Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2410.20528

Characterization of Noise using variants of Unitarity Randomized Benchmarking

Chandrashekar, Adarsh, S.R. Das, Paul, Goutam

Published Oct 27, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Benchmarking of noise that is induced during the implementation of quantum gates is the main concern for practical quantum computers. Several protocols have been proposed that empirically calculate various metrics that quantify the error rates of the quantum gates chosen from a preferred gate set. Unitarity randomized benchmarking (URB) protocol is a method to estimate the coherence of noise induced by the quantum gates which is measured by the metric \textit{unitarity}. In this paper, we for the first time, implement the URB protocol in a quantum simulator with all the parameters and noise model are used from a real quantum device. The direct implementation of the URB protocol in a quantum device is not possible using current technologies, as it requires the preparation of mixed states. To overcome this challenge, we propose a modification of the URB protocol, namely the m-URB protocol, that enables us to practically implement it on any quantum device. We validate our m-URB protocol using two single-qubit noise channels -- (a) depolarising channel and (b) bit-flip channel. We further alter the m-URB protocol, namely, native gate URB or Ng-URB protocol, to study the noise in the native gates into which the quantum circuits are compiled in a quantum computer. Using our Ng-URB protocol, we can also detect the presence of cross-talk errors which are correlated errors caused due to non-local and entangling gates such as CNOT gate. For illustration, we simulate the noise of the native gates taking the noise parameter from two real IBM-Q processors.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2410.20528

Related papers

Efficient unitarity randomized benchmarking of few-qubit Clifford gates

Bas Dirkse, Jonas Helsen, Stephanie Wehner

Unitarity randomized benchmarking (URB) is an experimental procedure for estimating the coherence of implemented quantum gates independently of state preparation and measurement errors. These estimates of the coherence are measured by the unitarity. A central problem in this experiment is relating the number of data points to rigorous confidence intervals. In this work we provide a bound on the required number of data points for Clifford URB as a function of confidence and experimental parameters. This bound has favorable scaling in the regime of near-unitary noise and is asymptotically independent of the length of the gate sequences used. We also show that, in contrast to standard randomized benchmarking, a nontrivial number of data points is always required to overcome the randomness introduced by state preparation and measurement errors even in the limit of perfect gates. Our bound is sufficiently sharp to benchmark small-dimensional systems in realistic parameter regimes using a modest number of data points. For example, we show that the unitarity of single-qubit Clifford gates can be rigorously estimated using few hundred data points under the assumption of gate-independent noise. This is a reduction of orders of magnitude compared to previously known bounds.

arXiv:1808.00850•Physical Review A•Jan 10, 2019•19 citations

Characterization of Quantum Gate Noise Using Randomized Benchmarking

Goutam Paul

Benchmarking noise in quantum gates is crucial for developing dependable quantum computers, as noise directly affects gate fidelity and computational accuracy. Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols, which evaluate performance through random gate sequences, provide a reliable way to quantify average error rates due to their scalability and robustness in averaging out complex, device-specific noise. In this talk, we will discuss several variants of randomized benchmarking protocols including an overview of our recent work in this area.

River Publishers eBooks•Jan 26, 2026•0 citations

Concepts and methods for benchmarking quantum computers

Kristine Boone

Quantum computers have the potential to bring about a new age of technology, but in order for them to become a reality, the elephant in the room must be addressed, quantum errors. The complexity of quantum errors grows exponentially as the system size is increased; scalable characterization protocols which work under physically realistic noise are therefore needed to assess and optimize control. \n \nRandomized Benchmarking (RB) is a family of characterization protocols with the requisite qualities. RB protocols are independent of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors, and because they extract partial information about the error profiles in the form of figures of merit, they are scalable in the number of qubits. In this thesis, we study these figures of merit under various error models, gate-sets, and sample distributions, to further our understanding of their physical meaning, and to fine-tune the best practice for diagnosing errors in basic gate-sets. \n \nThe first study presented in this thesis looks at the physical meaning of the unitarity under physically realistic gate-dependent noise. Numerically, we demonstrate that under these realistic noise models, the unitarity obtained via Extended RB (XRB) overlaps strongly with the average of the unitarity of the errors over the set of individual operations. \n \nThe second study numerically and analytically proves that the Standard RB (SRB) decay parameter p coincides with the decay parameter of the novel figure of merit gate-set circuit fidelity. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the disconnect between the average gate fidelity and SRB experimental results is caused by a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures. \n \nIn the third part of this thesis, we compare the results of two variations of the SRB protocol, one that samples uniformly (SRB) and one that samples non-uniformly (NIST RB) from the Clifford group. We prove that NIST RB produces an exponential fidelity curve that gives different infidelity results than SRB. \n \nThe fourth and final study gives a standard for assessing basic gate-sets. Experimental results are given from the assessment run on super-conducting and ion-trap devices. We also experimentally show how the systematic error bounds can be tightened by accounting for the error's degree of coherence, as well as using weaker randomizing sets.

•Jul 9, 2021•0 citations

Benchmarking universal quantum gates via channel spectrum

Yanwu Gu, Wei-Feng Zhuang, Xudan Chai +1 more

Noise remains the major obstacle to scalable quantum computation. Quantum benchmarking provides key information on noise properties and is an important step for developing more advanced quantum processors. However, current benchmarking methods are either limited to a specific subset of quantum gates or cannot directly describe the performance of the individual target gate. To overcome these limitations, we propose channel spectrum benchmarking (CSB), a method to infer the noise properties of the target gate, including process fidelity, stochastic fidelity, and some unitary parameters, from the eigenvalues of its noisy channel. Our CSB method is insensitive to state-preparation and measurement errors, and importantly, can benchmark universal gates and is scalable to many-qubit systems. Unlike standard randomized schemes, CSB can provide direct noise information for both target native gates and circuit fragments, allowing benchmarking and calibration of global entangling gates and frequently used modules in quantum algorithms like Trotterized Hamiltonian evolution operator in quantum simulation.

arXiv:2301.02056•Nature Communications•Sep 21, 2023•13 citations

Randomized benchmarking in the analogue setting

Ellen Derbyshire, Jorge Yago Malo, Andrew J. Daley +2 more

Abstract Current development in programmable analogue quantum simulators (AQS), whose physical implementation can be realised in the near-term compared to those of large-scale digital quantum computers, highlights the need for robust testing techniques in analogue platforms. Methods to properly certify or benchmark AQS should be efficiently scalable, and also provide a way to deal with errors from state preparation and measurement (SPAM). Up to now, attempts to address this combination of requirements have generally relied on model-specific properties. We put forward a new approach, applying a well-known digital noise characterisation technique called randomized benchmarking (RB) to the analogue setting. RB is a scalable experimental technique that provides a measure of the average error-rate of a gate-set on a quantum hardware, incorporating SPAM errors. We present the original form of digital RB, the necessary alterations to translate it to the analogue setting and introduce the analogue randomized benchmarking protocol (ARB). In ARB we measure the average error-rate per time evolution of a family of Hamiltonians and we illustrate this protocol with two case-studies of analogue models; classically simulating the system by incorporating several physically motivated noise scenarios. We find that for the noise models tested, the data fit with the theoretical predictions and we gain values for the average error rate for differing unitary sets. We compare our protocol with other relevant RB methods, where both advantages (physically motivated unitaries) and disadvantages (difficulty in reversing the time-evolution) are discussed.

arXiv:1909.01295•Quantum Science and Technology•Mar 12, 2020•13 citations

Characterizing large-scale quantum computers via cycle benchmarking

Alexander Erhard, Joel J. Wallman, Lukas Postler +7 more

Quantum computers promise to solve certain problems more efficiently than their digital counterparts. A major challenge towards practically useful quantum computing is characterizing and reducing the various errors that accumulate during an algorithm running on large-scale processors. Current characterization techniques are unable to adequately account for the exponentially large set of potential errors, including cross-talk and other correlated noise sources. Here we develop cycle benchmarking, a rigorous and practically scalable protocol for characterizing local and global errors across multi-qubit quantum processors. We experimentally demonstrate its practicality by quantifying such errors in non-entangling and entangling operations on an ion-trap quantum computer with up to 10 qubits, and total process fidelities for multi-qubit entangling gates ranging from [Formula: see text] for 2 qubits to [Formula: see text] for 10 qubits. Furthermore, cycle benchmarking data validates that the error rate per single-qubit gate and per two-qubit coupling does not increase with increasing system size.

arXiv:1902.08543•Nature Communications•Nov 25, 2019•254 citations
Benchmarking of noise that is induced during the implementation of quantum gates is the main concern for practical quantum computers. Several protocols have been proposed that empirically calculate various metrics that quantify the error rates of the quantum gates chosen from a preferred gate set. Unitarity randomized benchmarking (URB) protocol is a method to estimate the coherence of noise induced by the quantum gates which is measured by the metric \textit{unitarity}. In this paper, we for the first time, implement the URB protocol in a quantum simulator with all the parameters and noise model are used from a real quantum device. The direct implementation of the URB protocol in a quantum device is not possible using current technologies, as it requires the preparation of mixed states. To overcome this challenge, we propose a modification of the URB protocol, namely the m-URB protocol, that enables us to practically implement it on any quantum device. We validate our m-URB protocol using two single-qubit noise channels -- (a) depolarising channel and (b) bit-flip channel. We further alter the m-URB protocol, namely, native gate URB or Ng-URB protocol, to study the noise in the native gates into which the quantum circuits are compiled in a quantum computer. Using our Ng-URB protocol, we can also detect the presence of cross-talk errors which are correlated errors caused due to non-local and entangling gates such as CNOT gate. For illustration, we simulate the noise of the native gates taking the noise parameter from two real IBM-Q processors.
Unitarity randomized benchmarking (URB) is an experimental procedure for estimating the coherence of implemented quantum gates independently of state preparation and measurement errors. These estimates of the coherence are measured by the unitarity. A central problem in this experiment is relating the number of data points to rigorous confidence intervals. In this work we provide a bound on the required number of data points for Clifford URB as a function of confidence and experimental parameters. This bound has favorable scaling in the regime of near-unitary noise and is asymptotically independent of the length of the gate sequences used. We also show that, in contrast to standard randomized benchmarking, a nontrivial number of data points is always required to overcome the randomness introduced by state preparation and measurement errors even in the limit of perfect gates. Our bound is sufficiently sharp to benchmark small-dimensional systems in realistic parameter regimes using a modest number of data points. For example, we show that the unitarity of single-qubit Clifford gates can be rigorously estimated using few hundred data points under the assumption of gate-independent noise. This is a reduction of orders of magnitude compared to previously known bounds.
Benchmarking noise in quantum gates is crucial for developing dependable quantum computers, as noise directly affects gate fidelity and computational accuracy. Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols, which evaluate performance through random gate sequences, provide a reliable way to quantify average error rates due to their scalability and robustness in averaging out complex, device-specific noise. In this talk, we will discuss several variants of randomized benchmarking protocols including an overview of our recent work in this area.
Quantum computers have the potential to bring about a new age of technology, but in order for them to become a reality, the elephant in the room must be addressed, quantum errors. The complexity of quantum errors grows exponentially as the system size is increased; scalable characterization protocols which work under physically realistic noise are therefore needed to assess and optimize control. \n \nRandomized Benchmarking (RB) is a family of characterization protocols with the requisite qualities. RB protocols are independent of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors, and because they extract partial information about the error profiles in the form of figures of merit, they are scalable in the number of qubits. In this thesis, we study these figures of merit under various error models, gate-sets, and sample distributions, to further our understanding of their physical meaning, and to fine-tune the best practice for diagnosing errors in basic gate-sets. \n \nThe first study presented in this thesis looks at the physical meaning of the unitarity under physically realistic gate-dependent noise. Numerically, we demonstrate that under these realistic noise models, the unitarity obtained via Extended RB (XRB) overlaps strongly with the average of the unitarity of the errors over the set of individual operations. \n \nThe second study numerically and analytically proves that the Standard RB (SRB) decay parameter p coincides with the decay parameter of the novel figure of merit gate-set circuit fidelity. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the disconnect between the average gate fidelity and SRB experimental results is caused by a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures. \n \nIn the third part of this thesis, we compare the results of two variations of the SRB protocol, one that samples uniformly (SRB) and one that samples non-uniformly (NIST RB) from the Clifford group. We prove that NIST RB produces an exponential fidelity curve that gives different infidelity results than SRB. \n \nThe fourth and final study gives a standard for assessing basic gate-sets. Experimental results are given from the assessment run on super-conducting and ion-trap devices. We also experimentally show how the systematic error bounds can be tightened by accounting for the error's degree of coherence, as well as using weaker randomizing sets.
Noise remains the major obstacle to scalable quantum computation. Quantum benchmarking provides key information on noise properties and is an important step for developing more advanced quantum processors. However, current benchmarking methods are either limited to a specific subset of quantum gates or cannot directly describe the performance of the individual target gate. To overcome these limitations, we propose channel spectrum benchmarking (CSB), a method to infer the noise properties of the target gate, including process fidelity, stochastic fidelity, and some unitary parameters, from the eigenvalues of its noisy channel. Our CSB method is insensitive to state-preparation and measurement errors, and importantly, can benchmark universal gates and is scalable to many-qubit systems. Unlike standard randomized schemes, CSB can provide direct noise information for both target native gates and circuit fragments, allowing benchmarking and calibration of global entangling gates and frequently used modules in quantum algorithms like Trotterized Hamiltonian evolution operator in quantum simulation.
Abstract Current development in programmable analogue quantum simulators (AQS), whose physical implementation can be realised in the near-term compared to those of large-scale digital quantum computers, highlights the need for robust testing techniques in analogue platforms. Methods to properly certify or benchmark AQS should be efficiently scalable, and also provide a way to deal with errors from state preparation and measurement (SPAM). Up to now, attempts to address this combination of requirements have generally relied on model-specific properties. We put forward a new approach, applying a well-known digital noise characterisation technique called randomized benchmarking (RB) to the analogue setting. RB is a scalable experimental technique that provides a measure of the average error-rate of a gate-set on a quantum hardware, incorporating SPAM errors. We present the original form of digital RB, the necessary alterations to translate it to the analogue setting and introduce the analogue randomized benchmarking protocol (ARB). In ARB we measure the average error-rate per time evolution of a family of Hamiltonians and we illustrate this protocol with two case-studies of analogue models; classically simulating the system by incorporating several physically motivated noise scenarios. We find that for the noise models tested, the data fit with the theoretical predictions and we gain values for the average error rate for differing unitary sets. We compare our protocol with other relevant RB methods, where both advantages (physically motivated unitaries) and disadvantages (difficulty in reversing the time-evolution) are discussed.
Quantum computers promise to solve certain problems more efficiently than their digital counterparts. A major challenge towards practically useful quantum computing is characterizing and reducing the various errors that accumulate during an algorithm running on large-scale processors. Current characterization techniques are unable to adequately account for the exponentially large set of potential errors, including cross-talk and other correlated noise sources. Here we develop cycle benchmarking, a rigorous and practically scalable protocol for characterizing local and global errors across multi-qubit quantum processors. We experimentally demonstrate its practicality by quantifying such errors in non-entangling and entangling operations on an ion-trap quantum computer with up to 10 qubits, and total process fidelities for multi-qubit entangling gates ranging from [Formula: see text] for 2 qubits to [Formula: see text] for 10 qubits. Furthermore, cycle benchmarking data validates that the error rate per single-qubit gate and per two-qubit coupling does not increase with increasing system size.