Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2410.08484 · Physical Review A

Measurement time of weak measurements on large entangled systems

Truong‐Son Van, Andrew N. Jordan, David W. Snoke

Published Mar 20, 2025• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is well established that starting only with strong, projective quantum measurements, experiments can be designed to allow weak measurements, which lead to a random walk between the possible final measurement outcomes. However, one can ask the reverse question: starting with only weak measurements, can all the results of standard strong measurements be recovered? Prior work has shown that some results can be, such as the Born rule for the probability of measurement outcomes as a function of wave intensity. In this paper, we show that another crucial result can be reproduced by purely weak measurements, namely, the collapse of a many-body, nonlocally entangled wave function on a timescale comparable to the characteristic time of a single, local measurement. For an entangled state of a single excitation among $N$ qubits, we find the collapse time scales as a double logarithm of $N$. This result affirms the self-consistency of the hypothesis that spontaneous weak measurements lie at the base of all physical measurements, independent of human observers.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.111.032217

Related papers

The collapse time of weak measurement on NNN entangled sites

Truong-Son P. Van, David W. Snoke

We determine the time required for local weak measurements to collapse to one occupied site in an initial superposition of $N$ alternatives in the model of PRA 111, 032217 (2025). For equal initial occupation probabilities and a fixed confidence threshold $1-δ$, we prove $T_N/\ln N\to1/2$ in $L^1$, with time measured in units of the characteristic measurement time $τ_m$ of each detector. We also connect the asymptotic stabilization theorem of that work to a finite measurement: the first site to reach $1-δ$ is the eventual outcome with conditional probability exactly $1-δ$. The result corrects the previously proposed double-logarithmic asymptotic scaling. The finite-range numerical fit does not determine a constant asymptotic correction or a precise finite-$N$ law.

quant-pharXiv:2610.04556•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Weak measurements: From measuring incompatible observables and testing quantum contextuality to protective measurements

Fabrizio Piacentini, Alessio Avella, Rudi Lussana +9 more

Summary form only given. Measurements are the very basis of Physics, especially in Quantum Mechanics, where they assume even a more fundamental role because of wave function collapse after a “strong” (projective) measurement. Furthermore, measuring a quantum-mechanical observable completely erases the information on its conjugate one (e.g. measurement of position erases information on momentum, and vice-versa). Nevertheless, in Quantum Mechanics other kinds of measurement are possible. For example, wave function collapse can be overcome through Weak Measurements, i.e. measurements performed with an interaction sufficiently weak not to collapse the original state, featuring several interesting properties. An example of these are weak values [1-3], realised for the first time in [4-6], that have been used for addressing fundamental questions [7-12] as Contextuality and are also a tool for Quantum Metrology [13-19]. One of the most intriguing properties of Weak Measurements is that, since they are not affected by wave function collapse, they can allow gathering simultaneous information on non-commuting observables [20], impossible with the standard (projective) measurement protocols. A second example is offered by Protective Measurements [21], a new technique able to extract information on the expectation value of an observable even measuring a single particle. In this talk, after a general introduction to WMs, we present the first realisation of sequential weak value measurements [22], i.e. a joint measurement of the weak value of (incompatible) polarizations on a single photon. Then, we present an experiment addressed to explore the connection between anomalous weak values and Contextuality [23], showing a clear violation of the inequality proposed in [12] while satisfying all the additional theoretical requests, unequivocally demonstrating the contextual nature of weak values. Finally, we present and discuss the first implementation of Protective Measurements, showing unprecedented measurement capability and demonstrating how the expectation value of an observable can be obtained with a single measurement on a single particle.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•Jun 1, 2017•0 citations

Multitime measurements in quantum mechanics

M. S. Wang

The one-time and two-time measurements are studied by employing the idea of Aharonov et al. that the strength of a measurement depends on the state of the measuring device in the context of von Neumann measurement theory. A measurement is classified as either a strong or a weak measurement depending on whether the interaction between the system and the measuring device is infinitely large or negligibly small. A single strong measurement yields one of the eigenvalues of the operator while a single weak measurement, in addition to the eigenvalues, has infinite other possible outcomes. Nevertheless, the expectation values of the strong and the weak one-time measurements are the same. However, the expectation values of the two-time measurements depend on the strength of the first measurement. For the strong case the result is consistent with the conventional result without having to introduce the state collapsing. For the weak case the result is the real part of the expectation value of the time-ordered two-time operator. The fact that this expectation value cannot be factorized indicates that the entanglement between the system and the measuring device introduced by a weak measurement cannot be neglected.

Physical Review A•Jan 4, 2002•5 citations

An Evolutionary Formalism for Weak Quantum Measurements

Apoorva Patel, Parveen Kumar

Unitary evolution and projective measurement are fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics.Even though projective measurement yields one of the eigenstates of the measured operator as the outcome, there is no theory that predicts which eigenstate will be observed in which experimental run.There exists only an ensemble description, which predicts probabilities of various outcomes over many experimental runs.We propose a dynamical evolution equation for the projective collapse of the quantum state in individual experimental runs, which is consistent with the well-established framework of quantum mechanics.In case of gradual weak measurements, its predictions for ensemble evolution are different from those of the Born rule.It is an open question whether or not suitably designed experiments can observe this alternate evolution.

Current Science•Dec 1, 2015•1 citation

An Evolutionary Formalism for Weak Quantum Measurements

Apoorva Patel, Parveen Kumar

Unitary evolution and projective measurement are fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics. Even though projective measurement yields one of the eigenstates of the measured operator as the outcome, there is no theory that predicts which eigenstate will be observed in which experimental run. There exists only an ensemble description, which predicts probabilities of various outcomes over many experimental runs. We propose a dynamical evolution equation for the projective collapse of the quantum state in individual experimental runs, which is consistent with the well-established framework of quantum mechanics. In case of gradual weak measurements, its predictions for ensemble evolution are different from those of the Born rule. It is an open question whether or not suitably designed experiments can observe this alternate evolution.

Current Science•Dec 1, 2015•2 citations

An Evolutionary Formalism for Weak Quantum Measurements

Apoorva Patel, Parveen Kumar

Unitary evolution and projective measurement are fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics. Even though projective measurement yields one of the eigenstates of the measured operator as the outcome, there is no theory that predicts which eigenstate will be observed in which experimental run. There exists only an ensemble description, which predicts probabilities of various outcomes over many experimental runs. We propose a dynamical evolution equation for the projective collapse of the quantum state in individual experimental runs, which is consistent with the well-established framework of quantum mechanics. In case of gradual weak measurements, its predictions for ensemble evolution are different from those of the Born rule. It is an open question whether or not suitably designed experiments can observe this alternate evolution.

arXiv:1412.1312•Dec 3, 2014•0 citations
It is well established that starting only with strong, projective quantum measurements, experiments can be designed to allow weak measurements, which lead to a random walk between the possible final measurement outcomes. However, one can ask the reverse question: starting with only weak measurements, can all the results of standard strong measurements be recovered? Prior work has shown that some results can be, such as the Born rule for the probability of measurement outcomes as a function of wave intensity. In this paper, we show that another crucial result can be reproduced by purely weak measurements, namely, the collapse of a many-body, nonlocally entangled wave function on a timescale comparable to the characteristic time of a single, local measurement. For an entangled state of a single excitation among NNN qubits, we find the collapse time scales as a double logarithm of NNN. This result affirms the self-consistency of the hypothesis that spontaneous weak measurements lie at the base of all physical measurements, independent of human observers.
We determine the time required for local weak measurements to collapse to one occupied site in an initial superposition of NNN alternatives in the model of PRA 111, 032217 (2025). For equal initial occupation probabilities and a fixed confidence threshold 1−δ1-δ1−δ, we prove TN/ln⁡N→1/2T_N/\ln N\to1/2TN​/lnN→1/2 in L1L^1L1, with time measured in units of the characteristic measurement time τmτ_mτm​ of each detector. We also connect the asymptotic stabilization theorem of that work to a finite measurement: the first site to reach 1−δ1-δ1−δ is the eventual outcome with conditional probability exactly 1−δ1-δ1−δ. The result corrects the previously proposed double-logarithmic asymptotic scaling. The finite-range numerical fit does not determine a constant asymptotic correction or a precise finite-NNN law.
Summary form only given. Measurements are the very basis of Physics, especially in Quantum Mechanics, where they assume even a more fundamental role because of wave function collapse after a “strong” (projective) measurement. Furthermore, measuring a quantum-mechanical observable completely erases the information on its conjugate one (e.g. measurement of position erases information on momentum, and vice-versa). Nevertheless, in Quantum Mechanics other kinds of measurement are possible. For example, wave function collapse can be overcome through Weak Measurements, i.e. measurements performed with an interaction sufficiently weak not to collapse the original state, featuring several interesting properties. An example of these are weak values [1-3], realised for the first time in [4-6], that have been used for addressing fundamental questions [7-12] as Contextuality and are also a tool for Quantum Metrology [13-19]. One of the most intriguing properties of Weak Measurements is that, since they are not affected by wave function collapse, they can allow gathering simultaneous information on non-commuting observables [20], impossible with the standard (projective) measurement protocols. A second example is offered by Protective Measurements [21], a new technique able to extract information on the expectation value of an observable even measuring a single particle. In this talk, after a general introduction to WMs, we present the first realisation of sequential weak value measurements [22], i.e. a joint measurement of the weak value of (incompatible) polarizations on a single photon. Then, we present an experiment addressed to explore the connection between anomalous weak values and Contextuality [23], showing a clear violation of the inequality proposed in [12] while satisfying all the additional theoretical requests, unequivocally demonstrating the contextual nature of weak values. Finally, we present and discuss the first implementation of Protective Measurements, showing unprecedented measurement capability and demonstrating how the expectation value of an observable can be obtained with a single measurement on a single particle.
The one-time and two-time measurements are studied by employing the idea of Aharonov et al. that the strength of a measurement depends on the state of the measuring device in the context of von Neumann measurement theory. A measurement is classified as either a strong or a weak measurement depending on whether the interaction between the system and the measuring device is infinitely large or negligibly small. A single strong measurement yields one of the eigenvalues of the operator while a single weak measurement, in addition to the eigenvalues, has infinite other possible outcomes. Nevertheless, the expectation values of the strong and the weak one-time measurements are the same. However, the expectation values of the two-time measurements depend on the strength of the first measurement. For the strong case the result is consistent with the conventional result without having to introduce the state collapsing. For the weak case the result is the real part of the expectation value of the time-ordered two-time operator. The fact that this expectation value cannot be factorized indicates that the entanglement between the system and the measuring device introduced by a weak measurement cannot be neglected.
Unitary evolution and projective measurement are fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics.Even though projective measurement yields one of the eigenstates of the measured operator as the outcome, there is no theory that predicts which eigenstate will be observed in which experimental run.There exists only an ensemble description, which predicts probabilities of various outcomes over many experimental runs.We propose a dynamical evolution equation for the projective collapse of the quantum state in individual experimental runs, which is consistent with the well-established framework of quantum mechanics.In case of gradual weak measurements, its predictions for ensemble evolution are different from those of the Born rule.It is an open question whether or not suitably designed experiments can observe this alternate evolution.
Unitary evolution and projective measurement are fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics. Even though projective measurement yields one of the eigenstates of the measured operator as the outcome, there is no theory that predicts which eigenstate will be observed in which experimental run. There exists only an ensemble description, which predicts probabilities of various outcomes over many experimental runs. We propose a dynamical evolution equation for the projective collapse of the quantum state in individual experimental runs, which is consistent with the well-established framework of quantum mechanics. In case of gradual weak measurements, its predictions for ensemble evolution are different from those of the Born rule. It is an open question whether or not suitably designed experiments can observe this alternate evolution.
Unitary evolution and projective measurement are fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics. Even though projective measurement yields one of the eigenstates of the measured operator as the outcome, there is no theory that predicts which eigenstate will be observed in which experimental run. There exists only an ensemble description, which predicts probabilities of various outcomes over many experimental runs. We propose a dynamical evolution equation for the projective collapse of the quantum state in individual experimental runs, which is consistent with the well-established framework of quantum mechanics. In case of gradual weak measurements, its predictions for ensemble evolution are different from those of the Born rule. It is an open question whether or not suitably designed experiments can observe this alternate evolution.