Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2401.03434

Ground state phase diagram and the exotic phases in the spin-1/2 square lattice J1-J2-Jx model

Jianwei Yang, Zhao Liu, Ling Wang

Published Jan 7, 2024• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The intricate interplay between frustration and spin chirality has the potential to give rise to unprecedented phases in frustrated quantum magnets. We examine the ground state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 square lattice J1-J2-Jx model by employing critical level crossings and ground state fidelity susceptibility (FS) using exact diagonalization (ED) with full lattice symmetries. Our analysis reveals the evolution of highly symmetric energy levels as a function of J2 at fixed Jx. During a magnetic to non-magnetic phase transition, the precise identification of the phase boundary is achieved through critical level crossings between the gapless excitation of a magnetic phase and the quasi-degenerate ground state of a non-magnet phase. Conversely, a direct transition between two non-magnetic phases is characterized by a FS peak accompanied by an avoided ground state level crossing, serving as a distinctive signal. Within a substantial range of Jx, we identify an anticipated chiral spin liquid (CSL) state and an adjacent nematic spin liquid (NSL) phase with a degeneracy of two on a cylinder. These two phases are demarcated by a nearly vertical boundary line at J2 = 0.65. This critical line terminates at the lower boundary of a magnetic ordered chiral spin solid (CSS) phase. We validate the topological nature of the CSL using the modular S matrix of the minimum entangled states (MES) on a torus, along with the entanglement spectra (ES) of even and odd sectors on a cylinder, employing an SU(2)-symmetric density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method. Furthermore, we delve into a comprehensive discussion on the nature of the NSL, exploring aspects such as ground state degeneracy, the local bond energy landscape, and the singlet and triplet gaps on various tori. These analysis provide substantial evidence supporting the nematic nature of the NSL.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2401.03434

Related papers

Ground state phase diagram and the exotic phases in spin- 1 2 square lattice J 1 − J 2 − J χ model

Jianwei Yang, Zhao Liu, Ling Wang

The intricate interplay between frustration and spin chirality, induced by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, holds promise for unveiling novel phases in frustrated quantum magnets. This study investigates the ground state phase diagram of the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ square lattice ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ model upon incorporation of the chiral interaction ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$. Employing exact diagonalization (ED) with full lattice symmetries, we analyze the phase evolution as a function of ${J}_{2}$ at fixed ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$, utilizing highly symmetric energy levels. Critical level crossings and ground state fidelity susceptibility (FS) techniques aid in pinpointing phase boundaries: Magnetic to nonmagnetic phase transitions are identified through critical level crossings between gapless magnetic excitations and quasidegenerate ground states of nonmagnetic phases. Direct transitions between two nonmagnetic phases are characterized by FS peaks due to avoided ground state level crossing. Based on these observations, we identify an anticipated chiral spin liquid (CSL) state and an adjacent nematic spin liquid (NSL) phase within a significant range of ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$, demarcated by a nearly vertical boundary line at ${J}_{2}\ensuremath{\approx}0.65$. This critical line terminates at the lower boundary in ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$ of a magnetic ordered chiral spin solid phase, which gains prominence with increasing ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$ from both CSL and NSL phases. The topological nature of the CSL is confirmed using the modular $\mathcal{S}$ matrix of minimally entangled states on a torus and the entanglement spectra of even and odd sectors on a cylinder, employing ED and $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-symmetric density matrix renormalization group method, respectively. Furthermore, a comprehensive discussion on the nature of the NSL is provided, exploring aspects such as ground state degeneracy, local bond energy landscape, and singlet and triplet gaps on various tori, offering substantial evidence supporting the nematic nature of the NSL.

Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Dec 2, 2024•2 citations

Critical Level Crossings and Gapless Spin Liquid in the Square-Lattice Spin- 1/2 J1−J2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet

Ling Wang, Anders W. Sandvik

We use the density matrix renormalization group method to calculate several energy eigenvalues of the frustrated S=1/2 square-lattice J_{1}-J_{2} Heisenberg model on 2L×L cylinders with L≤10. We identify excited-level crossings versus the coupling ratio g=J_{2}/J_{1} and study their drifts with the system size L. The lowest singlet-triplet and singlet-quintuplet crossings converge rapidly (with corrections ∝L^{-2}) to different g values, and we argue that these correspond to ground-state transitions between the Néel antiferromagnet and a gapless spin liquid, at g_{c1}≈0.46, and between the spin liquid and a valence-bond solid at g_{c2}≈0.52. Previous studies of order parameters were not able to positively discriminate between an extended spin liquid phase and a critical point. We expect level-crossing analysis to be a generically powerful tool in density matrix renormalization group studies of quantum phase transitions.

arXiv:1702.08197•Physical Review Letters•Sep 4, 2018•184 citations

Chiral spin liquid on a Shastry-Sutherland Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Jian-Wei Yang, Weiwei Luo, W. Zhu +3 more

We demonstrate the existence of a topological chiral spin liquid in the frustrated Shastry-Sutherland Heisenberg model with an additional spin chirality interaction, using numerically unbiased exact diagonalization and density matrix renormalization group methods. We establish a quantum phase diagram where conventional phases, including dimer singlet, plaquette singlet, N\'eel, and collinear phase, can be clearly identified by suitable local order parameters. Among them, an $\text{SU}{(2)}_{1}$ chiral spin liquid emerges in the highly frustrated region, which is unambiguously identified by two topologically degenerate ground states, a modular matrix, and characteristic level counting in an entanglement spectrum, featuring the same topological order of the $\ensuremath{\nu}=1/2$ bosonic Laughlin state. The phase boundaries among the different orders are determined by the energy level crossing analysis and wave-function fidelity susceptibility.

arXiv:2403.00597•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•May 3, 2024•1 citation

Quantum phase diagram and chiral spin liquid in the extended spin- 12 honeycomb XY model

Yixuan Huang, Xiaoyu Dong, D. N. Sheng +1 more

The frustrated XY model on the honeycomb lattice has drawn lots of attention because of the potential emergence of chiral spin liquid (CSL) with the increasing of frustrations or competing interactions. In this paper, we study the extended spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ XY model with nearest-neighbor $({J}_{1})$, and next-nearest-neighbor $({J}_{2})$ interactions in the presence of a three-spins chiral $({J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}})$ term using density matrix renormalization group methods. We obtain a quantum phase diagram with both conventionally ordered and topologically ordered phases. In particular, the long-sought Kalmeyer-Laughlin CSL is shown to emerge under a small ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$ perturbation due to the interplay of the magnetic frustration and chiral interactions. The CSL, which is a nonmagnetic phase, is identified by the scalar chiral order, the finite spin gap on a torus, and the chiral entanglement spectrum described by chiral $SU{(2)}_{1}$ conformal field theory.

arXiv:1912.11156•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 19, 2021•13 citations

Absence of spin liquid phase in the J1−J2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice

Xiangjian Qian, Mingpu Qin

We perform an in-depth investigation of the phase diagram of the ${J}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ Heisenberg model on the square lattice. We take advantage of density matrix renormalization group and fully augmented matrix product states methods and reach unprecedented accuracy with large bond dimensions. We utilize excited-level crossing analysis to pinpoint the phase transition points. It was believed before that there exists a narrow spin liquid phase sandwiched by the N\'eel antiferromagnetic (AFM) and valence bond solid (VBS) phases. Through careful finite-size scaling of the level crossing points, we find a direct phase transition between the N\'eel AFM and VBS phases at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}=0.535(3)$, suggesting the absence of an intermediate spin liquid phase. We also provide accurate results for ground-state energies for a variety of sizes, from which we find that the transition between the N\'eel AFM and VBS phases is continuous. These results indicate the existence of a deconfined quantum critical point at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}=0.535(3)$ in the model. From the crossing of the first derivative of the energies with ${J}_{2}$ for different sizes, we also determine the precise location of the first-order phase transition between the VBS and stripe AFM phases at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}=0.610(5)$.

arXiv:2309.13630•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Apr 3, 2024•25 citations

Quantum phase diagram of spin-1 J1−J2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice: An infinite projected entangled-pair state and density matrix renormalization group study

Reza Haghshenas, Wang-Wei Lan, Shou-Shu Gong +1 more

We study the spin-1 Heisenberg model on the square lattice with the antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor ${J}_{1}$ and the next-nearest-neighbor ${J}_{2}$ couplings by using the infinite projected entangled-pair state (iPEPS) ansatz and the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculation. The iPEPS simulation, which studies the model directly in the thermodynamic limit, finds a crossing of the ground state from the N\'eel magnetic state to the stripe magnetic state at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$, showing a direct phase transition. In the finite-size DMRG calculation on the cylinder geometry up to the cylinder width ${L}_{y}=10$, we find that around the same critical point the N\'eel and the stripe orders are strongly suppressed, which implies the absence of an intermediate phase. Both calculations identify that the stripe order comes with a first-order transition at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$. Our results indicate that unlike the spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ square model, quantum fluctuations in the spin-1 model may not be strong enough to stabilize an intermediate nonmagnetic phase.

arXiv:1802.00874•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•May 31, 2018•21 citations
The intricate interplay between frustration and spin chirality has the potential to give rise to unprecedented phases in frustrated quantum magnets. We examine the ground state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 square lattice J1-J2-Jx model by employing critical level crossings and ground state fidelity susceptibility (FS) using exact diagonalization (ED) with full lattice symmetries. Our analysis reveals the evolution of highly symmetric energy levels as a function of J2 at fixed Jx. During a magnetic to non-magnetic phase transition, the precise identification of the phase boundary is achieved through critical level crossings between the gapless excitation of a magnetic phase and the quasi-degenerate ground state of a non-magnet phase. Conversely, a direct transition between two non-magnetic phases is characterized by a FS peak accompanied by an avoided ground state level crossing, serving as a distinctive signal. Within a substantial range of Jx, we identify an anticipated chiral spin liquid (CSL) state and an adjacent nematic spin liquid (NSL) phase with a degeneracy of two on a cylinder. These two phases are demarcated by a nearly vertical boundary line at J2 = 0.65. This critical line terminates at the lower boundary of a magnetic ordered chiral spin solid (CSS) phase. We validate the topological nature of the CSL using the modular S matrix of the minimum entangled states (MES) on a torus, along with the entanglement spectra (ES) of even and odd sectors on a cylinder, employing an SU(2)-symmetric density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method. Furthermore, we delve into a comprehensive discussion on the nature of the NSL, exploring aspects such as ground state degeneracy, the local bond energy landscape, and the singlet and triplet gaps on various tori. These analysis provide substantial evidence supporting the nematic nature of the NSL.
The intricate interplay between frustration and spin chirality, induced by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, holds promise for unveiling novel phases in frustrated quantum magnets. This study investigates the ground state phase diagram of the spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ square lattice ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ model upon incorporation of the chiral interaction ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$. Employing exact diagonalization (ED) with full lattice symmetries, we analyze the phase evolution as a function of J2{J}_{2}J2​ at fixed ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$, utilizing highly symmetric energy levels. Critical level crossings and ground state fidelity susceptibility (FS) techniques aid in pinpointing phase boundaries: Magnetic to nonmagnetic phase transitions are identified through critical level crossings between gapless magnetic excitations and quasidegenerate ground states of nonmagnetic phases. Direct transitions between two nonmagnetic phases are characterized by FS peaks due to avoided ground state level crossing. Based on these observations, we identify an anticipated chiral spin liquid (CSL) state and an adjacent nematic spin liquid (NSL) phase within a significant range of ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$, demarcated by a nearly vertical boundary line at ${J}_{2}\ensuremath{\approx}0.65$. This critical line terminates at the lower boundary in ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$ of a magnetic ordered chiral spin solid phase, which gains prominence with increasing ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$ from both CSL and NSL phases. The topological nature of the CSL is confirmed using the modular S\mathcal{S}S matrix of minimally entangled states on a torus and the entanglement spectra of even and odd sectors on a cylinder, employing ED and SU(2)\mathrm{SU}(2)SU(2)-symmetric density matrix renormalization group method, respectively. Furthermore, a comprehensive discussion on the nature of the NSL is provided, exploring aspects such as ground state degeneracy, local bond energy landscape, and singlet and triplet gaps on various tori, offering substantial evidence supporting the nematic nature of the NSL.
We use the density matrix renormalization group method to calculate several energy eigenvalues of the frustrated S=1/2 square-lattice J_{1}-J_{2} Heisenberg model on 2L×L cylinders with L≤10. We identify excited-level crossings versus the coupling ratio g=J_{2}/J_{1} and study their drifts with the system size L. The lowest singlet-triplet and singlet-quintuplet crossings converge rapidly (with corrections ∝L^{-2}) to different g values, and we argue that these correspond to ground-state transitions between the Néel antiferromagnet and a gapless spin liquid, at g_{c1}≈0.46, and between the spin liquid and a valence-bond solid at g_{c2}≈0.52. Previous studies of order parameters were not able to positively discriminate between an extended spin liquid phase and a critical point. We expect level-crossing analysis to be a generically powerful tool in density matrix renormalization group studies of quantum phase transitions.
We demonstrate the existence of a topological chiral spin liquid in the frustrated Shastry-Sutherland Heisenberg model with an additional spin chirality interaction, using numerically unbiased exact diagonalization and density matrix renormalization group methods. We establish a quantum phase diagram where conventional phases, including dimer singlet, plaquette singlet, N\'eel, and collinear phase, can be clearly identified by suitable local order parameters. Among them, an SU(2)1\text{SU}{(2)}_{1}SU(2)1​ chiral spin liquid emerges in the highly frustrated region, which is unambiguously identified by two topologically degenerate ground states, a modular matrix, and characteristic level counting in an entanglement spectrum, featuring the same topological order of the $\ensuremath{\nu}=1/2$ bosonic Laughlin state. The phase boundaries among the different orders are determined by the energy level crossing analysis and wave-function fidelity susceptibility.
The frustrated XY model on the honeycomb lattice has drawn lots of attention because of the potential emergence of chiral spin liquid (CSL) with the increasing of frustrations or competing interactions. In this paper, we study the extended spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ XY model with nearest-neighbor (J1)({J}_{1})(J1​), and next-nearest-neighbor (J2)({J}_{2})(J2​) interactions in the presence of a three-spins chiral $({J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}})$ term using density matrix renormalization group methods. We obtain a quantum phase diagram with both conventionally ordered and topologically ordered phases. In particular, the long-sought Kalmeyer-Laughlin CSL is shown to emerge under a small ${J}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$ perturbation due to the interplay of the magnetic frustration and chiral interactions. The CSL, which is a nonmagnetic phase, is identified by the scalar chiral order, the finite spin gap on a torus, and the chiral entanglement spectrum described by chiral SU(2)1SU{(2)}_{1}SU(2)1​ conformal field theory.
We perform an in-depth investigation of the phase diagram of the ${J}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ Heisenberg model on the square lattice. We take advantage of density matrix renormalization group and fully augmented matrix product states methods and reach unprecedented accuracy with large bond dimensions. We utilize excited-level crossing analysis to pinpoint the phase transition points. It was believed before that there exists a narrow spin liquid phase sandwiched by the N\'eel antiferromagnetic (AFM) and valence bond solid (VBS) phases. Through careful finite-size scaling of the level crossing points, we find a direct phase transition between the N\'eel AFM and VBS phases at J2/J1=0.535(3){J}_{2}/{J}_{1}=0.535(3)J2​/J1​=0.535(3), suggesting the absence of an intermediate spin liquid phase. We also provide accurate results for ground-state energies for a variety of sizes, from which we find that the transition between the N\'eel AFM and VBS phases is continuous. These results indicate the existence of a deconfined quantum critical point at J2/J1=0.535(3){J}_{2}/{J}_{1}=0.535(3)J2​/J1​=0.535(3) in the model. From the crossing of the first derivative of the energies with J2{J}_{2}J2​ for different sizes, we also determine the precise location of the first-order phase transition between the VBS and stripe AFM phases at J2/J1=0.610(5){J}_{2}/{J}_{1}=0.610(5)J2​/J1​=0.610(5).
We study the spin-1 Heisenberg model on the square lattice with the antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor J1{J}_{1}J1​ and the next-nearest-neighbor J2{J}_{2}J2​ couplings by using the infinite projected entangled-pair state (iPEPS) ansatz and the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculation. The iPEPS simulation, which studies the model directly in the thermodynamic limit, finds a crossing of the ground state from the N\'eel magnetic state to the stripe magnetic state at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$, showing a direct phase transition. In the finite-size DMRG calculation on the cylinder geometry up to the cylinder width Ly=10{L}_{y}=10Ly​=10, we find that around the same critical point the N\'eel and the stripe orders are strongly suppressed, which implies the absence of an intermediate phase. Both calculations identify that the stripe order comes with a first-order transition at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$. Our results indicate that unlike the spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ square model, quantum fluctuations in the spin-1 model may not be strong enough to stabilize an intermediate nonmagnetic phase.