Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2408.14011 · Quantum Information Processing

Geometric genuine N-partite entanglement measure for arbitrary dimensions

Hui Zhao, Pan-Wen Ma, Shao-Ming Fei, Zhi‐Xi Wang

Published Aug 25, 2024• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-024-04501-y

Related papers

Measure and detection of genuine multipartite entanglement for n-partite systems

Wen Xu, Zhu‐Jun Zheng, Chuan-Jie Zhu +1 more

The European Physical Journal Plus•Jan 1, 2021•8 citations

Complete k-partite entanglement measure

Jinxing Zhao, Yu Guo, Fei He

arXiv:2503.16178•Quantum Information Processing•Nov 21, 2025•0 citations

Genuine multipartite entanglement measure

Yu Jing Guo, Yanping Jia, Xinping Li +1 more

Abstract Quantifying genuine entanglement is a crucial task in quantum information theory. In this work, we give an approach of constituting genuine m -partite entanglement measures from any bipartite entanglement and any k -partite entanglement measure, 3 ⩽ k < m . In addition, as a complement to the three-qubit concurrence triangle proposed in ( Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 040403), we show that the triangle relation is also valid for any continuous entanglement measure and system with any dimension. We also discuss the tetrahedron structure for the four-partite system via the triangle relation associated with tripartite and bipartite entanglement respectively. For multipartite system that contains more than four parties, there is no symmetric geometric structure as that of tri- and four-partite cases.

arXiv:2108.03638•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 17, 2022•41 citations

Geometric genuine multipartite entanglement for four-qubit systems

Ansh Mishra, Soumik Mahanti, Abhinash Kumar Roy +1 more

Xie and Eberly introduced a genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) measure ‘concurrence fill’ (Xie and Eberly, 2021) for three-party systems. It is defined as the area of a triangle whose side lengths represent squared concurrence in each bi-partition. However, it has been recently shown that concurrence fill is not monotonic under LOCC, hence not a faithful measure of entanglement. Though it is not a faithful entanglement measure, it encapsulates an elegant geometric interpretation of bipartite squared concurrences. There have been a few attempts to generalize GME quantifier to four-party settings and beyond. However, some of them are not faithful, and others simply lack an elegant geometric interpretation. The recent proposal from Xie et al.. constructs a concurrence tetrahedron, whose volume gives the amount of GME for four-party systems; with generalization to more than four parties being the hypervolume of the simplex structure in that dimension. Here, we show by construction that to capture all aspects of multipartite entanglement, one does not need a more complex structure, and the four-party entanglement can be demonstrated using 2D geometry only. The subadditivity together with the Araki-Lieb inequality of linear entropy is used to construct a direct extension of the geometric GME quantifier to four-party systems resulting in quadrilateral geometry. Our quantifier can be geometrically interpreted as a combination of three quadrilaterals whose sides result from the concurrence in one-to-three bi-partition, and diagonal as concurrence in two-to-two bipartition.

arXiv:2212.11690•Physics Open•Jul 26, 2024•5 citations

Genuine N -partite entanglement without N -partite correlations

Minh C. Tran, Margherita Zuppardo, Lukas Knips +4 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 6, 2018•0 citations

Geometric multipartite entanglement measures

Gerardo A. Paz-Silva, John Henry Reina

arXiv:quant-ph/0603102•Physics Letters A•Jan 9, 2007•4 citations
Abstract Quantifying genuine entanglement is a crucial task in quantum information theory. In this work, we give an approach of constituting genuine m -partite entanglement measures from any bipartite entanglement and any k -partite entanglement measure, 3 ⩽ k < m . In addition, as a complement to the three-qubit concurrence triangle proposed in ( Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 040403), we show that the triangle relation is also valid for any continuous entanglement measure and system with any dimension. We also discuss the tetrahedron structure for the four-partite system via the triangle relation associated with tripartite and bipartite entanglement respectively. For multipartite system that contains more than four parties, there is no symmetric geometric structure as that of tri- and four-partite cases.
Xie and Eberly introduced a genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) measure ‘concurrence fill’ (Xie and Eberly, 2021) for three-party systems. It is defined as the area of a triangle whose side lengths represent squared concurrence in each bi-partition. However, it has been recently shown that concurrence fill is not monotonic under LOCC, hence not a faithful measure of entanglement. Though it is not a faithful entanglement measure, it encapsulates an elegant geometric interpretation of bipartite squared concurrences. There have been a few attempts to generalize GME quantifier to four-party settings and beyond. However, some of them are not faithful, and others simply lack an elegant geometric interpretation. The recent proposal from Xie et al.. constructs a concurrence tetrahedron, whose volume gives the amount of GME for four-party systems; with generalization to more than four parties being the hypervolume of the simplex structure in that dimension. Here, we show by construction that to capture all aspects of multipartite entanglement, one does not need a more complex structure, and the four-party entanglement can be demonstrated using 2D geometry only. The subadditivity together with the Araki-Lieb inequality of linear entropy is used to construct a direct extension of the geometric GME quantifier to four-party systems resulting in quadrilateral geometry. Our quantifier can be geometrically interpreted as a combination of three quadrilaterals whose sides result from the concurrence in one-to-three bi-partition, and diagonal as concurrence in two-to-two bipartition.