We study the problem of dynamic cooling whereby a target qubit is cooled at the expense of heating up N − 1 further identical qubits by means of a global unitary operation. A standard back-of-the-envelope high-temperature estimate establishes that the target qubit temperature can be dynamically cooled by at most a factor of 1 / N . Here we provide the exact expression for the minimum temperature to which the target qubit can be cooled and reveal that there is a crossover from the high initial temperature regime, where the scaling is 1 / N , to a low initial temperature regime, where a much faster scaling of 1 / N occurs. This slow, 1 / N scaling, which was relevant for early high-temperature NMR quantum computers, is the reason dynamic cooling was dismissed as ineffectual around 20 years ago; the fact that current low-temperature quantum computers fall in the fast, 1 / N scaling regime, reinstates the appeal of dynamic cooling today. We further show that the associated work cost of cooling is exponentially more advantageous in the low-temperature regime. We discuss the implementation of dynamic cooling in terms of quantum circuits and examine the effects of hardware noise. We successfully demonstrate dynamic cooling in a three-qubit system on a real quantum processor. Since the circuit size grows quickly with N , scaling dynamic cooling to larger systems on noisy devices poses a challenge. We therefore propose a suboptimal cooling algorithm, whereby relinquishing a small amount of cooling capability results in a drastically reduced circuit complexity, greatly facilitating the implementation of dynamic cooling on near-future quantum computers. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
We study the problem of dynamic cooling whereby a target qubit is cooled at the expense of heating up N − 1 further identical qubits by means of a global unitary operation. A standard back-of-the-envelope high-temperature estimate establishes that the target qubit temperature can be dynamically cooled by at most a factor of 1 / N . Here we provide the exact expression for the minimum temperature to which the target qubit can be cooled and reveal that there is a crossover from the high initial temperature regime, where the scaling is 1 / N , to a low initial temperature regime, where a much faster scaling of 1 / N occurs. This slow, 1 / N scaling, which was relevant for early high-temperature NMR quantum computers, is the reason dynamic cooling was dismissed as ineffectual around 20 years ago; the fact that current low-temperature quantum computers fall in the fast, 1 / N scaling regime, reinstates the appeal of dynamic cooling today. We further show that the associated work cost of cooling is exponentially more advantageous in the low-temperature regime. We discuss the implementation of dynamic cooling in terms of quantum circuits and examine the effects of hardware noise. We successfully demonstrate dynamic cooling in a three-qubit system on a real quantum processor. Since the circuit size grows quickly with N , scaling dynamic cooling to larger systems on noisy devices poses a challenge. We therefore propose a suboptimal cooling algorithm, whereby relinquishing a small amount of cooling capability results in a drastically reduced circuit complexity, greatly facilitating the implementation of dynamic cooling on near-future quantum computers. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
A key hurdle to the success of quantum computers is the ability to initialize qubits into a pure state, which can be achieved by cooling qubits down to very low temperatures. Computational cooling of qubits, whereby a subset of the qubits is cooled at the expense of heating the other qubits via the application of special sets of logic gates, offers a route to effectively cool qubits. Here, we present QuL, a programming library which can be used to generate, analyze, and test quantum circuits for various computational cooling protocols. In its most basic usage, QuL enables a novice user to easily produce cooling circuits with minimal input or knowledge required. The programming library, however, offers flexibility to more advanced users to finely tune the cooling protocol used to generate the quantum circuit. Finally, QuL offers methods to assess and compare various cooling protocols for users interested in studying optimal implementation of computational cooling in general, or on specific quantum backends. It is our hope that QuL will not only facilitate the execution of computational cooling on current quantum computers, but also serve as a tool to investigate open questions in the optimal implementation of computational cooling.
We solve the closed-system problem of cooling M qubits, selected from N identical thermal qubits, to the lowest common local temperature allowed by unitarity. The optimal protocol consists of two conceptually distinct steps. First, a passive rearrangement assigns the largest eigenvalues of the initial state to target sectors of lowest Hamming weight, thereby minimizing the total target energy. Second, a target-only complex-Hadamard transformation within each fixed-Hamming-weight subspace equalizes the one-qubit target marginals without changing any target-sector probability or the total energy. Consequently, imposing a common local temperature costs neither cooling depth nor additional work: the constrained optimum coincides with the unconstrained passive minimum for every N>M and every initial temperature. The complex-Hadamard correction may nevertheless be costly at the circuit level. We therefore derive an exact arithmetic criterion for when the same optimum can be attained by a temperature-independent computational-basis permutation alone, and exhaustively classify the resulting finite-size islands of feasibility for M+2≤N≤128. At isolated temperatures, further optimal permutations can arise through numerical cancellations between different thermal eigenvalue shells. These alternative realizations may reduce implementation complexity, but they cannot improve the cooling curve already attained by the universal protocol. We also derive the exact cooling curve, prove that at least two ancillary qubits are necessary and sufficient for nontrivial cooling, and show that joint many-target cooling can strictly outperform parallel single-target strategies.
Quantum computers have gained widespread interest as they can potentially solve problems that are intractable even for today’s supercomputers, such as the simulation of quantum systems as initially proposed by Feynman. To achieve such tremendous progress, a quantum computer relies on processing the information stored in quantum bits (qubits), the fundamental units of quantum computation, similar to the bits in a classical (i.e., non-quantum) processor. In general, a quantum processor comprising several qubits is connected through a quantum-to-classical interface consisting of classical electrical circuits for manipulating and reading out their quantum state. The accuracy of an operation on a qubit is characterized using the fidelity, which is 100 % in case of a perfect operation. In practice, a fidelity between 99 % and 99.9 % is typically achieved in today’s experiments with less than 100 qubits, limited by non-idealities in the control signals and by the implementation of the physical qubit itself. Since such qubit fidelities are too low to execute relevant quantum algorithms, quantum error correction schemes have been developed which rely on a much larger number of qubits to correct for possible errors, resulting in the need for quantum processors with thousands or millions of qubits. Solid-state qubits promise the largescale integration required to scale to millions of qubits, as they exploit the lithographic fabrication techniques borrowed from the semiconductor industry. However, state-of-theart solid-state qubits, such as transmons and single-electron spin qubits, must be typically cooled to cryogenic temperatures in a dilution refrigerator to exhibit quantum behavior. Because of the limited number of qubits (< 100) in state-of-theart solid-state quantum processors, the classical controller is currently implemented by general-purpose instruments or by tailor-made controllers operating at room temperature connected via several wires to the qubits in the cryogenic chamber. However, these systems must scale to support millions of qubits. While scaling up the underlying quantum processor is already exceptionally challenging, building the electronics required to interface such a large-scale processor is just as relevant and arduous.
Quantum computing promises an exponential speed-up of computation compared to what is nowadays achievable with classical computers. In this way, it enables the evaluation of more complex models and the breaching of current security algorithms. For the operation of a quantum system, many questions remain to be answered. Currently, there are several quantum technologies that promise to be both reliable and scalable, two features required for large scale quantum operations. Common to all technologies is the operating temperature that needs to be close to absolute zero, i.e. below 100 mK, to suppress environment noise and allow the quantum properties to become 'visible'. In order for any quantum processor to be operated, a so-called quantum-classical interface is required for the quantum bit (qubit) read-out and control. This interface consists of various electronic blocks, such as analog-to-digital converters, digital-to-analog converters, mixers, amplifiers and a digital controller. Especially the analog blocks require effort to meet the noise and stability constraints as not to disturb the very sensitive qubits and allow reading of the tiny signals. As the qubits live in extremely deep-cryogenic temperatures, long wires interface the cryogenic with the room temperature environment, where most of the electronics is situated. However, for a scalable system, heat injection becomes a serious problem, with many wires between 300 K and sub-Kelvin. Furthermore, such amount of interconnects is challenging to mechanically place in a dilution refrigerator. Therefore, in this work, we propose to implement the electronics not at room temperature, but at a temperature much closer to the qubits, for example at 4 K. This not only reduces significantly the wiring between room temperature and the qubits, but we can also benefit from lower electronic noise at such a temperature. The operation of conventional electronics almost 200°C below its normal temperature range is not trivial as device properties alter significantly and most circuits no longer operate as intended. In CMOS processes, the main technology in the integrated electronics world, the behaviour of the transistors, required for the implementation of any circuit, deviates considerably at low temperatures. The transistor's threshold voltage goes up, the mobility increases and the subthreshold slope becomes steeper, to name just a few of these deviations. Although there are improvements in performance, there are also some counter effects, and characterization of the transistors is needed to observe the changes. Once devices are characterized at such low temperatures, new models can be built and circuits can be simulated and adapted to operate properly at cryogenic temperatures. Luckily, there are various commercially available devices that can already withstand the chills of cold. We demonstrated various commercially available devices, such as a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) implemented in a 28 nm CMOS process, to be operating without major concerns at 4~K. Its properties alter only slightly, within 5 to 10%, and all tested circuit implementations, working at 300~K, also worked at 4 K. We combined both commercially available devices, that operate 200 K below their specified temperature range, with custom designed CMOS circuits to implement a cryogenic read-out platform for spin qubits. This system comprises amplifiers, an ADC, an FPGA, voltage regulators and a clock generator. It allows to amplify the tiny signal from the qubits and digitize it directly in the FPGA in order to process the data locally at 4~K. This system is one of the first systematic attempts at operating a part of the quantum-classical interface at cryogenic temperatures and forms the basis for future systems comprising the complete electronic interface for qubits to operate at such low temperatures. One of the main problems to tackle for cryogenic electronic systems is their power consumption. Power budgets are simply limited to roughly 1 or 2 Watts at 4 K and exponentially lower at deeper cryogenic temperatures, thus limiting the size of large-scale electronic systems. Our approach of combined commercial and custom circuits will have to be steadily replaced by a single (custom) technology that meets both power and scalability constraints. One of the best candidates is CMOS, a technology that the industry has relied upon for several decades and benefits from many optimizations thanks to Moore's law.
Quantum computers consist of a quantum processor – sets of quantum bits or qubits operating at an extremely low temperature – and a classical electronic controller to read out and control the processor. The machines utilize the unusual properties of matter at extremely small scales – the fact that a qubit, can represent “1” and “0” at the same time, a phenomenon known as superposition. (In traditional digital computing, transistors in silicon chips can exist in one of two states represented in binary by a 1 or 0 not both). Under the right conditions, computations carried out with qubits are equivalent to numerous classical computations performed in parallel, thus greatly enhancing computing power compared to today’s powerful supercomputers and the ability to solve complex problems without the sort of experiments necessary to generate quantum phenomena. this technology is unstable and needs to be stored in a cool environment for faster and more secure operation.In this paper, we discuss the possibility of integrating quantum computers with electronics at deep cryogenic temperatures.
A small quantum absorption refrigerator, consisting of three qubits, is discussed in the transient regime. We discuss time scales for coherent dynamics, damping, and approach to the steady state, and we study cooling and entanglement. We observe that cooling can be enhanced in the transient regime, in the sense that lower temperatures can be achieved compared to the steady-state regime. This is a consequence of coherent dynamics but can occur even when this dynamics is strongly damped by the dissipative thermal environment, and we note that precise control over couplings or timing is not needed to achieve enhanced cooling. We also show that the amount of entanglement present in the refrigerator can be much larger in the transient regime compared to the steady state. These results are of relevance to future implementations of quantum thermal machines.