Estimating a quantum phase is a necessary task in a wide range of fields of quantum science. To accomplish this task, two well-known methods have been developed in distinct contexts, namely, Ramsey interferometry (RI) in atomic and molecular physics and quantum phase estimation (QPE) in quantum computing. We demonstrate that these canonical examples are instances of a larger class of phase estimation protocols, which we call reductive quantum phase estimation (RQPE) circuits. Here, we present an explicit algorithm that allows one to create an RQPE circuit. This circuit distinguishes an arbitrary set of phases with a smaller number of qubits and unitary applications, thereby solving a general class of quantum hypothesis testing to which RI and QPE belong. We further demonstrate a tradeoff between measurement precision and phase distinguishability, which allows one to tune the circuit to be optimal for a specific application. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Estimating a quantum phase is a necessary task in a wide range of fields of quantum science. To accomplish this task, two well-known methods have been developed in distinct contexts, namely, Ramsey interferometry (RI) in atomic and molecular physics and quantum phase estimation (QPE) in quantum computing. We demonstrate that these canonical examples are instances of a larger class of phase estimation protocols, which we call reductive quantum phase estimation (RQPE) circuits. Here, we present an explicit algorithm that allows one to create an RQPE circuit. This circuit distinguishes an arbitrary set of phases with a smaller number of qubits and unitary applications, thereby solving a general class of quantum hypothesis testing to which RI and QPE belong. We further demonstrate a tradeoff between measurement precision and phase distinguishability, which allows one to tune the circuit to be optimal for a specific application. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Quantum phase estimation (QPE) serves as a building block of many different quantum algorithms and finds important applications in computational chemistry problems. Despite the rapid development of quantum hardware, experimental demonstration of QPE for chemistry problems remains challenging due to its large circuit depth and the lack of quantum resources to protect the hardware from noise with fully fault-tolerant protocols. In the present work, we take a step towards fault-tolerant quantum computing by demonstrating a QPE algorithm on a Quantinuum trapped-ion computer. We employ a Bayesian approach to QPE and introduce a routine for optimal parameter selection, which we combine with a [[ n + 2 , n , 2 ]] quantum error detection code carefully tailored to the hardware capabilities. As a simple quantum chemistry example, we take a hydrogen molecule represented by a two-qubit Hamiltonian and estimate its ground state energy using our QPE protocol. In the experiment, we use the quantum circuits containing as many as 920 physical two-qubit gates to estimate the ground state energy within 6 × 10 − 3 hartree of the exact value. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
It is suggested that computers exploiting quantum phenomena can solve tasks with an efficiency surpassing that achievable by classical computers. One example of this quantum advantage arises in the task of phase estimation. Here, an unknown eigenvalue of a unitary evolution is estimated, a critical subroutine for many quantum algorithms and quantum metrology protocols. For a fixed amount of resources, the utilisation of quantum coherence and entanglement can lead to a quadratic increase in precision of the final estimate compared to classical statistical limits. In systems affected by depolarising noise, including current quantum hardware, this improvement becomes a constant factor. While numerous phase estimation algorithms have been proposed claiming to achieve these theoretical limits, the lack of well-defined criteria for both precision and resource utilisation casts doubt on these results. Further issues arise due to a lack of point identification (the existence of multiple equally likely estimates) that some algorithms have. I aim to address these issues in this thesis. I employ statistical inference, the theoretical foundation for interpreting any quantum measurement, in order to find rigorous definitions for precision and resource use. By combining these definitions with previous work in the field of quantum metrology, I am able to derive theoretical precision limits that one can hope to achieve. I then outline several phase estimation algorithms that can achieve these limits in different contexts. These algorithms that I describe are split into three major groups. Algorithms in the first group focus on the process of point identification; one set of measurements provides a precise estimate of the unknown phase before an additional set of measurements removes any ambiguities present. This second set of measurements can be either decided before any measurement is taken or during measurements in an iterative fashion. I show that the balancing of resources used in each set of measurements can lead to optimally scaling precision both with and without depolarising noise. These algorithms are based upon two of my peer-reviewed articles, [Phys. Rev. A 106, 062615 (2022)] and [Phys. Rev. A 109, 042412 (2024)]. The second group of algorithms that I introduce use the principles of Bayesian experimental design. Here, previous measurement outcomes are used to select future measurements recursively. These algorithms require large classical computing times to select each measurement but boast high precision in certain metrics. The final group of algorithms exploit the oscillating nature of phases by using a discrete Fourier transform (DFT). The DFT can be implemented using either classical or quantum hardware, the latter of which leads to the famous quantum phase estimation algorithm (QPEA). In this thesis, I show that the QPEA performs worse than some classical precision limits. However, I also suggest some modifications to the QPEA circuit that can lead to optimal precision scaling. These results and modifications are described in one of my articles awaiting publication [arXiv:2505.00764].
Quantum computing is the field that studies computation using quantum mechanical systems, exploiting properties such as superposition or entanglement. The focus of this project will be on quantum phase estimation algorithms. The formalism commonly used to represent quantum algorithms as quantum circuits composed by qubits and quantum gates will be presented. Then, we will be able to explain the quantum Fourier transform (that is exponentially faster than its classical analogue) and three quantum phase estimation algorithms: Kitaev’s phase estimation (KPEA), the phase estimation algorithm based on QFT (PEA) and the iterative quantum phase estimation algorithm based on a semiclassical Fourier transform (IPEA). We will use the Qiskit framework in order to run simulations of such algorithms, and even run them in real IBM Q Experience quantum computers (specifically, we will use the 5 qubit computer ibmq_essex). Statistical post-processing techniques will be essential in order to extract a phase estimation from the results obtained. We will use two post-processing techniques: the majority and the average rule. The performance of these methods applied to the results of several simulations and executions in ibmq_essex will be studied. At last, we will talk about the possible applications of phase estimation algorithms. Phase estimation is used as a subroutine in the field of quantum simulation, allowing us to obtain several magnitudes of a quantum system such as the energy levels. We will present an efficient quantum algorithm for factoring called Shor’s algorithm. The cost of factorization with a classical computer increases exponentially with the size of the input, so this is a example of a task that cannot be solved efficiently on a classical computer, but can be solved efficiently by a quantum computer. Phase estimation is also used in the field of quantum metrology. Specifically, an N-V center can be used to measure magnetic fields with high sensitivity and spatial resolution operating at room temperature thanks to a measuring protocol based on phase estimation.
Quantum phase estimation (QPE) is fundamental to quantum algorithms for eigenvalue problems, chemistry simulation, and number-theoretic applications. However, canonical QPE implementations employ controlled unitary operations and quantum Fourier transform, incurring substantial circuit depth and control overhead that severely limit applicability on nearterm quantum hardware. This work develops a novel class of control-free phase estimation algorithms that eliminate both controlled unitaries and QFT by leveraging signal processing principles. Our approach applies uncontrolled powers of the unitary U = e −iHτ to an eigenstate or eigenstate-rich state, measures in multiple bases to capture interference patterns, and reconstructs eigenphases via classical post-processing techniques including Prony's method, compressed sensing, and harmonic inversion. We establish that for eigenstates or states with sparse eigendecomposition, our algorithms achieve phase estimation precision ϵ using Õ(1/ϵ) applications of U , matching standard QPE query complexity up to logarithmic factors while dramatically reducing circuit depth and eliminating control overhead. We provide detailed error analysis characterizing robustness to measurement noise, finite sampling, and state preparation errors. Applications to electronic structure estimation in small molecules and variational quantum eigensolvers demonstrate the practical viability of control-free QPE on both NISQ and early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Our results suggest that signal-processing-based phase estimation may offer more efficient implementations of quantum algorithms on realistic hardware.
A number of exciting recent results have been seen in the field of quantum error correction. These include initial demonstrations of error correction on current quantum hardware and resource estimates which improve understanding of the requirements to run large-scale quantum algorithms for real-world applications. In this work, we bridge the gap between these two developments by performing careful estimation of the resources required to fault-tolerantly perform quantum phase estimation (QPE) on a minimal chemical example. Specifically, we describe a detailed compilation of the QPE circuit to lattice surgery operations for the rotated surface code, for a hydrogen molecule in a minimal basis set. We describe a number of optimizations at both the algorithmic and error correction levels. We find that implementing even a simple chemistry circuit requires 1000 qubits and 2300 quantum error correction rounds, emphasising the need for improved error correction techniques specifically targeting the early fault-tolerant regime. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Abstract This guide is based on the IBM Quantum course Phase Estimation and Factoring and focuses on one of the most important breakthroughs in quantum computing: the quantum phase estimation (QPE) algorithm and its application to Shor’s factoring algorithm. The lesson begins with the phase estimation problem, Solving this problem efficiently is a cornerstone of many quantum algorithms. Spectral Theorem and Mathematical Foundations The discussion starts with the spectral theorem from linear algebra. In the context of this lesson, it is applied to unitary matrices, which can be diagonalized in an orthonormal eigenbasis. This property makes it possible to extract phase information using interference effects and controlled unitary operations. Later, the same mathematical framework extends to Hermitian operators, which are central to quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian simulation. Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) The Quantum Phase Estimation algorithm combines: Controlled unitary operations Superposition and interference The Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) The QFT plays a crucial role by transforming phase information encoded in amplitudes into measurable computational basis states. Importantly, the QFT can be implemented efficiently with a quantum circuit whose complexity scales polynomially with the number of qubits. From Phase Estimation to Shor’s Algorithm By applying QPE to a specific modular exponentiation operator, one obtains Shor’s algorithm, an efficient quantum algorithm for integer factorization. Shor’s algorithm demonstrates an exponential speedup over the best-known classical factoring algorithms and has profound implications for cryptography, particularly for RSA-based systems. Significance This lesson illustrates a major milestone in quantum computing: It connects abstract linear algebra (spectral theorem) to concrete algorithmic advantage. It shows how quantum interference enables extraction of hidden periodicity. It demonstrates a real-world cryptographic impact through efficient factorization. Through hands-on experimentation on IBM Q, theoretical concepts are translated into working quantum circuits, reinforcing the deep relationship between mathematics, algorithm design, and quantum computational power.