Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems are NP-hard problems and many real-world problems can be formulated as QUBO. Currently there are no algorithms known that can solve arbitrary instances of NP-hard problems efficiently. Therefore special-purpose hardware such as Digital Annealer, other Ising machines, as well as quantum annealers might lead to benefits in solving such problems. We study a particularly hard class of problems which can be formulated as QUBOs, namely Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, and specifically 3-SAT. One intriguing aspect about 3-SAT problems is that there are different transformations from 3-SAT to QUBO. We study the transformations' influence on the problem solution, using Digital Annealer as a special-purpose solver. Besides well-known transformations we investigate a novel in this context not yet discussed transformation, using less auxiliary variables and leading to very good performance. Using exact diagonalization, we explain the differences in performance originating from the different transformations. We envision that this knowledge allows for specifically engineering transformations that improve a solvers capacity to find high quality solutions. Furthermore, we show that the Digital Annealer outperforms a quantum annealer in solving hard 3-SAT instances.
Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems are NP-hard problems and many real-world problems can be formulated as QUBO. Currently there are no algorithms known that can solve arbitrary instances of NP-hard problems efficiently. Therefore special-purpose hardware such as Digital Annealer, other Ising machines, as well as quantum annealers might lead to benefits in solving such problems. We study a particularly hard class of problems which can be formulated as QUBOs, namely Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, and specifically 3-SAT. One intriguing aspect about 3-SAT problems is that there are different transformations from 3-SAT to QUBO. We study the transformations' influence on the problem solution, using Digital Annealer as a special-purpose solver. Besides well-known transformations we investigate a novel in this context not yet discussed transformation, using less auxiliary variables and leading to very good performance. Using exact diagonalization, we explain the differences in performance originating from the different transformations. We envision that this knowledge allows for specifically engineering transformations that improve a solvers capacity to find high quality solutions. Furthermore, we show that the Digital Annealer outperforms a quantum annealer in solving hard 3-SAT instances.
Abstract Boolean satisfiability (SAT) is a propositional logic problem of determining whether an assignment of variables satisfies a Boolean formula. Many combinatorial optimization problems can be formulated in Boolean SAT logic—either as k-SAT decision problems or Max k-SAT optimization problems, with conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers being the most prominent. Despite their ability to handle large instances, CDCL-based solvers have fundamental scalability limitations. In light of this, we propose recently-developed quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) solvers as an alternative platform for 3-SAT problems. To utilize them, we implement a 2-step [3-SAT]-[Max 2-SAT]-[QUBO] conversion procedure and present a novel approach using linear systems and Diophantine equation to calculate the number of both satisfied and violated clauses of the original 3-SAT instance from the transformed Max 2-SAT formulation. We then demonstrate, through numerical simulations on several benchmark instances, that digital QUBO solvers can achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on 78-variable 3-SAT benchmark problems. Our work facilitates the broader use of quantum annealers on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, as well as their quantum-inspired digital counterparts, for solving 3-SAT problems.
Quantum annealing device has shown a great potential in solving discrete problems that are theoretically and empirically hard. Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problem, determining if there is an assignment of variables that satisfies a given Boolean function, is the first proven NP-complete problem widely used in various domains. Here, we present a novel mapping of the SAT problem to the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem (QUBO), and further develop a tool flow embedding the proposed QUBO to the architecture of the commercialized quantum computer D-Wave. By leveraging electronic design automation techniques including synthesis, placement and routing, this is not only the first work providing the detail flow that embeds the QUBO, but also a technique scalable for real world applications and some hard SAT problems with over 6000 variables in QUBO. Based on our results, we discuss the challenges in solving SAT using the current generation of annealing device, and explore the problem solving capability of future quantum annealing computers.
Several optimization solvers inspired by quantum annealing have been recently developed, either running on actual quantum hardware or simulating it on traditional digital computers. Industry and academics look at their potential in solving hard combinatorial optimization problems. Formally, they provide heuristic solutions for Ising models, which are equivalent to quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Constraints on solutions feasibility need to be properly encoded. We experiment on different ways of performing such an encoding. As benchmark we consider the cardinality constrained quadratic knapsack problem (CQKP), a minimal extension of QUBO with one inequality and one equality constraint. We consider different strategies of constraints penalization and variables encoding. We compare three QUBO solvers: quantum annealing on quantum hardware (D-Wave Advantage), probabilistic algorithms on digital hardware and mathematical programming solvers. We analyze their QUBO resolution quality and time, and the persistence values extracted in the quantum annealing sampling process. Our results show that a linear penalization of CQKP inequality improves current best practice. Furthermore, using such a linear penalization, persistence values produced by quantum hardware in a generic way allow to match a specific CQKP metric from literature. They are therefore suitable for general purpose variable fixing in core algorithms for combinatorial optimization.
Quantum annealing is a promising technique to solve NP-hard problems more efficiently than state-of-the-art classical computing algorithms. Current generation quantum annealers require users to formulate problems following specific models: either as an Ising Hamiltonian, or as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) polynomial. In this paper, we show that a problem may be formulated in multiple, fundamentally different ways using these models, and that the choice of problem formulation drastically impacts the scope of problem instances that the quantum annealer is able to solve. Using Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solving as an example, we investigate which characteristics of problem formulation are determinant in solution viability. Drawing inspiration from classical algorithmic asymptotic analysis, we establish a framework for measuring the complexity of any given formulation using the QUBO or Ising models, which we argue can be useful for practitioners to evaluate and compare the different ways one may tackle a problem using quantum annealers.
Recent advancements in quantum computing have demonstrated significant potential for solving combinatorial optimization problems, like the quadratic knapsack problem, a constrained binary optimization problem. However, current quantum and quantum-inspired algorithms often require transforming these constrained problems into an unconstrained form, known as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Such transformations can significantly impact the algorithms’ speed and efficiency. In this study, we evaluate five existing transformation methods and propose four novel approaches. We assess all nine methods using Simulated Annealing and find that three of our approaches outperform existing methods in terms of execution time and the quality and quantity of feasible solutions found. Additionally, we tested these transformations on quantum annealers, which were unable to solve even small problem instances, due to limitations in connectivity and error rates. However, our results highlight the advantages of the new approaches, which reduce the total number of variables in the QUBO representation. This is a critical factor for enhanced performance on emerging quantum hardware, since it also reduces the required number of qubits and the embedding chain lengths.
Recent advancements in quantum computing have demonstrated significant potential for solving combinatorial optimization problems, like the quadratic knapsack problem, a constrained binary optimization problem. However, current quantum and quantum-inspired algorithms often require transforming these constrained problems into an unconstrained form, known as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Such transformations can significantly impact the algorithms’ speed and efficiency. In this study, we evaluate five existing transformation methods and propose four novel approaches. We assess all nine methods using Simulated Annealing and find that three of our approaches outperform existing methods in terms of execution time and the quality and quantity of feasible solutions found. Additionally, we tested these transformations on quantum annealers, which were unable to solve even small problem instances, due to limitations in connectivity and error rates. However, our results highlight the advantages of the new approaches, which reduce the total number of variables in the QUBO representation. This is a critical factor for enhanced performance on emerging quantum hardware, since it also reduces the required number of qubits and the embedding chain lengths.