The formation of energy communities is pivotal for advancing decentralized and sustainable energy management. Within this context, Coalition Structure Generation (CSG) emerges as a promising framework. The complexity of CSG grows rapidly with the number of agents, making classical solvers impractical for even moderate sizes. This suggests CSG as an ideal candidate for benchmarking quantum algorithms against classical ones. Facing ongoing challenges in attaining computational quantum advantage for exact optimization, we pivot our focus to benchmarking quantum and classical solvers for approximate optimization. Approximate optimization is particularly critical for industrial use cases requiring real-time optimization, where finding high-quality solutions quickly is often more valuable than achieving exact solutions more slowly. Our findings indicate that quantum annealing (QA) on DWave can achieve solutions of comparable quality to our best classical solver, but with more favorable runtime scaling, showcasing an advantage. This advantage is observed when compared to solvers, such as Tabu search, simulated annealing, and the state-of-the-art solver Gurobi, in finding approximate solutions for energy community formation involving over 100 agents. DWave also surpasses 1-round QAOA on IBM hardware. Our findings represent the largest benchmark of quantum approximate optimizations for a real-world dense model beyond the hardware's native topology, where D-Wave demonstrates a scaling advantage.
The formation of energy communities is pivotal for advancing decentralized and sustainable energy management. Within this context, Coalition Structure Generation (CSG) emerges as a promising framework. The complexity of CSG grows rapidly with the number of agents, making classical solvers impractical for even moderate sizes. This suggests CSG as an ideal candidate for benchmarking quantum algorithms against classical ones. Facing ongoing challenges in attaining computational quantum advantage for exact optimization, we pivot our focus to benchmarking quantum and classical solvers for approximate optimization. Approximate optimization is particularly critical for industrial use cases requiring real-time optimization, where finding high-quality solutions quickly is often more valuable than achieving exact solutions more slowly. Our findings indicate that quantum annealing (QA) on DWave can achieve solutions of comparable quality to our best classical solver, but with more favorable runtime scaling, showcasing an advantage. This advantage is observed when compared to solvers, such as Tabu search, simulated annealing, and the state-of-the-art solver Gurobi, in finding approximate solutions for energy community formation involving over 100 agents. DWave also surpasses 1-round QAOA on IBM hardware. Our findings represent the largest benchmark of quantum approximate optimizations for a real-world dense model beyond the hardware's native topology, where D-Wave demonstrates a scaling advantage.
Abstract The formation of energy communities is pivotal for advancing decentralized and sustainable energy management. Within this context, coalition structure generation (CSG) emerges as a promising framework. The complexity of CSG grows rapidly with the number of agents, making classical solvers impractical for even moderate sizes. This suggests CSG as an ideal candidate for benchmarking quantum algorithms against classical ones. Facing ongoing challenges in attaining computational quantum advantage for exact optimization, we pivot our focus to benchmarking quantum and classical solvers for approximate optimization. Approximate optimization is particularly critical for industrial use cases requiring real-time optimization, where finding high-quality solutions quickly is often more valuable than achieving exact solutions more slowly. Our findings indicate that quantum annealing (QA) on DWave can achieve solutions of comparable quality to our best classical solver, but with more favorable runtime scaling, showcasing an advantage. This advantage is observed when compared to solvers, such as Tabu search, simulated annealing, and the state-of-the-art solver Gurobi in finding approximate solutions for energy community formation involving over 100 agents. DWave also surpasses 1-round QAOA on IBM hardware. Our findings represent the largest benchmark of quantum approximate optimizations for a real-world dense model beyond the hardware’s native topology, where D-Wave demonstrates a scaling advantage.
The increasing number of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, driven by lower manufacturing and launch costs, is proving invaluable for Earth observation missions and low-latency internet connectivity. However, as the number of satellites increases, the number of communication links to maintain also rises, making the management of this vast network increasingly challenging and highlighting the need for clustering satellites into efficient groups as a promising solution. This paper formulates the clustering of LEO satellites as a coalition structure generation (CSG) problem and leverages quantum annealing to solve it. We represent the satellite network as a graph and obtain the optimal partitions using a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm called GCS-Q. The algorithm follows a top-down approach by iteratively splitting the graph at each step using a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) formulation. To evaluate our approach, we utilize real-world three-line element set (TLE/3LE) data for Starlink satellites from Celestrak. Our experiments, conducted using the D-Wave Advantage annealer and the state-of-the-art solver Gurobi, demonstrate that the quantum annealer significantly outperforms classical methods in terms of runtime while maintaining the solution quality. The performance achieved with quantum annealers surpasses the capabilities of classical computers, highlighting the transformative potential of quantum computing in optimizing the management of large-scale satellite networks.
The transition to 100% renewable energy requires new techniques for managing energy networks, such as dividing them into sensible subsets of prosumers called micro-grids. Doing so in an optimal manner is a difficult optimization problem, as it can be abstracted to the Coalition Structure Generation problem in Induced Subgraph Games, a NP-complete problem which requires dividing an undirected, complete, weighted graph into subgraphs in a way that maximizes the sum of their internal weights. Recently, Venkatesh et al. [1] published a Quantum Annealing (QA)-based iterative algorithm called GCS-Q, which they claim to be the best currently existing solver for the problem in terms of runtime complexity. As this algorithm makes the application of QA to the problem seem promising, but is a greedy one, this work proposes several less greedy QA-based approaches and investigates whether any of them can outperform GCS-Q in terms of solution quality. While we find that this is not the case yet on D-Wave hardware, most of them do when using the classical QBSolv software as a solver. Especially an algorithm we call 4-split iterative R-QUBO shows potential here, finding all optima in our dataset while scaling favorably with the problem size in terms of runtime. Thus, it appears to be interesting for future research on quantum approaches to the problem, assuming QA hardware will become more noise-resilient over time.
Quantum AI is an emerging field that uses quantum computing to solve typical complex problems in AI. In this work, we propose BILP-Q, the first-ever general quantum approach for solving the Coalition Structure Generation problem (CSGP), which is notably NP-hard. In particular, we reformulate the CSGP in terms of a Quadratic Binary Combinatorial Optimization (QUBO) problem to leverage existing quantum algorithms (e.g., QAOA) to obtain the best coalition structure. Thus, we perform a comparative analysis in terms of time complexity between the proposed quantum approach and the most popular classical baselines. Furthermore, we consider standard benchmark distributions for coalition values to test the BILP-Q on small-scale experiments using the IBM Qiskit environment. Finally, since QUBO problems can be solved operating with quantum annealing, we run BILP-Q on medium-size problems using a real quantum annealer (D-Wave).
Uncertainty is fundamental in modern power systems, where renewable generation and fluctuating demand make stochastic optimization indispensable. The chance constrained unit commitment problem (UCP) captures this uncertainty but rapidly becomes computationally challenging as the number of scenarios grows. Quantum computing has been proposed as a potential route to overcome such scaling barriers. In this work, we evaluate the applicability of quantum annealing platforms to the chance constrained UCP. Focusing on a scenario approximation, we reformulated the problem as a mixed integer linear program and solved it using DWave hybrid quantum classical solver alongside Gurobi. The hybrid solver proved competitive under strict runtime limits for large scenario sets (15,000 in our experiments), while Gurobi remained superior on smaller cases. QUBO reformulations were also tested, but current annealers cannot accommodate stochastic UCPs due to hardware limits, and deterministic cases suffered from embedding overhead. Our study delineates where chance constrained UCPs can already be addressed with hybrid quantum classical methods, and where current quantum annealers remain fundamentally limited.
Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.