We show that if quantum commitments exist, then either there is no polynomial-time solution to the unitary synthesis problem, or $\mathsf{BPP} \neq \mathsf{NEXP}$ . Thus, showing unconditionally that quantum commitments exist would require answering at least one of two longstanding open questions in complexity theory. We prove our main result as a consequence of a more general lemma, which shows that every unitary in $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ either cannot be synthesized efficiently relative to any classical oracle, or can be synthesized efficiently with an oracle for $\mathsf{NEXP}$ search problems. Our lemma has other noteworthy consequences, including that certain oracle separations involving $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ would imply breakthrough classical lower bounds such as $\mathsf{NC} \neq \mathsf{NP}$ . Along the way, we propose new definitions for the unitary complexity classes $\mathsf{unitaryP}$ and $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ . Our changes address the biggest conceptual issues with definitions suggested in prior work, and lead to elegant proofs. We study both implementations that erase garbage and implementations that allow it, because we cannot rule out the possibility that the two definitions differ. Nevertheless, we show that both definitions can be viewed as special cases of each other. We also showcase many other ways in which our definitions are robust. For example, we show that $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ has an equivalent characterization as the set of unitary transformations whose entries can be computed to arbitrary precision in polynomial space. Consequently, we deduce that $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ can generically erase garbage, a result that provably fails relative to unitary oracles.We show that if quantum commitments exist, then either there is no polynomial-time solution to the unitary synthesis problem, or $\mathsf{BPP} \neq \mathsf{NEXP}$. Thus, showing unconditionally that quantum commitments exist would require answering at least one of two longstanding open questions in complexity theory. We prove our main result as a consequence of a more general lemma, which shows that every unitary in $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ either cannot be synthesized efficiently relative to any classical oracle, or can be synthesized efficiently with an oracle for $\mathsf{NEXP}$ search problems. Our lemma has other noteworthy consequences, including that certain oracle separations involving $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ would imply breakthrough classical lower bounds such as $\mathsf{NC} \neq \mathsf{NP}$. Along the way, we propose new definitions for the unitary complexity classes $\mathsf{unitaryP}$ and $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$. Our changes address the biggest conceptual issues with definitions suggested in prior work, and lead to elegant proofs. We study both implementations that erase garbage and implementations that allow it, because we cannot rule out the possibility that the two definitions differ. Nevertheless, we show that both definitions can be viewed as special cases of each other. We also showcase many other ways in which our definitions are robust. For example, we show that $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ has an equivalent characterization as the set of unitary transformations whose entries can be computed to arbitrary precision in polynomial space. Consequently, we deduce that $\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}$ can generically erase garbage, a result that provably fails relative to unitary oracles.

quant-pharXiv:2610.03705Oct 5, 20260 citations

The Breakdown of Classical Minicrypt Equivalences in the Quantum-Computation Classical-Communication Model

Boyang Chen, Yiming Wang, Ziyi Xie

Classically, it is well-known that several fundamental cryptographic primitives, including one-way functions, pseudorandom number generators, commitments, and signatures, characterize the same cryptographic world, which is known as "Minicrypt". In this paper, we investigate to what extent this picture persists in the quantum-computation classical-communication (QCCC) setting, where parties may perform quantum local computation, but communicate through only classical messages. We demonstrate that the classical Minicrypt landscape breaks down in the QCCC model by oracle separations. We construct two oracle worlds where efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles (EV-OWPuzz) exist. By a known equivalence, QCCC one-time signatures also exist in both worlds. In the first, one-way functions do not exist, even if we allow quantum pseudodeterministic evaluation. In the second, QCCC bit commitments do not exist. Thus, the classical Minicrypt reductions from signatures to one-way functions and bit commitments have no fully black-box counterparts in the QCCC setting. Our proofs develop techniques for analyzing the random phase states, including a concentration theorem and an LOCC decoupling theorem. As a separate result, we establish quantum sum-binding for the NOVY protocol, settling the question of its post-quantum security. We also generalize it to a fully black-box construction of a QCCC commitment from EV-OWPuzz with nearly uniform puzzle distribution, complementing our oracle separation results.Classically, it is well-known that several fundamental cryptographic primitives, including one-way functions, pseudorandom number generators, commitments, and signatures, characterize the same cryptographic world, which is known as "Minicrypt". In this paper, we investigate to what extent this picture persists in the quantum-computation classical-communication (QCCC) setting, where parties may perform quantum local computation, but communicate through only classical messages. We demonstrate that the classical Minicrypt landscape breaks down in the QCCC model by oracle separations. We construct two oracle worlds where efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles (EV-OWPuzz) exist. By a known equivalence, QCCC one-time signatures also exist in both worlds. In the first, one-way functions do not exist, even if we allow quantum pseudodeterministic evaluation. In the second, QCCC bit commitments do not exist. Thus, the classical Minicrypt reductions from signatures to one-way functions and bit commitments have no fully black-box counterparts in the QCCC setting. Our proofs develop techniques for analyzing the random phase states, including a concentration theorem and an LOCC decoupling theorem. As a separate result, we establish quantum sum-binding for the NOVY protocol, settling the question of its post-quantum security. We also generalize it to a fully black-box construction of a QCCC commitment from EV-OWPuzz with nearly uniform puzzle distribution, complementing our oracle separation results.

quant-pharXiv:2609.33098Sep 29, 20260 citations

Oracle separations for non-adaptive collapse-free quantum computing

Henrique Hepp, Murilo V. G. da Silva, Leandro M. Zatesko

Theoretical Computer ScienceJan 14, 20251 citation

Quantum Computation Relative to Oracles

Christino Tamon, Tomoyuki Yamakami

Springer eBooksJan 1, 20011 citation

We show that if quantum commitments exist, then either there is no polynomial-time solution to the unitary synthesis problem, or

\mathsf{BPP} \neq \mathsf{NEXP}

. Thus, showing unconditionally that quantum commitments exist would require answering at least one of two longstanding open questions in complexity theory. We prove our main result as a consequence of a more general lemma, which shows that every unitary in

\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}

either cannot be synthesized efficiently relative to any classical oracle, or can be synthesized efficiently with an oracle for

\mathsf{NEXP}

search problems. Our lemma has other noteworthy consequences, including that certain oracle separations involving

\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}

would imply breakthrough classical lower bounds such as

\mathsf{NC} \neq \mathsf{NP}

. Along the way, we propose new definitions for the unitary complexity classes

\mathsf{unitaryP}

and

\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}

. Our changes address the biggest conceptual issues with definitions suggested in prior work, and lead to elegant proofs. We study both implementations that erase garbage and implementations that allow it, because we cannot rule out the possibility that the two definitions differ. Nevertheless, we show that both definitions can be viewed as special cases of each other. We also showcase many other ways in which our definitions are robust. For example, we show that

\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}

has an equivalent characterization as the set of unitary transformations whose entries can be computed to arbitrary precision in polynomial space. Consequently, we deduce that

\mathsf{unitaryPSPACE}

can generically erase garbage, a result that provably fails relative to unitary oracles.