfluids are extraordinary liquids whose viscosity is zero. This enables them to flow without friction and to pass effortlessly through fine pores or tiny openings (in earthenware pottery for example) that are quite impervious to ordinary fluids such as water. Similarly, an object moving in a superfluid experiences no drag and behaves dynamically as if it were moving in a vacuum. But what will happen if this object is subjected to a constant force? Physical intuition suggests that the object will accelerate uniformly, in the absence of drag, but it is also obvious that this cannot continue indefinitely. Sooner or later, something must surely happen to stop the acceleration (figure 1). The nature of this catastrophic event, in which the superfluidity breaks down at least temporarily, is of considerable intrinsic interest and also sheds much light on the fundamental character of the superfluid state, and the physics of the superfluid under consideration.

Physics World•Jul 1, 1991•0 citations

Velocity dependence of the density of the normal component, and hydrodynamics of superfluid flow at high velocities

L. V. Kiknadze, Yu. G. Mamaladze

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1980•0 citations
We consider the dynamics of a supersolid state that is based on Leggett's idea of local phase flow around the atomic sites of the solid. This leads to a local microscopic superfluid velocity that is not Galilean and is defined only relative to the solid and a T=0T=0T=0 superfluid fraction \ensuremathρS/\ensuremathρ<1{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}/\ensuremath{\rho}<1\ensuremathρS​/\ensuremathρ<1 (with \ensuremathρ\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremathρ being the macroscopic mass density). Landau's excitation-based argument for superfluids---that at temperature T=0T=0T=0 the normal fluid mass density \ensuremathρN{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}\ensuremathρN​ is zero---should apply to supersolids. Together these two arguments imply that at low TTT there is a missing mass density. We attribute this to a supersolid density \ensuremathρL{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}\ensuremathρL​, with \ensuremathρL\ensuremath≡\ensuremathρ\ensuremath−\ensuremathρS\ensuremath−\ensuremathρN{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}\ensuremathρL​\ensuremath≡\ensuremathρ\ensuremath−\ensuremathρS​\ensuremath−\ensuremathρN​ and a momentum-bearing supersolid velocity vLi{v}_{Li}vLi​. We derive the macroscopic dynamical equations for this system with three momentum-bearing macroscopic velocities (vLi,vNi,vSi)({v}_{Li},{v}_{Ni},{v}_{Si})(vLi​,vNi​,vSi​) using Onsager's irreversible thermodynamics. For slow spatial variations, vSi{v}_{Si}vSi​ accelerates along the negative gradient of the chemical potential or mass, like for an ordinary superfluid, and vNi{v}_{Ni}vNi​ is subject to drag against vLi{v}_{Li}vLi​ with a characteristic drag time \ensuremathτ\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremathτ. There are three contributions to the acceleration of vLi{v}_{Li}vLi​: drag against vNi{v}_{Ni}vNi​, along the negative gradient of the chemical potential or mass, and due to the forces of lattice elasticity. For high-frequency motion relative to the drag time \ensuremathτ\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremathτ, \ensuremathρL{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}\ensuremathρL​ moves independently of \ensuremathρN{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}\ensuremathρN​. The normal modes for such a system have a crossover frequency below which the normal fluid velocity vNi{v}_{Ni}vNi​ is dragged into motion with vLi{v}_{Li}vLi​ (so the theory reduces to the vSi,vNi{v}_{Si},{v}_{Ni}vSi​,vNi​ theory of Andreev and Lifshitz) and above which the normal fluid velocity vNi{v}_{Ni}vNi​ is an independent variable. For an isotropic lattice we study the transverse and longitudinal responses. A frequency-dependent rotational inertia experiment is predicted to show, at frequencies that are low relative to \ensuremathτ\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremathτ, that \ensuremathρL{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}\ensuremathρL​ and \ensuremathρN{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}\ensuremathρN​ move together but that at high frequencies \ensuremathρL{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{L}\ensuremathρL​ moves much more than \ensuremathρN{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{N}\ensuremathρN​.
We study the drag force on objects moving in a Fermi superfluid at velocities on the order of the Landau velocity vL{v}_{L}vL​. The expectation has been that vL{v}_{L}vL​ is the critical velocity beyond which the drag force starts to increase toward its normal-state value. This expectation is challenged by a recent experiment measuring the heat generated by a uniformly moving wire immersed in superfluid 3He^{3}\mathrm{He}3He. We introduce the basis for the calculation of the drag force on a macroscopic object using the Fermi-liquid theory of superfluidity. As a technical tool in the calculations, we propose a boundary condition that describes diffuse reflection of quasiparticles from a surface on a scale that is larger than the superfluid coherence length. We calculate the drag force on steadily moving objects of different sizes. For an object that is small compared to the coherence length, we find a drag force that is in accordance with the expectation. For a macroscopic object, we need to take into account the spatially varying flow field around the object. At low velocities, this arises from ideal flow of the superfluid. At higher velocities, the flow field is modified by excitations that are created when the flow velocity locally exceeds vL{v}_{L}vL​. The flow field causes Andreev reflection of quasiparticles and thus leads to change in the drag force. We calculate multiple limiting cases for a cylinder-shaped object. In the absence of quasiparticle-quasiparticle collisions, we find that the critical velocity is larger than vL{v}_{L}vL​ and the drag force (per cross-sectional area) at 2vL2{v}_{L}2vL​ is reduced by an order of magnitude compared to the case of a small object. In a collision-dominated limit, the flow shows signs of instability at a velocity below vL{v}_{L}vL​.
The famous two-fluid model of finite-temperature superfluids has been recently extended to describe the mixed classical-superfluid dynamics of the newly discovered supersolid phase of matter. We show that for rigidly rotating supersolids one can derive a more appropriate single-fluid model, in which the seemingly classical and superfluid contributions to the motion emerge from a spatially varying phase of the global wave function. That allows one to design experimental protocols to excite and detect the peculiar rotation dynamics of annular supersolids, including partially quantized supercurrents, in which each atom brings less than ℏ units of angular momentum. Our results are valid for a more general class of density-modulated superfluids.
The phenomena of superfluidity and superconductivity are intimately connected with the existence of a condensate, a macroscopically occupied quantum state. Such condensates occur in a variety of different physical systems, as described in Chapter 1. The foundation for the description of superfluidity is a picture of the system as being comprised of a condensate and elementary excitations. In Chapter 8 we have seen how physical properties such as the energy and the density of a Bose–Einstein condensed system may be expressed in terms of a contribution from the condensate, plus one from the elementary excitations, and in this chapter we shall consider further developments of this basic idea to other situations. As a first application, we determine the critical velocity for creation of an excitation in a homogeneous system (Sec. 10.1). Following that, we show how to express the momentum density in terms of the velocity of the condensate and the distribution function for excitations. This provides the basis for a two-component description, the two components being the condensate and the thermal excitations (Sec. 10.2). In the past, this framework has proved to be very effective in describing the properties of superfluids and superconductors, and in Sec. 10.3 we apply it to dynamical processes. To describe the state of a superfluid, one must specify the condensate velocity, in addition to the variables needed to characterize the state of an ordinary fluid. As a consequence, the collective behaviour of a superfluid is richer than that of an ordinary one. Collective modes are most simply examined when excitations collide frequently enough that they are in local thermodynamic equilibrium.
We investigate the dynamics of quantized vortices in a model two-dimensional supersolid. Starting from an effective action that captures the dynamics of the superfluid condensate and its coupling to the lattice displacements, we integrate out the low-energy Goldstone modes-the phonons of the solid and the superfluid condensate-to arrive at an effective action for the vortices in the condensate. In the low-velocity limit we calculate the effective inertial mass for the vortices, and we find that the mass has a logarithmic frequency dependence, similar to the inertial mass found in superfluid vortices. The vortex dynamics also includes a Magnus force term in the equation of motion that arises from the Berry phase in the effective action.
Superfluids are extraordinary liquids whose viscosity is zero. This enables them to flow without friction and to pass effortlessly through fine pores or tiny openings (in earthenware pottery for example) that are quite impervious to ordinary fluids such as water. Similarly, an object moving in a superfluid experiences no drag and behaves dynamically as if it were moving in a vacuum. But what will happen if this object is subjected to a constant force? Physical intuition suggests that the object will accelerate uniformly, in the absence of drag, but it is also obvious that this cannot continue indefinitely. Sooner or later, something must surely happen to stop the acceleration (figure 1). The nature of this catastrophic event, in which the superfluidity breaks down at least temporarily, is of considerable intrinsic interest and also sheds much light on the fundamental character of the superfluid state, and the physics of the superfluid under consideration.