Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2409.03739

Better bounds on finite-order Grothendieck constants

Sébastien Designolle, Tamás Vértesi, Sebastian Pokutta

Published Sep 5, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Grothendieck constants $K_G(d)$ bound the advantage of $d$-dimensional strategies over $1$-dimensional ones in a specific optimisation task. They have applications ranging from approximation algorithms to quantum nonlocality. However, apart from $d=2$, their values are unknown. Here, we exploit a recent Frank-Wolfe approach to provide good candidates for lower bounding some of these constants. The complete proof relies on solving difficult binary quadratic optimisation problems. For $d\in\{3,4,5\}$, we construct specific rectangular instances that we can solve to certify better bounds than those previously known; by monotonicity, our lower bounds improve on the state of the art for $d\leqslant9$. For $d\in\{4,7,8\}$, we exploit elegant structures to build highly symmetric instances achieving even greater bounds; however, we can only solve them heuristically. We also recall the standard relation with violations of Bell inequalities and elaborate on it to interpret generalised Grothendieck constants $K_G(d\mapsto2)$ as the advantage of complex $d$-dimensional quantum mechanics over real qubit quantum mechanics. Motivated by this connection, we also improve the bounds on $K_G(d\mapsto2)$.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2409.03739

Related papers

Heuristic lower bounds on real Grothendieck constants of finite and infinite order

Erika Bene, Tamás Vértesi

We propose candidate lower bounds on the real Grothendieck constants $K_{\mathrm G}(d)$ and their infinite-dimensional limit $K_{\mathrm G}$ using rotationally invariant cubic kernels. For the continuous construction, we identify an explicit threshold above which hemispherical binary strategies are unstable under cubic boundary deformations. Supported by numerical evidence, we conjecture that hemispherical strategies are globally optimal at this threshold. This conjecture would imply $K_{\mathrm G}\geq9π/16\simeq1.767146$, improving the rigorous lower bound $6π/11\simeq1.713596$. We also construct finite symmetric coefficient matrices from unit vectors in dimensions up to $24$. Large-scale see-saw optimization supports the continuous predictions and suggests improved lower bounds on $K_{\mathrm G}(d)$ in the studied dimensions from $4$ to $24$, conditional on the conjectured binary optima being exact. Selected matrices also yield finite-setting candidate dimension witnesses when interpreted as bipartite correlation Bell functionals. If the corresponding binary upper bounds hold, these witnesses would certify a local Hilbert-space dimension of at least five for each party.

quant-pharXiv:2609.35399•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

Grothendieck bound in a single quantum system

Apostol Vourdas

Abstract Grothendieck’s bound is used in the context of a single quantum system, in contrast to previous work which used it for multipartite entangled systems and the violation of Bell-like inequalities. Roughly speaking the Grothendieck theorem considers a ‘classical’ quadratic form C that uses complex numbers in the unit disc, and takes values less than 1. It then proves that if the complex numbers are replaced with vectors in the unit ball of the Hilbert space, then the ‘quantum’ quadratic form Q might take values greater than 1, up to the complex Grothendieck constant k G . The Grothendieck theorem is reformulated here in terms of arbitrary matrices (which are multiplied with appropriate normalisation prefactors), so that it is directly applicable to quantum quantities. The emphasis in the paper is in the ‘Grothendieck region’ ( 1 , k G ) , which is a classically forbidden region in the sense that C cannot take values in it. Necessary (but not sufficient) conditions for Q taking values in the Grothendieck region are given. Two examples that involve physical quantities in systems with six and 12-dimensional Hilbert space, are shown to lead to Q in the Grothendieck region ( 1 , k G ) . They involve projectors of the overlaps of novel generalised coherent states that resolve the identity and have a discrete isotropy.

arXiv:2212.11663•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 27, 2022•6 citations

Towards Grothendieck constants and LHV models in quantum mechanics

Bobo Hua, Ming Li, Tinggui Zhang +3 more

We adopt a continuous model to estimate the Grothendieck constants. An analytical formula to compute the lower bounds of Grothendieck constants has been explicitly derived for arbitrary orders, which improves previous bounds. Moreover, our lower bound of the Grothendieck constant of order three gives a refined bound of the threshold value for the nonlocality of the two-qubit Werner states.

arXiv:1501.05507•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jan 21, 2015•29 citations

Sharper Bounds for the Complex Grothendieck Constant

Steven Heilman, Chris Jones, Giulio Malavolta

We show that $1.4<K_G^{\mathbb{C}}<1.404898554746$, where $K_G^{\mathbb{C}}$ is the complex Grothendieck constant. The upper bound improves on Haagerup's bound of $1.40490913\ldots$ from 1987, and the lower bound improves on Davie's bound of $1.33807$ from 1984. The upper bound combines ideas from the real and noncommutative complex cases of Grothendieck's inequality.

math.FACross-listedarXiv:2609.25462•Sep 23, 2026

Qutrit witness from the Grothendieck constant of order four

Péter Diviánszky, Erika Bene, Tamás Vértesi

In this paper, we prove that ${K}_{G}(3)<{K}_{G}(4)$, where ${K}_{G}(d)$ denotes the Grothendieck constant of order $d$. To this end, we use a branch-and-bound algorithm commonly used in the solution of NP-hard problems. It has recently been proven that ${K}_{G}(3)\ensuremath{\le}1.4644$. Here we prove that ${K}_{G}(4)\ensuremath{\ge}1.4841$, which has implications for device-independent witnessing dimensions greater than two. Furthermore, the algorithm with some modifications may find applications in various black-box quantum information tasks with large number of inputs and outputs.

arXiv:1707.04719•Physical Review A•Jul 13, 2017•29 citations

Grothendieck inequalities for semidefinite programs with rank constraint

Jop Briët, Fernando Mário de Oliveira Filho, Frank Vallentin

Grothendieck inequalities are fundamental inequalities which are frequently used in many areas of mathematics and computer science. They can be interpreted as upper bounds for the integrality gap between two optimization problems: a difficult semidefinite program with rank-1 constraint and its easy semidefinite relaxation where the rank constraint is dropped. For instance, the integrality gap of the Goemans-Williamson approximation algorithm for MAX CUT can be seen as a Grothendieck inequality. In this paper we consider Grothendieck inequalities for ranks greater than $1$ and we give two applications: approximating ground states in the $n$-vector model in statistical mechanics and XOR games in quantum information theory.

arXiv:1011.1754•Theory of Computing•Jan 1, 2014•26 citations
Grothendieck constants KG(d)K_G(d)KG​(d) bound the advantage of ddd-dimensional strategies over 111-dimensional ones in a specific optimisation task. They have applications ranging from approximation algorithms to quantum nonlocality. However, apart from d=2d=2d=2, their values are unknown. Here, we exploit a recent Frank-Wolfe approach to provide good candidates for lower bounding some of these constants. The complete proof relies on solving difficult binary quadratic optimisation problems. For d∈{3,4,5}d\in\{3,4,5\}d∈{3,4,5}, we construct specific rectangular instances that we can solve to certify better bounds than those previously known; by monotonicity, our lower bounds improve on the state of the art for d⩽9d\leqslant9d⩽9. For d∈{4,7,8}d\in\{4,7,8\}d∈{4,7,8}, we exploit elegant structures to build highly symmetric instances achieving even greater bounds; however, we can only solve them heuristically. We also recall the standard relation with violations of Bell inequalities and elaborate on it to interpret generalised Grothendieck constants KG(d↦2)K_G(d\mapsto2)KG​(d↦2) as the advantage of complex ddd-dimensional quantum mechanics over real qubit quantum mechanics. Motivated by this connection, we also improve the bounds on KG(d↦2)K_G(d\mapsto2)KG​(d↦2).
We propose candidate lower bounds on the real Grothendieck constants KG(d)K_{\mathrm G}(d)KG​(d) and their infinite-dimensional limit KGK_{\mathrm G}KG​ using rotationally invariant cubic kernels. For the continuous construction, we identify an explicit threshold above which hemispherical binary strategies are unstable under cubic boundary deformations. Supported by numerical evidence, we conjecture that hemispherical strategies are globally optimal at this threshold. This conjecture would imply KG≥9π/16≃1.767146K_{\mathrm G}\geq9π/16\simeq1.767146KG​≥9π/16≃1.767146, improving the rigorous lower bound 6π/11≃1.7135966π/11\simeq1.7135966π/11≃1.713596. We also construct finite symmetric coefficient matrices from unit vectors in dimensions up to 242424. Large-scale see-saw optimization supports the continuous predictions and suggests improved lower bounds on KG(d)K_{\mathrm G}(d)KG​(d) in the studied dimensions from 444 to 242424, conditional on the conjectured binary optima being exact. Selected matrices also yield finite-setting candidate dimension witnesses when interpreted as bipartite correlation Bell functionals. If the corresponding binary upper bounds hold, these witnesses would certify a local Hilbert-space dimension of at least five for each party.
Abstract Grothendieck’s bound is used in the context of a single quantum system, in contrast to previous work which used it for multipartite entangled systems and the violation of Bell-like inequalities. Roughly speaking the Grothendieck theorem considers a ‘classical’ quadratic form C that uses complex numbers in the unit disc, and takes values less than 1. It then proves that if the complex numbers are replaced with vectors in the unit ball of the Hilbert space, then the ‘quantum’ quadratic form Q might take values greater than 1, up to the complex Grothendieck constant k G . The Grothendieck theorem is reformulated here in terms of arbitrary matrices (which are multiplied with appropriate normalisation prefactors), so that it is directly applicable to quantum quantities. The emphasis in the paper is in the ‘Grothendieck region’ ( 1 , k G ) , which is a classically forbidden region in the sense that C cannot take values in it. Necessary (but not sufficient) conditions for Q taking values in the Grothendieck region are given. Two examples that involve physical quantities in systems with six and 12-dimensional Hilbert space, are shown to lead to Q in the Grothendieck region ( 1 , k G ) . They involve projectors of the overlaps of novel generalised coherent states that resolve the identity and have a discrete isotropy.
We show that 1.4<KGC<1.4048985547461.4<K_G^{\mathbb{C}}<1.4048985547461.4<KGC​<1.404898554746, where KGCK_G^{\mathbb{C}}KGC​ is the complex Grothendieck constant. The upper bound improves on Haagerup's bound of 1.40490913…1.40490913\ldots1.40490913… from 1987, and the lower bound improves on Davie's bound of 1.338071.338071.33807 from 1984. The upper bound combines ideas from the real and noncommutative complex cases of Grothendieck's inequality.
In this paper, we prove that KG(3)<KG(4){K}_{G}(3)<{K}_{G}(4)KG​(3)<KG​(4), where KG(d){K}_{G}(d)KG​(d) denotes the Grothendieck constant of order ddd. To this end, we use a branch-and-bound algorithm commonly used in the solution of NP-hard problems. It has recently been proven that ${K}_{G}(3)\ensuremath{\le}1.4644$. Here we prove that ${K}_{G}(4)\ensuremath{\ge}1.4841$, which has implications for device-independent witnessing dimensions greater than two. Furthermore, the algorithm with some modifications may find applications in various black-box quantum information tasks with large number of inputs and outputs.
Grothendieck inequalities are fundamental inequalities which are frequently used in many areas of mathematics and computer science. They can be interpreted as upper bounds for the integrality gap between two optimization problems: a difficult semidefinite program with rank-1 constraint and its easy semidefinite relaxation where the rank constraint is dropped. For instance, the integrality gap of the Goemans-Williamson approximation algorithm for MAX CUT can be seen as a Grothendieck inequality. In this paper we consider Grothendieck inequalities for ranks greater than 111 and we give two applications: approximating ground states in the nnn-vector model in statistical mechanics and XOR games in quantum information theory.