Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2411.09256 · Quantum

On the structure of higher order quantum maps

Anna Jenčová

Published May 5, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study higher order quantum maps in the context of a *-autonomous category of affine subspaces. We show that types of higher order maps can be identified with certain Boolean functions that we call type functions. By an extension of this identification, the algebraic structure of Boolean functions is inherited by some sets of quantum objects including higher order maps. Using the Mobius transform, we assign to each type function a poset whose elements are labelled by subsets of indices of the involved spaces. We then show that the type function corresponds to a comb type if and only if the poset is a chain. We also devise a procedure for decomposition of the poset to a set of basic chains from which the type function is constructed by taking maxima and minima of concatenations of the basic chains in different orders. On the level of higher order maps, maxima and minima correspond to affine mixtures and intersections, respectively.

DOI
10.22331/q-2026-05-05-2090

Related papers

Order structure and signalling in higher order quantum maps

Anna Jenčová

We study the signalling structure of higher order quantum maps from an order-theoretic perspective, building on the combinatorial characterization of higher order types by Bisio and Perinotti. We have shown in a previous work arxiv:2411.09256 that types are represented by boolean functions called type functions, and that each such function is characterized by a related structure poset. We characterize the distributive lattice generated by all type functions with fixed indices of input and output systems - whose elements we call regular subtypes - by a monotonicity condition. Unlike the set of type functions, the lattice of regular subtypes is closed under the one-way signalling product, moreover, it is generated by a specific family of causally ordered types. We then study signalling relations for maps belonging to a regular subtype, showing that the no-signalling conditions between an input and an output system are determined by a single evaluation of the corresponding function. For higher order types specifically, we show that all signalling relations can be read off directly from the structure poset via a rank parity condition. Finally, we study relations between the structure poset of a type and its normal forms, that is, expressions of the type in terms of causally ordered types. We illustrate construction of normal forms on some examples, demonstrating the possibility that the normal form can be systematically derived from maximal chains of the poset and signalling relations between them.

quant-pharXiv:2604.09192•Apr 13, 2026•0 citations

A type-based framework for higher-order quantum theory

Samuel B. Steakley

The study of quantum information protocols that process quantum gates has led to an interest in ‘higher-order’ quantum transformations, which are transformations that act on other quantum transformations as inputs and/or return them as outputs. Mathematically, such transformations form an inductive hierarchy of infinitely many levels, or ‘orders’: quantum states are at order zero; channels, which transform quantum states, are at order one; superchannels, which transform channels, are at order two; maps that transform superchannels are at order three, and so on. To proceed toward a general understanding of higher-order quantum theory, we need methods to study the full inductive hierarchy in a uniform manner. In the context of the Hilbert space formalism of quantum theory, this means studying operator spaces (used to represent states), linear operators between operator spaces (used to represent channels), etc.; in other words, the inductive hierarchy of higher-order linear maps. We introduce a methodological framework for higher-order quantum theory, partly modeled on that of [Bisio \& Perinotti, 2019]. The framework is based on a set of types, denoted TypesA. Types may be thought of as labels that we use to identify and differentiate all the different kinds of objects of higher-order quantum theory. The central objects of the framework are typed (higher-order) linear maps, as given by the construction of a set L(x) of linear maps of type x for each x ∈ TypesA. We equip the framework with a parallel product operation for typed linear maps, which modifies and generalizes the tensor product so as to be physically meaningful when applied to maps of distinct and arbitrary orders. With the aim of characterizing the higher-order linear maps that represent valid quantum objects, we give a construction, consisting of a convex cone K(x) for each x ∈ TypesA, which generalizes the notion of complete positivity to all orders. We construct a version of the Choi isomorphism for our framework, and we use it to show that K(x) is self-dual for all x ∈ TypesA.

•Dec 18, 2025•0 citations

Characterising transformations between quantum objects, 'completeness' of quantum properties, and transformations without a fixed causal order

Simon Milz, Marco Túlio Quintino

Many fundamental and key objects in quantum mechanics are linear mappings between particular affine/linear spaces. This structure includes basic quantum elements such as states, measurements, channels, instruments, non-signalling channels and channels with memory, and also higher-order operations such as superchannels, quantum combs, n-time processes, testers, and process matrices which may not respect a definite causal order. Deducing and characterising their structural properties in terms of linear and semidefinite constraints is not only of foundational relevance, but plays an important role in enabling the numerical optimisation over sets of quantum objects and allowing simpler connections between different concepts and objects. Here, we provide a general framework to deduce these properties in a direct and easy to use way. While primarily guided by practical quantum mechanical considerations, we also extend our analysis to mappings between general linear/affine spaces and derive their properties, opening the possibility for analysing sets which are not explicitly forbidden by quantum theory, but are still not much explored. Together, these results yield versatile and readily applicable tools for all tasks that require the characterisation of linear transformations, in quantum mechanics and beyond. As an application of our methods, we discuss how the existence of indefinite causality naturally emerges in higher-order quantum transformations and provide a simple strategy for the characterisation of mappings that have to preserve properties in a 'complete' sense, i.e., when acting non-trivially only on parts of an input space.

arXiv:2305.01247•Quantum•Jul 17, 2024•1 citation

Theoretical framework for higher-order quantum theory

Alessandro Bisio, Paolo Perinotti

Higher-order quantum theory is an extension of quantum theory where one introduces transformations whose input and output are transformations, thus generalizing the notion of channels and quantum operations. The generalization then goes recursively, with the construction of a full hierarchy of maps of increasingly higher order. The analysis of special cases already showed that higher-order quantum functions exhibit features that cannot be tracked down to the usual circuits, such as indefinite causal structures, providing provable advantages over circuital maps. The present treatment provides a general framework where this kind of analysis can be carried out in full generality. The hierarchy of higher-order quantum maps is introduced axiomatically with a formulation based on the language of types of transformations. Complete positivity of higher-order maps is derived from the general admissibility conditions instead of being postulated as in previous approaches. The recursive characterization of convex sets of maps of a given type is used to prove equivalence relations between different types. The axioms of the framework do not refer to the specific mathematical structure of quantum theory, and can therefore be exported in the context of any operational probabilistic theory.

arXiv:1806.09554•Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•May 1, 2019•59 citations

Quantum Logic Maps and Triangular Norms on D-posets

Ahmed M. Al-Adilee, Mustafa G. Al-Mousawi

Abstract In this paper, we propose a type of generalization of triangular norms and quantum logic functions on d-poset algebra. We compare the modified constructions, and properties to the classical properties of the generalized concepts. We show several structures with proof of each type of the proposed generalization. We show several relationships that connect the triangular norms to the quantum logic maps, and also show their relationships to the classical probability space. We provide some explanatory examples that show each structure on d-poset with extra properties that depends on a definition of state.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 1, 2020•0 citations

On Boolean posets of numerical events

Dietmar W. Dorninger, Helmut Länger

Abstract With many physical processes in which quantum mechanical phenomena can occur, it is essential to take into account a decision mechanism based on measurement data. This can be achieved by means of so-called numerical events, which are specified as follows: Let S be a set of states of a physical system and p(s) the probability of the occurrence of an event when the system is in state $$s\in S$$ s ∈ S . A function $$p:S\rightarrow [0,1]$$ p : S → [ 0 , 1 ] is called a numerical event or alternatively, an S-probability. If a set P of S-probabilities is ordered by the order of real functions, it becomes a poset which can be considered as a quantum logic. In case the logic P is a Boolean algebra, this will indicate that the underlying physical system is a classical one. The goal of this paper is to study sets of S-probabilities which are not far from being Boolean algebras by means of the addition and comparison of functions that occur in these sets. In particular, certain classes of so-called Boolean posets of S-probabilities are characterized and related to each other and descriptions based on sets of states are derived.

arXiv:2002.01058•Advances in Computational Intelligence•Jun 7, 2021•1 citation
We study higher order quantum maps in the context of a *-autonomous category of affine subspaces. We show that types of higher order maps can be identified with certain Boolean functions that we call type functions. By an extension of this identification, the algebraic structure of Boolean functions is inherited by some sets of quantum objects including higher order maps. Using the Mobius transform, we assign to each type function a poset whose elements are labelled by subsets of indices of the involved spaces. We then show that the type function corresponds to a comb type if and only if the poset is a chain. We also devise a procedure for decomposition of the poset to a set of basic chains from which the type function is constructed by taking maxima and minima of concatenations of the basic chains in different orders. On the level of higher order maps, maxima and minima correspond to affine mixtures and intersections, respectively.
We study the signalling structure of higher order quantum maps from an order-theoretic perspective, building on the combinatorial characterization of higher order types by Bisio and Perinotti. We have shown in a previous work arxiv:2411.09256 that types are represented by boolean functions called type functions, and that each such function is characterized by a related structure poset. We characterize the distributive lattice generated by all type functions with fixed indices of input and output systems - whose elements we call regular subtypes - by a monotonicity condition. Unlike the set of type functions, the lattice of regular subtypes is closed under the one-way signalling product, moreover, it is generated by a specific family of causally ordered types. We then study signalling relations for maps belonging to a regular subtype, showing that the no-signalling conditions between an input and an output system are determined by a single evaluation of the corresponding function. For higher order types specifically, we show that all signalling relations can be read off directly from the structure poset via a rank parity condition. Finally, we study relations between the structure poset of a type and its normal forms, that is, expressions of the type in terms of causally ordered types. We illustrate construction of normal forms on some examples, demonstrating the possibility that the normal form can be systematically derived from maximal chains of the poset and signalling relations between them.
The study of quantum information protocols that process quantum gates has led to an interest in ‘higher-order’ quantum transformations, which are transformations that act on other quantum transformations as inputs and/or return them as outputs. Mathematically, such transformations form an inductive hierarchy of infinitely many levels, or ‘orders’: quantum states are at order zero; channels, which transform quantum states, are at order one; superchannels, which transform channels, are at order two; maps that transform superchannels are at order three, and so on. To proceed toward a general understanding of higher-order quantum theory, we need methods to study the full inductive hierarchy in a uniform manner. In the context of the Hilbert space formalism of quantum theory, this means studying operator spaces (used to represent states), linear operators between operator spaces (used to represent channels), etc.; in other words, the inductive hierarchy of higher-order linear maps. We introduce a methodological framework for higher-order quantum theory, partly modeled on that of [Bisio \& Perinotti, 2019]. The framework is based on a set of types, denoted TypesA. Types may be thought of as labels that we use to identify and differentiate all the different kinds of objects of higher-order quantum theory. The central objects of the framework are typed (higher-order) linear maps, as given by the construction of a set L(x) of linear maps of type x for each x ∈ TypesA. We equip the framework with a parallel product operation for typed linear maps, which modifies and generalizes the tensor product so as to be physically meaningful when applied to maps of distinct and arbitrary orders. With the aim of characterizing the higher-order linear maps that represent valid quantum objects, we give a construction, consisting of a convex cone K(x) for each x ∈ TypesA, which generalizes the notion of complete positivity to all orders. We construct a version of the Choi isomorphism for our framework, and we use it to show that K(x) is self-dual for all x ∈ TypesA.
Many fundamental and key objects in quantum mechanics are linear mappings between particular affine/linear spaces. This structure includes basic quantum elements such as states, measurements, channels, instruments, non-signalling channels and channels with memory, and also higher-order operations such as superchannels, quantum combs, n-time processes, testers, and process matrices which may not respect a definite causal order. Deducing and characterising their structural properties in terms of linear and semidefinite constraints is not only of foundational relevance, but plays an important role in enabling the numerical optimisation over sets of quantum objects and allowing simpler connections between different concepts and objects. Here, we provide a general framework to deduce these properties in a direct and easy to use way. While primarily guided by practical quantum mechanical considerations, we also extend our analysis to mappings between general linear/affine spaces and derive their properties, opening the possibility for analysing sets which are not explicitly forbidden by quantum theory, but are still not much explored. Together, these results yield versatile and readily applicable tools for all tasks that require the characterisation of linear transformations, in quantum mechanics and beyond. As an application of our methods, we discuss how the existence of indefinite causality naturally emerges in higher-order quantum transformations and provide a simple strategy for the characterisation of mappings that have to preserve properties in a 'complete' sense, i.e., when acting non-trivially only on parts of an input space.
Higher-order quantum theory is an extension of quantum theory where one introduces transformations whose input and output are transformations, thus generalizing the notion of channels and quantum operations. The generalization then goes recursively, with the construction of a full hierarchy of maps of increasingly higher order. The analysis of special cases already showed that higher-order quantum functions exhibit features that cannot be tracked down to the usual circuits, such as indefinite causal structures, providing provable advantages over circuital maps. The present treatment provides a general framework where this kind of analysis can be carried out in full generality. The hierarchy of higher-order quantum maps is introduced axiomatically with a formulation based on the language of types of transformations. Complete positivity of higher-order maps is derived from the general admissibility conditions instead of being postulated as in previous approaches. The recursive characterization of convex sets of maps of a given type is used to prove equivalence relations between different types. The axioms of the framework do not refer to the specific mathematical structure of quantum theory, and can therefore be exported in the context of any operational probabilistic theory.
Abstract In this paper, we propose a type of generalization of triangular norms and quantum logic functions on d-poset algebra. We compare the modified constructions, and properties to the classical properties of the generalized concepts. We show several structures with proof of each type of the proposed generalization. We show several relationships that connect the triangular norms to the quantum logic maps, and also show their relationships to the classical probability space. We provide some explanatory examples that show each structure on d-poset with extra properties that depends on a definition of state.
Abstract With many physical processes in which quantum mechanical phenomena can occur, it is essential to take into account a decision mechanism based on measurement data. This can be achieved by means of so-called numerical events, which are specified as follows: Let S be a set of states of a physical system and p(s) the probability of the occurrence of an event when the system is in state s∈Ss\in Ss∈S s ∈ S . A function p:S→[0,1]p:S\rightarrow [0,1]p:S→[0,1] p : S → [ 0 , 1 ] is called a numerical event or alternatively, an S-probability. If a set P of S-probabilities is ordered by the order of real functions, it becomes a poset which can be considered as a quantum logic. In case the logic P is a Boolean algebra, this will indicate that the underlying physical system is a classical one. The goal of this paper is to study sets of S-probabilities which are not far from being Boolean algebras by means of the addition and comparison of functions that occur in these sets. In particular, certain classes of so-called Boolean posets of S-probabilities are characterized and related to each other and descriptions based on sets of states are derived.