, we study what happens in the classical-quantum correspondence as we change the indeterminacy of the classical particle. Furthermore, finding a correspondence between a classical state and a quantum state is not a trivial task. Quantum observables, described by Hermitian operators, do not generally commute, so a precise ordering must be introduced to resolve this ambiguity. In this work, we study two different arbitrary orderings: the first is an arbitrary ordering of the position and momentum observables; the second, which is the main focus of the present work, is an arbitrary ordering of the annihilation and creation operators. In this latter case, we find the interesting result that even a

δ

-function, which in general has no quantum correspondence, can be mapped into a valid quantum state for a particular ordering, specifically the antinormal one (all creation operators are to the right of all annihilation operators in the product). This means that the Gaussian probability density corresponds to a valid quantum state, regardless of how localized classical particles are in phase space.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2411.14043

Related papers

From classical probability densities to quantum states: Quantization of Gaussian for arbitrary orderings

Giorgio Lo Giudice, Lorenzo Leone, Fedele Lizzi

The primary focus of this work is to investigate how the most emblematic classical probability density, namely a Gaussian, can be mapped to a valid quantum states. To explore this issue, we consider a Gaussian whose squared variance depends on a parameter [Formula: see text]. Specifically, depending on the value of [Formula: see text], we study what happens in the classical-quantum correspondence as we change the indeterminacy of the classical particle. Furthermore, finding a correspondence between a classical state and a quantum state is not a trivial task. Quantum observables, described by Hermitian operators, do not generally commute, so a precise ordering must be introduced to resolve this ambiguity. In this work, we study two different arbitrary orderings: the first is an arbitrary ordering of the position and momentum observables; the second, which is the main focus of the present work, is an arbitrary ordering of the annihilation and creation operators. In this latter case, we find the interesting result that even a [Formula: see text]-function, which in general has no quantum correspondence, can be mapped into a valid quantum state for a particular ordering, specifically the antinormal one (all creation operators are to the right of all annihilation operators in the product). This means that the Gaussian probability density corresponds to a valid quantum state, regardless of how localized classical particles are in phase space.The primary focus of this work is to investigate how the most emblematic classical probability density, namely a Gaussian, can be mapped to a valid quantum states. To explore this issue, we consider a Gaussian whose squared variance depends on a parameter [Formula: see text]. Specifically, depending on the value of [Formula: see text], we study what happens in the classical-quantum correspondence as we change the indeterminacy of the classical particle. Furthermore, finding a correspondence between a classical state and a quantum state is not a trivial task. Quantum observables, described by Hermitian operators, do not generally commute, so a precise ordering must be introduced to resolve this ambiguity. In this work, we study two different arbitrary orderings: the first is an arbitrary ordering of the position and momentum observables; the second, which is the main focus of the present work, is an arbitrary ordering of the annihilation and creation operators. In this latter case, we find the interesting result that even a [Formula: see text]-function, which in general has no quantum correspondence, can be mapped into a valid quantum state for a particular ordering, specifically the antinormal one (all creation operators are to the right of all annihilation operators in the product). This means that the Gaussian probability density corresponds to a valid quantum state, regardless of how localized classical particles are in phase space.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsFeb 7, 20250 citations

Quantization as a universal probabilistic phenomenon

Luigi Accardi, Yun Gang Lu

We survey some results obtained in the last 25 years to illustrate the following probabilistic quantization statement: quantum probability is not a generalization of classical probability but a deeper level of it. Generalizing the classical theory of orthogonal polynomials, one can show that any random field $X$ admitting all the moments can be represented as the sum of three operators, which are natural extensions of the creation, annihilation, and preservation operators in the usual boson Fock quantum theory. These operators generate a noncommutative $*$ -algebra on which the quantum extension of the expected value relative to the probability distribution of the field $X$ induces a quantum state. So, any classical algebraic probability space generates a quantum space with its own commutation relations. The Heisenberg commutation relation characterizes the classical fields, while the new type of commutation relations (of type II) appears in non-Gaussian cases. The same machinery, but applied to Bernoulli fields, leads to Fermi-Dirac anticommutation relations (see the introduction).We survey some results obtained in the last 25 years to illustrate the following probabilistic quantization statement: quantum probability is not a generalization of classical probability but a deeper level of it. Generalizing the classical theory of orthogonal polynomials, one can show that any random field $X$ admitting all the moments can be represented as the sum of three operators, which are natural extensions of the creation, annihilation, and preservation operators in the usual boson Fock quantum theory. These operators generate a noncommutative $*$-algebra on which the quantum extension of the expected value relative to the probability distribution of the field $X$ induces a quantum state. So, any classical algebraic probability space generates a quantum space with its own commutation relations. The Heisenberg commutation relation characterizes the classical fields, while the new type of commutation relations (of type II) appears in non-Gaussian cases. The same machinery, but applied to Bernoulli fields, leads to Fermi-Dirac anticommutation relations (see the introduction).

Теория вероятностей и ее примененияJan 1, 20250 citations

Quantization as a Universal Probabilistic Phenomenon

L. Accardi, Yu. G. Lu

We survey some results obtained in the last 25 years to illustrate the following probabilistic quantization statement: quantum probability is not a generalization of classical probability but a deeper level of it. Generalizing the classical theory of orthogonal polynomials, one can show that any random field $X$ admitting all the moments can be represented as the sum of three operators, which are natural extensions of the creation, annihilation, and preservation operators in the usual boson Fock quantum theory. These operators generate a noncommutative $*$ -algebra on which the quantum extension of the expected value relative to the probability distribution of the field $X$ induces a quantum state. So, any classical algebraic probability space generates a quantum space with its own commutation relations. The Heisenberg commutation relation characterizes the classical fields, while the new type of commutation relations (of type II) appears in non-Gaussian cases. The same machinery, but applied to Bernoulli fields, leads to Fermi--Dirac anticommutation relations (see the introduction).We survey some results obtained in the last 25 years to illustrate the following probabilistic quantization statement: quantum probability is not a generalization of classical probability but a deeper level of it. Generalizing the classical theory of orthogonal polynomials, one can show that any random field $X$ admitting all the moments can be represented as the sum of three operators, which are natural extensions of the creation, annihilation, and preservation operators in the usual boson Fock quantum theory. These operators generate a noncommutative $*$-algebra on which the quantum extension of the expected value relative to the probability distribution of the field $X$ induces a quantum state. So, any classical algebraic probability space generates a quantum space with its own commutation relations. The Heisenberg commutation relation characterizes the classical fields, while the new type of commutation relations (of type II) appears in non-Gaussian cases. The same machinery, but applied to Bernoulli fields, leads to Fermi--Dirac anticommutation relations (see the introduction).

Theory of Probability and Its ApplicationsFeb 1, 20260 citations

Eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a hermitian gaussian operator: Role of the Schrödinger-Robertson uncertainty relation

Robert F. Snider

The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a normalized gaussian operator do not seem to have been previously considered. I solve this problem for 1-dimensional translational systems. I also address the question as to whether a gaussian operator is a density operator. To answer that question, it is first necessary to be sure what conditions must be satisfied, so a short review of density operators is given. Since position and momentum do not commute in quantum mechanics, it is useful to start with the consequences of the noncommutation, which is generally the Schrödinger-Robertson uncertainty relation, which is also briefly reviewed. It is found that the question of whether a gaussian operator is a density operator is directly tied to this uncertainty relation. Since the Wigner function is the phase space representation of a translational density operator, it is natural to consider the gaussian phase space function associated with a gaussian operator and to compare the phase space and operator properties. Throughout such discussions, the independent parameters in these functions are the first and second moments of position and momentum. The application of this formalism to the free translation and spreading of a gaussian packet is given and shows the formal similarity between classical and quantum behavior, whereas the literature standardly only considers the pure state case (equivalent to a single wavefunction).The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a normalized gaussian operator do not seem to have been previously considered. I solve this problem for 1-dimensional translational systems. I also address the question as to whether a gaussian operator is a density operator. To answer that question, it is first necessary to be sure what conditions must be satisfied, so a short review of density operators is given. Since position and momentum do not commute in quantum mechanics, it is useful to start with the consequences of the noncommutation, which is generally the Schrödinger-Robertson uncertainty relation, which is also briefly reviewed. It is found that the question of whether a gaussian operator is a density operator is directly tied to this uncertainty relation. Since the Wigner function is the phase space representation of a translational density operator, it is natural to consider the gaussian phase space function associated with a gaussian operator and to compare the phase space and operator properties. Throughout such discussions, the independent parameters in these functions are the first and second moments of position and momentum. The application of this formalism to the free translation and spreading of a gaussian packet is given and shows the formal similarity between classical and quantum behavior, whereas the literature standardly only considers the pure state case (equivalent to a single wavefunction).

Electronic Research ArchiveJan 1, 20231 citation

Double Covariance Model for Entangled Quantum States: Gaussian Reduction to Second Order Covariances

Andrei Khrennikov

We propose a novel approach to the problem of interconnecting the probabilistic formalisms of classical and quantum physics, focusing on its most challenging aspect: the classical probabilistic generation of entangled states. We show that the statistics encoded in the density operators of composite quantum systems correspond to fourth-order classical statistics. Specifically, to generate a density operator, one must consider the covariance of a random covariance operator. We term this framework the Double Covariance Model (DCM). This double covariance possesses a non-trivial internal structure that arises from the interplay between two distinct time scales, combining temporal and statistical covariances. In this article, we exploit a well-known property of Gaussian processes: the second-order moment determines the moments of higher orders, specifically the fourth-order moment. This Gaussian reduction simplifies the DCM by reducing it to second-order statistics. Utilizing (circular) Gaussian processes simplifies and generalizes the DCM construction for entangled states, rendering it mathematically rigorous. Furthermore, it clarifies the classical probabilistic meaning of concurrence, a foundational quantitative measure of entanglement.We propose a novel approach to the problem of interconnecting the probabilistic formalisms of classical and quantum physics, focusing on its most challenging aspect: the classical probabilistic generation of entangled states. We show that the statistics encoded in the density operators of composite quantum systems correspond to fourth-order classical statistics. Specifically, to generate a density operator, one must consider the covariance of a random covariance operator. We term this framework the Double Covariance Model (DCM). This double covariance possesses a non-trivial internal structure that arises from the interplay between two distinct time scales, combining temporal and statistical covariances. In this article, we exploit a well-known property of Gaussian processes: the second-order moment determines the moments of higher orders, specifically the fourth-order moment. This Gaussian reduction simplifies the DCM by reducing it to second-order statistics. Utilizing (circular) Gaussian processes simplifies and generalizes the DCM construction for entangled states, rendering it mathematically rigorous. Furthermore, it clarifies the classical probabilistic meaning of concurrence, a foundational quantitative measure of entanglement.

quant-pharXiv:2607.11968Journal of Mathematical PhysicsJul 14, 20260 citations

From Quantum to Classical Within the Framework of Integral Quantization

Ligia M. C. S. Rodrigues, Evaldo M. F. Curado, Diego Noguera +1 more

Integral quantization is a powerful framework for mapping classical phase-space functions—defined on a symplectic manifold—onto quantum operators in a Hilbert space. It encompasses several quantization methods, such as coherent-state quantization, and inherently incorporates operator symmetrization. The formalism relies on a choice of weight function, whose flexibility allows for a family of possible quantizations. In this work, we address the inverse problem: given a quantum operator, how can one determine a classical phase-space function whose integral quantization reproduces exactly that operator? We propose a systematic method, within the integral quantization framework, to construct such a classical function, which depends on the chosen weight. We demonstrate that quantizing the resulting function recovers the original operator, thereby establishing a consistent two-way mapping between classical and quantum descriptions. The method is applied to several physically relevant operators: the projector, a mixed-state density operator, the annihilation operator, and an entangled state. We also analyze how quantum entanglement manifests in the structure of the corresponding classical phase-space function.Integral quantization is a powerful framework for mapping classical phase-space functions—defined on a symplectic manifold—onto quantum operators in a Hilbert space. It encompasses several quantization methods, such as coherent-state quantization, and inherently incorporates operator symmetrization. The formalism relies on a choice of weight function, whose flexibility allows for a family of possible quantizations. In this work, we address the inverse problem: given a quantum operator, how can one determine a classical phase-space function whose integral quantization reproduces exactly that operator? We propose a systematic method, within the integral quantization framework, to construct such a classical function, which depends on the chosen weight. We demonstrate that quantizing the resulting function recovers the original operator, thereby establishing a consistent two-way mapping between classical and quantum descriptions. The method is applied to several physically relevant operators: the projector, a mixed-state density operator, the annihilation operator, and an entangled state. We also analyze how quantum entanglement manifests in the structure of the corresponding classical phase-space function.

SymmetryFeb 25, 20260 citations

λ

. Specifically, depending on the value of

λ

δ

X

admitting all the moments can be represented as the sum of three operators, which are natural extensions of the creation, annihilation, and preservation operators in the usual boson Fock quantum theory. These operators generate a noncommutative

*

-algebra on which the quantum extension of the expected value relative to the probability distribution of the field

X

induces a quantum state. So, any classical algebraic probability space generates a quantum space with its own commutation relations. The Heisenberg commutation relation characterizes the classical fields, while the new type of commutation relations (of type II) appears in non-Gaussian cases. The same machinery, but applied to Bernoulli fields, leads to Fermi-Dirac anticommutation relations (see the introduction).

X

*

-algebra on which the quantum extension of the expected value relative to the probability distribution of the field

X

induces a quantum state. So, any classical algebraic probability space generates a quantum space with its own commutation relations. The Heisenberg commutation relation characterizes the classical fields, while the new type of commutation relations (of type II) appears in non-Gaussian cases. The same machinery, but applied to Bernoulli fields, leads to Fermi--Dirac anticommutation relations (see the introduction).