Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2408.05943 · Journal of the Franklin Institute

Closed-loop designed open-loop control of quantum systems: An error analysis

Shikun Zhang, Guofeng Zhang

Published Aug 13, 2024• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.107170

Related papers

Quantum control theory and applications: a survey

Daoyi Dong, Ian R. Petersen

This study presents a survey on quantum control theory and applications from a control systems perspective. Some of the basic concepts and main developments (including open-loop control and closed-loop control) in quantum control theory are reviewed. In the area of open-loop quantum control, the paper surveys the notion of controllability for quantum systems and presents several control design strategies including optimal control, Lyapunov-based methodologies, variable structure control and quantum incoherent control. In the area of closed-loop quantum control, this study reviews closed-loop learning control and several important issues related to quantum feedback control including quantum filtering, feedback stabilisation, linear-quadratic-Gaussian control and robust quantum control.

arXiv:0910.2350•IET Control Theory and Applications•Dec 3, 2010•603 citations

Robust quantum control in closed and open systems: Theory and practice

Carrie Ann Weidner, Emily A. Reed, Jonathan Monroe +6 more

arXiv:2401.00294•Automatica•Nov 19, 2024•23 citations

Gradient-based closed-loop quantum optimal control in a solid-state two-qubit system

Guanru Feng, Franklin H. Cho, Hemant Katiyar +4 more

Quantum optimal control can play a crucial role in realizing a set of universal quantum logic gates with error rates below the threshold required for fault tolerance. Open-loop quantum optimal control relies on accurate modeling of the quantum system under control and does not scale efficiently with system size. These problems can be avoided in closed-loop quantum optimal control, which utilizes feedback from the system to improve control fidelity. In this paper, two gradient-based closed-loop quantum optimal control algorithms, the hybrid quantum-classical approach (HQCA) described by Li et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 150503 (2017)] and the finite-difference (FD) method, are experimentally investigated and compared to the open-loop quantum optimal control utilizing the gradient ascent method. We employ a solid-state ensemble of coupled electron-nuclear spins serving as a two-qubit system. Specific single-qubit and two-qubit state preparation gates are optimized using the closed-loop and open-loop methods. The experimental results demonstrate the implemented closed-loop quantum control outperforms the open-loop control in our system. Furthermore, simulations reveal that HQCA is more robust than the FD method to gradient noise which originates from measurement noise in this experimental setting. On the other hand, the FD method is more robust to control field distortions coming from nonideal hardware.

arXiv:1805.11674•Physical Review A•Nov 26, 2018•37 citations

FEEDBACK CONTROL OF QUANTUM SYSTEMS

M. R. James

Quantum Stochastics and Information•Aug 1, 2008•4 citations

Robust control of quantum dynamics under input and parameter uncertainty

Andy Koswara, Vaibhav Bhutoria, Raj Chakrabarti

Despite significant progress in theoretical and laboratory quantum control, engineering quantum systems remains principally challenging due to manifestation of noise and uncertainties associated with the field and Hamiltonian parameters. In this paper, we extend and generalize the asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis method, which provides more accurate estimates of quantum control objective moments than standard leading-order techniques, to diverse quantum observables, gates, and moments thereof and also introduce the Pontryagin maximum principle for quantum robust control. In addition, we present a Pareto optimization framework for achieving robust control via evolutionary open-loop (model-based) and closed-loop (model-free) approaches with the mechanisms of robustness and convergence described using asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis. In the open-loop approach, a multiobjective genetic algorithm is used to obtain Pareto solutions in terms of the expectation and variance of the transition probability under Hamiltonian parameter uncertainty. The set of numerically determined solutions can then be used as a starting population for model-free learning control in a feedback loop. The closed-loop approach utilizes a real-coded genetic algorithm with adaptive exploration and exploitation operators in order to preserve solution diversity and dynamically optimize the transition probability in the presence of field noise. Together, these methods provide a foundation for high-fidelity adaptive feedback control of quantum systems wherein open-loop control predictions are iteratively improved based on data from closed-loop experiments.

arXiv:2102.11813•Physical Review A•Nov 30, 2021•19 citations

Simulation of Quantum Open-Loop Control Systems on a Quantum Computer

Bin Ye, XU Wen-bo

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations
This study presents a survey on quantum control theory and applications from a control systems perspective. Some of the basic concepts and main developments (including open-loop control and closed-loop control) in quantum control theory are reviewed. In the area of open-loop quantum control, the paper surveys the notion of controllability for quantum systems and presents several control design strategies including optimal control, Lyapunov-based methodologies, variable structure control and quantum incoherent control. In the area of closed-loop quantum control, this study reviews closed-loop learning control and several important issues related to quantum feedback control including quantum filtering, feedback stabilisation, linear-quadratic-Gaussian control and robust quantum control.
Quantum optimal control can play a crucial role in realizing a set of universal quantum logic gates with error rates below the threshold required for fault tolerance. Open-loop quantum optimal control relies on accurate modeling of the quantum system under control and does not scale efficiently with system size. These problems can be avoided in closed-loop quantum optimal control, which utilizes feedback from the system to improve control fidelity. In this paper, two gradient-based closed-loop quantum optimal control algorithms, the hybrid quantum-classical approach (HQCA) described by Li et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 150503 (2017)] and the finite-difference (FD) method, are experimentally investigated and compared to the open-loop quantum optimal control utilizing the gradient ascent method. We employ a solid-state ensemble of coupled electron-nuclear spins serving as a two-qubit system. Specific single-qubit and two-qubit state preparation gates are optimized using the closed-loop and open-loop methods. The experimental results demonstrate the implemented closed-loop quantum control outperforms the open-loop control in our system. Furthermore, simulations reveal that HQCA is more robust than the FD method to gradient noise which originates from measurement noise in this experimental setting. On the other hand, the FD method is more robust to control field distortions coming from nonideal hardware.
Despite significant progress in theoretical and laboratory quantum control, engineering quantum systems remains principally challenging due to manifestation of noise and uncertainties associated with the field and Hamiltonian parameters. In this paper, we extend and generalize the asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis method, which provides more accurate estimates of quantum control objective moments than standard leading-order techniques, to diverse quantum observables, gates, and moments thereof and also introduce the Pontryagin maximum principle for quantum robust control. In addition, we present a Pareto optimization framework for achieving robust control via evolutionary open-loop (model-based) and closed-loop (model-free) approaches with the mechanisms of robustness and convergence described using asymptotic quantum control robustness analysis. In the open-loop approach, a multiobjective genetic algorithm is used to obtain Pareto solutions in terms of the expectation and variance of the transition probability under Hamiltonian parameter uncertainty. The set of numerically determined solutions can then be used as a starting population for model-free learning control in a feedback loop. The closed-loop approach utilizes a real-coded genetic algorithm with adaptive exploration and exploitation operators in order to preserve solution diversity and dynamically optimize the transition probability in the presence of field noise. Together, these methods provide a foundation for high-fidelity adaptive feedback control of quantum systems wherein open-loop control predictions are iteratively improved based on data from closed-loop experiments.