Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2312.13300 · Royal Society Open Science

Contextual measurement model and quantum theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Published Mar 1, 2024• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We develop a contextual measurement model (CMM) that is used for the clarification of the quantum foundations. This model matches Bohr's views on the role of experimental contexts. CMM is based on a contextual probability theory that is connected with generalized probability theory. CMM covers measurements in classical, quantum and semi-classical physics. The CMM formalism is illustrated by a few examples. We consider the CMM framing of classical probability, the von Neumann measurement theory and the quantum instrument theory. CMM can also be applied outside of physics, e.g. in cognition, decision-making and psychology, the so-called quantum-like modelling.

DOI
10.1098/rsos.231953

Related papers

Contextual Approach to Probability and Measurement

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

In this chapter we develop the contextual approach to quantum mechanics.This approach matches with the views ofBohr who emphasized that the quantum description represents complexes ofexperimental physical conditions, in the modern terminology – experimentalcontexts. In this chapter we formalize the contextual approach on the basisof contextual probability theory which is closely connected with generalizedprobability theory (but interpretationally not identical with it). The contextualprobability theory serves as the basis of the contextual measurementmodel (CMM). The latter covers measurements in classical, quantum, andquasi-classical physics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2024•0 citations

Contextual Structuring of Classical and Quantum Physics

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

In this chapter the contextual measurement model (CMM) is employed forprobabilistic structuring of classical and quantum physics. We start with CMM framing of classical probability theory (Kolmogorov 1933) servingas the basis of classical statistical physics and thermodynamics. Then weconsider the von Neumann quantum measurement theory with observablesgiven by Hermitian operators and the state update of the projective typeand represent it as CMM. The quantum instrument theory is a generalizationof the von Neumann theory permitting state updates of the non-projectivetype and it also can be represented as CMM. We also show connectionof the generalized probability theory with the space of probability measureswith CMM. Finally, linear space representation for contextual probabilityspace is constructed by using the construction going back to Mackey.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2024•0 citations

Introduction to Quantum Measurement Theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

This short chapter contains basics of the mathematical formalism for thequantum measurement theory. In this book we proceed mainly withthe von Neumann measurement theory in which observables are given byHermitian operators and the state update by projections. However, we alsomention the measurement formalism based on quantum instruments, sinceit gives the general framework for quantum measurements. This formalismis used only in Chapters 10 and 18. The latter chapter is devoted to quantum-likemodeling – the applications of the mathematical formalism and methodologyof quantum mechanics (QM) to cognition, psychology, and decision making.Surprisingly, in such applications even the simplest effects can’t be described bythe von Neumann theory. One should use quantum instruments (compare withquantum physics where the main body of theory can be presented solelywithin the von Neumann measurement theory).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2024•1 citation

Växjö Interpretation

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

The contextual measurement model (CMM) that was invented in Chapter 10 representsthe wide range of non-Bayesian procedures for probability updatebased on context updates (or state updates). In this chapter we compareBayesian classical probability inference with general contextual probabilityinference. CMM is the basis of the Växjö interpretation of quantum mechanics,one of the contextual probabilistic interpretations. This interpretationhighlights that quantum update of probability (based on the state update)is one of the non-Bayesian updates. Quantum mechanics is interpreted as aprobability update machinery.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2024•0 citations

Decision-Making and Cognition Modeling from the Theory of Mental Instruments

Irina Basieva, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

The authors present the theory of quantum measurements in a humanities friendly way. The most general process of decision-making is represented with the aid of the formalism of quantum apparatuses and instruments. This measurement formalism generalizes the standard one based on the von Neumann–Lüders projection postulate. Generalized quantum observables are mathematically represented as positive operator valued measures (POVMs) and state transformers resulting from the feedback of measurements to the states of systems that are given by quantum instruments. The quantum scheme of indirect measurements (a special realization of quantum instruments) is applied to model decision-making as resulting from the interaction between the belief and decision states. The authors analyze the specific features of quantum instruments which are important for cognitive and social applications. In particular, the state transformers given by quantum instruments are in general less invasive than the state projections. Thus quantum-like decision-making need not be viewed as a kind of state collapse. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks•Jan 1, 2017•12 citations

Quantum contextuality in the Copenhagen approach

Gregg S. Jaeger

The origin and basis of the notion of quantum contextuality is identified in the Copenhagen approach to quantum mechanics, where context is automatically invoked by its requirement that the experimental arrangement involved in any measurements or set of measurements be taken into account while, in general, the outcome of a measurement may depend on other measurements immediately preceding or jointly performed on the same system. For Bohr, the specification of the experimental situation of any measurement is essential to its significance in light of complementarity and the omnipresence of the quantum of action in physics; for Heisenberg, the incompatibility of pairs of sharp measurements belonging to different situations coheres with both the completeness of the quantum state as an objective physical description and the principle of indeterminacy. Here, context in the Copenhagen approach is taken to be the equivalence class of experimental arrangements corresponding to a set of compatible measurements of quantum observables in standard quantum mechanics; the associated form of contextuality in quantum mechanics arises via the non-commutativity in general of sharp observables, proven by von Neumann, that can appear, providing different contexts. This notion is related to theoretical situations explored later by Bell, by Kochen and Specker, and by others in relation to the classification of hidden-variables theories and elsewhere in physics. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Contextuality and probability in quantum mechanics and beyond’.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Sep 16, 2019•18 citations
We develop a contextual measurement model (CMM) that is used for the clarification of the quantum foundations. This model matches Bohr's views on the role of experimental contexts. CMM is based on a contextual probability theory that is connected with generalized probability theory. CMM covers measurements in classical, quantum and semi-classical physics. The CMM formalism is illustrated by a few examples. We consider the CMM framing of classical probability, the von Neumann measurement theory and the quantum instrument theory. CMM can also be applied outside of physics, e.g. in cognition, decision-making and psychology, the so-called quantum-like modelling.
In this chapter we develop the contextual approach to quantum mechanics.This approach matches with the views ofBohr who emphasized that the quantum description represents complexes ofexperimental physical conditions, in the modern terminology – experimentalcontexts. In this chapter we formalize the contextual approach on the basisof contextual probability theory which is closely connected with generalizedprobability theory (but interpretationally not identical with it). The contextualprobability theory serves as the basis of the contextual measurementmodel (CMM). The latter covers measurements in classical, quantum, andquasi-classical physics.
In this chapter the contextual measurement model (CMM) is employed forprobabilistic structuring of classical and quantum physics. We start with CMM framing of classical probability theory (Kolmogorov 1933) servingas the basis of classical statistical physics and thermodynamics. Then weconsider the von Neumann quantum measurement theory with observablesgiven by Hermitian operators and the state update of the projective typeand represent it as CMM. The quantum instrument theory is a generalizationof the von Neumann theory permitting state updates of the non-projectivetype and it also can be represented as CMM. We also show connectionof the generalized probability theory with the space of probability measureswith CMM. Finally, linear space representation for contextual probabilityspace is constructed by using the construction going back to Mackey.
This short chapter contains basics of the mathematical formalism for thequantum measurement theory. In this book we proceed mainly withthe von Neumann measurement theory in which observables are given byHermitian operators and the state update by projections. However, we alsomention the measurement formalism based on quantum instruments, sinceit gives the general framework for quantum measurements. This formalismis used only in Chapters 10 and 18. The latter chapter is devoted to quantum-likemodeling – the applications of the mathematical formalism and methodologyof quantum mechanics (QM) to cognition, psychology, and decision making.Surprisingly, in such applications even the simplest effects can’t be described bythe von Neumann theory. One should use quantum instruments (compare withquantum physics where the main body of theory can be presented solelywithin the von Neumann measurement theory).
The contextual measurement model (CMM) that was invented in Chapter 10 representsthe wide range of non-Bayesian procedures for probability updatebased on context updates (or state updates). In this chapter we compareBayesian classical probability inference with general contextual probabilityinference. CMM is the basis of the Växjö interpretation of quantum mechanics,one of the contextual probabilistic interpretations. This interpretationhighlights that quantum update of probability (based on the state update)is one of the non-Bayesian updates. Quantum mechanics is interpreted as aprobability update machinery.
The authors present the theory of quantum measurements in a humanities friendly way. The most general process of decision-making is represented with the aid of the formalism of quantum apparatuses and instruments. This measurement formalism generalizes the standard one based on the von Neumann–Lüders projection postulate. Generalized quantum observables are mathematically represented as positive operator valued measures (POVMs) and state transformers resulting from the feedback of measurements to the states of systems that are given by quantum instruments. The quantum scheme of indirect measurements (a special realization of quantum instruments) is applied to model decision-making as resulting from the interaction between the belief and decision states. The authors analyze the specific features of quantum instruments which are important for cognitive and social applications. In particular, the state transformers given by quantum instruments are in general less invasive than the state projections. Thus quantum-like decision-making need not be viewed as a kind of state collapse. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The origin and basis of the notion of quantum contextuality is identified in the Copenhagen approach to quantum mechanics, where context is automatically invoked by its requirement that the experimental arrangement involved in any measurements or set of measurements be taken into account while, in general, the outcome of a measurement may depend on other measurements immediately preceding or jointly performed on the same system. For Bohr, the specification of the experimental situation of any measurement is essential to its significance in light of complementarity and the omnipresence of the quantum of action in physics; for Heisenberg, the incompatibility of pairs of sharp measurements belonging to different situations coheres with both the completeness of the quantum state as an objective physical description and the principle of indeterminacy. Here, context in the Copenhagen approach is taken to be the equivalence class of experimental arrangements corresponding to a set of compatible measurements of quantum observables in standard quantum mechanics; the associated form of contextuality in quantum mechanics arises via the non-commutativity in general of sharp observables, proven by von Neumann, that can appear, providing different contexts. This notion is related to theoretical situations explored later by Bell, by Kochen and Specker, and by others in relation to the classification of hidden-variables theories and elsewhere in physics. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Contextuality and probability in quantum mechanics and beyond’.