Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2412.17197

Q-LIME πππ: A Quantum-Inspired Extension to LIME

Vargas, Nelson Colón

Published Dec 23, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Machine learning models offer powerful predictive capabilities but often lack transparency. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) addresses this by perturbing features and measuring their impact on a model's output. In text-based tasks, LIME typically removes present words (bits set to 1) to identify high-impact tokens. We propose \textbf{Q-LIME $π$} (Quantum LIME $π$), a quantum-inspired extension of LIME that encodes a binary feature vector in a quantum state, leveraging superposition and interference to explore local neighborhoods more efficiently. Our method focuses on flipping bits from $1 \rightarrow 0$ to emulate LIME's ``removal'' strategy, and can be extended to $0 \rightarrow 1$ where adding features is relevant. Experiments on subsets of the IMDb dataset demonstrate that Q-LIME $π$ often achieves near-identical top-feature rankings compared to classical LIME while exhibiting lower runtime in small- to moderate-dimensional feature spaces. This quantum-classical hybrid approach thus provides a new pathway for interpretable AI, suggesting that, with further improvements in quantum hardware and methods, quantum parallelism may facilitate more efficient local explanations for high-dimensional data.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2412.17197

Related papers

On the Stability of Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Quantum Classifiers

Giovanni Acampora, Autilia Vitiello

Abstract The interplay between machine learning and quantum computing can lead to unprecedented prospects for both fundamental research and real-world applications. In this new field of quantum machine learning, quantum classifiers, i.e., quantum algorithms for solving classification problems, have attracted the most attention. However, despite the promising performance of these new models for classification tasks, they are complex black-box models. Therefore, like or even more so than classical machine learning models, their use in critical contexts such as medical diagnosis could be hampered without the support of explanations. This paper addresses this challenge by investigating the use of Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) for quantum classifiers, with a specific focus on the stability of the explanations. Stability is a key property for ensuring that explanations are consistent and trustworthy, especially when decisions impact sensitive domains. The paper conducts a systematic stability study of LIME in the quantum setting, validating whether a classical explainable AI technique can be meaningfully applied to quantum models. As shown in experiments involving different datasets belonging to critical applications, LIME provides explanations for quantum support vector machines and quantum neural networks that are not only interpretable but also stable. By highlighting the stability of explanations, these findings demonstrate the suitability of LIME as an explainability tool for quantum classifiers.

Machine Learning•Jun 1, 2026•2 citations

From Black Boxes to Glass Boxes: Interpretable Quantum Machine Learning through Explainability Tools

Manojkumar S. Langote, Abhishek Kawane

Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising paradigm that leverages quantum mechanical principles to accelerate machine learning tasks.Despite its potential, most QML models remain opaque "black boxes," hindering their deployment in high-stakes or regulated domains where trust and accountability are essential.This work introduces two novel interpretability methods tailored for QML: Quantum Shapley Values (QSV) and Quantum Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (Q-LIME).QSV adapts cooperative game theory to quantify the contribution of individual qubits, observables, or circuit parameters, while Q-LIME generates perturbed quantum states and trains surrogate classical models to approximate local decision boundaries.Through experiments on variational quantum classifiers and hybrid quantum-classical neural networks, we demonstrate that QSV provides rigorous attribution but suffers from scalability constraints, whereas Q-LIME yields efficient, approximate explanations suitable for near-term devices.By transforming quantum models from opaque "black boxes" into interpretable "glass boxes," this research lays the foundation for trustworthy, transparent, and human centred quantum AI.

•Dec 29, 2025•0 citations

Image Classification and Explainability Analysis Using GPU-Based CUDA-Q Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks

Sieun Kim, Inwhee Joe

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) remains underexplored in quantum machine learning (QML) due to limited quantum computational resources and the lack of practical interpretability techniques. In this study, we implement the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithm within the CUDA-Q framework and propose an interpretable QML analysis method using GPU-accelerated quantum simulation. All experiments are conducted on a GPU-based simulator rather than real quantum hardware, enabling stable large-scale sampling required by LIME and ensuring reproducible results. We design a binary classification model based on a single-qubit variational circuit composed of parameterized RY and RX rotations, and the model is trained with gradient-based optimization. The performance is evaluated on the MNIST, KMNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 datasets using training and test accuracy as metrics. By applying LIME, the classification outcomes of the quantum model are visualized and interpreted in a human-understandable form, demonstrating that meaningful interpretability can be achieved even under limited qubit counts and constrained computational environments. Furthermore, we analyze the trade-off between simulator performance and model accuracy, confirming that GPU-based CUDA-Q simulation provides a scalable and practical research environment for QML. This work offers a concrete pathway toward transparent and interpretable quantum machine learning.

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

QRLaXAI: quantum representation learning and explainable AI

Asitha Kottahachchi Kankanamge Don, Ibrahim Khalil

Abstract As machine learning grows increasingly complex due to big data and deep learning, model explainability has become essential to fostering user trust. Quantum machine learning (QML) has emerged as a promising field, leveraging quantum computing to enhance classical machine learning methods, particularly through quantum representation learning (QRL). QRL aims to provide more efficient and powerful machine learning capabilities on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. However, interpreting QRL models poses significant challenges due to the reliance on quantum gate-based parameterized circuits, which, while analogous to classical neural network layers, operate in the quantum domain. To address these challenges, we propose an explainable QRL framework combining a quantum autoencoder (QAE) with a variational quantum classifier (VQC) and incorporating theoretical and empirical explainability for image data. Our dual approach enhances model interpretability by integrating visual explanations via local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) and analytical insights using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). These complementary methods provide a deeper understanding of the model’s decision-making process based on prediction outcomes. Experimental evaluations on simulators and superconducting quantum hardware validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework for classification tasks, underscoring the importance of explainable representation learning in advancing QML towards more transparent and reliable applications.

Quantum Machine Intelligence•Feb 19, 2025•10 citations

A Novel Approach to Explainable AI with Quantized Active Ingredients in Decision Making

A. M. A. S. D. Alagiyawanna, Asoka Karunananda, Thushari Silva +1 more

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have shown good success at classifying. However, the lack of explainability is a true and significant challenge, especially in high-stakes domains, such as health and finance, where understanding is paramount. We propose a new solution to this challenge: an explainable AI framework based on our comparative study with Quantum Boltzmann Machines (QBMs) and Classical Boltzmann Machines (CBMs). We leverage principles of quantum computing within classical machine learning to provide substantive transparency around decision-making. The design involves training both models on a binarised and dimensionally reduced MNIST dataset, where Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied for preprocessing. For interpretability, we employ gradient-based saliency maps in QBMs and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) in CBMs to evaluate feature attributions.QBMs deploy hybrid quantum-classical circuits with strongly entangling layers, allowing for richer latent representations, whereas CBMs serve as a classical baseline that utilises contrastive divergence. Along the way, we found that QBMs outperformed CBMs on classification accuracy (83.5% vs. 54%) and had more concentrated distributions in feature attributions as quantified by entropy (1.27 vs. 1.39). In other words, QBMs not only produced better predictive performance than CBMs, but they also provided clearer identification of "active ingredient" or the most important features behind model predictions. To conclude, our results illustrate that quantum-classical hybrid models can display improvements in both accuracy and interpretability, which leads us toward more trustworthy and explainable AI systems.

cs.LGCross-listedarXiv:2601.08733•SLAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SLAAI-ICAI)•Jan 14, 2026•0 citations

On the interpretability of quantum neural networks

Lirandë Pira, Christopher Ferrie

Abstract Interpretability of artificial intelligence (AI) methods, particularly deep neural networks, is of great interest. This heightened focus stems from the widespread use of AI-backed systems. These systems, often relying on intricate neural architectures, can exhibit behavior that is challenging to explain and comprehend. The interpretability of such models is a crucial component of building trusted systems. Many methods exist to approach this problem, but they do not apply straightforwardly to the quantum setting. Here, we explore the interpretability of quantum neural networks using local model-agnostic interpretability measures commonly utilized for classical neural networks. Following this analysis, we generalize a classical technique called LIME, introducing Q-LIME, which produces explanations of quantum neural networks. A feature of our explanations is the delineation of the region in which data samples have been given a random label, likely subjects of inherently random quantum measurements. We view this as a step toward understanding how to build responsible and accountable quantum AI models.

arXiv:2308.11098•Quantum Machine Intelligence•Aug 28, 2024•42 citations
Machine learning models offer powerful predictive capabilities but often lack transparency. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) addresses this by perturbing features and measuring their impact on a model's output. In text-based tasks, LIME typically removes present words (bits set to 1) to identify high-impact tokens. We propose \textbf{Q-LIME πππ} (Quantum LIME πππ), a quantum-inspired extension of LIME that encodes a binary feature vector in a quantum state, leveraging superposition and interference to explore local neighborhoods more efficiently. Our method focuses on flipping bits from 1→01 \rightarrow 01→0 to emulate LIME's ``removal'' strategy, and can be extended to 0→10 \rightarrow 10→1 where adding features is relevant. Experiments on subsets of the IMDb dataset demonstrate that Q-LIME πππ often achieves near-identical top-feature rankings compared to classical LIME while exhibiting lower runtime in small- to moderate-dimensional feature spaces. This quantum-classical hybrid approach thus provides a new pathway for interpretable AI, suggesting that, with further improvements in quantum hardware and methods, quantum parallelism may facilitate more efficient local explanations for high-dimensional data.
Abstract The interplay between machine learning and quantum computing can lead to unprecedented prospects for both fundamental research and real-world applications. In this new field of quantum machine learning, quantum classifiers, i.e., quantum algorithms for solving classification problems, have attracted the most attention. However, despite the promising performance of these new models for classification tasks, they are complex black-box models. Therefore, like or even more so than classical machine learning models, their use in critical contexts such as medical diagnosis could be hampered without the support of explanations. This paper addresses this challenge by investigating the use of Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) for quantum classifiers, with a specific focus on the stability of the explanations. Stability is a key property for ensuring that explanations are consistent and trustworthy, especially when decisions impact sensitive domains. The paper conducts a systematic stability study of LIME in the quantum setting, validating whether a classical explainable AI technique can be meaningfully applied to quantum models. As shown in experiments involving different datasets belonging to critical applications, LIME provides explanations for quantum support vector machines and quantum neural networks that are not only interpretable but also stable. By highlighting the stability of explanations, these findings demonstrate the suitability of LIME as an explainability tool for quantum classifiers.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising paradigm that leverages quantum mechanical principles to accelerate machine learning tasks.Despite its potential, most QML models remain opaque "black boxes," hindering their deployment in high-stakes or regulated domains where trust and accountability are essential.This work introduces two novel interpretability methods tailored for QML: Quantum Shapley Values (QSV) and Quantum Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (Q-LIME).QSV adapts cooperative game theory to quantify the contribution of individual qubits, observables, or circuit parameters, while Q-LIME generates perturbed quantum states and trains surrogate classical models to approximate local decision boundaries.Through experiments on variational quantum classifiers and hybrid quantum-classical neural networks, we demonstrate that QSV provides rigorous attribution but suffers from scalability constraints, whereas Q-LIME yields efficient, approximate explanations suitable for near-term devices.By transforming quantum models from opaque "black boxes" into interpretable "glass boxes," this research lays the foundation for trustworthy, transparent, and human centred quantum AI.
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) remains underexplored in quantum machine learning (QML) due to limited quantum computational resources and the lack of practical interpretability techniques. In this study, we implement the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithm within the CUDA-Q framework and propose an interpretable QML analysis method using GPU-accelerated quantum simulation. All experiments are conducted on a GPU-based simulator rather than real quantum hardware, enabling stable large-scale sampling required by LIME and ensuring reproducible results. We design a binary classification model based on a single-qubit variational circuit composed of parameterized RY and RX rotations, and the model is trained with gradient-based optimization. The performance is evaluated on the MNIST, KMNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 datasets using training and test accuracy as metrics. By applying LIME, the classification outcomes of the quantum model are visualized and interpreted in a human-understandable form, demonstrating that meaningful interpretability can be achieved even under limited qubit counts and constrained computational environments. Furthermore, we analyze the trade-off between simulator performance and model accuracy, confirming that GPU-based CUDA-Q simulation provides a scalable and practical research environment for QML. This work offers a concrete pathway toward transparent and interpretable quantum machine learning.
Abstract As machine learning grows increasingly complex due to big data and deep learning, model explainability has become essential to fostering user trust. Quantum machine learning (QML) has emerged as a promising field, leveraging quantum computing to enhance classical machine learning methods, particularly through quantum representation learning (QRL). QRL aims to provide more efficient and powerful machine learning capabilities on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. However, interpreting QRL models poses significant challenges due to the reliance on quantum gate-based parameterized circuits, which, while analogous to classical neural network layers, operate in the quantum domain. To address these challenges, we propose an explainable QRL framework combining a quantum autoencoder (QAE) with a variational quantum classifier (VQC) and incorporating theoretical and empirical explainability for image data. Our dual approach enhances model interpretability by integrating visual explanations via local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) and analytical insights using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). These complementary methods provide a deeper understanding of the model’s decision-making process based on prediction outcomes. Experimental evaluations on simulators and superconducting quantum hardware validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework for classification tasks, underscoring the importance of explainable representation learning in advancing QML towards more transparent and reliable applications.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have shown good success at classifying. However, the lack of explainability is a true and significant challenge, especially in high-stakes domains, such as health and finance, where understanding is paramount. We propose a new solution to this challenge: an explainable AI framework based on our comparative study with Quantum Boltzmann Machines (QBMs) and Classical Boltzmann Machines (CBMs). We leverage principles of quantum computing within classical machine learning to provide substantive transparency around decision-making. The design involves training both models on a binarised and dimensionally reduced MNIST dataset, where Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied for preprocessing. For interpretability, we employ gradient-based saliency maps in QBMs and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) in CBMs to evaluate feature attributions.QBMs deploy hybrid quantum-classical circuits with strongly entangling layers, allowing for richer latent representations, whereas CBMs serve as a classical baseline that utilises contrastive divergence. Along the way, we found that QBMs outperformed CBMs on classification accuracy (83.5% vs. 54%) and had more concentrated distributions in feature attributions as quantified by entropy (1.27 vs. 1.39). In other words, QBMs not only produced better predictive performance than CBMs, but they also provided clearer identification of "active ingredient" or the most important features behind model predictions. To conclude, our results illustrate that quantum-classical hybrid models can display improvements in both accuracy and interpretability, which leads us toward more trustworthy and explainable AI systems.
Abstract Interpretability of artificial intelligence (AI) methods, particularly deep neural networks, is of great interest. This heightened focus stems from the widespread use of AI-backed systems. These systems, often relying on intricate neural architectures, can exhibit behavior that is challenging to explain and comprehend. The interpretability of such models is a crucial component of building trusted systems. Many methods exist to approach this problem, but they do not apply straightforwardly to the quantum setting. Here, we explore the interpretability of quantum neural networks using local model-agnostic interpretability measures commonly utilized for classical neural networks. Following this analysis, we generalize a classical technique called LIME, introducing Q-LIME, which produces explanations of quantum neural networks. A feature of our explanations is the delineation of the region in which data samples have been given a random label, likely subjects of inherently random quantum measurements. We view this as a step toward understanding how to build responsible and accountable quantum AI models.