Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2410.23972 · Automated Software Engineering

Envisioning responsible quantum software engineering and quantum artificial intelligence

Muneera Bano, Shaukat Ali, Didar Zowghi

Published Aug 1, 2025• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract The convergence of Quantum Computing (QC), Quantum Software Engineering (QSE), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents transformative opportunities across various domains. However, existing methodologies inadequately address the ethical, security, and governance challenges arising from this technological shift. This paper highlights the urgent need for interdisciplinary collaboration to embed ethical principles into the development of Quantum AI (QAI) and QSE, ensuring transparency, inclusivity, and equitable global access. Without proactive governance, there is a risk of deepening digital inequalities and consolidating power among a select few. We call on the software engineering community to actively shape a future where responsible QSE and QAI are foundational for ethical, accountable, and socially beneficial technological progress.

DOI
10.1007/s10515-025-00541-5

Related papers

RQAI-SE: Multi-Layered Ethical and Accountable Quantum AI Engineering

Muhammad Awais, Sabeen Masood, Farah Haneef +3 more

Introduction/Importance of Study: The application of quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI) that combines artificial intelligence and quantum computing allows simulation, optimization, and decision-making capabilities never seen before, but introduces ethical and governance issues that are beyond conventional software engineering paradigms.Novelty statement: In this paper, we introduce the Responsible Quantum-AI Software Engineering (RQAI-SE) framework, a systematic integration of quantum-specific mechanisms for ethics, accountability, fairness, and transparency into the QAI software lifecycle.The framework comprises five hierarchically structured engineering layers, addresses four categories of quantum-specific ethical risks (algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, access inequality, andregulatory gaps), and explicitly maps its components to nine governance pillars established by the World Economic Forum (WEF) —structural contributions that distinguish RQAI-SE from existing QSE frameworks that treat ethics as secondary or post-development concerns.Material and Method: The study employs a conceptual design methodology grounded in a systematic review of 40 high-quality sources spanning quantum software engineering, AI ethics, and governance (2021–2025). The framework is validated through comparative analysis with existing QSE frameworks Table 1 and criterion-referenced mapping to the WEF nine governance pillars Table 3.Result and Discussion: The suggested RQAI-SE framework shows how quantum-AI systems can be designed to be both computationally efficientand responsible toward societyusing human-understandable quantum design, the ethical development cycle of the process, and governance models that are multidisciplinary. In contrast to the more performance-focused QSE strategies, the RQAI-SE directly deals with quantum-specific ethical risks, including but not limited to opacity, amplifying bias of probabilistic guarantees, and governance loopholes, and allows creating trustworthy, inclusive, and accountable. The model also offers a guided basis to align the emerging QAI technologies to the long-term societal values,as well as facilitating scalable and sustainable quantum software development.Concluding Remarks: RQAI-SE provides an effective and prospective basis of responsible QAI development, under which innovations in quantum intelligence are always within the ethical, social, and governance requirements. The framework identifies five priority areas for future research,including empirical case study validation and international certification standards.

International Journal of Innovations in Science and Technology•Apr 28, 2026•0 citations

LEVERAGING QUANTUM COMPUTING FOR INCLUSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE AI DEVELOPMENT: A CONCEPTUAL AND REVIEW FRAMEWORK

Temidayo Olorunsogo, Boma Sonimitiem Jacks, Olakunle Abayomi Ajala

This paper proposes a novel conceptual framework that integrates the advanced capabilities of quantum computing to address the urgent need for responsible and inclusive Artificial Intelligence (AI) development. It reviews current challenges in AI, such as bias, lack of inclusivity, and the computational limitations faced by classical computing methods in solving complex societal problems. By harnessing quantum computing, this framework aims to overcome these barriers, enabling faster, more efficient AI solutions that are ethically grounded and universally accessible. By adopting a holistic approach that integrates technical innovation with ethical considerations and stakeholder engagement, we believe that quantum computing can serve as a catalyst for the development of AI technologies that are not only more advanced but also more inclusive, responsible, and beneficial for society as a whole. This concept paper serves as a foundational framework for further research, collaboration, and action in the intersection of quantum computing and AI, with the ultimate goal of harnessing the transformative potential of these technologies to address pressing societal challenges and promote human well-being. Keywords: Quantum Computing, AI, Development, Responsible.

Computer Science & IT Research Journal•Mar 22, 2024•39 citations

Quantum artificial intelligence: Bridging innovation, ethics, and sustainability in a hybrid era

Ibrahim A. Atoum

The convergence of Quantum Computing (QC) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) ushers in a transformative era of computational capability, with profound implications for science and industry alongside significant technical, ethical, and environmental challenges. This article explores quantum-enhanced AI (QAI), focusing on foundational quantum principles—superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism—and their applications in molecular simulation, financial optimization, and climate modeling. While quantum algorithms offer exponential speedups for Machine Learning (ML) and optimization, persistent barriers such as qubit decoherence, scalability limitations, and high energy demands hinder progress. Hybrid quantum-classical architectures are identified as critical transitional tools, combining quantum processors for specialized tasks like combinatorial optimization with classical systems for error correction and data preprocessing. Near-term commercial healthcare, finance, and logistics applications are highlighted, including pilot projects using quantum neural networks (QNNs) for drug discovery, portfolio risk analysis, and supply chain optimization. However, dual-use risks—such as quantum-powered surveillance and threats to classical encryption—emphasize the need for post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and ethical frameworks. Environmental concerns, particularly the carbon footprint of superconducting qubits, drive calls for sustainable innovations like photonic qubit designs and renewable-powered quantum data centers. Anticipated milestones include fault-tolerant QNNs, standardized benchmarks for quantum advantage, and democratized cloud access. Achieving these goals requires addressing interdisciplinary talent shortages, algorithmic biases, and global disparities in quantum infrastructure. This work advocates for governance models integrating sustainability metrics and equity-focused policies to steer QAI development responsibly. By harmonizing technical innovation with ethical foresight, the quantum-AI synergy can advance solutions to global challenges while mitigating misuse and ecological harm risks.

International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems•Jun 10, 2026•0 citations

Technical, economic, and societal risks in the progress of artificial intelligence driven quantum technologies

Alberto A. Boretti

Quantum technologies (QTs) hold the promise to transform a wide range of industries, such as computing, communications, finance, healthcare, defense, space, and beyond. Of the various QTs, the most relevant is presently quantum computing (QC), of significant projected market potential, with some estimates forecasting it to reach many billion dollars over the next few years. There are, however, risks to factor, as highlighted in this perspective, the most relevant technical, economic, and societal risks. Those financial and societal are projected to become increasingly relevant phased with the progressing solution of the technical issues. The synergy with artificial intelligence comes with further opportunities as development can be faster and more effective, but also increases risks. AI presents numerous opportunities, but it also comes with several risks and challenges. Some of the major risks associated with AI include bias and fairness, transparency and explainability, job displacement, security concerns, ethical concerns, privacy issues, lack of regulation and standards, and exponential growth and unintended consequences. Balancing the advantages of AI-driven quantum technologies with associated risks presents a significant challenge. It necessitates careful consideration of ethical, economic, and technical aspects to ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed in a manner that is beneficial and equitable for everyone. Graphical Abstract

Discover Artificial Intelligence•Oct 7, 2024•42 citations

Human-Centered Quantum Software Engineering: A Research Agenda

Muneera Bano, Rashina Hoda, Didar Zowghi +2 more

Quantum computing, grounded in principles such as superposition and entanglement, is revolutionising the design, testing, and understanding of software. While the community is working on its technical challenges, the human and collaborative aspects have received little attention. This vision paper outlines a research agenda for human-centred quantum software engineering (HC-QSE). Building on current QSE foundations, the agenda spans three interrelated themes: understanding practice, designing support, and embedding responsibility. The first calls for studying how interdisciplinary teams construct and share mental models of quantum behaviour, collaborate across disciplinary boundaries, and reason under uncertainty inherent in probabilistic computation. The second focuses on creating tools, workflows, and learning environments that enhance comprehension, interpretability, and shared accountability among practitioners, educators, and learners. The third integrates ethical reflection and equity considerations into the design and governance of quantum software ecosystems. By centering human experience within QSE, this agenda encourages cooperative, reflective, and ethically grounded approaches to building quantum software.

International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)•Apr 12, 2026•1 citation

Quantum Artificial Intelligence for Software Engineering: The Road Ahead

Xinyi Wang, Shaukat Ali, Paolo Arcaini

In order to handle the increasing complexity of software systems, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been applied to various areas of software engineering, including requirements engineering, coding, testing, and debugging. This has led to the emergence of AI for Software Engineering as a distinct research area within the field of software engineering. With the development of quantum computing, the field of Quantum AI (QAI) is arising, enhancing the performance of classical AI and holding significant potential for solving classical software engineering problems. Some initial applications of QAI in software engineering have already emerged, such as test case optimization. However, the path ahead remains open, offering ample opportunities to solve complex software engineering problems cost-effectively with QAI. To this end, this article presents a roadmap towards the application of QAI in software engineering. Specifically, we consider two of the main categories of QAI, i.e., quantum optimization algorithms and quantum machine learning. For each software engineering phase, we discuss how these QAI approaches can address some of the tasks associated with that phase. Moreover, we provide an overview of some of the possible challenges that need to be addressed to make the application of QAI for software engineering successful.

arXiv:2505.04797•ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology•Jul 2, 2026•1 citation
Abstract The convergence of Quantum Computing (QC), Quantum Software Engineering (QSE), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents transformative opportunities across various domains. However, existing methodologies inadequately address the ethical, security, and governance challenges arising from this technological shift. This paper highlights the urgent need for interdisciplinary collaboration to embed ethical principles into the development of Quantum AI (QAI) and QSE, ensuring transparency, inclusivity, and equitable global access. Without proactive governance, there is a risk of deepening digital inequalities and consolidating power among a select few. We call on the software engineering community to actively shape a future where responsible QSE and QAI are foundational for ethical, accountable, and socially beneficial technological progress.
Introduction/Importance of Study: The application of quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI) that combines artificial intelligence and quantum computing allows simulation, optimization, and decision-making capabilities never seen before, but introduces ethical and governance issues that are beyond conventional software engineering paradigms.Novelty statement: In this paper, we introduce the Responsible Quantum-AI Software Engineering (RQAI-SE) framework, a systematic integration of quantum-specific mechanisms for ethics, accountability, fairness, and transparency into the QAI software lifecycle.The framework comprises five hierarchically structured engineering layers, addresses four categories of quantum-specific ethical risks (algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, access inequality, andregulatory gaps), and explicitly maps its components to nine governance pillars established by the World Economic Forum (WEF) —structural contributions that distinguish RQAI-SE from existing QSE frameworks that treat ethics as secondary or post-development concerns.Material and Method: The study employs a conceptual design methodology grounded in a systematic review of 40 high-quality sources spanning quantum software engineering, AI ethics, and governance (2021–2025). The framework is validated through comparative analysis with existing QSE frameworks Table 1 and criterion-referenced mapping to the WEF nine governance pillars Table 3.Result and Discussion: The suggested RQAI-SE framework shows how quantum-AI systems can be designed to be both computationally efficientand responsible toward societyusing human-understandable quantum design, the ethical development cycle of the process, and governance models that are multidisciplinary. In contrast to the more performance-focused QSE strategies, the RQAI-SE directly deals with quantum-specific ethical risks, including but not limited to opacity, amplifying bias of probabilistic guarantees, and governance loopholes, and allows creating trustworthy, inclusive, and accountable. The model also offers a guided basis to align the emerging QAI technologies to the long-term societal values,as well as facilitating scalable and sustainable quantum software development.Concluding Remarks: RQAI-SE provides an effective and prospective basis of responsible QAI development, under which innovations in quantum intelligence are always within the ethical, social, and governance requirements. The framework identifies five priority areas for future research,including empirical case study validation and international certification standards.
This paper proposes a novel conceptual framework that integrates the advanced capabilities of quantum computing to address the urgent need for responsible and inclusive Artificial Intelligence (AI) development. It reviews current challenges in AI, such as bias, lack of inclusivity, and the computational limitations faced by classical computing methods in solving complex societal problems. By harnessing quantum computing, this framework aims to overcome these barriers, enabling faster, more efficient AI solutions that are ethically grounded and universally accessible. By adopting a holistic approach that integrates technical innovation with ethical considerations and stakeholder engagement, we believe that quantum computing can serve as a catalyst for the development of AI technologies that are not only more advanced but also more inclusive, responsible, and beneficial for society as a whole. This concept paper serves as a foundational framework for further research, collaboration, and action in the intersection of quantum computing and AI, with the ultimate goal of harnessing the transformative potential of these technologies to address pressing societal challenges and promote human well-being. Keywords: Quantum Computing, AI, Development, Responsible.
The convergence of Quantum Computing (QC) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) ushers in a transformative era of computational capability, with profound implications for science and industry alongside significant technical, ethical, and environmental challenges. This article explores quantum-enhanced AI (QAI), focusing on foundational quantum principles—superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism—and their applications in molecular simulation, financial optimization, and climate modeling. While quantum algorithms offer exponential speedups for Machine Learning (ML) and optimization, persistent barriers such as qubit decoherence, scalability limitations, and high energy demands hinder progress. Hybrid quantum-classical architectures are identified as critical transitional tools, combining quantum processors for specialized tasks like combinatorial optimization with classical systems for error correction and data preprocessing. Near-term commercial healthcare, finance, and logistics applications are highlighted, including pilot projects using quantum neural networks (QNNs) for drug discovery, portfolio risk analysis, and supply chain optimization. However, dual-use risks—such as quantum-powered surveillance and threats to classical encryption—emphasize the need for post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and ethical frameworks. Environmental concerns, particularly the carbon footprint of superconducting qubits, drive calls for sustainable innovations like photonic qubit designs and renewable-powered quantum data centers. Anticipated milestones include fault-tolerant QNNs, standardized benchmarks for quantum advantage, and democratized cloud access. Achieving these goals requires addressing interdisciplinary talent shortages, algorithmic biases, and global disparities in quantum infrastructure. This work advocates for governance models integrating sustainability metrics and equity-focused policies to steer QAI development responsibly. By harmonizing technical innovation with ethical foresight, the quantum-AI synergy can advance solutions to global challenges while mitigating misuse and ecological harm risks.
Quantum technologies (QTs) hold the promise to transform a wide range of industries, such as computing, communications, finance, healthcare, defense, space, and beyond. Of the various QTs, the most relevant is presently quantum computing (QC), of significant projected market potential, with some estimates forecasting it to reach many billion dollars over the next few years. There are, however, risks to factor, as highlighted in this perspective, the most relevant technical, economic, and societal risks. Those financial and societal are projected to become increasingly relevant phased with the progressing solution of the technical issues. The synergy with artificial intelligence comes with further opportunities as development can be faster and more effective, but also increases risks. AI presents numerous opportunities, but it also comes with several risks and challenges. Some of the major risks associated with AI include bias and fairness, transparency and explainability, job displacement, security concerns, ethical concerns, privacy issues, lack of regulation and standards, and exponential growth and unintended consequences. Balancing the advantages of AI-driven quantum technologies with associated risks presents a significant challenge. It necessitates careful consideration of ethical, economic, and technical aspects to ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed in a manner that is beneficial and equitable for everyone. Graphical Abstract
Quantum computing, grounded in principles such as superposition and entanglement, is revolutionising the design, testing, and understanding of software. While the community is working on its technical challenges, the human and collaborative aspects have received little attention. This vision paper outlines a research agenda for human-centred quantum software engineering (HC-QSE). Building on current QSE foundations, the agenda spans three interrelated themes: understanding practice, designing support, and embedding responsibility. The first calls for studying how interdisciplinary teams construct and share mental models of quantum behaviour, collaborate across disciplinary boundaries, and reason under uncertainty inherent in probabilistic computation. The second focuses on creating tools, workflows, and learning environments that enhance comprehension, interpretability, and shared accountability among practitioners, educators, and learners. The third integrates ethical reflection and equity considerations into the design and governance of quantum software ecosystems. By centering human experience within QSE, this agenda encourages cooperative, reflective, and ethically grounded approaches to building quantum software.
In order to handle the increasing complexity of software systems, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been applied to various areas of software engineering, including requirements engineering, coding, testing, and debugging. This has led to the emergence of AI for Software Engineering as a distinct research area within the field of software engineering. With the development of quantum computing, the field of Quantum AI (QAI) is arising, enhancing the performance of classical AI and holding significant potential for solving classical software engineering problems. Some initial applications of QAI in software engineering have already emerged, such as test case optimization. However, the path ahead remains open, offering ample opportunities to solve complex software engineering problems cost-effectively with QAI. To this end, this article presents a roadmap towards the application of QAI in software engineering. Specifically, we consider two of the main categories of QAI, i.e., quantum optimization algorithms and quantum machine learning. For each software engineering phase, we discuss how these QAI approaches can address some of the tasks associated with that phase. Moreover, we provide an overview of some of the possible challenges that need to be addressed to make the application of QAI for software engineering successful.