Quantum annealing with chaotic driver Hamiltonians

悟史 森田

Takashi Imoto, Yuichiro Matsuzaki

Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising method for solving combinatorial optimization problems whose solutions are embedded into a ground state of the Ising Hamiltonian. This method employs two types of Hamiltonians: a driver Hamiltonian and a problem Hamiltonian. After a sufficiently slow change from the driver Hamiltonian to the problem Hamiltonian, we can obtain the target ground state that corresponds to the solution. The inclusion of non-stoquastic terms in the driver Hamiltonian is believed to enhance the efficiency of the QA. Meanwhile, decoherence is regarded as of the main obstacles for QA. Here, we present examples showing that non-stoaquastic Hamiltonians can lead to catastrophic failure of QA, whereas a certain decoherence process can be used to avoid such failure. More specifically, when we include anti-ferromagnetic interactions (i.e., typical non-stoquastic terms) in the Hamiltonian, we are unable to prepare the target ground state even with an infinitely long annealing time for some specific cases. In our example, owing to a symmetry, the Hamiltonian is block-diagonalized, and a crossing occurs during the QA, which leads to a complete failure of the ground-state search. Moreover, we show that, when we add a certain type of decoherence, we can obtain the ground state after QA for these cases. This is because, even when symmetry exists in isolated quantum systems, the environment breaks the symmetry. Our counter intuitive results provide a deep insight into the fundamental mechanism of QA.

Trevor M. Lanting, Andrew D. King, Bram Evert +1 more

Perturbative anticrossings have long been identified as a potential computational bottleneck for quantum annealing. This bottleneck can appear, for example, when a uniform transverse driver Hamiltonian is applied to each qubit. Previous theoretical research sought to alleviate such anticrossings by adjusting the transverse driver Hamiltonians on individual qubits according to a perturbative approximation. Here we apply this principle to a physical implementation of quantum annealing in a D-Wave 2000Q system. We use samples from the quantum annealing hardware and per-qubit anneal offsets to produce nonuniform driver Hamiltonians. On small instances with severe perturbative anticrossings, our algorithm yields an increase in minimum eigengaps, ground-state success probabilities, and escape rates from metastable valleys. We also demonstrate that the same approach can mitigate biased sampling of degenerate ground states.

Peter Schuhmacher, Aditi Misra, Salil Bedkihal +3 more

悟史 森田, Satoshi Morita, 秀稔 西森 +1 more

Shunta Ide, Shu Tanaka

Quantum annealing generally samples degenerate ground states with nonuniform probabilities. This unfair sampling depends on how the driver Hamiltonian couples these states near the end of annealing. For combinatorial optimization problems with a cardinality constraint, the penalty method and constrained quantum annealing (CQA) differ in these couplings. The transverse-field driver of the penalty method does not directly couple feasible ground states, whereas the fully connected XY driver of CQA couples pairs of them related by a single spin exchange. We investigate how this difference affects ground-state sampling, using closed-system simulations of random graph bipartitioning instances together with degenerate perturbation theory. For the instances studied, the conditional ground-state distribution of penalty-based quantum annealing approaches that of CQA at sufficiently large penalties and long annealing times. This convergence can be explained by the effective Hamiltonian of penalty-based quantum annealing, in which virtual single-spin flips to infeasible states generate a second-order interaction proportional to the CQA driver projected onto the feasible ground-state manifold, which is the leading term of the effective Hamiltonian of CQA. In the numerical simulations, the Jensen--Shannon divergence between the conditional ground-state distributions of penalty-based quantum annealing and CQA decreases approximately as the inverse square of the penalty-to-objective energy ratio, consistent with the perturbative analysis. This correspondence between the effective Hamiltonians extends to equal-weight fixed-magnetization constraints under the same perturbative conditions, providing a common mechanism for sampling bias in the two implementations.