Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2411.01711

Nash equilibria in four-strategy quantum game extensions of the Prisoner's Dilemma

Piotr Frąckiewicz, Anna Gorczyca–Goraj, Krzysztof Grzegorz Grzanka, Nowakowska, Katarzyna, M. Szopa

Published Nov 3, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper investigates Nash equilibria in pure strategies for quantum approach to the Prisoner's Dilemma. The quantization process involves extending the classical game by introducing two additional unitary strategies. We consider five classes of such quantum games, which remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. For each class, we identify and analyse all possible Nash equilibria. Our results reveal the complexity and diversity of strategic behaviour in the quantum setting, providing new insights into the dynamics of classical decision-making dilemmas. In the case of the standard Prisoner's Dilemma, the resulting Nash equilibria of quantum extensions are found to be closer to Pareto optimal solutions than those of the classical equilibrium.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2411.01711

Related papers

Nash Equilibria in Four-Strategy Quantum Extensions of the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Piotr Frąckiewicz, Anna Gorczyca–Goraj, Krzysztof Grzegorz Grzanka +2 more

The concept of Nash equilibria in pure strategies for quantum extensions of the general form of the Prisoner's Dilemma game is investigated. The process of quantization involves incorporating two additional unitary strategies, which effectively expand the classical game. We consider five classes of such quantum games, which remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. The resulting Nash equilibria are found to be more closely aligned with Pareto-optimal solutions than those of the conventional Nash equilibrium outcome of the classical game. Our results demonstrate the complexity and diversity of strategic behavior in the quantum setting, providing new insights into the dynamics of classical decision-making dilemmas. In particular, we provide a detailed characterization of strategy profiles and their corresponding Nash equilibria, thereby extending the understanding of quantum strategies' impact on traditional game-theoretical problems.

Entropy•Jul 15, 2025•2 citations

Efficiency of Classical and Quantum Games Equilibria

M. Szopa

Nash equilibria and correlated equilibria of classical and quantum games are investigated in the context of their Pareto efficiency. The examples of the prisoner's dilemma, battle of the sexes and the game of chicken are studied. Correlated equilibria usually improve Nash equilibria of games but require a trusted correlation device susceptible to manipulation. The quantum extension of these games in the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein formalism and the Frąckiewicz-Pykacz parameterization is analyzed. It is shown that the Nash equilibria of these games in quantum mixed Pauli strategies are closer to Pareto optimal results than their classical counter-parts. The relationship of mixed Pauli strategies equilibria and correlated equilibria is also studied.

Entropy•Apr 22, 2021•21 citations

Nash Equilibria of Quantum Games in the Special Two-Parameter Strategy Space

Piotr Frąckiewicz, M. Szopa, Marcin Makowski +1 more

The aim of the paper is to examine pure Nash equilibria in a quantum game that extends the classical bimatrix game of dimension 2. The strategies of quantum players are specific types of two-parameter unitary operations such that the resulting quantum game is invariant under isomorphic transformations of the input classical game. We formulate general statements for the existence and form of Nash equilibria and discuss their Pareto efficiency. We prove that, depending on the payoffs of a classical game, the corresponding quantum game may or may not have Nash equilibria in the set of unitary strategies under study. Some of the equilibria cease to be equilibria if the players’ strategy set is the three-parameter special unitary group.

Applied Sciences•Nov 13, 2022•8 citations

Unique Solution to the Quantum Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Ahmed S. Elgazzar

A quantized version of the prisoner’s dilemma game based on the Marinatto–Weber quantization scheme is introduced. A four-qubit-basis initial entangled quantum state is assumed. Two domains for Nash equilibria are observed in terms of the degree of entanglement of the game. Each Nash equilibrium point is found to be Pareto optimal in its corresponding domain. Therefore, there is a unique solution to the game dilemma in each domain of the entanglement parameter. The maximally entangled limit is studied, and the players’ payoffs are found to equal the average of the payoff matrix independently of their choices. Consequently, any combination of players’ choices is a solution to the dilemma of the game. The nonentangled limits are also studied and found to coincide with the classical mixed-strategy game. Our results are equivalent to those of the noisy schemes of the quantum prisoner’s dilemma game. In our scheme, entanglement can be interpreted as a noise.

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Feb 1, 2019•12 citations

Quantum volunteer's dilemma

Dax Enshan Koh, Kaavya Kumar, Siong Thye Goh

The volunteer's dilemma is a well-known game in game theory that models the conflict players face when deciding whether to volunteer for a collective benefit, knowing that volunteering incurs a personal cost. In this work we introduce a quantum variant of the classical volunteer's dilemma, generalizing it by allowing players to utilize quantum strategies. Employing the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein quantization framework, we analyze a multiplayer quantum volunteer's dilemma scenario with an arbitrary number of players, where the cost of volunteering is shared equally among the volunteers. We derive analytical expressions for the players' expected payoffs and demonstrate the quantum game's advantage over the classical game. In particular, we prove that the quantum volunteer's dilemma possesses symmetric Nash equilibria with larger expected payoffs compared to the unique symmetric Nash equilibrium of the classical game, wherein players use mixed strategies. Furthermore, we show that the quantum Nash equilibria we identify are Pareto optimal. Our findings reveal distinct dynamics in volunteer's dilemma scenarios when players adhere to quantum rules, underscoring a strategic advantage of decision making in quantum settings.

arXiv:2409.05708•Physical Review Research•Jan 27, 2025•10 citations

Nash Equilibrium Improvement in Quantum Extensions of Symmetric Games

Anna Gorczyca–Goraj, Krzysztof Grzegorz Grzanka, Piotr Frąckiewicz +2 more

Abstract Quantum strategies can alter the equilibrium structure of classical games, but apparent improvements may depend on arbitrary strategy labels or on the particular quantum operations admitted. Here, we characterize payoff improvement across all permissible three-strategy extensions of renaming-symmetric \(2 \times 2\) games within the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein framework. We preserve the classical game as a subgame and add one fixed unitary strategy, restricting attention to the three extension classes that remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. Across six canonical payoff orderings, including coordination, anti-coordination, and dominant-strategy dilemmas, we derive the conditions under which the extended games admit pure Nash equilibria whose payoffs are no lower than those of the corresponding symmetric classical equilibrium. The classical-type \(A_0\) extension produces no strict improvement, while \(B_0\) does so only in restricted regions and generally asymmetrically. By contrast, the genuinely quantum \(C_0\) extension supports non-inferior equilibria across all six classes and yields strict, mutually beneficial improvements in identifiable payoff regions. These results move beyond isolated game examples by showing precisely when representation-invariant quantum extensions can improve equilibrium payoffs and when they cannot. These conditions provide a design map for quantum-enabled multi-agent protocols by identifying the payoff structures under which an added quantum strategy can improve equilibrium outcomes without altering the players' underlying preferences.

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations
This paper investigates Nash equilibria in pure strategies for quantum approach to the Prisoner's Dilemma. The quantization process involves extending the classical game by introducing two additional unitary strategies. We consider five classes of such quantum games, which remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. For each class, we identify and analyse all possible Nash equilibria. Our results reveal the complexity and diversity of strategic behaviour in the quantum setting, providing new insights into the dynamics of classical decision-making dilemmas. In the case of the standard Prisoner's Dilemma, the resulting Nash equilibria of quantum extensions are found to be closer to Pareto optimal solutions than those of the classical equilibrium.
The concept of Nash equilibria in pure strategies for quantum extensions of the general form of the Prisoner's Dilemma game is investigated. The process of quantization involves incorporating two additional unitary strategies, which effectively expand the classical game. We consider five classes of such quantum games, which remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. The resulting Nash equilibria are found to be more closely aligned with Pareto-optimal solutions than those of the conventional Nash equilibrium outcome of the classical game. Our results demonstrate the complexity and diversity of strategic behavior in the quantum setting, providing new insights into the dynamics of classical decision-making dilemmas. In particular, we provide a detailed characterization of strategy profiles and their corresponding Nash equilibria, thereby extending the understanding of quantum strategies' impact on traditional game-theoretical problems.
Nash equilibria and correlated equilibria of classical and quantum games are investigated in the context of their Pareto efficiency. The examples of the prisoner's dilemma, battle of the sexes and the game of chicken are studied. Correlated equilibria usually improve Nash equilibria of games but require a trusted correlation device susceptible to manipulation. The quantum extension of these games in the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein formalism and the Frąckiewicz-Pykacz parameterization is analyzed. It is shown that the Nash equilibria of these games in quantum mixed Pauli strategies are closer to Pareto optimal results than their classical counter-parts. The relationship of mixed Pauli strategies equilibria and correlated equilibria is also studied.
The aim of the paper is to examine pure Nash equilibria in a quantum game that extends the classical bimatrix game of dimension 2. The strategies of quantum players are specific types of two-parameter unitary operations such that the resulting quantum game is invariant under isomorphic transformations of the input classical game. We formulate general statements for the existence and form of Nash equilibria and discuss their Pareto efficiency. We prove that, depending on the payoffs of a classical game, the corresponding quantum game may or may not have Nash equilibria in the set of unitary strategies under study. Some of the equilibria cease to be equilibria if the players’ strategy set is the three-parameter special unitary group.
A quantized version of the prisoner’s dilemma game based on the Marinatto–Weber quantization scheme is introduced. A four-qubit-basis initial entangled quantum state is assumed. Two domains for Nash equilibria are observed in terms of the degree of entanglement of the game. Each Nash equilibrium point is found to be Pareto optimal in its corresponding domain. Therefore, there is a unique solution to the game dilemma in each domain of the entanglement parameter. The maximally entangled limit is studied, and the players’ payoffs are found to equal the average of the payoff matrix independently of their choices. Consequently, any combination of players’ choices is a solution to the dilemma of the game. The nonentangled limits are also studied and found to coincide with the classical mixed-strategy game. Our results are equivalent to those of the noisy schemes of the quantum prisoner’s dilemma game. In our scheme, entanglement can be interpreted as a noise.
The volunteer's dilemma is a well-known game in game theory that models the conflict players face when deciding whether to volunteer for a collective benefit, knowing that volunteering incurs a personal cost. In this work we introduce a quantum variant of the classical volunteer's dilemma, generalizing it by allowing players to utilize quantum strategies. Employing the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein quantization framework, we analyze a multiplayer quantum volunteer's dilemma scenario with an arbitrary number of players, where the cost of volunteering is shared equally among the volunteers. We derive analytical expressions for the players' expected payoffs and demonstrate the quantum game's advantage over the classical game. In particular, we prove that the quantum volunteer's dilemma possesses symmetric Nash equilibria with larger expected payoffs compared to the unique symmetric Nash equilibrium of the classical game, wherein players use mixed strategies. Furthermore, we show that the quantum Nash equilibria we identify are Pareto optimal. Our findings reveal distinct dynamics in volunteer's dilemma scenarios when players adhere to quantum rules, underscoring a strategic advantage of decision making in quantum settings.
Abstract Quantum strategies can alter the equilibrium structure of classical games, but apparent improvements may depend on arbitrary strategy labels or on the particular quantum operations admitted. Here, we characterize payoff improvement across all permissible three-strategy extensions of renaming-symmetric 2×22 \times 22×2 games within the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein framework. We preserve the classical game as a subgame and add one fixed unitary strategy, restricting attention to the three extension classes that remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. Across six canonical payoff orderings, including coordination, anti-coordination, and dominant-strategy dilemmas, we derive the conditions under which the extended games admit pure Nash equilibria whose payoffs are no lower than those of the corresponding symmetric classical equilibrium. The classical-type A0A_0A0​ extension produces no strict improvement, while B0B_0B0​ does so only in restricted regions and generally asymmetrically. By contrast, the genuinely quantum C0C_0C0​ extension supports non-inferior equilibria across all six classes and yields strict, mutually beneficial improvements in identifiable payoff regions. These results move beyond isolated game examples by showing precisely when representation-invariant quantum extensions can improve equilibrium payoffs and when they cannot. These conditions provide a design map for quantum-enabled multi-agent protocols by identifying the payoff structures under which an added quantum strategy can improve equilibrium outcomes without altering the players' underlying preferences.