arXiv:2410.16245

Separations in query complexity for total search problems

Shalev Ben-David, Srijita Kundu

Published Oct 21, 2024• 1 citation

Abstract

We study the query complexity analogue of the class TFNP of total search problems. We give a way to convert partial functions to total search problems under certain settings; we also give a way to convert search problems back into partial functions. As an application, we give new separations for degree-like measures. We give an exponential separation between quantum query complexity and approximate degree for a total search problem. We also give an exponential separation between approximate degree and the positive quantum adversary for a total search problem. We then strengthen the former separation to upper bound a larger measure: the two-sided approximate non-negative degree, also called the conical junta degree. This measure is often larger than quantum query complexity and even a separation from randomized query complexity was not known. We extend our results to communication complexity, and obtain an exponential separation between quantum information complexity and the relaxed partition bound for a total search problem. Even a weaker separation between randomized communication complexity and the relaxed partition bound was not known for total search problems (or even for partial functions). Most of our separations for total search problems can be converted to separations for partial functions. Using this, we reprove the recent exponential separation between quantum query complexity and approximate degree for a partial function by Ambainis and Belovs (2023), among other new results.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2410.16245

Related papers

Separations in query complexity using cheat sheets

Scott Aaronson, Shalev Ben-David, Robin Kothari

We show a power 2.5 separation between bounded-error randomized and quantum query complexity for a total Boolean function, refuting the widely believed conjecture that the best such separation could only be quadratic (from Grover's algorithm). We also present a total function with a power 4 separation between quantum query complexity and approximate polynomial degree, showing severe limitations on the power of the polynomial method. Finally, we exhibit a total function with a quadratic gap between quantum query complexity and certificate complexity, which is optimal (up to log factors). These separations are shown using a new, general technique that we call the cheat sheet technique, which builds upon the techniques of Ambainis et al. [STOC 2016]. The technique is based on a generic transformation that converts any (possibly partial) function into a new total function with desirable properties for showing separations. The framework also allows many known separations, including some recent breakthrough results of Ambainis et al. [STOC 2016], to be shown in a unified manner.

arXiv:1511.01937ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)Jun 10, 201674 citations

Lower bounds on quantum query complexity for symmetric functions

Rajat Mittal, Sanjay S Nair, Sunayana Patro

One of the main reasons for query model's prominence in quantum complexity is the presence of concrete lower bounding techniques: polynomial method and adversary method. There have been considerable efforts to not just give lower bounds using these methods but even to compare and relate them. We explore the value of these bounds on quantum query complexity for the class of symmetric functions, arguably one of the most natural and basic set of Boolean functions. We show (using the recently introduced spectral sensitivity) that both these bounds (positive adversary and approximate degree) give the same value for every total symmetric Boolean function. We also look at the quantum query complexity of Gap Majority, a partial symmetric function. It has gained importance recently in regard to understanding the composition of randomized query complexity. We characterize the quantum query complexity of Gap Majority and show a lower bound on noisy randomized query complexity (Ben-David and Blais, FOCS 2020) in terms of quantum query complexity. In addition, we study how large certificate complexity and block sensitivity can be as compared to sensitivity (even up to constant factors) for symmetric functions. We show tight separations, i.e., give upper bound on possible separations and construct functions achieving the same.

Oct 25, 20210 citations

An Exponential Separation Between Quantum Query Complexity and the Polynomial Degree

Andris Ambainis, Aleksandrs Belovs

While it is known that there is at most a polynomial separation between quantum query complexity and the polynomial degree for total functions, the precise relationship between the two is not clear for partial functions. In this paper, we demonstrate an exponential separation between exact polynomial degree and approximate quantum query complexity for a partial Boolean function. For an unbounded alphabet size, we have a constant versus polynomial separation.

arXiv:2301.09218Jan 22, 20230 citations

Separations in Communication Complexity Using Cheat Sheets and Information Complexity

Anurag Anshu, Aleksandrs Belovs, Shalev Ben-David +5 more

While exponential separations are known between quantum and randomized communication complexity for partial functions (Raz, STOC 1999), the best known separation between these measures for a total function is quadratic, witnessed by the disjointness function. We give the first super-quadratic separation between quantum and randomized communication complexity for a total function, giving an example exhibiting a power 2.5 gap. We further present a 1.5 power separation between exact quantum and randomized communication complexity, improving on the previous ≅ 1.15 separation by Ambainis (STOC 2013). Finally, we present a nearly optimal quadratic separation between randomized communication complexity and the logarithm of the partition number, improving upon the previous best power 1.5 separation due to Goos, Jayram, Pitassi, and Watson. Our results are the communication analogues of separations in query complexity proved using the recent cheat sheet framework of Aaronson, Ben-David, and Kothari (STOC 2016). Our main technical results are randomized communication and information complexity lower bounds for a family of functions, called lookup functions, that generalize and port the cheat sheet framework to communication complexity.

arXiv:1605.01142Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer ScienceOct 1, 201614 citations

Separations in Query Complexity Based on Pointer Functions

Andris Ambainis, Kaspars Balodis, Aleksandrs Belovs +3 more

In 1986, Saks and Wigderson conjectured that the largest separation between deterministic and zero-error randomized query complexity for a total Boolean function is given by the function f on n = 2 k bits defined by a complete binary tree of NAND gates of depth k , which achieves R 0 ( f ) = O ( D ( f ) 0.7537… ). We show that this is false by giving an example of a total Boolean function f on n bits whose deterministic query complexity is Ω( n ) while its zero-error randomized query complexity is Õ(√ n ). We further show that the quantum query complexity of the same function is Õ( n 1/4 ), giving the first example of a total function with a super-quadratic gap between its quantum and deterministic query complexities. We also construct a total Boolean function g on n variables that has zero-error randomized query complexity Ω( n / log ( n )) and bounded-error randomized query complexity R ( g ) = Õ(√ n ). This is the first super-linear separation between these two complexity measures. The exact quantum query complexity of the same function is Q E ( g ) = Õ(√ n ). These functions show that the relations D ( f ) = O ( R 1 ( f ) 2 ) and R 0 ( f ) = Õ( R ( f ) 2 ) are optimal, up to polylogarithmic factors. Further variations of these functions give additional separations between other query complexity measures: a cubic separation between Q and R 0 , a 3/2-power separation between Q E and R , and a 4th-power separation between approximate degree and bounded-error randomized query complexity. All of these examples are variants of a function recently introduced by Göös, Pitassi, and Watson, which they used to separate the unambiguous 1-certificate complexity from deterministic query complexity and to resolve the famous Clique versus Independent Set problem in communication complexity.

arXiv:1506.04719Journal of the ACMSep 4, 201728 citations

Query Complexity: Cryptography, Property Testing, and Lower Bounds Across Models

Weiqiang Yuan

Query complexity studies the amount of information about an input that is needed to solve a computational problem. This thesis investigates query complexity in several settings, with applications to cryptography and property testing, as well as connections to communication complexity and other computational models. In property testing, we study tolerant junta testing and establish the first superpolynomial quantum advantage for this problem: within a certain parameter regime, a quantum algorithm uses polynomially many queries, whereas every classical randomised algorithm requires quasipolynomially many queries. In cryptography, we study the average-case complexity of search problems. We show that verifiable delay functions do not exist in the random oracle model, and strengthen known barriers to constructing average-case hard TFNP problems from one-way functions. Finally, we study lower bounds and their behaviour across computational models. We prove new direct sum results for randomised parity decision trees. We also establish a new separation between query complexity measures of total Boolean functions and, through query-to-communication lifting, derive new communication lower bounds and lower bounds for unambiguous finite automata.

Jan 1, 20260 citations