Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2404.00743

Complex phases in quantum mechanics

Carl M. Bender, Daniel W. Hook

Published Mar 31, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Hamilton's equations of motion are local differential equations and boundary conditions are required to determine the solution uniquely. Depending on the choice of boundary conditions, a Hamiltonian may thereby describe several different physically observable phases, each exhibiting its own characteristic global symmetry.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2404.00743

Related papers

Complex phases in quantum mechanics

Carl M. Bender, Daniel W. Hook

Abstract Schrödinger's equation is a local differential equation and boundary conditions are required to determine the solution uniquely. Depending on the choice of boundary conditions, a given Hamiltonian may describe several different physically observable phases, each exhibiting its own characteristic global symmetry.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•May 28, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Hamilton mechanics: Hamilton equations of quantum motion, origin of quantum operators, and proof of quantization axiom

Ciann‐Dong Yang

Annals of Physics•Sep 9, 2006•63 citations

Semiclassical theory and the Koopman-van Hove equation *

Ilon Joseph

Abstract The phase space Koopman-van Hove (KvH) equation can be derived from the asymptotic semiclassical analysis of partial differential equations. Semiclassical theory yields the Hamilton–Jacobi equation for the complex phase factor and the transport equation for the amplitude. These two equations can be combined to form a nonlinear semiclassical version of the KvH equation in configuration space. There is a natural injection of configuration space solutions into phase space and a natural projection of phase space solutions onto configuration space. Hence, every solution of the configuration space KvH equation satisfies both the semiclassical phase space KvH equation and the Hamilton–Jacobi constraint. For configuration space solutions, this constraint resolves the paradox that there are two different conserved densities in phase space. For integrable systems, the KvH spectrum is the Cartesian product of a classical and a semiclassical spectrum. If the classical spectrum is eliminated, then, with the correct choice of Jeffreys–Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin (JWKB) matching conditions, the semiclassical spectrum satisfies the Einstein–Brillouin–Keller quantization conditions which include the correction due to the Maslov index. However, semiclassical analysis uses different choices for boundary conditions, continuity requirements, and the domain of definition. For example, use of the complex JWKB method allows for the treatment of tunneling through the complexification of phase space. Finally, although KvH wavefunctions include the possibility of interference effects, interference is not observable when all observables are approximated as local operators on phase space. Observing interference effects requires consideration of nonlocal operations, e.g. through higher orders in the asymptotic theory.

arXiv:2306.01865•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 19, 2023•6 citations

Classical and quantum mechanics of complex hamiltonian systems: An extended complex phase space approach

R. S. Kaushal

Pramana•Aug 1, 2009•18 citations

On Geometric Paradox in Quantization of Natural Dynamical Systems

Эрнест Ахмеджанович Тагиров

The Schrodinger variational approach (1926) to quantization of the natural Hamilton mechanics in $2n$-dimensional phase space is revised in the modern paradigm of quantum mechanics in application to the system the Hamilton function of which is a positive-definite quadratic form of the n momenta with the coefficients depending on coordinates in the generic configuration space $V_n$. The quantum Hamilonian thus obtained has a paradoxical potential term depending on choice of coordinates in $V_n$, which was discovered first by B. DeWitt in 1952 in the framework of canonical quantization of the system by a particular ordering of the operators of observables of momenta and coordinates. It is shown that the Schrodinger approach in the standard paradigm of quantum mechanics determines uniquely the ordering selected by DeWitt among a continuum of other possibilties to determine the quantum Hamiltonian. Two particular classes of observables of localization in $V_n$ are considered in detail. It is shown that, in general, the quantum-mechanical potential does not vanish even in the Euclidean configuration space $V_n$ except the case when Cartesian coordinates are taken as the observables of localization of the system. It is noted also that, in the quasi-classical approach to the quantization considered by DeWitt in 1957, the quantum Green function (propagator) is also non-unique and depends on the choice of a line in $V_n$ connecting these points. All three formalisms have the same local asymtotics of the quantum Hamiltonian if the normal Riemannian cordinates are used, at least implicitly, to localize the system in $V_n$. Keywords: Hamilton function; Quantization; Quantum-Mechanical Potential; Observables of Localization; Quantum Anomaly of (non-relativistic) General Covariance.

arXiv:1805.11493•May 29, 2018•0 citations

Quantum and Classical Mechanics of Hamiltonian Systems Having Exponential-Type Potentials

J. Akande, L. H. Koudahoun, Kolawolé Kêgnidé Damien Adjaï +2 more

The problem to solve consists of finding explicit solutions for the classical equation of motion of a particle subject to an exponential-type potential and for the quantum version.

•Sep 1, 2016•0 citations
Abstract The phase space Koopman-van Hove (KvH) equation can be derived from the asymptotic semiclassical analysis of partial differential equations. Semiclassical theory yields the Hamilton–Jacobi equation for the complex phase factor and the transport equation for the amplitude. These two equations can be combined to form a nonlinear semiclassical version of the KvH equation in configuration space. There is a natural injection of configuration space solutions into phase space and a natural projection of phase space solutions onto configuration space. Hence, every solution of the configuration space KvH equation satisfies both the semiclassical phase space KvH equation and the Hamilton–Jacobi constraint. For configuration space solutions, this constraint resolves the paradox that there are two different conserved densities in phase space. For integrable systems, the KvH spectrum is the Cartesian product of a classical and a semiclassical spectrum. If the classical spectrum is eliminated, then, with the correct choice of Jeffreys–Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin (JWKB) matching conditions, the semiclassical spectrum satisfies the Einstein–Brillouin–Keller quantization conditions which include the correction due to the Maslov index. However, semiclassical analysis uses different choices for boundary conditions, continuity requirements, and the domain of definition. For example, use of the complex JWKB method allows for the treatment of tunneling through the complexification of phase space. Finally, although KvH wavefunctions include the possibility of interference effects, interference is not observable when all observables are approximated as local operators on phase space. Observing interference effects requires consideration of nonlocal operations, e.g. through higher orders in the asymptotic theory.
The Schrodinger variational approach (1926) to quantization of the natural Hamilton mechanics in 2n2n2n-dimensional phase space is revised in the modern paradigm of quantum mechanics in application to the system the Hamilton function of which is a positive-definite quadratic form of the n momenta with the coefficients depending on coordinates in the generic configuration space VnV_nVn​. The quantum Hamilonian thus obtained has a paradoxical potential term depending on choice of coordinates in VnV_nVn​, which was discovered first by B. DeWitt in 1952 in the framework of canonical quantization of the system by a particular ordering of the operators of observables of momenta and coordinates. It is shown that the Schrodinger approach in the standard paradigm of quantum mechanics determines uniquely the ordering selected by DeWitt among a continuum of other possibilties to determine the quantum Hamiltonian. Two particular classes of observables of localization in VnV_nVn​ are considered in detail. It is shown that, in general, the quantum-mechanical potential does not vanish even in the Euclidean configuration space VnV_nVn​ except the case when Cartesian coordinates are taken as the observables of localization of the system. It is noted also that, in the quasi-classical approach to the quantization considered by DeWitt in 1957, the quantum Green function (propagator) is also non-unique and depends on the choice of a line in VnV_nVn​ connecting these points. All three formalisms have the same local asymtotics of the quantum Hamiltonian if the normal Riemannian cordinates are used, at least implicitly, to localize the system in VnV_nVn​. Keywords: Hamilton function; Quantization; Quantum-Mechanical Potential; Observables of Localization; Quantum Anomaly of (non-relativistic) General Covariance.