Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2403.13542

Scalability of quantum error mitigation techniques: from utility to advantage

Sergey N. Filippov, Sabrina Maniscalco, Guillermo García-Pérez

Published Mar 20, 2024• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Error mitigation has elevated quantum computing to the scale of hundreds of qubits and tens of layers; however, yet larger scales (deeper circuits) are needed to fully exploit the potential of quantum computing to solve practical problems otherwise intractable. Here we demonstrate three key results that pave the way for the leap from quantum utility to quantum advantage: (1) we present a thorough derivation of random and systematic errors associated to the most advanced error mitigation strategies, including probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), zero noise extrapolation (ZNE) with probabilistic error amplification, and tensor-network error mitigation (TEM); (2) we prove that TEM (i) has the lowest sampling overhead among all three techniques under realistic noise, (ii) is optimal, in the sense that it saturates the universal lower cost bound for error mitigation, and (iii) is therefore the most promising approach to quantum advantage; (3) we propose a concrete notion of practical quantum advantage in terms of the universality of algorithms, stemming from the commercial need for a problem-independent quantum simulation device. We also establish a connection between error mitigation, relying on additional measurements, and error correction, relying on additional qubits, by demonstrating that TEM with a sufficient bond dimension works similarly to an error correcting code of distance 3. We foresee that the interplay and trade-off between the two resources will be the key to a smooth transition between error mitigation and error correction, and hence between near-term and fault-tolerant quantum computers. Meanwhile, we argue that quantum computing with optimal error mitigation, relying on modest classical computer power for tensor network contraction, has the potential to reach larger scales in accurate simulation than classical methods alone.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2403.13542

Related papers

Scalable tensor-network error mitigation for near-term quantum computing

Filippov, Sergei, Matea Leahy, Matteo A. C. Rossi +1 more

Until fault-tolerance becomes implementable at scale, quantum computing will heavily rely on noise mitigation techniques. While methods such as zero noise extrapolation with probabilistic error amplification (ZNE-PEA) and probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) have been successfully tested on hardware recently, their scalability to larger circuits may be limited. Here, we introduce the tensor-network error mitigation (TEM) algorithm, which acts in post-processing to correct the noise-induced errors in estimations of physical observables. The method consists of the construction of a tensor network representing the inverse of the global noise channel affecting the state of the quantum processor, and the consequent application of the map to informationally complete measurement outcomes obtained from the noisy state. TEM does therefore not require additional quantum operations other than the implementation of informationally complete POVMs, which can be achieved through randomised local measurements. The key advantage of TEM is that the measurement overhead is quadratically smaller than in PEC. We test TEM extensively in numerical simulations in different regimes. We find that TEM can be applied to circuits of twice the depth compared to what is achievable with PEC under realistic conditions with sparse Pauli-Lindblad noise, such as those in [E. van den Berg et al., Nat. Phys. (2023)]. By using Clifford circuits, we explore the capabilities of the method in wider and deeper circuits with lower noise levels. We find that in the case of 100 qubits and depth 100, both PEC and ZNE fail to produce accurate results by using $\sim 10^5$ shots, while TEM succeeds.

arXiv:2307.11740•Jul 21, 2023•13 citations

Quantum Error Correction on Error-mitigated Physical Qubits

Minjun Jeon, Zhenyu Cai

We present a general framework for applying linear quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques directly to physical qubits within a logical qubit to suppress logical errors. By exploiting the linearity of quantum error correction (QEC), we demonstrate that any linear QEM method$\unicode{x2014}$including probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), and symmetry verification$\unicode{x2014}$can be integrated into the physical layer without requiring modifications to the subsequent QEC decoder. Applying this framework to memory experiments using PEC, we analytically prove and numerically verify that the leading-order contribution to the logical error can be removed, increasing the effective code distance by 2. Our simulations on repetition and rotated surface codes show that a distance-3 code with physical-level PEC achieves logical error rates lower than or similar to a distance-5 unmitigated code while using 40% and 64% fewer qubits, respectively. These results establish physical-level QEM as a widely compatible and resource-efficient strategy for enhancing logical performance in early fault-tolerant architectures.

quant-pharXiv:2601.18384•Jan 27, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Error Mitigation: A Comprehensive Survey

Ratun Rahman, Dinh C. Nguyen

Quantum noise poses a significant challenge for current near-term quantum computing. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) has therefore emerged as a key strategy, offering a practical and effective solution to reduce error impacts and enhance the performance of near-term variational quantum circuits (VQC). Given the lack of a comprehensive survey on this important topic in the literature, this article provides a dedicated overview of QEM, including both during and after the training of VQC. Specifically, during VQC training, we explore and discuss key QEM techniques such as optimal control and dynamical decoupling. For the post-processing stage of VQC, we will examine and discuss mitigation techniques such as zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) and probabilistic error cancellation (PEC). For each of these QEM techniques, we will investigate the fundamentals, mitigation concepts, and recent advances. Subsequently, we also explore research toolboxes, including Mitiq and Qiskit Aer, as well as provide a case study that demonstrates contextual multi-armed bandit-guided ZNE. Finally, we discuss ongoing problems and future research initiatives, including ML-assisted mitigation and integration with error correction. This survey article aims to synthesize the state-of-the-art in QEM, offer organized insights across approaches, and propose potential paths towards error-resilient quantum computing.

ACM Computing Surveys•Aug 21, 2026•0 citations

Error Mitigation of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits with Soft Information

Zeyuan Zhou, Shaun Pexton, Aleksander Kubica +1 more

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.

quant-pharXiv:2512.09863•Dec 11, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Error Mitigated Classical Shadows

Hamza Jnane, Jonathan Steinberg, Zhenyu Cai +2 more

Classical shadows enable us to learn many properties of a quantum state ρ with very few measurements. However, near-term and early fault-tolerant quantum computers will only be able to prepare noisy quantum states ρ and it is thus a considerable challenge to efficiently learn properties of an ideal, noise-free state ρ id . We consider error mitigation techniques, such as probabilistic error cancelation (PEC), zero noise extrapolation (ZNE), and symmetry verification (SV), which have been developed for mitigating errors in single expected value measurements and generalize them for mitigating errors in classical shadows. We find that PEC is the most natural candidate and thus develop a thorough theoretical framework for PEC shadows with the following rigorous theoretical guarantees: PEC shadows are an unbiased estimator for the ideal quantum state ρ id ; the sample complexity for simultaneously predicting many linear properties of ρ id is identical to that of the conventional shadows approach up to a multiplicative factor, which is the sample overhead due to error mitigation. Due to efficient postprocessing of shadows, this overhead does not depend directly on the number of qubits but rather grows exponentially with the number of noisy gates. The broad set of tools introduced in this work may be instrumental in exploiting near-term and early fault-tolerant quantum computers: we demonstrate in detailed numerical simulations a range of practical applications of quantum computers that will significantly benefit from our techniques. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2305.04956•PRX Quantum•Feb 9, 2024•37 citations

Fundamental limits of quantum error mitigation

Ryuji Takagi, Suguru Endo, Shintaro Minagawa +1 more

Abstract The inevitable accumulation of errors in near-future quantum devices represents a key obstacle in delivering practical quantum advantages, motivating the development of various quantum error-mitigation methods. Here, we derive fundamental bounds concerning how error-mitigation algorithms can reduce the computation error as a function of their sampling overhead. Our bounds place universal performance limits on a general error-mitigation protocol class. We use them to show (1) that the sampling overhead that ensures a certain computational accuracy for mitigating local depolarizing noise in layered circuits scales exponentially with the circuit depth for general error-mitigation protocols and (2) the optimality of probabilistic error cancellation among a wide class of strategies in mitigating the local dephasing noise on an arbitrary number of qubits. Our results provide a means to identify when a given quantum error-mitigation strategy is optimal and when there is potential room for improvement.

arXiv:2109.04457•npj Quantum Information•Sep 22, 2022•161 citations
Error mitigation has elevated quantum computing to the scale of hundreds of qubits and tens of layers; however, yet larger scales (deeper circuits) are needed to fully exploit the potential of quantum computing to solve practical problems otherwise intractable. Here we demonstrate three key results that pave the way for the leap from quantum utility to quantum advantage: (1) we present a thorough derivation of random and systematic errors associated to the most advanced error mitigation strategies, including probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), zero noise extrapolation (ZNE) with probabilistic error amplification, and tensor-network error mitigation (TEM); (2) we prove that TEM (i) has the lowest sampling overhead among all three techniques under realistic noise, (ii) is optimal, in the sense that it saturates the universal lower cost bound for error mitigation, and (iii) is therefore the most promising approach to quantum advantage; (3) we propose a concrete notion of practical quantum advantage in terms of the universality of algorithms, stemming from the commercial need for a problem-independent quantum simulation device. We also establish a connection between error mitigation, relying on additional measurements, and error correction, relying on additional qubits, by demonstrating that TEM with a sufficient bond dimension works similarly to an error correcting code of distance 3. We foresee that the interplay and trade-off between the two resources will be the key to a smooth transition between error mitigation and error correction, and hence between near-term and fault-tolerant quantum computers. Meanwhile, we argue that quantum computing with optimal error mitigation, relying on modest classical computer power for tensor network contraction, has the potential to reach larger scales in accurate simulation than classical methods alone.
Until fault-tolerance becomes implementable at scale, quantum computing will heavily rely on noise mitigation techniques. While methods such as zero noise extrapolation with probabilistic error amplification (ZNE-PEA) and probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) have been successfully tested on hardware recently, their scalability to larger circuits may be limited. Here, we introduce the tensor-network error mitigation (TEM) algorithm, which acts in post-processing to correct the noise-induced errors in estimations of physical observables. The method consists of the construction of a tensor network representing the inverse of the global noise channel affecting the state of the quantum processor, and the consequent application of the map to informationally complete measurement outcomes obtained from the noisy state. TEM does therefore not require additional quantum operations other than the implementation of informationally complete POVMs, which can be achieved through randomised local measurements. The key advantage of TEM is that the measurement overhead is quadratically smaller than in PEC. We test TEM extensively in numerical simulations in different regimes. We find that TEM can be applied to circuits of twice the depth compared to what is achievable with PEC under realistic conditions with sparse Pauli-Lindblad noise, such as those in [E. van den Berg et al., Nat. Phys. (2023)]. By using Clifford circuits, we explore the capabilities of the method in wider and deeper circuits with lower noise levels. We find that in the case of 100 qubits and depth 100, both PEC and ZNE fail to produce accurate results by using ∼105\sim 10^5∼105 shots, while TEM succeeds.
We present a general framework for applying linear quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques directly to physical qubits within a logical qubit to suppress logical errors. By exploiting the linearity of quantum error correction (QEC), we demonstrate that any linear QEM method$\unicode{x2014}$including probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), and symmetry verification$\unicode{x2014}$can be integrated into the physical layer without requiring modifications to the subsequent QEC decoder. Applying this framework to memory experiments using PEC, we analytically prove and numerically verify that the leading-order contribution to the logical error can be removed, increasing the effective code distance by 2. Our simulations on repetition and rotated surface codes show that a distance-3 code with physical-level PEC achieves logical error rates lower than or similar to a distance-5 unmitigated code while using 40% and 64% fewer qubits, respectively. These results establish physical-level QEM as a widely compatible and resource-efficient strategy for enhancing logical performance in early fault-tolerant architectures.
Quantum noise poses a significant challenge for current near-term quantum computing. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) has therefore emerged as a key strategy, offering a practical and effective solution to reduce error impacts and enhance the performance of near-term variational quantum circuits (VQC). Given the lack of a comprehensive survey on this important topic in the literature, this article provides a dedicated overview of QEM, including both during and after the training of VQC. Specifically, during VQC training, we explore and discuss key QEM techniques such as optimal control and dynamical decoupling. For the post-processing stage of VQC, we will examine and discuss mitigation techniques such as zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) and probabilistic error cancellation (PEC). For each of these QEM techniques, we will investigate the fundamentals, mitigation concepts, and recent advances. Subsequently, we also explore research toolboxes, including Mitiq and Qiskit Aer, as well as provide a case study that demonstrates contextual multi-armed bandit-guided ZNE. Finally, we discuss ongoing problems and future research initiatives, including ML-assisted mitigation and integration with error correction. This survey article aims to synthesize the state-of-the-art in QEM, offer organized insights across approaches, and propose potential paths towards error-resilient quantum computing.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Classical shadows enable us to learn many properties of a quantum state ρ with very few measurements. However, near-term and early fault-tolerant quantum computers will only be able to prepare noisy quantum states ρ and it is thus a considerable challenge to efficiently learn properties of an ideal, noise-free state ρ id . We consider error mitigation techniques, such as probabilistic error cancelation (PEC), zero noise extrapolation (ZNE), and symmetry verification (SV), which have been developed for mitigating errors in single expected value measurements and generalize them for mitigating errors in classical shadows. We find that PEC is the most natural candidate and thus develop a thorough theoretical framework for PEC shadows with the following rigorous theoretical guarantees: PEC shadows are an unbiased estimator for the ideal quantum state ρ id ; the sample complexity for simultaneously predicting many linear properties of ρ id is identical to that of the conventional shadows approach up to a multiplicative factor, which is the sample overhead due to error mitigation. Due to efficient postprocessing of shadows, this overhead does not depend directly on the number of qubits but rather grows exponentially with the number of noisy gates. The broad set of tools introduced in this work may be instrumental in exploiting near-term and early fault-tolerant quantum computers: we demonstrate in detailed numerical simulations a range of practical applications of quantum computers that will significantly benefit from our techniques. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Abstract The inevitable accumulation of errors in near-future quantum devices represents a key obstacle in delivering practical quantum advantages, motivating the development of various quantum error-mitigation methods. Here, we derive fundamental bounds concerning how error-mitigation algorithms can reduce the computation error as a function of their sampling overhead. Our bounds place universal performance limits on a general error-mitigation protocol class. We use them to show (1) that the sampling overhead that ensures a certain computational accuracy for mitigating local depolarizing noise in layered circuits scales exponentially with the circuit depth for general error-mitigation protocols and (2) the optimality of probabilistic error cancellation among a wide class of strategies in mitigating the local dephasing noise on an arbitrary number of qubits. Our results provide a means to identify when a given quantum error-mitigation strategy is optimal and when there is potential room for improvement.