The quantum switch, the canonical example of a process with indefinite causal order, has been claimed to provide various advantages over processes with definite causal orders for some particular tasks in the field of quantum metrology. In this work, we argue that some of these advantages in fact do not hold if a fairer comparison is made. To this end, we consider a framework that allows for a proper comparison between the performance, quantified by the quantum Fisher information, of different classes of indefinite causal order processes and that of causal strategies on a given metrological task. More generally, by considering the recently proposed classes of circuits with classical or quantum control of the causal order, we come up with different examples where processes with indefinite causal order offer (or not) an advantage over processes with definite causal order, qualifying the interest of indefinite causal order regarding quantum metrology. As it turns out, for a range of examples, the class of quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order, which are known to be physically realizable, is shown to provide a strict advantage over causally ordered quantum circuits as well as over the class of quantum circuits with causal superposition. Thus, the consideration of this class provides new evidence that indefinite causal order strategies can strictly outperform definite causal order strategies in quantum metrology.
The quantum switch, the canonical example of a process with indefinite causal order, has been claimed to provide various advantages over processes with definite causal orders for some particular tasks in the field of quantum metrology. In this work, we argue that some of these advantages in fact do not hold if a fairer comparison is made. To this end, we consider a framework that allows for a proper comparison between the performance, quantified by the quantum Fisher information, of different classes of indefinite causal order processes and that of causal strategies on a given metrological task. More generally, by considering the recently proposed classes of circuits with classical or quantum control of the causal order, we come up with different examples where processes with indefinite causal order offer (or not) an advantage over processes with definite causal order, qualifying the interest of indefinite causal order regarding quantum metrology. As it turns out, for a range of examples, the class of quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order, which are known to be physically realizable, is shown to provide a strict advantage over causally ordered quantum circuits as well as over the class of quantum circuits with causal superposition. Thus, the consideration of this class provides new evidence that indefinite causal order strategies can strictly outperform definite causal order strategies in quantum metrology.
Indefinite causal order is a key feature involved in the study of quantum higher-order transformations. Recently, intense research has been focused on possible advantages related to the lack of definite causal order of quantum processes. Quite often the quantum switch is claimed to provide advantages in information-theoretic and thermodynamic tasks. We address here the question of whether indefinite causal order is a resource for quantum thermodynamics. Inspired by previous results in the literature, we show that indefinite causal order is not necessary for the reported increase in free energy and ergotropy. More specifically, we show that a simple causally ordered process, which replaces the system's state with a new one before the final measurement, outperforms the quantum switch in all thermodynamic tasks considered so far. We further show that a similar advantage can also be achieved without completely discarding system if we allow for non-Markovian interactions between the system and an environment. We extend the analysis to more extreme examples of indefinite causal order, showing that they do not provide an advantage either. Finally, we discuss a possible way to study the advantages that may arise from indefinite causal order in a general scenario.
Quantum supermaps are transformations that map quantum operations to quantum operations.It is known that quantum supermaps which respect a definite, predefined causal order between their input operations correspond to fixed-order quantum circuits, also called quantum combs.A systematic understanding of the physical interpretation of more general types of quantum supermaps-in particular, those incompatible with a definite causal structure-is however lacking.In this paper, we identify two types of circuits that naturally generalize the fixed-order case and that likewise correspond to distinct classes of quantum supermaps, which we fully characterize.We first introduce "quantum circuits with classical control of causal order," in which the order of operations is still well defined, but not necessarily fixed in advance: it can, in particular, be established dynamically, in a classically controlled manner, as the circuit is being used.We then consider "quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order," in which the order of operations is controlled coherently.The supermaps described by these classes of circuits are physically realizable, and the latter encompasses all known examples of physically realizable processes with indefinite causal order, including the celebrated "quantum switch."Interestingly, it also contains other examples arising from the combination of dynamical and coherent control of causal order, and we detail explicitly one such process.Nevertheless, we show that quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order can only generate "causal" correlations, compatible with a well-defined causal order.We furthermore extend our considerations to probabilistic circuits that produce also classical outcomes, and we demonstrate by an example how the characterizations derived in this work allow us to identify advantages for quantum information processing tasks that could be demonstrated in practice.
Quantum metrology with indefinite causal order (ICO) has attracted intense interest due to its potential to surpass the limitations of conventional fixed-order strategies. A key open question is whether ICO can fundamentally enhance asymptotic precision scaling. In this work, we bridge this gap for the estimation of a single parameter encoded in N identical uses of a finite-dimensional quantum channel. We first establish a universal Heisenberg-scaling upper bound for the full general ICO process-matrix class and show that for unitary channels its optimal quantum Fisher information (QFI) coincides exactly with that of parallel strategies. For noisy channels, a structurally refined bound shows that channels restricted to the standard quantum limit (SQL) under parallel strategies remain SQL-limited under general ICO strategies. Most significantly, an asymptotically tight (AT) bound is derived to close the remaining possibility of an asymptotic ICO advantage by showing that general ICO and optimal parallel strategies have exactly the same leading QFI coefficient in both the SQL and Heisenberg regimes. For the operationally motivated class of quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order, we further obtain an iterative constraint on finite-query precision whose asymptotic limit agrees with that of the AT bound. Our results clarify the ultimate role of indefinite causality as a metrological resource for quantum channel estimation.
Quantum processes with indefinite causal order challenge the classical assumption that operations must occur in a single fixed temporal sequence. The quantum switch provides a concrete setting in which two operation orders, A≺B and B≺A, are coherently controlled by a quantum system. In the strict process matrix formulation of the lazy guess your neighbour’s input (LGYNI) game, however, quantum theory, including the quantum switch, does not violate the standard causal inequality when probabilities are computed solely from local instruments. In this work, we study an extended control-assisted operational protocol in which the control system of the quantum switch is measured and used to define the task output. We compare increasingly expressive strategy classes, including single-qubit SU(2) operations, product target-ancilla operations, and entangling Cartan-decomposed two-qubit operations with generalized POVMs. Restricted models saturate or remain below the 3/4 fixed-order benchmark, whereas the optimized Cartan + ancilla + POVM strategy reaches Psuccext≈0.83596, demonstrating enhanced task performance within the extended protocol. The optimized strategy remains operationally no-signaling to numerical precision and retains its extended protocol advantage under more than 25% white noise admixture. These results identify the operational resources required for control-assisted quantum switch enhancement and support the view that indefinite temporal order can be used as a quantum informational resource without implying a breakdown of operational causality.
In a recent series of works [Ebler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120502 (2018); arXiv:1809.06655v2; arXiv:1810.10457v2], it has been shown that the quantum superposition of causal order---the quantum switch---offers an enhancement of classical and quantum channel capacity through noisy channels, a phenomenon that was coined ``causal activation.'' In this paper, we attempt to clarify the nature of the advantage, by comparing the quantum switch to a class of processes that can be interpreted as quantum superposition of processes with the same causal order. We show that some of these processes can match or even outperform the quantum switch at enhancing classical and quantum channel capacity, and argue that they require the same resources as the switch. We conclude, in agreement with Abbott et al. [arXiv:1810.09826v1], that the aforementioned advantages appear to be attributable to the ability to coherently control quantum operations, and not to indefinite causal order per se.
Indefinite causal order extends quantum information processing beyond fixed causal structures, with the quantum SWITCH serving as its canonical realization. By coherently superposing different orders of quantum channels, the quantum SWITCH has been shown to provide operational advantages in communication, computation, metrology, and related tasks. Despite these advances, the physical resources responsible for these advantages remains unclear. Recent studies have further revealed that the quantum SWITCH can generate memory effects, manifested as non-Markovian information backflow. In this work, we examine the origin of such memory and determine whether they reflect genuine (quantum) non-Markovianity or instead arises from classical origin. To this end, we analyze two representative scenarios: one based on discrete-time evolution and another formulated through dynamical maps in open quantum systems. We show that the memory effects generated by the quantum SWITCH are not genuinely quantum non-Markovian, thereby prompting a re-examination of the source of quantum advantage in indefinite causal order frameworks.