Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2406.00280 · Computers & Fluids

Incompressible Navier–Stokes solve on noisy quantum hardware via a hybrid quantum–classical scheme

Zhixin Song, Robert Deaton, Bryan Gard, Spencer H. Bryngelson

Published Dec 18, 2024• 22 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106507

Related papers

Solving the Navier-Stokes governing equations through quantum computing

Frank Gaitan

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Nov 26, 2019•0 citations

Finding Navier-Stokes fluid flows through quantum computung

Frank Gaitan

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2020•0 citations

Schrödinger-Navier-Stokes-Quantum-π: A Unified Model and Hybrid Numerical Method for Quantum Fluids with π-Phase Structure

Ndenga Lumbu Barack

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

A quantum lattice Boltzmann method for solving the Navier-Stokes systems with a linearized non-equilibrium collision operator and modular circuit

Kang-Yang Zeng, Zhao-Dong Wei, Xiaodong Niu +3 more

Acta Mechanica Sinica•May 5, 2026•2 citations

Quantum-Classical Iterative Refinement for the Pressure-Poisson Equation on NISQ Hardware

Doyeol "David" Ahn, Byeongyong Park, Rho Shin Myong +1 more

We present a hybrid quantum-classical iterative refinement for the pressure-Poisson equation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes projection method on noisy quantum hardware. Rather than solving the pressure equation once per time step, we solve it repeatedly for the normalized residual and scale each quantum direction by a least-squares fit to the physical residual. As a result, the error of the quantum solve enters as a contraction factor $\sinθ_k$ of the residual rather than as an error floor. This removes the requirement of a state infidelity below $10^{-7}$ that was estimated for single-solve schemes. The hardware noise then sets the rate of convergence but not the attainable accuracy, and it is this change of the role of the quantum solve, not an improvement of the hardware, that allows the residual to converge. With a boundary-consistent staggered (MAC) discretization, the pressure residual equals the velocity divergence left after projection up to the factor $Δt/ρ$. On the IBM processor ibm_cleveland, a four-qubit ($16\times16$) problem reached a relative residual below $10^{-7}$ within eight to ten corrections in all 20 runs of a pre-registered experiment, whereas a single solve with a comparable number of shots stopped at 0.33-0.59. In a six-qubit ($64\times64$) pilot, all three runs reached the same tolerance in 13 corrections. On the IonQ Forte processor, a manufactured-solution benchmark reached $5.6\times10^{-8}$ in nine corrections. With the variational training itself carried out on ibm_cleveland, the residual fell to $5.6\times10^{-4}$ in seven corrections, below the pre-specified tolerance of $10^{-3}$, at the rate predicted by a noise model. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first converged pressure solutions obtained on quantum hardware.

quant-pharXiv:2610.24342•Oct 20, 2026•0 citations

The Hydrodynamic Origin of Quantum Mechanics and the Regularity of Navier-Stokes

Ford, Nicholas

•Dec 5, 2025•0 citations
We present a hybrid quantum-classical iterative refinement for the pressure-Poisson equation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes projection method on noisy quantum hardware. Rather than solving the pressure equation once per time step, we solve it repeatedly for the normalized residual and scale each quantum direction by a least-squares fit to the physical residual. As a result, the error of the quantum solve enters as a contraction factor sin⁡θk\sinθ_ksinθk​ of the residual rather than as an error floor. This removes the requirement of a state infidelity below 10−710^{-7}10−7 that was estimated for single-solve schemes. The hardware noise then sets the rate of convergence but not the attainable accuracy, and it is this change of the role of the quantum solve, not an improvement of the hardware, that allows the residual to converge. With a boundary-consistent staggered (MAC) discretization, the pressure residual equals the velocity divergence left after projection up to the factor Δt/ρΔt/ρΔt/ρ. On the IBM processor ibm_cleveland, a four-qubit (16×1616\times1616×16) problem reached a relative residual below 10−710^{-7}10−7 within eight to ten corrections in all 20 runs of a pre-registered experiment, whereas a single solve with a comparable number of shots stopped at 0.33-0.59. In a six-qubit (64×6464\times6464×64) pilot, all three runs reached the same tolerance in 13 corrections. On the IonQ Forte processor, a manufactured-solution benchmark reached 5.6×10−85.6\times10^{-8}5.6×10−8 in nine corrections. With the variational training itself carried out on ibm_cleveland, the residual fell to 5.6×10−45.6\times10^{-4}5.6×10−4 in seven corrections, below the pre-specified tolerance of 10−310^{-3}10−3, at the rate predicted by a noise model. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first converged pressure solutions obtained on quantum hardware.