Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2405.00805 · Physical Review X

Classifying Two-Body Hamiltonians for Quantum Darwinism

Emery Doucet, Sebastian Deffner

Published Dec 11, 2024• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum Darwinism is a paradigm to understand how classically objective reality emerges from within a fundamentally quantum universe. Despite the growing attention that this field of research has been enjoying, it is currently not known what specific properties a given Hamiltonian describing a generic quantum system must have to allow the emergence of classicality. Therefore, in the present work, we consider a broadly applicable generic model of an arbitrary finite-dimensional system interacting with an environment formed from an arbitrary collection of finite-dimensional degrees of freedom via an unspecified, potentially time-dependent Hamiltonian containing at most two-body interaction terms. We show that such models support quantum Darwinism if the set of operators acting on the system which enter the Hamiltonian satisfy a set of commutation relations with a pointer observable and with one other. We demonstrate our results by analyzing a wide range of example systems: a qutrit interacting with a qubit environment, a qubit-qubit model with interactions alternating in time, and a series of collision models including a minimal model of a quantum Maxwell demon. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

DOI
10.1103/physrevx.14.041064

Related papers

Pointer States and Quantum Darwinism with Two-Body Interactions

Paul Duruisseau, Akram Touil, Sebastian Deffner

Quantum Darwinism explains the emergence of classical objectivity within a quantum universe. However, to date, most research on quantum Darwinism has focused on specific models and their stationary properties. To further our understanding of the quantum-to-classical transition, it appears desirable to identify the general criteria a Hamiltonian has to fulfill to support classical reality. To this end, we categorize all N-qubit models with two-body interactions, and show that only those with separable interaction of the system and environment can support a pointer basis. We further demonstrate that “perfect” quantum Darwinism can only emerge if there are no intra-environmental interactions. Our analysis is complemented by solving the ensuing dynamics. We find that in systems exhibiting information scrambling, the dynamical emergence of classical objectivity directly competes with the non-local spread of quantum correlations. Our rigorous findings are illustrated through the numerical analysis of four representative models.

Entropy•Nov 22, 2023•14 citations

Pointer states and quantum Darwinism with 2-body interactions

Paul Duruisseau, Akram Touil, Sebastian Deffner

Quantum Darwinism explains the emergence of classical objectivity within a quantum universe. However, to date most research in quantum Darwinism has focused on specific models and their stationary properties. To further our understanding of the quantum-to-classical transition it appears desirable to identify the general criteria a Hamiltonian has to fulfill to support classical reality. To this end, we categorize all models with 2-body interactions, and we show that only those with separable interaction of system and environment can support a pointer basis. We further show that "perfect" quantum Darwinism can only emerge if there are no intra-environmental interactions. Our analysis is complemented by the solution of the ensuing dynamics. We find that in systems that exhibit information scrambling, the dynamical emergence of classical objectivity is in direct competition with the non-local spread of quantum correlations. Our rigorous findings are illustrated with the numerical analysis of four representative models.

arXiv:2309.03299•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Emergence of quantum Darwinism and pointer states for noncommuting evolutions

Diana A. Chisholm, G. Massimo Palma, Luca Innocenti

Quantum systems achieve objectivity by redundantly encoding information about themselves into the surrounding environment, through a mechanism known as quantum Darwinism. When this happens, observers measure the environment and infer the system to be in one of its pointer states. We study the emergence of objectivity whenever the Hamiltonian of the system and the interaction Hamiltonian between system and environment do not commute, a condition where it becomes difficult to identify pointer states, and the use of methods such as the predictability sieve becomes necessary. We show in an explicit qubit model to what degree the noncommuting evolution allows for the emergence of objective states, and show that a definition of pointer states based on spectrum broadcast structure is more natural in this context, and coincides with the one based on the predictability sieve for commuting evolutions.

arXiv:2510.06867•APS Open Science•May 1, 2026•0 citations

Generic emergence of classical features in quantum Darwinism

Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Marco Piani, Paweł Horodecki

Quantum Darwinism posits that only specific information about a quantum system that is redundantly proliferated to many parts of its environment becomes accessible and objective, leading to the emergence of classical reality. However, it is not clear under what conditions this mechanism holds true. Here we prove that the emergence of classical features along the lines of quantum Darwinism is a general feature of any quantum dynamics: observers who acquire information indirectly through the environment have effective access at most to classical information about one and the same measurement of the quantum system. Our analysis does not rely on a strict conceptual splitting between a system-of-interest and its environment, and allows one to interpret any system as part of the environment of any other system. Finally, our approach leads to a full operational characterization of quantum discord in terms of local redistribution of correlations. Quantum Darwinism provides an explanation for the emergence of classical reality from the underlying quantum world, as information proliferates in the environment and becomes objective. Here, the authors show how some aspects of this mechanism is generic and classicality emerges for any quantum dynamics.

arXiv:1310.8640•Nature Communications•Aug 12, 2015•138 citations

Classical selection and quantum Darwinism

Ruth E. Kastner

This short letter in response to Wojciech Zurek’s article “Quantum Darwinism, classical reality, and the randomness of quantum jumps” points out extant rebuttals in the literature to some of the author’s key claims.On the first page of his arXiv.org version of the Physics Today article (http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5206), Zurek states thatdecoherence selects preferred pointer states that survive interaction with the environment. They are localized and effectively classical. They persist while their superpositions decohere. Decoherence marks the border between quantum and classical, alleviating concern about flagrant … manifestations of quantumness in the macroscopic domain.Here we consider emergence of “the classical” starting at a more fundamental pre-decoherence level, tracing the origin of preferred pointer states.However, the idea that preferred pointer states naturally “emerge” from the quantum level has been refuted in the literature, in particular in a paper11. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56 (2014), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004 showing that “classical” pointer states do not emerge unless a key aspect of classicality has been tacitly assumed from the beginning. In other words, the “quantum Darwinism” program is fatally circular.The assumption generating the circularity usually takes the form of a predesignated system that is considered separable from its environment (the same assumption appears in the discussion about information flow in Zurek’s article). The system acquires decohered observable (or stable) states because it is presumed to be distinguishable from a designated set of environmental subsystems, all assumed as having random phases—with respect to each other and the system. The only correlations between the system and the environmental subsystems are assumed to be established via the designated Hamiltonians.However, in the absence of this sort of predesignated partitioning of all degrees of freedom into the system and its surroundings—measurement apparatus, environment, and so forth—where the initial phase of each subsystem is random, the desired decoherence and emergence of pointer states, or einselection, do not follow. The partitioning is inevitably based on what a human observer would be able to identify and measure, such as distinguishable atoms and molecules, so the account is dependent on assuming the classical realm of the observer.The need for this pre-partitioning fatally conflicts with the claim that classicality emerges naturally from the quantum realm: Absent a pre-partitioning of all degrees of freedom into uncorrelated systems of interest, classical pointer states do not emerge. With unitary-only dynamics (lacking nonunitary collapse), the quantum realm does not have any a priori preference for the assumed uncorrelated degrees of freedom. On the contrary, a unitary-only evolution would typically begin with a maximally entangled universal state.As I noted in reference 11. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56 (2014), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004, one can observe the decoherence process experimentally, but that observation does not demonstrate that einselection occurs in a unitary-only dynamics or that classicality emerges in such a dynamics. A key missing ingredient in quantum Darwinism is some real physical randomization process, such as collapse, that could create an observer-independent, physical partitioning at the quantum level. Without such a process, quantum Darwinism contains the same kind of logical circularity as Boltzmann’s H-theorem, which attempted to derive irreversible thermodynamic laws from reversible laws. Boltzmann inadvertently smuggled in irreversibility by assuming molecular chaos; quantum Darwinists smuggle in classicality via their partitioning of the universe into distinguishable systems of interest that interact with mutually randomized environmental subsystems.In his article, Zurek does not address this refutation of quantum Darwinism and repeats the refuted claims and circular assumptions. Similar criticisms of quantum Darwinism’s presumption of classically distinguishable primordial systems, raised by Jasmina Jeknić-Dugić, Miroljub Dugić, and collaborators,2–42. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-013-1794-x3. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, M. Arsenijević, Open Access Libr. J. 1, e501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.11005014. M. Dugić, J. Jeknić, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45, 2215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9186-0 and Chris Fields’s concern about the division of primordial degrees of freedom into a classically distinguishable system and environment55. C. Fields, Phys. Essays 24, 518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3644391 have also not been countered by proponents of quantum Darwinism.I acknowledge and thank Miroljub Dugić for his helpful comments.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56 (2014), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004, Google ScholarCrossref2. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-013-1794-x, Google ScholarCrossref3. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, M. Arsenijević, Open Access Libr. J. 1, e501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1100501, Google ScholarCrossref4. M. Dugić, J. Jeknić, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45, 2215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9186-0, Google ScholarCrossref5. C. Fields, Phys. Essays 24, 518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3644391, Google ScholarCrossref© 2015 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Apr 30, 2015•3 citations

Quantum Darwinism in Action

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

Quantum Darwinism demonstrates not only that preferred states are selected for their stability but also that information about them is broadcast by the same environment that causes decoherence and einselection. That environment acts both as a censor and as an advertising agent that disseminates information about pointer states while suppressing complementary information. Chapter 8 explores the implications and limitations of quantum Darwinism using models inspired by the structure of the Universe we inhabit. We perceive our Universe using light and other means of information transmission. We explore models that have a well-defined relation with our everyday reality, and where one can also selectively relax some of the idealized assumptions and investigate the consequences. Light is the communication channel through which we obtain most of our information. Fortunately, it is an ideal channel in the sense of quantum Darwinism, and simple but realistic cases are exactly solvable. The solution presented herein demonstrates the inevitability of the consensus between observers who rely on scattered photons: The emergence of classical objective reality (classical because pointer states are einselected, and objective because redundancy imposes consensus) is inevitable. This is how the classical world we perceive emerges from within the quantum Universe we inhabit.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 6, 2025•0 citations
Quantum Darwinism is a paradigm to understand how classically objective reality emerges from within a fundamentally quantum universe. Despite the growing attention that this field of research has been enjoying, it is currently not known what specific properties a given Hamiltonian describing a generic quantum system must have to allow the emergence of classicality. Therefore, in the present work, we consider a broadly applicable generic model of an arbitrary finite-dimensional system interacting with an environment formed from an arbitrary collection of finite-dimensional degrees of freedom via an unspecified, potentially time-dependent Hamiltonian containing at most two-body interaction terms. We show that such models support quantum Darwinism if the set of operators acting on the system which enter the Hamiltonian satisfy a set of commutation relations with a pointer observable and with one other. We demonstrate our results by analyzing a wide range of example systems: a qutrit interacting with a qubit environment, a qubit-qubit model with interactions alternating in time, and a series of collision models including a minimal model of a quantum Maxwell demon. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Quantum Darwinism explains the emergence of classical objectivity within a quantum universe. However, to date, most research on quantum Darwinism has focused on specific models and their stationary properties. To further our understanding of the quantum-to-classical transition, it appears desirable to identify the general criteria a Hamiltonian has to fulfill to support classical reality. To this end, we categorize all N-qubit models with two-body interactions, and show that only those with separable interaction of the system and environment can support a pointer basis. We further demonstrate that “perfect” quantum Darwinism can only emerge if there are no intra-environmental interactions. Our analysis is complemented by solving the ensuing dynamics. We find that in systems exhibiting information scrambling, the dynamical emergence of classical objectivity directly competes with the non-local spread of quantum correlations. Our rigorous findings are illustrated through the numerical analysis of four representative models.
Quantum Darwinism explains the emergence of classical objectivity within a quantum universe. However, to date most research in quantum Darwinism has focused on specific models and their stationary properties. To further our understanding of the quantum-to-classical transition it appears desirable to identify the general criteria a Hamiltonian has to fulfill to support classical reality. To this end, we categorize all models with 2-body interactions, and we show that only those with separable interaction of system and environment can support a pointer basis. We further show that "perfect" quantum Darwinism can only emerge if there are no intra-environmental interactions. Our analysis is complemented by the solution of the ensuing dynamics. We find that in systems that exhibit information scrambling, the dynamical emergence of classical objectivity is in direct competition with the non-local spread of quantum correlations. Our rigorous findings are illustrated with the numerical analysis of four representative models.
Quantum systems achieve objectivity by redundantly encoding information about themselves into the surrounding environment, through a mechanism known as quantum Darwinism. When this happens, observers measure the environment and infer the system to be in one of its pointer states. We study the emergence of objectivity whenever the Hamiltonian of the system and the interaction Hamiltonian between system and environment do not commute, a condition where it becomes difficult to identify pointer states, and the use of methods such as the predictability sieve becomes necessary. We show in an explicit qubit model to what degree the noncommuting evolution allows for the emergence of objective states, and show that a definition of pointer states based on spectrum broadcast structure is more natural in this context, and coincides with the one based on the predictability sieve for commuting evolutions.
Quantum Darwinism posits that only specific information about a quantum system that is redundantly proliferated to many parts of its environment becomes accessible and objective, leading to the emergence of classical reality. However, it is not clear under what conditions this mechanism holds true. Here we prove that the emergence of classical features along the lines of quantum Darwinism is a general feature of any quantum dynamics: observers who acquire information indirectly through the environment have effective access at most to classical information about one and the same measurement of the quantum system. Our analysis does not rely on a strict conceptual splitting between a system-of-interest and its environment, and allows one to interpret any system as part of the environment of any other system. Finally, our approach leads to a full operational characterization of quantum discord in terms of local redistribution of correlations. Quantum Darwinism provides an explanation for the emergence of classical reality from the underlying quantum world, as information proliferates in the environment and becomes objective. Here, the authors show how some aspects of this mechanism is generic and classicality emerges for any quantum dynamics.
This short letter in response to Wojciech Zurek’s article “Quantum Darwinism, classical reality, and the randomness of quantum jumps” points out extant rebuttals in the literature to some of the author’s key claims.On the first page of his arXiv.org version of the Physics Today article (http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5206), Zurek states thatdecoherence selects preferred pointer states that survive interaction with the environment. They are localized and effectively classical. They persist while their superpositions decohere. Decoherence marks the border between quantum and classical, alleviating concern about flagrant … manifestations of quantumness in the macroscopic domain.Here we consider emergence of “the classical” starting at a more fundamental pre-decoherence level, tracing the origin of preferred pointer states.However, the idea that preferred pointer states naturally “emerge” from the quantum level has been refuted in the literature, in particular in a paper11. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56 (2014), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004 showing that “classical” pointer states do not emerge unless a key aspect of classicality has been tacitly assumed from the beginning. In other words, the “quantum Darwinism” program is fatally circular.The assumption generating the circularity usually takes the form of a predesignated system that is considered separable from its environment (the same assumption appears in the discussion about information flow in Zurek’s article). The system acquires decohered observable (or stable) states because it is presumed to be distinguishable from a designated set of environmental subsystems, all assumed as having random phases—with respect to each other and the system. The only correlations between the system and the environmental subsystems are assumed to be established via the designated Hamiltonians.However, in the absence of this sort of predesignated partitioning of all degrees of freedom into the system and its surroundings—measurement apparatus, environment, and so forth—where the initial phase of each subsystem is random, the desired decoherence and emergence of pointer states, or einselection, do not follow. The partitioning is inevitably based on what a human observer would be able to identify and measure, such as distinguishable atoms and molecules, so the account is dependent on assuming the classical realm of the observer.The need for this pre-partitioning fatally conflicts with the claim that classicality emerges naturally from the quantum realm: Absent a pre-partitioning of all degrees of freedom into uncorrelated systems of interest, classical pointer states do not emerge. With unitary-only dynamics (lacking nonunitary collapse), the quantum realm does not have any a priori preference for the assumed uncorrelated degrees of freedom. On the contrary, a unitary-only evolution would typically begin with a maximally entangled universal state.As I noted in reference 11. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56 (2014), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004, one can observe the decoherence process experimentally, but that observation does not demonstrate that einselection occurs in a unitary-only dynamics or that classicality emerges in such a dynamics. A key missing ingredient in quantum Darwinism is some real physical randomization process, such as collapse, that could create an observer-independent, physical partitioning at the quantum level. Without such a process, quantum Darwinism contains the same kind of logical circularity as Boltzmann’s H-theorem, which attempted to derive irreversible thermodynamic laws from reversible laws. Boltzmann inadvertently smuggled in irreversibility by assuming molecular chaos; quantum Darwinists smuggle in classicality via their partitioning of the universe into distinguishable systems of interest that interact with mutually randomized environmental subsystems.In his article, Zurek does not address this refutation of quantum Darwinism and repeats the refuted claims and circular assumptions. Similar criticisms of quantum Darwinism’s presumption of classically distinguishable primordial systems, raised by Jasmina Jeknić-Dugić, Miroljub Dugić, and collaborators,2–42. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-013-1794-x3. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, M. Arsenijević, Open Access Libr. J. 1, e501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.11005014. M. Dugić, J. Jeknić, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45, 2215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9186-0 and Chris Fields’s concern about the division of primordial degrees of freedom into a classically distinguishable system and environment55. C. Fields, Phys. Essays 24, 518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3644391 have also not been countered by proponents of quantum Darwinism.I acknowledge and thank Miroljub Dugić for his helpful comments.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56 (2014), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004, Google ScholarCrossref2. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-013-1794-x, Google ScholarCrossref3. J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Dugić, A. Francom, M. Arsenijević, Open Access Libr. J. 1, e501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1100501, Google ScholarCrossref4. M. Dugić, J. Jeknić, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45, 2215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9186-0, Google ScholarCrossref5. C. Fields, Phys. Essays 24, 518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3644391, Google ScholarCrossref© 2015 American Institute of Physics.
Quantum Darwinism demonstrates not only that preferred states are selected for their stability but also that information about them is broadcast by the same environment that causes decoherence and einselection. That environment acts both as a censor and as an advertising agent that disseminates information about pointer states while suppressing complementary information. Chapter 8 explores the implications and limitations of quantum Darwinism using models inspired by the structure of the Universe we inhabit. We perceive our Universe using light and other means of information transmission. We explore models that have a well-defined relation with our everyday reality, and where one can also selectively relax some of the idealized assumptions and investigate the consequences. Light is the communication channel through which we obtain most of our information. Fortunately, it is an ideal channel in the sense of quantum Darwinism, and simple but realistic cases are exactly solvable. The solution presented herein demonstrates the inevitability of the consensus between observers who rely on scattered photons: The emergence of classical objective reality (classical because pointer states are einselected, and objective because redundancy imposes consensus) is inevitable. This is how the classical world we perceive emerges from within the quantum Universe we inhabit.